07.03.2014 Views

standardization of environmental data and information - International ...

standardization of environmental data and information - International ...

standardization of environmental data and information - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental baseline studies<br />

One participant cited the difficulties involved in using baseline<br />

studies to ascertain the impacts <strong>of</strong> exploration <strong>and</strong> mining. How was it<br />

possible to fix a baseline at a certain point in time, given all the<br />

uncertainties involved in parameters such as oceanography, sediment<br />

properties, biological communities <strong>and</strong> bioturbation, <strong>and</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge about those parameters?<br />

Adaptability <strong>of</strong> recommendations<br />

Lenoble stressed that the recommendations were not meant to be<br />

binding <strong>and</strong> in any case should be reviewed every five years. The annual<br />

reporting system would present opportunities to discuss matters with<br />

contractors, whose own <strong>environmental</strong> monitoring programmes were<br />

subject to review <strong>and</strong> modification in a five-year cycle. The LTC viewed the<br />

recommendations as rules emanating from the scientific community that<br />

were proposed to the contractors as guidance for their work. As such, they<br />

could be adjusted in the light <strong>of</strong> new knowledge that could affect such<br />

matters as measurement systems <strong>and</strong> techniques.<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> scientific community<br />

A question was asked as to what kind <strong>of</strong> review would take place<br />

when a contractor submitted a proposal to meet the <strong>environmental</strong><br />

guidelines in a particular way. Lenoble replied that the Authority would<br />

review the proposal with the help <strong>of</strong> the LTC, which would normally be able<br />

to take a decision. However, if something was not clear, the Authority might<br />

consult scientific experts or convene a workshop, in which the scientific<br />

community could voice its feelings about what the contractors were doing.<br />

While it was the task <strong>of</strong> the Authority rather than the scientific community to<br />

establish regulations, neither the Authority nor contractors, on their own,<br />

should determine what should be observed or what kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>information</strong><br />

should be collected.<br />

In this regard, a suggestion was advanced that, for continuity <strong>and</strong><br />

for perception <strong>of</strong> fairness to the contractors, a small scientific commission<br />

might be set up to review contractors’ proposals in parallel with or after a<br />

review by LTC.<br />

49 INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!