05.03.2014 Views

ekS - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego PAN w Lublinie ...

ekS - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego PAN w Lublinie ...

ekS - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego PAN w Lublinie ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that st<strong>im</strong>ulate the phenomena and processes observed in the soil-plant-atmosphere<br />

system.<br />

Monitoring of water status is accomplished using digital systems. The digital<br />

data acquisition systems react only on electric signals and the applied sensors<br />

must convert the measured value into the proportional electric signal.<br />

Water status of soil, as a porous material should be expressed by min<strong>im</strong>um<br />

five variables: amount of water in the soil (ie soil water content), soil potential,<br />

salinity, oxygenation and temperature (Malicki and Bieganowski [55]).<br />

The most difficult are the electric measurement of soil water potential and soil<br />

water content (soil water content), therefore they are the subject of permanent<br />

research. It is assumed here, that the method successfully verified for soils will be<br />

also applicable for other porous agricultural materials because their structure is<br />

not so complex as soil.<br />

1.1.1. Min<strong>im</strong>al number of variables describing the water status<br />

The number of variables for water status description in the porous material<br />

depends on the specificity of the analysed problem and, up till now, is arbitrary<br />

chosen. In majority of practical cases the status of water is described by one<br />

variable: water content of the material. One variable - water content – is enough<br />

for wood as building material. Two variables are practically enough to describe<br />

the status of water in grain: water content and temperature. Soil is a material in<br />

which water status should be describes by min<strong>im</strong>um five variables: amount of<br />

water (soil water content), its potential, salinity, oxygenation and temperature.<br />

Soil is the most difficult biological material for water status monitoring<br />

because soil is diverse and its properties are not stable in t<strong>im</strong>e and space. Soil<br />

water content is the most challenging soil water status parameter for<br />

determination because the measurement results must be in the form of electric<br />

signal, while the current flow though the soil depends not only on its water<br />

content.<br />

Assuming that:<br />

− the methods effective for soil water content measurements are also<br />

effective for water content measurements of other biological materials<br />

−<br />

characterized by s<strong>im</strong>pler construction, and<br />

sensors, methods and instrumentation requirements in soil water content<br />

monitoring are not stronger than in water content monitoring of other<br />

biological materials<br />

we can concentrate further discussion on soil water content measurement and<br />

monitoring.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!