Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance The time between the first appearance in court to trial was reduced within one year to an average of 14 months from 19 months. The average trial delay for a defendant out of custody has been reduced to 11 months from 22 months. On average, a defendant held in custody goes to trial six to eight weeks earlier. Overtime costs for transporting defendants in custody were reduced by US $158,000 during 2004-2005 fiscal year. The project has also provided counselling at the early stages of the prosecution process to those accused of domestic violence assaults, so as to prevent repeating the offence. In the meantime, the project ensures early contact between the prosecutor and the victim by assigning one Crown attorney. The Front End Project has brought significant changes into the criminal justice system in the city of Winnipeg, province of Manitoba. The innovation has been successful and has been beneficial to both the government officials and the community. 338
2006 Category 2: Brazil Latin America and the Caribbean Brazil 2006 Category 2 Winner Implementation of the Self-Sustainable Sanitation Systems Programme Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Humano do Estado da Bahia, Brazil Description Efficient providing water supply to the community of Bahia. The Problem The majority of the population in Bahia consists of low income households. The local government that maintained the water supply system, was not very effective due to a lack of resources and high maintenance costs. The challenge of the government of Bahia was to improve the water supply system to enhance the quality of services to the people in Bahia. The Solution The Government of Bahia started the Self-Sustainable Systems Program to address the community’s concerns and alleviate problems related to water supply and sewage systems’ maintenance. The project was sponsored by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany through a loan agreement with Kreditanstalt Für Wiederaufbau – KfW Bank. In 1995, a civil society organisation called ’Central’, formed by the communities of Jacobina and Seabra in Bahia, established two maintenance facilities. The organisation was responsible for educating community members in the operation and maintenance of the system; it also provided information about the prevention of waterborne diseases. In order to improve the quality of the water supply and sewerage systems, the government requested community’s participation in management, maintenance and installation of the systems. The contract with the German Bank (KfW) was signed in 1983, however little was done till 1992. The total investment was R$19.1 million, allocated between the KFW (R$11.7 million), and the State Government (R$7.4 million). Since the inception of this programme, 182 simplified and conventional water supply systems with distribution networks were installed. Also, the new project improved the condition of 12,704 existing hygienic privies. This achievement brought positive change to the lives of 76,000 people – or 15,000 families. After ten years since the 339
- Page 312 and 313: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 314 and 315: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 316 and 317: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 318 and 319: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 320 and 321: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 322 and 323: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 324 and 325: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 326 and 327: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 328 and 329: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 330 and 331: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 332 and 333: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 334 and 335: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 336 and 337: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 338 and 339: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 340 and 341: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 342 and 343: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 344 and 345: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 346 and 347: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 348 and 349: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 350 and 351: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 352 and 353: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 354 and 355: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 356 and 357: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 358 and 359: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 360 and 361: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 364 and 365: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 366 and 367: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 368 and 369: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 370 and 371: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 372 and 373: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 374 and 375: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 376 and 377: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 378 and 379: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 380 and 381: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 382 and 383: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 384 and 385: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 386 and 387: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 388 and 389: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 390 and 391: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 392 and 393: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 395 and 396: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 397 and 398: 2004 Category 1: Morocco Africa Mor
- Page 399 and 400: 2004 Category 1: Canada Europe and
- Page 401 and 402: 2004 Category 1: Brazil Latin Ameri
- Page 403 and 404: 2004 Category 1: Brazil Many countr
- Page 405 and 406: 2004 Category 2: Cameroon Africa Ca
- Page 407 and 408: 2004 Category 2: Australia Asia and
- Page 409 and 410: 2004 Category 2: Austria Europe and
- Page 411 and 412: 2004 Category 2: Brazil Latin Ameri
<strong>Good</strong> <strong>Practices</strong> <strong>and</strong> InnovATIONS <strong>in</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Governance</strong><br />
The time between the first appearance <strong>in</strong> court to trial was reduced with<strong>in</strong> one year<br />
to an average of 14 months from 19 months. The average trial delay for a defendant<br />
out of custody has been reduced to 11 months from 22 months. On average, a defendant<br />
held <strong>in</strong> custody goes to trial six to eight weeks earlier. Overtime costs for<br />
transport<strong>in</strong>g defendants <strong>in</strong> custody were reduced by US $158,000 dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004-2005<br />
fiscal year.<br />
The project has also provided counsell<strong>in</strong>g at the early stages of the prosecution process<br />
to those accused of domestic violence assaults, so as to prevent repeat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
offence. In the meantime, the project ensures early contact between the prosecutor<br />
<strong>and</strong> the victim by assign<strong>in</strong>g one Crown attorney. The Front End Project has brought<br />
significant changes <strong>in</strong>to the crim<strong>in</strong>al justice system <strong>in</strong> the city of W<strong>in</strong>nipeg, prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
of Manitoba. The <strong>in</strong>novation has been successful <strong>and</strong> has been beneficial to both the<br />
government officials <strong>and</strong> the community.<br />
338