05.03.2014 Views

ekS - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego PAN w Lublinie ...

ekS - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego PAN w Lublinie ...

ekS - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego PAN w Lublinie ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY ON THE<br />

SOIL WATER CONTENT VALUES MEASURED BY TDR METHOD<br />

Topp et al. [90] did not find the influence of soil salinity, or soil electrical<br />

conductivity, EC a , on the the electromagnetic wave velocity of propagation for<br />

mineral soils wetted with NaCl and CaSO 4 solutions of conductivity values<br />

practically found for soil solutions. However they found the increase of TDR<br />

measured water content, θ TDR , measurement error for high saline soils. The<br />

explained is as a result of high attenuation of the TDR pulse and the problems<br />

with finding the correct reflection point.<br />

Dalton et al. [19] measured s<strong>im</strong>ultaneously water content and electrical<br />

conductivity in the range 0.03 ÷ 0.14 [Sm -1 ] of saturated soil samples<br />

(θ = 0.34 ± 0.01) using the TDR method. They found that TDR determined soil<br />

water content is not influenced by the soil electrical conductivity.<br />

In the electromagnetic field of high frequency the soil electric conductivity<br />

does seem to influence the velocity of EM propagation. Fig. 8 shows that in the<br />

defined frequency range the loss angle decreases to the values close to zero. This<br />

means that for the frequencies in this range the <strong>im</strong>aginary part of the complex<br />

dielectric permittivity (6) is negligible. Consequently for the TDR measurement<br />

technique of soil content determination based on the measurement of the<br />

electromagnetic wave propagation velocity in the soil can be s<strong>im</strong>plified from<br />

Eq. (4) to Eq. (2). The following chapter will practically verify these conclusions.<br />

4.1. Material and method<br />

The soil material consisted of two soils (Table 4) and their mixtures prepared<br />

in the proportion, so as to have the density of soil samples equally distributed in<br />

the range 1.23 – 1.91 [gcm -3 ].<br />

Table 4.<br />

The parameters of the soils used for the preparation of soil mixtures.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!