05.03.2014 Views

C - Lublin

C - Lublin

C - Lublin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Basing on this simplified bending test, the apparatus has been constructed for<br />

evaluation of pod cracking susceptibility, presented here. The measuring procedure<br />

consists in pressing the pod (at a characteristic ring-shaped swelling of the stalk) at<br />

the measuring holder of the sensor of force. A person performing the measurement<br />

keeps the pod in hand in a precisely defined way. As a result of the force interaction,<br />

a cracking takes place of the valves with the linking septum. This way the<br />

cracking and opening of pods in natural (field) conditions is imitated. For registration<br />

of the bending course, determination of the force values and saving the results,<br />

a program has been elaborated. A portable instrument collaborates with commonly<br />

used PC computers. It weighs 1,2 kg and has dimensions of 20x20x7 cm. A series<br />

of measurements with the instrument has given the results comparable with the<br />

results obtained by other method (torsion of pods). The usefulness of the instrument<br />

has been stated, for simple and fast evaluation of rape pods cracking susceptibility<br />

in the conditions of an indifferently equipped laboratory.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Jakubiec J., Grochowski L.: 1963, Polowa i laboratoryjna ocena odporności dwóch<br />

odmian rzepaku jarego na pękanie łuszczyn. Zesz. Nauk SGGW – Rolnictwo, 7, 49-65.<br />

2. Josefsson E.: 1968, Investigations on shattering resistance of cruciferous oil crops.<br />

Zeitschrift fur Pflancenzuchtung 59/4, 384 - 395. Communic from Swedish Seed Association<br />

No.306.<br />

3. Kadkol G. P., Mac Millan R. H., Burrow R. P., Halloran G. M.: 1984, Evaluation of<br />

brassica genotypes for resistance to shatter. I. Development of a laboratory test.<br />

EUPHYTIA. Netherlands J. of plant breeding. Vol 33: 63 - 73.<br />

4. Loof B.: 1961, Platzfestigkeit als zuchtproblem bei olipflanzen der familie Cruciferae.<br />

Zeitschlift fur Pflanzen - zuchtung, 46, 405 - 416.<br />

5. Morgan C.L., Bruce D.M., Child R., Ladbrooke Z.L., Arthur A.E.: 1998, Genetic<br />

variation for pod shatter resistance among lines of oilseed rape developed from synthetic<br />

B. Napus. Field Crops Research 58, 153-165.<br />

6. Reznicek R. 1973 Vysterovani Agrofizikalnych vlasnosti repky. Zem. Tech. 2, 87 - 92.<br />

7. Rudko T.: 2000, Próba zastosowania testu zginania do oceny podatności łuszczyn<br />

rzepaku jarego na pękanie. Acta Agrophysica, 37, 193-198.<br />

8. Rudko T., Sokołowska Z., Hajnos M.: 2003, Zastosowanie metody porozymetrii rtęciowej<br />

do badania mikrostruktury łuszczyn rzepaku. Konferencja Naukowa. Olsztyn.<br />

Właściwości geometryczne, mechaniczne i strukturalne surowców i produktów spożywczych.<br />

Referaty i doniesienia, 64.<br />

9. Szot B., Tys J.: 1987, Metodyka badań mechanicznych właściwości łuszczyn i łodyg<br />

rzepaku. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych. 321, 193-202.<br />

10. Tomaszewska Z.: 1964, Badania morfologiczne i anatomiczne łuszczyn kilku odmian<br />

rzepaku i rzepiku ozimego oraz przyczyny i mechanizm ich pękania. Hodowla Roślin,<br />

Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo. tom 8, z. 2, 147 - 180.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!