Data Base Cell - Central Board of Direct Taxes - (IRS) Officers Online

Page # 1 of 4
Data Base Cell - Central Board of Direct Taxes
E-2, Mezzanine Floor, A.R.A. Centre,
Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-110055
Tel No. : 011-23593256, Fax No.: 011-23593359, Email: dbc.cbdt@incometaxindia.gov.in
Annual General Transfer – 2012
Explanatory Note to MIS Reports
(Please refer to the Power Point Presentation at DBC News #4.3)
Data Base Cell (DBC) collected on-line Transfer Requests (On-line options as
well as Representations) through www.irsofficersonline.gov.in from the IRS
officers for consideration of the Placement Committee of CBDT in connection with
Annual General Transfer – 2012 (AGT-2012). Similarly, the DBC also extracted
from Cadre Management System (CMS) the ‘Due List’ of officers who are due for
transfer from particular posts/station/region as per the provisions of
Transfer/Placement Guidelines – 2010 (TPG-2010).
2. Both the Compilations, i.e. the Compilation of Transfer Requests (only
where the Transfer Request was YES) and Compilation of Due List, were published
in the website on 13.02.2012 requesting the officers to verify the details therein
and intimate DBC any corrections/modifications/changes in their respective
entries in the said compilations. The DBC examined the requests received from
the Officers in this regard in the light of TPG-2010 and Executive Profile data in
CMS and updated these Compilations accordingly. The revised Compilation of
Transfer Requests and Due List were published in the
www.irsofficersonline.gov.in on 09.03.2012 as DBC News #4.1 and 4.2
respectively, for information of Officers.

Page # 2 of 4
3. Further, DBC analyzed the Transfer Requests furnished by the officers and
the Due list generated by the CMS and compiled certain MIS (Management
Information System) reports. Even though DBC collected Options for Transfer
from all the Officers (whether they are due for transfer or not), the Transfer
Requests received from Officers who had specifically requested for transfer (TR
mentioned as YES in the On-line option form) are only considered in these MIS
reports. It is generally seen that Transfer Requests from Promotee Officers are for
the parent CCA Regions from where they were promoted and transferred out.
Hence, for this analysis, the Transfer Requests from Promottee Officers were kept
aside as the pattern of Transfer Requests from Promotee Officers is dependent on
the number of officers promoted from particular CCA Regions and this issue
needs to be addressed separately. Due list for transfer is as per calculation of
CMS.
3.1 CCA wise vacancy positions could not be included in these MIS Reports for
want of Relieving/Joining Reports which are pending in substantial number from
local CCAs and individual officers. CCAs and individual officers are requested to
send their respective pending Relieving/Joining Reports to DBC expeditiously.
These reports were published in the www.irsofficersonline.gov.in as a Power
Point Presentation (PPT), vide DBC News #4.3, on 09.03.2012.
4. Few key findings are briefly presented, on a sample basis, as under:-
4.1 MIS-R1 and MIS-R2:
The pie-chart in MIS-R1 shows that out of 352 Transfer requests received
for AGT 2012 from Direct Recruit officers, the number of Transfer Requests for
cities Mumbai and Delhi are 122 (35%) and 88 (25%) respectively. In order of
demand, the next popular stations are Bangalore, Hyderabad and Ahmadabad
(incl. Surat and Baroda) etc,. In all, 75% of total Transfer Requests received from
the D.Rs are for these 5/6 stations only.
The pie-chart in MIS-R2 shows that out of total of 565 Transfer requests
received for AGT 2012 from ALL (Direct Recruit + Promotee officers), the number
of Transfer Requests for cities Mumbai and Delhi are 148 (26%) and 114 (20%)

Page # 3 of 4
respectively. In order of demand, the next popular stations are Kolkata,
Bangalore, Hyderabad and Ahmadabad (incl. Surat and Baroda) etc, In all, 76%
of total Transfer Requests received are for these 5/6 stations only.
4.2 MIS-R3:
This report contains the details of Transfer Requests, as per CCA Preference
wise, as disaggregated in respect of D.Rs and Promotee officers. As could be seen
from this, no. of Transfer Requests received from D.Rs and Promotees are 352
and 213 respectively.
D.Rs has requested for transfer to the cities of Mumbai and Delhi in
substantial number. Whereas in the case of Promotee officers, out of total of 213
requests received from them, 57 (27%) requests are for Kolkata only. The next
popular stations are Mumbai, Delhi and CCA Gujarat etc.
4.3 MIS-R4:
Transfer Requests presented in MIS-R3 were further deconstructed into
Rank wise (A/DCIT, Addl.CIT/JCIT and CITs) and presented in MIS-R4.
As could be seen, majority of Transfer Requests are from CITs (182 out of
352). Further, substantial numbers of Transfer Requests of CITs are for cities like
Mumbai and Delhi. Similarly, in the case of Addl./JCITs, out of 77 total requests,
38 (50%) requests are for Mumbai alone and 18 (25%) are for Delhi.

Page # 4 of 4
4.4 MIS-R5:
It depicts the flow of Transfer Requests for both D.Rs and Promotees in all
grades.
The total Transfer Requests received are 565. Out of these 565 Requests,
for an example, 60 Requests were received from CCA Gujarat. Out of this 60
Requests received from CCA Gujarat, 29 and 10 Requests are seeking transfer to
CCA Mumbai and CCA Rajasthan respectively.
Similarly, out of 565 Transfer Requests received, as an example, 31
Requests are seeking transfer to CCA AP. Out of this 31 Requests seeking transfer
to CCA AP, 13 and 5 Requests are received from CCA TN and CCA Karnatak
respectively.
4.5 MIS-R6:
In MIS-R6, the ‘Transfer Requests’ vis-à-vis ‘Transfer Due’ were mapped and
the same was cross tabulated ‘CCA Preference’ wise and ‘Rank wise’.
As could be seen, against substantial number of Transfer Requests, the
number of Transfer Due were 0 across almost all of the CCAs in respect of A/DCIT
and Addl./JCITs.
In the case of CITs too, the gap between Transfer Request and Transfer Due
is very substantial. i.e. (183 vs. 31). This gap becomes extremely wide in the cases
of Delhi and Mumbai, i.e. (57 vs. 0) and (47 vs. 1) respectively.
Further, as has been highlighted in green color cells, in the rank of CITs, the
number of ‘Transfer Due’ out of the deficient Regions (such as WB, NER, Kerala
and Nagpur) are more than the number of ‘Transfer Requests’ to these Regions.
--oOo--