06.03.2014 Views

Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011

Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011

Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2006 Category 2: Canada<br />

Europe <strong>and</strong> North America<br />

Canada<br />

2006 Category 2 W<strong>in</strong>ner<br />

The Domestic Violence Front-End Project<br />

The Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Court of Manitoba, Canada<br />

Description<br />

Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g justice to all citizens <strong>in</strong> an appropriate <strong>and</strong> timely manner.<br />

The Problem<br />

The crim<strong>in</strong>al justice system of the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Courts was <strong>in</strong>effective, costly <strong>and</strong><br />

overburdened. In cases <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g allegations of domestic violence, it took on average<br />

19 months from the time a defendant made his/her first court appearance until<br />

the date of the trial. The Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Court of Manitoba faced the challenge of <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

changes to its system <strong>in</strong> order to improve the quality of services <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

their efficiency.<br />

The Solution<br />

In 1993, the W<strong>in</strong>nipeg Police Service implemented m<strong>and</strong>atory arrests <strong>in</strong> cases of<br />

domestic violence as a result of a new policy aimed at end<strong>in</strong>g violence aga<strong>in</strong>st women<br />

<strong>and</strong> others who found themselves <strong>in</strong> an abusive relationship. This resulted <strong>in</strong> a<br />

dramatic <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of domestic violence cases <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Court<br />

system, <strong>and</strong> the delay <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g these cases became a significant problem.<br />

In <strong>2003</strong>, the Chief Judge of the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Court implemented the Domestic Violence<br />

Front End Project. The Chief Judge formed a consultation committee across organisational<br />

borders to determ<strong>in</strong>e how the system could be run more efficiently <strong>and</strong> more<br />

effectively. The consultation committee <strong>in</strong>volved the judiciary, the Crown prosecution,<br />

legal aid, defense bar, senior court personnel, victim services <strong>and</strong> the W<strong>in</strong>nipeg<br />

Police Services.<br />

This <strong>in</strong>novative project promotes public underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the system, reduces the<br />

number of court appearances <strong>and</strong> the time necessary for process<strong>in</strong>g charges. The first<br />

phase of the project focused on defendants held <strong>in</strong> custody for domestic violence<br />

charges. By March 2004, the project exp<strong>and</strong>ed to <strong>in</strong>clude defendants who were out<br />

of custody. As a result, the number of cases brought to court has been cut <strong>in</strong> half even<br />

though the total number of cases has rema<strong>in</strong>ed constant.<br />

In February 2004, there were 2,861 charges for domestic violence, <strong>and</strong> by the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

year, that number was reduced to 1,263.<br />

337

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!