Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance Members of the Ministry of Local Government in charge of implementing the Ubudehe initiative asked cell (village) residents in Butare to select two people as facilitators for each village. 12 Master Trainers attached to the Ministry of Local Government trained the selected village facilitators. Between February and June 2001, 1,823 facilitators were trained to embark on the pilot process. The facilitators were assigned the task of helping local people to come together in a purposeful way and to engage in solving a single problem of their choosing. Citizens were encouraged to rely on their own ideas instead of always depending on government’s support to find solutions to their problems. If necessary, however, residents at the village level could consult government, NGOs, and donors for technical and financial advice. During the meetings at the local level, the facilitator together with the other citizens of the village had to engage in the following activities: • Define social categories and their characteristics; • Draw a Social Map of the village on the ground; • Reproduce the hand-drawn map of the village on a cloth with all the social categories; • Indicate the number of people for every category; • Define other categories according to their status, to what they do and own; • Prioritize local problems; • Define a concrete action to be taken to solve one problem of their own choosing; • One poor household is selected in every village so that it may be helped with some resources to pursue livelihood strategies; and • Any other information that village residents need to provide is elaborated on a visual tool. In 2002, citizens in 681 Villages/Cellules in Butare completed detailed social maps (in large cloths making visual validation possible – from individual household names, social categories, infrastructure and service provision and other characteristics) analyzing their poverty characteristics. Once the people have assessed together their problems, they gather in a village council meeting where they map out solutions for their problems. After coming to a common understanding, they work out a project that best suits their needs, and financial support is granted to them through the Ubudehe Unit at the Common Development Fund. A bank account has been created for every Ubudehe initiative and this in turn has created a network of resources flows, which can be the backbone of a microfinance system. Ubudehe is embedded at the grassroot levels, and implemented at the village levels precisely because this is where poverty lies. “One cannot tackle poverty from the top 196
2008 Category 1: RWANDA level, one has to solve it from its grassroot levels,” said Egide Rugamba, the acting Director of the Common Development Fund (AllAfrica.com). So the poor themselves at the cell level as well as those at the household level identify the causes of poverty and their consequences. “We provide Frw 600,000 to each household project for the poorest household in the community and Frw 600,000 to each community project. And since 2005 up to this year, we have financed 15,000 households,” explained Jean Baptist Ngerejah. “Community members come up with village-based community projects and we finance them.” Results from the Butare pilot project demonstrated the power of citizen participation and collective action in reducing poverty. By the year 2004, the positive outcome of the pilot phase was enough to convince the government to make Ubudehe a national policy and the European Union (EU) to allocate €10 million for a nationwide rollout with the aim to reach over 9,175 cellules (villages) covering the whole of Rwanda. In brief, the Ubudehe approach seeks to promote self governance, participatory planning, problem solving, social capital building and entrepreneurship development. It is designed to increase the level of institutional problem-solving capacity at the local level by citizens and local government. It puts into operation the principle of citizen’s participation through local collective action. With this initiative, all the households in the village are encouraged to take part in all discussions about their poverty reduction needs and solutions. This poverty analysis informs all poverty reduction efforts and forms a robust and rigorous baseline to assess future performance and social change. The programme has fostered citizens’ participation in policymaking while having improved transparency, accountability and responsiveness in the public service. The strategies adopted to make this initiative successful included: • Working with citizens selected as facilitators to be based in the communities to facilitate participatory processes. Over 17,500 cascade facilitators were trained by the Master Trainers of the Ministry of Local Government; • Transforming the nature of Participatory Poverty Assessments (PPA) to move away from the conventional consultative approaches adopted by most countries preparing PRSP papers, to an approach that truly encouraged participation and ensured 100% nationwide involvement of all citizens in defining poverty profiles using social maps and other visual tools as a foundation. (Facilitated by community facilitators); • Providing more accurate statistics about poverty. The rich analysis that emerged from this process has started to influence the production of national statistics and is beginning to demonstrate that it is possible to get more accurate poverty related data compared to survey based statistical systems. (Used by the Ministry of Local Government and Ministry of Finance); 197
- Page 170 and 171: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 172 and 173: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 174 and 175: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 176 and 177: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 178 and 179: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 180 and 181: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 182 and 183: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 184 and 185: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 186 and 187: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 188 and 189: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 190 and 191: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 192 and 193: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 194 and 195: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 197 and 198: 2009 United Nations Public Service
- Page 199 and 200: 2009 Category 1: republic of Korea
- Page 201 and 202: 2009 Category 1: Sweden Europe and
- Page 203 and 204: 2009 Category 2: South Africa Afric
- Page 205 and 206: 2009 Category 2: Thailand Asia and
- Page 207 and 208: 2009 Category 2: Egypt Western Asia
- Page 209 and 210: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 211 and 212: 2009 Category 3: Republic of Korea
- Page 213: 2009 Category 4: Poland Europe and
- Page 216 and 217: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 218 and 219: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 222 and 223: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 224 and 225: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 226 and 227: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 228 and 229: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 230 and 231: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 232 and 233: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 234 and 235: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 236 and 237: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 238 and 239: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 240 and 241: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 242 and 243: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 244 and 245: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 246 and 247: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 248 and 249: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 250 and 251: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 252 and 253: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 254 and 255: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 256 and 257: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 258 and 259: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 260 and 261: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 262 and 263: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 264 and 265: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 266 and 267: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 268 and 269: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
<strong>Good</strong> <strong>Practices</strong> <strong>and</strong> InnovATIONS <strong>in</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Governance</strong><br />
Members of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Local Government <strong>in</strong> charge of implement<strong>in</strong>g the Ubudehe<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiative asked cell (village) residents <strong>in</strong> Butare to select two people as facilitators<br />
for each village. 12 Master Tra<strong>in</strong>ers attached to the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Local Government<br />
tra<strong>in</strong>ed the selected village facilitators. Between February <strong>and</strong> June 2001, 1,823<br />
facilitators were tra<strong>in</strong>ed to embark on the pilot process. The facilitators were assigned<br />
the task of help<strong>in</strong>g local people to come together <strong>in</strong> a purposeful way <strong>and</strong> to<br />
engage <strong>in</strong> solv<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle problem of their choos<strong>in</strong>g. Citizens were encouraged to<br />
rely on their own ideas <strong>in</strong>stead of always depend<strong>in</strong>g on government’s support to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
solutions to their problems. If necessary, however, residents at the village level could<br />
consult government, NGOs, <strong>and</strong> donors for technical <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial advice.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the meet<strong>in</strong>gs at the local level, the facilitator together with the other citizens<br />
of the village had to engage <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g activities:<br />
• Def<strong>in</strong>e social categories <strong>and</strong> their characteristics;<br />
• Draw a Social Map of the village on the ground;<br />
• Reproduce the h<strong>and</strong>-drawn map of the village on a cloth with all the social<br />
categories;<br />
• Indicate the number of people for every category;<br />
• Def<strong>in</strong>e other categories accord<strong>in</strong>g to their status, to what they do <strong>and</strong> own;<br />
• Prioritize local problems;<br />
• Def<strong>in</strong>e a concrete action to be taken to solve one problem of their own choos<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
• One poor household is selected <strong>in</strong> every village so that it may be helped with<br />
some resources to pursue livelihood strategies; <strong>and</strong><br />
• Any other <strong>in</strong>formation that village residents need to provide is elaborated on a<br />
visual tool.<br />
In 2002, citizens <strong>in</strong> 681 Villages/Cellules <strong>in</strong> Butare completed detailed social maps<br />
(<strong>in</strong> large cloths mak<strong>in</strong>g visual validation possible – from <strong>in</strong>dividual household names,<br />
social categories, <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>and</strong> service provision <strong>and</strong> other characteristics) analyz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
their poverty characteristics.<br />
Once the people have assessed together their problems, they gather <strong>in</strong> a village council<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g where they map out solutions for their problems. After com<strong>in</strong>g to a common<br />
underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, they work out a project that best suits their needs, <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial support<br />
is granted to them through the Ubudehe Unit at the Common Development Fund. A<br />
bank account has been created for every Ubudehe <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>and</strong> this <strong>in</strong> turn has created<br />
a network of resources flows, which can be the backbone of a microf<strong>in</strong>ance system.<br />
Ubudehe is embedded at the grassroot levels, <strong>and</strong> implemented at the village levels<br />
precisely because this is where poverty lies. “One cannot tackle poverty from the top<br />
196