PDF file - Ipce
PDF file - Ipce
PDF file - Ipce
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Part_5_2<br />
2. BERLIN: ETHICS<br />
Tom O'Carroll<br />
[Whiteboard belonging to this speech]<br />
The four principles<br />
Frans's paper for the Paris conference led to discussion on IMO [<strong>Ipce</strong> Meets Online, the mailing<br />
List for <strong>Ipce</strong> members] as to whether it can ever be right these days to have sexual relations<br />
with a child. The worry is, of course, that even if a child participates with enthusiasm, he or she<br />
may later come to regret it. As a result of society's fierce condemnation of such contacts they<br />
may come to feel guilty over what happened or feel they have been victimized and damaged<br />
by them, especially if such thoughts are encouraged through counseling.<br />
In this regard, Frans commended to IMO's attention an official <strong>Ipce</strong> statement on the <strong>Ipce</strong><br />
website known as the Four Principles, which outline conditions under which a sexual<br />
relationship with a child could be considered ethically acceptable. Frans also posted a copy of<br />
his paper called I didn't know how to deal with it, which discusses these principles in the light<br />
of various negative reactions reported to him from young people following a sexually<br />
expressed relationship some years before - contacts which had been reported by reliable adult<br />
partners as consensual at the time.<br />
In his own paper, Frans went so far as to say he believes that conditions are now so bad in<br />
society that it has become impossible to have a relationship in conformity with all these<br />
principles. As a result, he personally has decided he should not have sexual contacts with a<br />
child. Well, that is a decision for him and he is surely to be commended on his strength of<br />
character in his Stoical, or some might even say positively saintly, acceptance of reality. It is<br />
principled behaviour in the most literal sense.<br />
But is it the last word on the subject? I hope we will all behave in a principled, ethical fashion,<br />
but does that mean that unlike other people the only correct life for a paedophile is that of a<br />
saint? That prescription would have been too hard for many of the saints themselves, including<br />
the great St Augustine, who famously asked God on the question of celibacy to make him<br />
good, but not just yet.<br />
I feel a challenge can validly be made to the even more saintly approach of our very our own<br />
modern St Francis, or St Frans, but I should say straight away that it is not my intention to<br />
make a formal challenge to the Four Principles or to suggest they ought to be rejected. On the<br />
contrary I believe they are sound and valuable as far as they go. However, as I indicated in an<br />
IMO posting, I believe the ethical position they represent is conceived rather narrowly. We will<br />
http://home.wanadoo.nl/ipce/newsletters/nl_e_12/part_5_2.htm (1 of 13) [10/16/2002 5:35:14 PM]