05.03.2014 Views

Infant and Child Sexuality: A Sociological Perspective - Ipce

Infant and Child Sexuality: A Sociological Perspective - Ipce

Infant and Child Sexuality: A Sociological Perspective - Ipce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

der st<strong>and</strong>ing the sexual structure <strong>and</strong> function, true communication cannot<br />

take place. The child senses that the parent has strong attitudes<br />

about sex. But he does not know what it is that the parent feels<br />

strongly about or why he feels that way.<br />

One might ask, if a parent feels unable to give correct information,<br />

are there types of misinformation that are less damaging to the<br />

child than others?! I submit that there are. Innocuous misinformation<br />

given rationally is apt to have less negative effect on the child than<br />

if the parent h<strong>and</strong>les the situation by going “into a rage.”<br />

I was over at a friend’s house <strong>and</strong> she <strong>and</strong> I were<br />

examining the contents of her dad’s dresser<br />

drawer. I remember her pulling out condoms, however,<br />

we thought they were balloons. We took them<br />

outside <strong>and</strong> proceeded to blow them up. Her mother<br />

came home <strong>and</strong> went into a rage. She told us they<br />

were naughty <strong>and</strong> that we should never play with<br />

such things again. As we were really scared, we<br />

told her that some kids had given them to us. Out<br />

of curiosity, we looked in all the drawers at my<br />

house. Again, eventually finding our so-called<br />

balloons in my dad’s drawer. This time we were<br />

caught filling them up with water. My mother simply<br />

explained that as I had some special possessions<br />

that I didn’t want people to touch, so did<br />

everyone else <strong>and</strong> that this was one of my dad’s.<br />

When asked what it was used for, we were told<br />

that it was used by dads in their work.<br />

Generally speaking the schools have been no better than the parents<br />

when it comes to sex education. Ambiguity, misinformation, mislabeling<br />

<strong>and</strong> excessive idealism often characterize sex instruction in the<br />

schools as well as at home. For example, a school principle told me<br />

that his school felt that it was being very progressive <strong>and</strong> was doing<br />

the right thing when they told children that every child born is the<br />

result of an act of love on the part of the parents. In this case, some<br />

progressive parents called in as consultants on the school’s sex education<br />

curriculum objected to such instruction, pointing out that such<br />

instruction was too idealistic. Not every child is the fruition of an<br />

act of love. In this case, the parents wanted the school to tell the<br />

truth!<br />

Sex Questions <strong>Child</strong>ren Ask of Parents<br />

If the home atmosphere is sexually repressive, the children do not<br />

ask many sex-related questions. Conn (1948) reports that twenty-nine<br />

percent of 128 boys <strong>and</strong> thirty percent of 72 girls in one of his studies<br />

had inquired about sexual topics. As a group, the more intelligent<br />

children offered more questions per child. But even in the superior<br />

group (I.Q. 111-140) the average number of sex inquiries did not rise<br />

above two questions for each child. The children (four to six years of<br />

age) used such information as they had received at home, <strong>and</strong> combining<br />

this information with their limited experiences, were able to produce<br />

naive explanations as to where babies come from, for instance. The<br />

child of this age thinks of “being born” in such terms as: “the baby is<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!