Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance Asia and the Pacific India 2009 Category 3 Winner Institutionalization of Community Managed Drinking Water Supply Programme and User Level Water Quality Monitoring Water and Sanitation Management Organisation (WASMO) Recipients on behalf of the institution H.E. Mr. Nitinkumar Ratilal Patel Minister for Water Supply, Water Resources Urban Development and Urban Housing, Government of Gujarat Mr. V.S.Gadhavi, IAS Secretary for Water Supply, Government of Gujarat Dr. Jaipal Singh, IFS Chief Executive Officer, Water and Sanitation Management Organisation Summary In India the State of Gujarat, which is prone to frequent droughts and water scarcity, has improved access to water in rural areas by engaging citizens in its management through the “Institutionalization of Community Managed Drinking Water Supply Programme and User Level Water Quality Monitoring,” which was developed by the Water and Sanitation Management Organisation (WASMO) in 2002, a Government of Gujarat initiative. The Problem Prior to the initiative, water supply in the rural areas of Gujarat was ensured by Government agencies and the entire sector was supply driven. A rigid bureaucracratic structure gradually led to the ’build–neglect–rebuild’ syndrome. The service was irregular, inefficient, and unable to meet the people’s requirements. As a result, user satisfaction was low and the people were unwilling to pay the user charges. The Solution WASMO was established in 2002 as a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for effective citizens’ engagement in drinking water services in rural areas. Community institutions in the form of Village Water and Sanitation Committees (VWSCs) and partnership links between the State and NGOs, and other entities, such as the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) have been formed. 186
2009 Category 3: Republic of Korea Asia and the Pacific Republic of Korea 2009 Category 3 Finalist Seoul City’s Oasis Seoul Metropolitan Government Recipients on behalf of the institution Mr. Oh Se Hoon Mayor of Seoul Mr. Chang Kyung Hwan Director-General of Policy Evaluation Summary Through Seoul City’s Oasis (oasis.seoul.go.kr), developed by the Seoul Metropolitan Government of the Republic of Korea, citizens are encouraged to participate in decision-making processes by engaging in open discussions with local government officials and by making proposals through an online portal. Oasis has adopted the Web 2.0 spirit of creativity, sharing, and collaboration. The Problem Seoul City ran a citizens’ creative idea suggestion system from 1997 to 2007 in order to urge citizens to participate in the policy making process of the city. However, it was a rather closed system in that citizens filled out a suggestion form and submitted it in person or by mail and were notified whether their ideas would be adopted or not a month later. Since those ideas were reviewed in closed-door meetings without the participation of the idea providers, the system was bound to have limited success and drew little interest and citizen participation. The Solution The OASIS system was created as a more open and interacting system to serve as a channel, through which citizens actively participate in the city government and suggest fresh ideas for improvements. Oasis (oasis.seoul.go.kr), which was initiated on 10 October 2007 represents creativity and imagination as Seoul City’s vision. 187
- Page 160 and 161: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 162 and 163: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 164 and 165: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 166 and 167: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 168 and 169: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 170 and 171: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 172 and 173: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 174 and 175: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 176 and 177: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 178 and 179: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 180 and 181: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 182 and 183: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 184 and 185: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 186 and 187: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 188 and 189: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 190 and 191: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 192 and 193: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 194 and 195: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 197 and 198: 2009 United Nations Public Service
- Page 199 and 200: 2009 Category 1: republic of Korea
- Page 201 and 202: 2009 Category 1: Sweden Europe and
- Page 203 and 204: 2009 Category 2: South Africa Afric
- Page 205 and 206: 2009 Category 2: Thailand Asia and
- Page 207 and 208: 2009 Category 2: Egypt Western Asia
- Page 209: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 213: 2009 Category 4: Poland Europe and
- Page 216 and 217: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 218 and 219: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 220 and 221: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 222 and 223: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 224 and 225: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 226 and 227: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 228 and 229: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 230 and 231: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 232 and 233: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 234 and 235: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 236 and 237: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 238 and 239: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 240 and 241: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 242 and 243: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 244 and 245: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 246 and 247: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 248 and 249: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 250 and 251: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 252 and 253: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 254 and 255: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 256 and 257: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 258 and 259: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
2009 Category 3: Republic of Korea<br />
Asia <strong>and</strong> the Pacific<br />
Republic of Korea<br />
2009 Category 3 F<strong>in</strong>alist<br />
Seoul City’s Oasis<br />
Seoul Metropolitan Government<br />
Recipients on behalf of the <strong>in</strong>stitution<br />
Mr. Oh Se Hoon<br />
Mayor of Seoul<br />
Mr. Chang Kyung Hwan<br />
Director-General of Policy Evaluation<br />
Summary<br />
Through Seoul City’s Oasis (oasis.seoul.go.kr), developed by the Seoul Metropolitan<br />
Government of the Republic of Korea, citizens are encouraged to participate <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
processes by engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> open discussions with local government officials<br />
<strong>and</strong> by mak<strong>in</strong>g proposals through an onl<strong>in</strong>e portal. Oasis has adopted the Web<br />
2.0 spirit of creativity, shar<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> collaboration.<br />
The Problem<br />
Seoul City ran a citizens’ creative idea suggestion system from 1997 to 2007 <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to urge citizens to participate <strong>in</strong> the policy mak<strong>in</strong>g process of the city. However, it<br />
was a rather closed system <strong>in</strong> that citizens filled out a suggestion form <strong>and</strong> submitted<br />
it <strong>in</strong> person or by mail <strong>and</strong> were notified whether their ideas would be adopted or not<br />
a month later. S<strong>in</strong>ce those ideas were reviewed <strong>in</strong> closed-door meet<strong>in</strong>gs without the<br />
participation of the idea providers, the system was bound to have limited success <strong>and</strong><br />
drew little <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>and</strong> citizen participation.<br />
The Solution<br />
The OASIS system was created as a more open <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g system to serve as a<br />
channel, through which citizens actively participate <strong>in</strong> the city government <strong>and</strong> suggest<br />
fresh ideas for improvements. Oasis (oasis.seoul.go.kr), which was <strong>in</strong>itiated on<br />
10 October 2007 represents creativity <strong>and</strong> imag<strong>in</strong>ation as Seoul City’s vision.<br />
187