IRSE Sept 08.indd

IRSE Sept 08.indd IRSE Sept 08.indd

06.03.2014 Views

APPRENTICESHIP AWARD IRSE So how do we measure success of the Network Rail Advanced Apprenticeship Scheme, is it by individual progression, or is it by the effect it will have in the long term development of Network Rail, and the UK rail industry? I think it is by both. Individual success will always be easier to measure, academic achievement, vocational achievement, promotion, and economic activity are all relative and fairly easy for individuals to measure against their peers both within the railway industry, and those outside. More difficult is the organisational benefit derived from the significant investment. Achieving Experienced Worker Standard [EWS] in a shorter timescale, achieving high levels of retention, encouraging mobility, and promoting transferable skills, these are some of the metrics that can be applied. But what about the effect on culture within Network Rail, how will that change over a period of time, and to what extent will the Advanced Apprenticeship Scheme have on that change? When will this be achieved, what is a significant cohort of apprentice trained technicians, supervisors and front line managers needed to inculcate this evolutionary change from the bottom up, supporting the other top down drivers for change. What effect will 200 have on the business? And what effect will 2000 have on the business? Maybe that should be another article in a few years time. Supporting the growth of the UK economy is also another lynch pin of all apprenticeship schemes and underpins the government’s current emphasis on developing a workforce with a higher level of skills. The UK skill base is falling behind other countries, not because we are standing still, but because other countries are progressing faster and further. Economic competitiveness is dependent upon significantly increasing the UK skills base, and this set against a significant decline in school leavers just around the corner. The Leich report identified the need to increase the quality and quantity of apprenticeships in the UK, and Network Rail has risen to that challenge. So after just three years of the Advanced Apprenticeship Scheme, how successful has it been? Marketing of the scheme has had an effect, from 950 applications in 2005 to 3500 applications for the 2008 intake. This year, the first Telecommunications apprentices will also be taken on. Network Rail are attracting a more diverse workforce into the scheme with a higher percentage of ethnic minorities and females into engineering apprenticeships than the national average. The academic achievement of the apprentices has also steadily risen with 75% of the 2007 intake achieving a distinction in mathematics at BTec Level 3 [ONC in old speak]. Retention during the Taryn Bailey being presented by Colin Porter, Chief Executive IRSE, with the IRSE/NR S&T Apprentice of the Year Award trophy (left) and Award Certificate (above) at HMS Collingswood on 13 June 2008 (Network Rail) apprenticeship scheme has also steadily increased from 88% for the 2005 intake to 99% for the 2007 intake. Individual performance has also been recognised. Taryn Baily who was this years IRSE/ Network Rail S&T Engineering Apprentice of the year, has just been appointed to a Senior Technician position at Preston. The 2008 intake commences in September, and the future of the scheme looks pretty well secure for the next few years. Have we done enough to meet the increased demand over the next decade, of course time will tell, but I think we have made significant strides over the last five years, and we will continue on that path. We have risen to the challenge. (Colin Porter Footnote) The IRSE Council initiated the IRSE/NR S&T Apprentice of the Year Award earlier this year to recognise the significant efforts being put into recruitment and training by Network Rail. The award consists of the colour light signal Trophy which is retained at HMS Sultan, a Certificate, a cheque for £100 and a year’s free membership of the IRSE. The Trophy was kindly donated by Unipart Rail, having been manufactured at the York Service Centre. IRSE/NR S&T Apprentice of the Year Award trophy (Colin Porter) 24 Issue 137 September 2008 IRSE NEWS

CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS IRSE O n 25 June the Younger Members (YM) delivered the latest training workshop to assist students in preparing for the exam. This was the first of two workshops planned for this year, and focussed upon general awareness for module 3 in particular. The latter workshop will be more directly exam focused and will cover modules 2 and 3 equally. Sixteen students of both mainline and metro signalling travelled from around Britain to spend the day learning about topics related to Signalling Principles. Content for the sessions did not purely relate to control tables, and was equally applicable to those preferring the written questions. The aim of the event was to attempt to give a deeper understanding of the various principles which determine the interlocking between the various signalling functions, rather than concentrating purely on the filling in of the Control Table boxes. This was achieved through a mixture of classroom and demonstrations sessions. The workshops were ‘participative’ rather than passive turn-up-and-listen-lectures. On the Day IRSE – YOUNGER MEMBERS EXAMINATION WORKSHOP MODULE 3 Network Rail Watford Training Centre – Supported by The Railway Engineering Company The sessions on the day, primarily focussed on giving an overview of the implementation of Signalling Principles by an interlocking, and aimed to improve students’ general understanding and enhance their domain knowledge. Prior to the event students were provided with a layout of the scheme for the panel (that is normally used for signaller training) at the Watford Training Centre, and were asked to prepare control tables as they would for the exam. Students were also encouraged to put their completed control tables on the student’s online forum, to discuss and compare answers. The students were split into two groups, broadly those that intended to offer Control Tables at the October 2008 exam, and those who were after a more general awareness; the programme for each was fundamentally similar but the sessions evolved slightly differently according to their different aspirations. In the morning the groups attended a lecture about interlocking and its purpose, this was given by Anil Rana and provided students an overview. Following on from this, Peter Woodbridge led a workshop session in which the students took their pre-prepared Controlled Tables to refer to whilst he demonstrated how to test elements of the locking for certain sets of points on the panel. Peter instructed one of the students to operate the trackside simulator, primarily dropping track circuits but also imposing various faults. Having checked that the points were free, the first activity was the dead track and foul track locking and once its presence had been demonstrated, Peter called out the locking to another student who recorded it on a blank Control Table drawn on a white board. There then followed an explanation regarding the role of the anti-preselection that had been observed, but is one of the functions of interlocking that does not get explicitly recorded on the Control Tabless but has to be tested none-the-less. The session then continued in similar vein with the calling and locking of points in route and overlap; there were several times when a Test Log pad would have been used had this been a real installation- the most obvious being when a set of traps which had been called by a route were found not to be locked by it and thus responded to another call leading to aspect reversion! The final morning session was held by The Railway Engineering Company (TRE), with Stevan Collins introducing the concept of Visual Display Unit controlled signalling; he also described the other possibilities for the simulator such as Timetable Verification, Scheme Plan Evaluation and Human Factors Studies. Peter Scott participated in this session, and Peter and Stevan bounced off of one another, combining general awareness of IECC with typical exam questions. This had not been planned in any detail but shows how by providing an appropriate facility and the IRSE NEWS Issue 137 September 2008 25

CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS<br />

<strong>IRSE</strong><br />

O<br />

n 25 June the Younger<br />

Members (YM)<br />

delivered the latest training workshop to<br />

assist students in preparing for the exam.<br />

This was the first of two workshops<br />

planned for this year, and focussed upon<br />

general awareness for module 3 in<br />

particular. The latter workshop will be<br />

more directly exam focused and will cover<br />

modules 2 and 3 equally. Sixteen<br />

students of both mainline and metro<br />

signalling travelled from around Britain to<br />

spend the day learning about topics<br />

related to Signalling Principles.<br />

Content for the sessions did not purely<br />

relate to control tables, and was equally<br />

applicable to those preferring the written<br />

questions. The aim of the event was to<br />

attempt to give a deeper understanding of<br />

the various principles which determine the<br />

interlocking between the various signalling<br />

functions, rather than concentrating purely<br />

on the filling in of the Control Table boxes.<br />

This was achieved through a mixture of<br />

classroom and demonstrations sessions.<br />

The workshops were ‘participative’ rather<br />

than passive turn-up-and-listen-lectures.<br />

On the Day<br />

<strong>IRSE</strong> – YOUNGER MEMBERS EXAMINATION WORKSHOP MODULE 3<br />

Network Rail Watford Training Centre – Supported by The Railway Engineering Company<br />

The sessions on the day, primarily focussed<br />

on giving an overview of the implementation<br />

of Signalling Principles by an interlocking,<br />

and aimed to improve students’ general<br />

understanding and enhance their domain<br />

knowledge. Prior to the event students<br />

were provided with a layout of the scheme<br />

for the panel (that is normally used for<br />

signaller training) at the Watford Training<br />

Centre, and were asked to prepare control<br />

tables as they would for the exam.<br />

Students were also encouraged to put<br />

their completed control tables on the<br />

student’s online forum, to discuss and<br />

compare answers.<br />

The students were split into two<br />

groups, broadly those that intended to<br />

offer Control Tables at the October 2008<br />

exam, and those who were after a more<br />

general awareness; the programme for<br />

each was fundamentally similar but the<br />

sessions evolved slightly differently<br />

according to their different aspirations.<br />

In the morning the groups attended a<br />

lecture about interlocking and its purpose,<br />

this was given by Anil Rana and provided<br />

students an overview. Following on from<br />

this, Peter Woodbridge led a workshop<br />

session in which the students took their<br />

pre-prepared Controlled Tables to refer to<br />

whilst he demonstrated how to test<br />

elements of the locking for certain sets of<br />

points on the panel. Peter instructed one<br />

of the students to operate the trackside<br />

simulator, primarily dropping track circuits<br />

but also imposing various faults.<br />

Having checked that the points<br />

were free, the first activity was the<br />

dead track and foul track locking<br />

and once its presence had been<br />

demonstrated, Peter called out<br />

the locking to another student<br />

who recorded it on a blank Control<br />

Table drawn on a white board.<br />

There then followed an<br />

explanation regarding the role of<br />

the anti-preselection that had<br />

been observed, but is one of the<br />

functions of interlocking that<br />

does not get explicitly recorded<br />

on the Control Tabless but has<br />

to be tested none-the-less. The<br />

session then continued in<br />

similar vein with the calling and<br />

locking of points in route and<br />

overlap; there were several<br />

times when a Test Log pad<br />

would have been used had this been a real<br />

installation- the most obvious being when<br />

a set of traps which had been called by a<br />

route were found not to be locked by it and<br />

thus responded to another call leading to<br />

aspect reversion!<br />

The final morning session was held by<br />

The Railway Engineering Company (TRE),<br />

with Stevan Collins introducing the concept<br />

of Visual Display Unit controlled signalling;<br />

he also described the other possibilities for<br />

the simulator such as Timetable<br />

Verification, Scheme Plan Evaluation and<br />

Human Factors Studies. Peter Scott<br />

participated in this session, and Peter and<br />

Stevan bounced off of one another,<br />

combining general awareness of IECC with<br />

typical exam questions. This had not been<br />

planned in any detail but shows how by<br />

providing an appropriate facility and the<br />

<strong>IRSE</strong><br />

NEWS Issue 137 <strong>Sept</strong>ember 2008 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!