Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance 2006 Special Award 2006 Special Award in Innovation Region Country Winner Description Pg Asia and Republic The Government Measuring the level of innovation in the public sector 349 the Pacific of Korea Innovation Index (GII) through a user-friendly web-based system Rwanda Singapore Netherlands Zambia India Canada Brazil Australia Belgium UAE Rep. of Korea 348
2006 Special AWARD: Republic of Korea Asia and the Pacific Republic of Korea 2006 Special Award in Innovation Winner The Government Innovation Index (GII) The Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, Republic of Korea Description Measuring the level of innovation in the public sector through a user-friendly web-based system. The Problem Innovation must be oriented to achieving measurable progress. The Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs developed a diagnostic tool to measure the level of innovation in the public sector. The Solution The Government Innovation Index (GII), developed by MOGAHA, is a tool to measure the level of innovation achieved in the public sector. The GII is a compound index consisting of various elements that ascertain innovation efforts and results by scientifically diagnosing numerous dimensions of innovation. The core components of the GII include “Foundation Readiness for Innovation”, “Level of Active Innovation” and “Innovation Results.” Each institution can use the web-based system to measure and diagnose their level of innovation at various standpoints. The web-based system is easy to use, enables the accumulation of data and is a superior method, advantageous for statistical analysis. The basic concept for the GII emerged in 2004 in response to the need to assess the level of innovation in governmental organisations. It was eventually conceived in 2005. A total of 496 public institutions, including the central government, local government agencies, local office of education, took part in the voluntary diagnosis to measure their innovation level. The first round of diagnosis resulted in comprehensive information on the level of innovation for each respective agency and their weakness in promoting innovation in government. It also provided statistical, narrative explanation on the innovation level according to specific areas and the innovation level in comparison to similar agencies. Furthermore, it helped the MOGAHA, an innovation-managing agency, to establish appropriate innovation strategies by understanding the public sector’s overall innovation level and what causes successful 349
- Page 322 and 323: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 324 and 325: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 326 and 327: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 328 and 329: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 330 and 331: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 332 and 333: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 334 and 335: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 336 and 337: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 338 and 339: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 340 and 341: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 342 and 343: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 344 and 345: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 346 and 347: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 348 and 349: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 350 and 351: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 352 and 353: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 354 and 355: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 356 and 357: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 358 and 359: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 360 and 361: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 362 and 363: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 364 and 365: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 366 and 367: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 368 and 369: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 370 and 371: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 374 and 375: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 376 and 377: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 378 and 379: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 380 and 381: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 382 and 383: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 384 and 385: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 386 and 387: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 388 and 389: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 390 and 391: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 392 and 393: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 395 and 396: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 397 and 398: 2004 Category 1: Morocco Africa Mor
- Page 399 and 400: 2004 Category 1: Canada Europe and
- Page 401 and 402: 2004 Category 1: Brazil Latin Ameri
- Page 403 and 404: 2004 Category 1: Brazil Many countr
- Page 405 and 406: 2004 Category 2: Cameroon Africa Ca
- Page 407 and 408: 2004 Category 2: Australia Asia and
- Page 409 and 410: 2004 Category 2: Austria Europe and
- Page 411 and 412: 2004 Category 2: Brazil Latin Ameri
- Page 413 and 414: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 415 and 416: 2004 Category 3: South Africa Since
- Page 417 and 418: 2004 Category 3: Malaysia NPC champ
- Page 419 and 420: 2004 Category 4: Philippines Asia a
- Page 421 and 422: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
2006 Special AWARD: Republic of Korea<br />
Asia <strong>and</strong> the Pacific<br />
Republic of Korea<br />
2006 Special Award <strong>in</strong> Innovation W<strong>in</strong>ner<br />
The Government Innovation Index (GII)<br />
The M<strong>in</strong>istry of Government Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />
<strong>and</strong> Home Affairs, Republic of Korea<br />
Description<br />
Measur<strong>in</strong>g the level of <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> the public sector through a user-friendly<br />
web-based system.<br />
The Problem<br />
Innovation must be oriented to achiev<strong>in</strong>g measurable progress. The M<strong>in</strong>istry of Government<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>and</strong> Home Affairs developed a diagnostic tool to measure<br />
the level of <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> the public sector.<br />
The Solution<br />
The Government Innovation Index (GII), developed by MOGAHA, is a tool to measure<br />
the level of <strong>in</strong>novation achieved <strong>in</strong> the public sector. The GII is a compound <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of various elements that ascerta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation efforts <strong>and</strong> results by<br />
scientifically diagnos<strong>in</strong>g numerous dimensions of <strong>in</strong>novation.<br />
The core components of the GII <strong>in</strong>clude “Foundation Read<strong>in</strong>ess for Innovation”,<br />
“Level of Active Innovation” <strong>and</strong> “Innovation Results.” Each <strong>in</strong>stitution can use<br />
the web-based system to measure <strong>and</strong> diagnose their level of <strong>in</strong>novation at various<br />
st<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
The web-based system is easy to use, enables the accumulation of data <strong>and</strong> is a<br />
superior method, advantageous for statistical analysis. The basic concept for the<br />
GII emerged <strong>in</strong> 2004 <strong>in</strong> response to the need to assess the level of <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong><br />
governmental organisations. It was eventually conceived <strong>in</strong> 2005. A total of 496<br />
public <strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the central government, local government agencies,<br />
local office of education, took part <strong>in</strong> the voluntary diagnosis to measure their <strong>in</strong>novation<br />
level. The first round of diagnosis resulted <strong>in</strong> comprehensive <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on the level of <strong>in</strong>novation for each respective agency <strong>and</strong> their weakness <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> government. It also provided statistical, narrative explanation<br />
on the <strong>in</strong>novation level accord<strong>in</strong>g to specific areas <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novation level <strong>in</strong><br />
comparison to similar agencies. Furthermore, it helped the MOGAHA, an <strong>in</strong>novation-manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agency, to establish appropriate <strong>in</strong>novation strategies by underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the public sector’s overall <strong>in</strong>novation level <strong>and</strong> what causes successful<br />
349