08.03.2014 Views

Conference Program (PDF) - ISOQOL

Conference Program (PDF) - ISOQOL

Conference Program (PDF) - ISOQOL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thursday, October 28, 2010<br />

Thursday<br />

7:00 am – 5:00 pm<br />

Registration and Exhibits<br />

West Wing Lobby<br />

A continental breakfast will be served at 7:30 am. Please be sure to visit the exhibits!<br />

8:00 am – 6:45 pm<br />

Poster Session I on Display<br />

Viscount Suite and Foyer<br />

Poster numbers 1 through 104 are on display today (see page 36 through 42)<br />

7:45 – 8:00 am<br />

Welcome/Remarks<br />

Room<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> Chairs: Stefan Cano, PhD and Jane Scott, PhD<br />

<strong>ISOQOL</strong> President: Diane Fairclough, DrPH<br />

8:00 – 9:30 am<br />

Plenary Session:<br />

Psychometric Methods for Developing and Evaluating Rating Scales: Why I Do What I Do<br />

sponsored by ??<br />

Chairs: Jeremy Hobart, PhD and Stefan Cano, PhD<br />

Speakers:<br />

Sandringham Suite<br />

Although classical test theory, generalizability theory and modern psychometrics (including Rasch analysis and IRT) are commonly<br />

discussed in <strong>ISOQOL</strong> meetings and publications in our journal, Quality of Life Research, the appropriate use of these<br />

different methods has not been discussed in a major forum within <strong>ISOQOL</strong>. To allow members to learn about the strengths and<br />

appropriate use of each of these models for psychometric analysis, session chairs Jeremy Hobart and Stefan Cano will lead what<br />

promises to be a lively session with some of the world’s experts in each of these methods answering the question “Why I Do<br />

What I Do”.<br />

OR?<br />

Rating scales play a critical role in shaping health care and health outcomes. Several psychometric methods are used to develop<br />

and validate health rating scales. Each has its strengths and no method is fully adequate to address all the requirements of<br />

rigorous psychometric validation. Session chairs Jeremy Hobart and Stefan Cano invite experts in each of these methods to<br />

present and discuss “Why I Do What I Do”. Invited speakers include leaders in the application of the following methods to patient<br />

reported outcome data:<br />

• Generalizability Theory<br />

• Item Response Theory<br />

• Rasch Measurement<br />

9:30 – 9:45 am<br />

Break<br />

West Wing Lobby<br />

9:45 – 11:15 am<br />

Concurrent Oral Sessions<br />

Mixed Methodology<br />

Chair: Karen Sousa, PhD<br />

Sandringham Suite<br />

1713/What do people with dementia and their proxies say about HRQL? A quantitative test of qualitative findings<br />

Sarah C. Smith, Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK, Brendan<br />

Mulhern, John E. Brazier, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, Donna L. Lamping,<br />

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK, Martin Knapp,<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!