Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance from the general budget, 45% was foreign capital in the form of loans or grants, and 10% was paid by a national fund financed by surtaxes levied on the use of water by urban population. 5% was contributed by users themselves. Although this may have not seemed significant, it was crucial to create ownership among the users and it guarantees sustainability of the initiative. PAGER engaged rural communities by getting them to participate, thus conferring the responsibility of operation and maintenance to the rural communes as primary users of services. Community members were actively involved throughout the process of establishing installations by expressing their needs and opinions on technical proposals. These proposals were the result of a dialogue, which took into consideration the circumstances, resources, and organisational capacities of the rural communities. The process gave local communities a sense of ownership and at the same time prepared them to operate and maintain the installations autonomously. The latter is stipulated in the contract agreed on between the community and the people on one side, and the provider of the services and the State on the other. The contract also defines the prerequisites that must be fulfilled, such as the establishment of an association of users, and the collection and mobilization of financial resources before the actual implementation of the project. To ensure the sustainability and maintenance of the infrastructure, the government has decided to involve the National Authority of Potable Water (Office national de l’eau potable – ONEP) in managing the project. For more information, please visit: www.matee.govt.ma 374
2004 Category 1: Canada Europe and North America Canada 2004 Category 1 Winner Information Service for Business Community The Network of Canada Business Service Centre (CBSC) Description Addressing the needs of the business community through the creation of a single-point information service delivered across multiple channels aimed at responding to Canadian entrepreneurs’ needs. The Problem In accordance with the Canadian Constitution, government programs, services and compliance requirements for the business community are dealt with by federal or provincial/territorial levels of government making it difficult for entrepreneurs to easily access information from a panoply of sources. The Solution The CBSC was created to address the needs of the business community, mostly small and medium enterprises, for a single-point information service delivered across multiple channels. The overarching achievement of the network of Canada Business Service Centres is facilitating access to government programs, services and compliance requirements for the business community. It is estimated that 150,000 new businesses are created every year; 2.4 million citizens representing 14% of the total labour force are self-employed, with 1/5 being new Canadians. Therefore, most of the new businesses have little knowledge of all the regulations and procedures for starting an enterprise. They need a one stop centre with comprehensive and accurate information about issues such as: how to start a new business, what are the regulations and legislation pertaining to a specific sector, how and where to apply for financing, how to contact suppliers, how to export, etc. The CBSC addresses the need for obtaining information through a single-window information service delivered across multiple channels. This service is dynamically developed with input and feedback from: • Advisory Boards with representatives from a spectrum of business interests; • Periodic evaluations that take a consistent national look at the views of clients, partners and staff regarding gaps and relevance of the service; and • Service standards and complaints/feedback mechanisms for each access channel. 375
- Page 348 and 349: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 350 and 351: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 352 and 353: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 354 and 355: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 356 and 357: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 358 and 359: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 360 and 361: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 362 and 363: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 364 and 365: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 366 and 367: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 368 and 369: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 370 and 371: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 372 and 373: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 374 and 375: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 376 and 377: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 378 and 379: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 380 and 381: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 382 and 383: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 384 and 385: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 386 and 387: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 388 and 389: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 390 and 391: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 392 and 393: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 395 and 396: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 397: 2004 Category 1: Morocco Africa Mor
- Page 401 and 402: 2004 Category 1: Brazil Latin Ameri
- Page 403 and 404: 2004 Category 1: Brazil Many countr
- Page 405 and 406: 2004 Category 2: Cameroon Africa Ca
- Page 407 and 408: 2004 Category 2: Australia Asia and
- Page 409 and 410: 2004 Category 2: Austria Europe and
- Page 411 and 412: 2004 Category 2: Brazil Latin Ameri
- Page 413 and 414: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 415 and 416: 2004 Category 3: South Africa Since
- Page 417 and 418: 2004 Category 3: Malaysia NPC champ
- Page 419 and 420: 2004 Category 4: Philippines Asia a
- Page 421 and 422: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 423 and 424: 2003 Category 1: Singapore Asia and
- Page 425 and 426: 2003 Category 1: Singapore technolo
- Page 427 and 428: 2003 Category 1: Greece The agencie
- Page 429 and 430: 2003 Category 1: Bolivia To underta
- Page 431 and 432: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 433 and 434: 2003 Category 2: Spain period, the
- Page 435 and 436: 2003 Category 2: MEXICO • Creatio
- Page 437 and 438: 2003 Category 2: Egypt • Integrat
- Page 439 and 440: 2003 Category 3: Zambia Africa Zamb
- Page 441 and 442: 2003 Category 3: Republic of Korea
- Page 443 and 444: 2003 Category 3: Canada Europe and
- Page 445 and 446: 2003 Category 3: Italy Europe and N
- Page 447 and 448: 2003 Category 3: Chile Latin Americ
<strong>Good</strong> <strong>Practices</strong> <strong>and</strong> InnovATIONS <strong>in</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Governance</strong><br />
from the general budget, 45% was foreign capital <strong>in</strong> the form of loans or grants, <strong>and</strong><br />
10% was paid by a national fund f<strong>in</strong>anced by surtaxes levied on the use of water by<br />
urban population. 5% was contributed by users themselves. Although this may have<br />
not seemed significant, it was crucial to create ownership among the users <strong>and</strong> it<br />
guarantees susta<strong>in</strong>ability of the <strong>in</strong>itiative.<br />
PAGER engaged rural communities by gett<strong>in</strong>g them to participate, thus conferr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the responsibility of operation <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance to the rural communes as primary<br />
users of services. Community members were actively <strong>in</strong>volved throughout the<br />
process of establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stallations by express<strong>in</strong>g their needs <strong>and</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ions on<br />
technical proposals. These proposals were the result of a dialogue, which took<br />
<strong>in</strong>to consideration the circumstances, resources, <strong>and</strong> organisational capacities of<br />
the rural communities.<br />
The process gave local communities a sense of ownership <strong>and</strong> at the same time prepared<br />
them to operate <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stallations autonomously. The latter is stipulated<br />
<strong>in</strong> the contract agreed on between the community <strong>and</strong> the people on one side,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the provider of the services <strong>and</strong> the State on the other. The contract also def<strong>in</strong>es<br />
the prerequisites that must be fulfilled, such as the establishment of an association of<br />
users, <strong>and</strong> the collection <strong>and</strong> mobilization of f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources before the actual<br />
implementation of the project.<br />
To ensure the susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the <strong>in</strong>frastructure, the government<br />
has decided to <strong>in</strong>volve the National Authority of Potable Water (Office national de l’eau<br />
potable – ONEP) <strong>in</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g the project.<br />
For more <strong>in</strong>formation, please visit: www.matee.govt.ma<br />
374