Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011 Good Practices and Innovations in Public Governance 2003-2011
Good Practices and InnovATIONS in Public Governance 2010 Category 2: Tanzania The second phase of the MKURABITA programme consisted of reform design. This phase, which aimed at re-engineering the existing legal and institutional framework, began in earnest in January 2006 and was largely completed in May 2008. Six Tanzanian experts carried out the reform design work, with technical support from a team of consultants from the Institute of Liberty and Democracy based in Lima, Peru. The methodology used was termed convergence analysis. The property archetypes were standardized; at the same time, property laws were reviewed and improved to remove the inbuilt barriers to formalization. Then the two systems were merged to produce a series of reform proposals that were submitted to stakeholders for consideration. Five main types of reforms were developed: • Proposals to formalize rural and urban real estate (see items 1–4 in the table below). • Proposals to formalize business (items 9–11). • Proposals to facilitate economic use of formalized real estate assets (items 5–7). • Proposals to facilitate business growth and economic use of assets (items 14–17). • Proposals to address cross-cutting issues such as a system of personal identification, the need for administrative simplification, and creation of a specialized institution responsible for formalizing business and real estate assets. The third phase of MKURABITA entails implementation: institutionalizing the legal and institutional framework developed during the second phase, as well as rolling out the processes for formalizing extralegal assets. This phase began in July 2008, and it is being carried out through short-term plans (one year), medium-term plans (five years) and long-term plans (ten years) that focus on proactive property and business formalization campaigns, consensus building, and establishment of feedback mechanisms, a national database and a record-keeping organisation. Phase 3 involves: • Amending and or enacting new laws or regulations that will facilitate institutionalization of fast-track and cost-effective proposals for formalizing properties and businesses. • Reviewing selected policies and establishing the local and central government structures proposed for mainstreaming property and business formalization. • Strengthening institutions by supporting the establishment of the necessary infrastructure and personnel training programmes. Throughout the implementation phase, a capacity-building approach is being used to empower local authorities. The steps include introducing the formalization process at the regional and district levels, handing over assets and equipment for formalization by the District Council, raising awareness at the ward, village and hamlet levels, 102
2008 Category 1 working with the village land-use planning committees and establishing GIS laboratories in districts. These efforts are leading to a more effective and responsive public administrative in Tanzania. Phase 4 of MKURABITA will focus on capital formation and good governance. The activities in this phase will involve formulating and implementing recommendations for connecting the newly formalized properties to national, regional and international capital markets and allowing property to be leveraged to create capital and generate more wealth. Replicability and Sustainability By empowering local authorities and helping build their capacity to formalize landholdings and businesses, MKURABITA is moving Tanzania toward sustainable delivery of secured property rights. Specific achievements include: • Efficient formalization of village land. Before implementation of the initiative, all land formalization matters were handled by the Centre by the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlement Development. Now that the process has been decentralized, the time spent formalizing village land has been significantly reduced—from six months to two months. • Enhanced professionalism through the creation of a database of experts. The capacity-building process carried out from the national to village level has created a sustainable database of professionals in the management of property rights delivery and secured rights in the country. The process created surveyors, land administrators, hand-held GPS users, GIS experts, land adjudicators, etc. • Creation of a sustainable land management process within District Councils. Trained ward teams can be used to facilitate land formalization in neighbouring wards and villages. In this way, the formalization process will be smoothly and speedily carried out all over the country. The villagers’ ownership of the process assures further continuation and sustainability. • Cost savings. Before the implementation of MKURABITA, the cost of formalizing land in one village was approximately 35 million Tanzanian shillings (US$23,171. After the initiative was introduced, the cost went down to approximately 15 million Tanzanian shillings (US$9930). • Availability and accessibility of land management information in the District Councils. The creation of GIS laboratories at the district level has ensured that information related to property management issues in a given district is available and easily accessible. Lessons Learned The MKURABITA initiative is a good example of the public being the providers of a service—in this case, property formalization—and, at the same time, the beneficia- 103
- Page 76 and 77: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 78 and 79: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 80 and 81: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 82 and 83: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 84 and 85: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 86 and 87: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 88 and 89: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 90 and 91: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 92 and 93: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 94 and 95: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 96 and 97: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 98 and 99: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 100 and 101: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 102 and 103: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 104 and 105: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 106 and 107: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 108 and 109: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 110 and 111: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 112 and 113: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 114 and 115: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 116 and 117: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 118 and 119: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 120 and 121: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 122 and 123: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 124 and 125: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 128 and 129: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 130 and 131: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 132 and 133: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 134 and 135: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 136 and 137: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 138 and 139: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 140 and 141: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 142 and 143: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 144 and 145: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 146 and 147: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 148 and 149: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 150 and 151: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 152 and 153: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 154 and 155: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 156 and 157: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 158 and 159: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 160 and 161: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 162 and 163: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 164 and 165: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 166 and 167: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 168 and 169: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 170 and 171: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 172 and 173: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
- Page 174 and 175: Good Practices and InnovATIONS in P
<strong>Good</strong> <strong>Practices</strong> <strong>and</strong> InnovATIONS <strong>in</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Governance</strong><br />
2010 Category 2: Tanzania<br />
The second phase of the MKURABITA programme consisted of reform design. This<br />
phase, which aimed at re-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g legal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional framework,<br />
began <strong>in</strong> earnest <strong>in</strong> January 2006 <strong>and</strong> was largely completed <strong>in</strong> May 2008. Six Tanzanian<br />
experts carried out the reform design work, with technical support from a team of<br />
consultants from the Institute of Liberty <strong>and</strong> Democracy based <strong>in</strong> Lima, Peru.<br />
The methodology used was termed convergence analysis. The property archetypes were<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ardized; at the same time, property laws were reviewed <strong>and</strong> improved to remove<br />
the <strong>in</strong>built barriers to formalization. Then the two systems were merged to produce a<br />
series of reform proposals that were submitted to stakeholders for consideration.<br />
Five ma<strong>in</strong> types of reforms were developed:<br />
• Proposals to formalize rural <strong>and</strong> urban real estate (see items 1–4 <strong>in</strong> the table<br />
below).<br />
• Proposals to formalize bus<strong>in</strong>ess (items 9–11).<br />
• Proposals to facilitate economic use of formalized real estate assets (items 5–7).<br />
• Proposals to facilitate bus<strong>in</strong>ess growth <strong>and</strong> economic use of assets (items 14–17).<br />
• Proposals to address cross-cutt<strong>in</strong>g issues such as a system of personal identification,<br />
the need for adm<strong>in</strong>istrative simplification, <strong>and</strong> creation of a specialized<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitution responsible for formaliz<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> real estate assets.<br />
The third phase of MKURABITA entails implementation: <strong>in</strong>stitutionaliz<strong>in</strong>g the legal<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional framework developed dur<strong>in</strong>g the second phase, as well as roll<strong>in</strong>g out<br />
the processes for formaliz<strong>in</strong>g extralegal assets. This phase began <strong>in</strong> July 2008, <strong>and</strong> it<br />
is be<strong>in</strong>g carried out through short-term plans (one year), medium-term plans (five<br />
years) <strong>and</strong> long-term plans (ten years) that focus on proactive property <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
formalization campaigns, consensus build<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> establishment of feedback mechanisms,<br />
a national database <strong>and</strong> a record-keep<strong>in</strong>g organisation. Phase 3 <strong>in</strong>volves:<br />
• Amend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> or enact<strong>in</strong>g new laws or regulations that will facilitate <strong>in</strong>stitutionalization<br />
of fast-track <strong>and</strong> cost-effective proposals for formaliz<strong>in</strong>g properties<br />
<strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses.<br />
• Review<strong>in</strong>g selected policies <strong>and</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g the local <strong>and</strong> central government<br />
structures proposed for ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g property <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess formalization.<br />
• Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions by support<strong>in</strong>g the establishment of the necessary <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
<strong>and</strong> personnel tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes.<br />
Throughout the implementation phase, a capacity-build<strong>in</strong>g approach is be<strong>in</strong>g used to<br />
empower local authorities. The steps <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g the formalization process at<br />
the regional <strong>and</strong> district levels, h<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g over assets <strong>and</strong> equipment for formalization<br />
by the District Council, rais<strong>in</strong>g awareness at the ward, village <strong>and</strong> hamlet levels,<br />
102