Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance matter that the SMG had to deal with was to find ways to encourage the people to login to the website as often as possible. Indeed, the low rate of citizens’ participation was rather problematic at the initial stage of the Forum. In this respect, the SMG has come up with different solutions to tackle the problem by: • Having different discussion topics for every single month in order to draw attention from varied people from all walks of life; • Offering experts/specialists opinions on the given topics so that participants can have a smoother and in-depth debate; • Conducting a live poll along with the Forum so that anyone can express their views on the topic; • Renewing the programs of the Forum, and creating a more detailed menu of the website to let the participants know as to whether or not their suggestions/ proposals have been taken into consideration in a policy-making process; and • Having a partnership with a private portal provider to let citizens participate in the Forum via more diversified channels. As a result of such hard work, the Cyber Policy Forum also won the Government Technology Awards 2007; the Award recognizes outstanding public sector technology programmes throughout the Asia Pacific and Gulf States, as a municipal government that practiced best technology leadership. The initiative has proved its excellence by winning two prestigious international awards in two consecutive years in 2007 and 2008. The Cyber Policy Forum and its sustainability are positive since it is opened to everyone working as an efficient tool that encourages citizens’ participation in the municipality. Plus, the operation of the website does not cost much, and policy-makers can easily know what the public opinion thinks prior to executing policies, which in turn reduces possible errors and improves efficiency. That is why other cities and district offices in Korea are now benchmarking the Cyber Policy Forum of the SMG for possible replication. 270
2008 Category 3: Germany Europe and North America Germany 2008 Category 3 Finalist City of Cologne, Germany Description Introducing participatory budgeting to ensure citizen participation in decisionmaking processes regarding the allocation of public funds. Summary The participatory budget introduced in Cologne’s municipal administration is a new “service for citizen participation” with the goal of effectively supporting decision making processes in various fields affecting the community with the help of online media, while putting the citizen at the centre of governance. By providing an electronic platform for the participation of citizens, useful ideas of the citizens can be tapped and additional knowledge generated via the Internet. The Problem Citizens were not given the opportunity to decide how public funds were going to be spent. The Solution In December 2005, the administration was asked to work out a concept note for preparing future budgets in the form of a participatory budget. The Cologne City Council voted with a great majority to ask the municipal administration to carry out a public symposium called “Participatory Municipal Budget for Cologne”. Upon decision of the finance committee, a steering committee (6 persons) consisting of representatives of the political parties and an advisory council (7 persons) with representatives of organisations/institutions interested in the participatory budget were established. The symposium “Participatory Budget Cologne” was carried out in September 2006 with the help of Hamburger Ramboll Management GmbH. The subsequent preparations for the Cologne participatory budget were expedited by the finance department and the e-government and online services of the City of Cologne – accompanied by monthly meetings of the advisory council. To inform and activate the citizens and encourage them to participate, the use of the Internet and the potential of online media were discussed in depth at the third meeting of the advisory council on 25 January 2007. This meeting brought a consensus to develop a specific approach for the City of Cologne. On 19 June 2007, the City Council asked for the introduction of an electronic participation platform 271
- Page 244 and 245: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 246 and 247: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 248 and 249: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 250 and 251: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 252 and 253: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 254 and 255: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 256 and 257: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 258 and 259: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 260 and 261: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 262 and 263: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 264 and 265: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 266 and 267: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 268 and 269: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 270 and 271: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 272 and 273: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 274 and 275: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 276 and 277: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 278 and 279: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 280 and 281: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 282 and 283: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 284 and 285: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 286 and 287: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 288 and 289: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 290 and 291: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 292 and 293: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 296 and 297: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 298 and 299: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 300 and 301: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 302 and 303: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 304 and 305: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 306 and 307: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 308 and 309: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 310 and 311: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 312 and 313: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 314 and 315: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 316 and 317: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 318 and 319: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 320 and 321: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 322 and 323: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 324 and 325: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 326 and 327: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 328 and 329: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 330 and 331: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 332 and 333: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 334 and 335: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 336 and 337: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 338 and 339: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 340 and 341: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 342 and 343: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
<strong>Good</strong> <strong>Practices</strong> <strong>and</strong> InnovATIONS <strong>in</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Governance</strong><br />
matter that the SMG had to deal with was to f<strong>in</strong>d ways to encourage the people to<br />
log<strong>in</strong> to the website as often as possible. Indeed, the low rate of citizens’ participation<br />
was rather problematic at the <strong>in</strong>itial stage of the Forum.<br />
In this respect, the SMG has come up with different solutions to tackle the problem by:<br />
• Hav<strong>in</strong>g different discussion topics for every s<strong>in</strong>gle month <strong>in</strong> order to draw attention<br />
from varied people from all walks of life;<br />
• Offer<strong>in</strong>g experts/specialists op<strong>in</strong>ions on the given topics so that participants<br />
can have a smoother <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>-depth debate;<br />
• Conduct<strong>in</strong>g a live poll along with the Forum so that anyone can express their<br />
views on the topic;<br />
• Renew<strong>in</strong>g the programs of the Forum, <strong>and</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g a more detailed menu of the<br />
website to let the participants know as to whether or not their suggestions/<br />
proposals have been taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration <strong>in</strong> a policy-mak<strong>in</strong>g process; <strong>and</strong><br />
• Hav<strong>in</strong>g a partnership with a private portal provider to let citizens participate <strong>in</strong><br />
the Forum via more diversified channels.<br />
As a result of such hard work, the Cyber Policy Forum also won the Government<br />
Technology Awards 2007; the Award recognizes outst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g public sector technology<br />
programmes throughout the Asia Pacific <strong>and</strong> Gulf States, as a municipal government<br />
that practiced best technology leadership. The <strong>in</strong>itiative has proved its excellence<br />
by w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g two prestigious <strong>in</strong>ternational awards <strong>in</strong> two consecutive years <strong>in</strong><br />
2007 <strong>and</strong> 2008.<br />
The Cyber Policy Forum <strong>and</strong> its susta<strong>in</strong>ability are positive s<strong>in</strong>ce it is opened to everyone<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g as an efficient tool that encourages citizens’ participation <strong>in</strong> the municipality.<br />
Plus, the operation of the website does not cost much, <strong>and</strong> policy-makers<br />
can easily know what the public op<strong>in</strong>ion th<strong>in</strong>ks prior to execut<strong>in</strong>g policies, which <strong>in</strong><br />
turn reduces possible errors <strong>and</strong> improves efficiency. That is why other cities <strong>and</strong><br />
district offices <strong>in</strong> Korea are now benchmark<strong>in</strong>g the Cyber Policy Forum of the SMG<br />
for possible replication.<br />
270