05.03.2014 Views

C - Lublin

C - Lublin

C - Lublin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Q V (pH)/N t = α(pH) =<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

n<br />

αi(K i , pH s ) N i /N t = ∑ αi(K i , pH s ) f(K i ), (4)<br />

where N t is the total amount of surface groups and f(K i )=N i /N t is a fraction of i-th<br />

groups. Using condensation approximation (Nederlof et al. 1993) the f(K i ) values<br />

are:<br />

f(K i ) = 1/N t ∆ Q V (pH)/∆K i ; K i = [H + s ], (5)<br />

and in logarithmic scale:<br />

f(pK i ) = 1/N t ∆ Q V (pH)/∆pK i ; pK i = pH s . (6)<br />

The distribution function of surface dissociation constants, i.e. f(K i ) vs. K i dependence,<br />

can be calculated knowing both surface protons activity (pH s ) and N t<br />

values. Soil components, as well as plant root surfaces may have different shapes<br />

and different charges thus may vary in surface potential values. For pH s (and K i )<br />

calculations, basing on the diffuse double layer theory, a single potential value<br />

spread uniformly over all surfaces of the same shape is a common assumption,<br />

which seems not to be valid in the case of soils and plants. Also, there still exist<br />

much controversies on the application of the DDL theory to surface chemistry (Mc<br />

Bride, 1997). Therefore, the surface proton activity is replaced by the solution activity<br />

and N t is taken as N max = maximal value of (N susp -N sol ) measured within the<br />

experimental window and, instead of the intrinsic, the distribution functions of<br />

apparent surface dissociation constants, K app , are determined:<br />

f (pK app,i ) = 1/N max ∆Q V (pH)/∆pK app ; pK app = pH. (7)<br />

The average value of pK app , pK app,av , is calculated as:<br />

n<br />

pK app,av = ∑ pKi,app f i (pK app ), (8)<br />

i=1<br />

which is direct measure of the average energy of the proton binding.<br />

Having the variable charge vs. pH dependence one can find the relation of actual<br />

surface charge, Q A , vs. pH. To do this the Q V (pH) curves are shifted against y-<br />

axis to meet the actual charge value at any pH e.g. a cation exchange capacity of<br />

the studied solid, estimated at the same ionic strength, at which the titration is performed.<br />

One should select a higher pH value to diminish eventual occurrence of<br />

positive surface charge that is not determined during the CEC measurements.<br />

i=1<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!