05.03.2014 Views

C - Lublin

C - Lublin

C - Lublin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORGANIC SOIL CONSTITUENTS<br />

Acidic functional groups of soil organic matter (aliphatic and aromatic carboxyls,<br />

sulfoxyls, phenolic, enolic etc.) have very different acidic strength, depending<br />

not only on the kind of the group, but also on its locality. An increase of the pH<br />

of the soil solution leads to the neutralization of these groups thus they become<br />

negatively charged. Surface groups of stronger acidic character (similarly as<br />

stronger acids) are neutralized at lower pH values. The weaker acidic is the group,<br />

its neutralization requires higher pH value. Therefore the higher is the soil pH, the<br />

larger surface charge occurs on organic matter surfaces. These acidic surface<br />

groups, which are located closely to each other, create common electric field surrounding<br />

these groups and within this field their protons become delocalized (proximity<br />

effect). The delocalized protons behave as strong acids and so the neighboring<br />

groups are strongly acidic and the soil organic matter has some negative charge<br />

even at very low pH values. The negative charge at pH around 8.2 of fulvic acids<br />

reaches a few hundreds centimoles per kg and for fulvic acids up to one thousand.<br />

PLANT ROOTS<br />

On surfaces of plant roots, variable charge of carboxylic groups dominate. The<br />

charge of plant roots was found to be closely correlated to uronic acid, present as<br />

polymerized galacturonic acid in pectic substances (Knight et al. 1961). The magnitude<br />

of root charge (CEC) was used for an explanation how various plant species<br />

survive environments with low level of cations availability (Gray et al. 1953), why<br />

plants uptake different proportion of mono and divalent cations (Huffaker and Wallace<br />

1958), how plants compete in nutrient deficient mixed populations (Woodward<br />

et al. 1983), what are the mechanisms of aluminum toxicity (Keltjens 1995).<br />

This may be connected also with the surface charge density. The higher the SCD,<br />

the higher the surface potential and the higher relative adsorption of multivalent<br />

cations. Significant positive correlation between CEC of cell walls and Al sorption<br />

was found by Schmol and Horst (2001), who postulated that Al binding by pectin<br />

matrix is an important step in the expression of Al toxicity. The roots charge is<br />

higher for Al sensitive plants than for Al resistant plants.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Chi Ma and Eggleton, R.A. Cation exchange capacity of kaolinite. Clays and Clay Minerals<br />

47, 174–180.<br />

2. Gray B, Drake M and Colby W G 1953 Potassium competition in grass-legume associations<br />

as a function of root cation exchange capacity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 17,<br />

235-239.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!