Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011

Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011

shubhambhuyat
from shubhambhuyat More from this publisher
06.03.2014 Views

Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance 2010 Category 2: Tanzania The second phase of the MKURABITA programme consisted of reform design. This phase, which aimed at re-engineering the existing legal and institutional framework, began in earnest in January 2006 and was largely completed in May 2008. Six Tanzanian experts carried out the reform design work, with technical support from a team of consultants from the Institute of Liberty and Democracy based in Lima, Peru. The methodology used was termed convergence analysis. The property archetypes were standardized; at the same time, property laws were reviewed and improved to remove the inbuilt barriers to formalization. Then the two systems were merged to produce a series of reform proposals that were submitted to stakeholders for consideration. Five main types of reforms were developed: • Proposals to formalize rural and urban real estate (see items 1–4 in the table below). • Proposals to formalize business (items 9–11). • Proposals to facilitate economic use of formalized real estate assets (items 5–7). • Proposals to facilitate business growth and economic use of assets (items 14–17). • Proposals to address cross-cutting issues such as a system of personal identification, the need for administrative simplification, and creation of a specialized institution responsible for formalizing business and real estate assets. The third phase of MKURABITA entails implementation: institutionalizing the legal and institutional framework developed during the second phase, as well as rolling out the processes for formalizing extralegal assets. This phase began in July 2008, and it is being carried out through short-term plans (one year), medium-term plans (five years) and long-term plans (ten years) that focus on proactive property and business formalization campaigns, consensus building, and establishment of feedback mechanisms, a national database and a record-keeping organisation. Phase 3 involves: • Amending and or enacting new laws or regulations that will facilitate institutionalization of fast-track and cost-effective proposals for formalizing properties and businesses. • Reviewing selected policies and establishing the local and central government structures proposed for mainstreaming property and business formalization. • Strengthening institutions by supporting the establishment of the necessary infrastructure and personnel training programmes. Throughout the implementation phase, a capacity-building approach is being used to empower local authorities. The steps include introducing the formalization process at the regional and district levels, handing over assets and equipment for formalization by the District Council, raising awareness at the ward, village and hamlet levels, 102

2008 Category 1 working with the village land-use planning committees and establishing GIS laboratories in districts. These efforts are leading to a more effective and responsive public administrative in Tanzania. Phase 4 of MKURABITA will focus on capital formation and good governance. The activities in this phase will involve formulating and implementing recommendations for connecting the newly formalized properties to national, regional and international capital markets and allowing property to be leveraged to create capital and generate more wealth. Replicability and Sustainability By empowering local authorities and helping build their capacity to formalize landholdings and businesses, MKURABITA is moving Tanzania toward sustainable delivery of secured property rights. Specific achievements include: • Efficient formalization of village land. Before implementation of the initiative, all land formalization matters were handled by the Centre by the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlement Development. Now that the process has been decentralized, the time spent formalizing village land has been significantly reduced—from six months to two months. • Enhanced professionalism through the creation of a database of experts. The capacity-building process carried out from the national to village level has created a sustainable database of professionals in the management of property rights delivery and secured rights in the country. The process created surveyors, land administrators, hand-held GPS users, GIS experts, land adjudicators, etc. • Creation of a sustainable land management process within District Councils. Trained ward teams can be used to facilitate land formalization in neighbouring wards and villages. In this way, the formalization process will be smoothly and speedily carried out all over the country. The villagers’ ownership of the process assures further continuation and sustainability. • Cost savings. Before the implementation of MKURABITA, the cost of formalizing land in one village was approximately 35 million Tanzanian shillings (US$23,171. After the initiative was introduced, the cost went down to approximately 15 million Tanzanian shillings (US$9930). • Availability and accessibility of land management information in the District Councils. The creation of GIS laboratories at the district level has ensured that information related to property management issues in a given district is available and easily accessible. Lessons Learned The MKURABITA initiative is a good example of the public being the providers of a service—in this case, property formalization—and, at the same time, the beneficia- 103

2008 Category 1<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g with the village l<strong>and</strong>-use plann<strong>in</strong>g committees <strong>and</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g GIS laboratories<br />

<strong>in</strong> districts. These efforts are lead<strong>in</strong>g to a more effective <strong>and</strong> responsive public<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative <strong>in</strong> Tanzania.<br />

Phase 4 of MKURABITA will focus on capital formation <strong>and</strong> good governance. The<br />

activities <strong>in</strong> this phase will <strong>in</strong>volve formulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g recommendations for<br />

connect<strong>in</strong>g the newly formalized properties to national, regional <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational capital<br />

markets <strong>and</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g property to be leveraged to create capital <strong>and</strong> generate more wealth.<br />

Replicability <strong>and</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

By empower<strong>in</strong>g local authorities <strong>and</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g build their capacity to formalize l<strong>and</strong>hold<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses, MKURABITA is mov<strong>in</strong>g Tanzania toward susta<strong>in</strong>able delivery<br />

of secured property rights. Specific achievements <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Efficient formalization of village l<strong>and</strong>. Before implementation of the <strong>in</strong>itiative,<br />

all l<strong>and</strong> formalization matters were h<strong>and</strong>led by the Centre by the M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />

L<strong>and</strong>s, Hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Human Settlement Development. Now that the process<br />

has been decentralized, the time spent formaliz<strong>in</strong>g village l<strong>and</strong> has been significantly<br />

reduced—from six months to two months.<br />

• Enhanced professionalism through the creation of a database of experts. The<br />

capacity-build<strong>in</strong>g process carried out from the national to village level has created<br />

a susta<strong>in</strong>able database of professionals <strong>in</strong> the management of property rights<br />

delivery <strong>and</strong> secured rights <strong>in</strong> the country. The process created surveyors, l<strong>and</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrators, h<strong>and</strong>-held GPS users, GIS experts, l<strong>and</strong> adjudicators, etc.<br />

• Creation of a susta<strong>in</strong>able l<strong>and</strong> management process with<strong>in</strong> District Councils.<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong>ed ward teams can be used to facilitate l<strong>and</strong> formalization <strong>in</strong> neighbour<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wards <strong>and</strong> villages. In this way, the formalization process will be smoothly<br />

<strong>and</strong> speedily carried out all over the country. The villagers’ ownership of the<br />

process assures further cont<strong>in</strong>uation <strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />

• Cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs. Before the implementation of MKURABITA, the cost of formaliz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

l<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> one village was approximately 35 million Tanzanian shill<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

(US$23,171. After the <strong>in</strong>itiative was <strong>in</strong>troduced, the cost went down to approximately<br />

15 million Tanzanian shill<strong>in</strong>gs (US$9930).<br />

• Availability <strong>and</strong> accessibility of l<strong>and</strong> management <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the District<br />

Councils. The creation of GIS laboratories at the district level has ensured that<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation related to property management issues <strong>in</strong> a given district is available<br />

<strong>and</strong> easily accessible.<br />

Lessons Learned<br />

The MKURABITA <strong>in</strong>itiative is a good example of the public be<strong>in</strong>g the providers of<br />

a service—<strong>in</strong> this case, property formalization—<strong>and</strong>, at the same time, the beneficia-<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!