06.03.2014 Views

deployment of the PLA Navy ships in the - Information Resource ...

deployment of the PLA Navy ships in the - Information Resource ...

deployment of the PLA Navy ships in the - Information Resource ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF<br />

fundamental requirement around which <strong>the</strong> success<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed operations by IOR navies h<strong>in</strong>ges. It<br />

is <strong>the</strong>refore important to see that technical<br />

cooperation at all levels <strong>of</strong> ship design, build, operation<br />

and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, is adequately addressed.<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g far away from <strong>the</strong> base port for an<br />

extended time period would require open and<br />

unlimited access to <strong>the</strong> repair facilities <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> navies<br />

<strong>of</strong> IOR, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dry docks, to ensure that <strong>the</strong><br />

platforms dedicated to <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed operations are<br />

sea worthy all <strong>the</strong> time. Demand for mach<strong>in</strong>ery and<br />

naval stores to take care <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exigencies aris<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

sea can be met only through standard codification.<br />

NEED FOR STANDARDS<br />

Interoperability and technical cooperation<br />

amongst <strong>the</strong> countries <strong>of</strong> IOR can be successful for <strong>the</strong><br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed operations by ensur<strong>in</strong>g large scale<br />

standardisation <strong>in</strong> procedures, methods, design and<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>ships</strong> and equipment. This will not only<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed operational effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> naval forces to achieve <strong>the</strong> common goals, but also<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease overall efficiency <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> available naval<br />

resources. This <strong>in</strong>cludes, among o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g co-operation and elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g unnecessary<br />

duplication among IOR navies <strong>in</strong> research,<br />

development, production, procurement and support<br />

<strong>of</strong> defence systems and equipment. The collective<br />

naval capability <strong>the</strong>n enhances manifolds and carries<br />

additional political value as on outward<br />

demonstration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cooperation and solidarity. This<br />

can be achieved only by <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> formulat<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

agree<strong>in</strong>g, implement<strong>in</strong>g and updat<strong>in</strong>g Standards for<br />

use with<strong>in</strong> IOR navies and can classified <strong>in</strong>to three ma<strong>in</strong><br />

groups as has been done by NATO countries [2] –<br />

Operational, Materiel and Adm<strong>in</strong>istration. It may be<br />

preferable to maximise <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> NATO standards to<br />

ensure worldwide supportability.<br />

It is a well known fact that Standards promote<br />

consistent quality, reliability and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ability, whilst<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential for variety control and economic<br />

production, by provid<strong>in</strong>g technical criteria accepted<br />

by consensus. They also encourage both <strong>in</strong>terchange<br />

ability and <strong>in</strong>teroperability, and rationalize processes<br />

and methods <strong>of</strong> operation mak<strong>in</strong>g communication<br />

and <strong>the</strong> exchange <strong>of</strong> materiel and services easier. Their<br />

use gives confidence to manufacturers and to users<br />

alike. Hence, <strong>the</strong> need to have common Standards,<br />

as early as possible, to make <strong>the</strong> IOR navies<br />

cooperation more robust.<br />

Levels <strong>of</strong> Standardisation. Standardized<br />

equipment belong<strong>in</strong>g to different navies may be<br />

compatible, <strong>in</strong>teroperable, <strong>in</strong>terchangeable or<br />

common. They may be none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se, yet <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

components may be standardized, i.e.<br />

<strong>in</strong>terchangeable or common, an important<br />

advantage <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and repair. In ascend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

order, <strong>the</strong> four levels <strong>of</strong> standardization has been<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed by NATO as:<br />

• Compatibility is <strong>the</strong> capability <strong>of</strong> two or<br />

more items or components <strong>of</strong> equipment or<br />

materiel to exist or function <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same system<br />

or environment without mutual <strong>in</strong>terference;<br />

• Interoperability is <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> systems,<br />

units or forces to provide services to, and accept<br />

services from, o<strong>the</strong>r systems, units or forces and<br />

to use <strong>the</strong> services so exchanged to enable<br />

<strong>the</strong>m to operate effectively toge<strong>the</strong>r;<br />

• Interchangeability is a condition which<br />

exists when two or more items possess such<br />

functional and physical characteristics as to be<br />

equivalent <strong>in</strong> performance and durability, and<br />

are capable <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g exchanged one for <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r without alteration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> items <strong>the</strong>mselves,<br />

or <strong>of</strong> adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g items, except for adjustments,<br />

and without selection for fit and performance;<br />

• Commonality is a state achieved when<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals, organizations or nations<br />

use common doctr<strong>in</strong>es, procedures or<br />

equipment.<br />

There is a school <strong>of</strong> thought that where it is<br />

possible to do so, maximum procurement should be<br />

<strong>of</strong> Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) equipment for<br />

naval platforms. NATO and <strong>the</strong> America, Brita<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Canada and Australia (ABCA) Group <strong>of</strong> countries are<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore plac<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creased emphasis on <strong>the</strong> use<br />

<strong>of</strong> civil standards for military materiel standardization,<br />

a concept that is be<strong>in</strong>g implemented successfully.<br />

LIKELY CHALLENGES<br />

Networked Operations. The challenge that<br />

will confront all <strong>the</strong> Navies <strong>of</strong> IOR <strong>in</strong>itially would be <strong>in</strong><br />

FFFFFFFFF SEPTEMBER 2010<br />

FFFFFFFFF10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!