C - Lublin
C - Lublin
C - Lublin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Basing on this simplified bending test, the apparatus has been constructed for<br />
evaluation of pod cracking susceptibility, presented here. The measuring procedure<br />
consists in pressing the pod (at a characteristic ring-shaped swelling of the stalk) at<br />
the measuring holder of the sensor of force. A person performing the measurement<br />
keeps the pod in hand in a precisely defined way. As a result of the force interaction,<br />
a cracking takes place of the valves with the linking septum. This way the<br />
cracking and opening of pods in natural (field) conditions is imitated. For registration<br />
of the bending course, determination of the force values and saving the results,<br />
a program has been elaborated. A portable instrument collaborates with commonly<br />
used PC computers. It weighs 1,2 kg and has dimensions of 20x20x7 cm. A series<br />
of measurements with the instrument has given the results comparable with the<br />
results obtained by other method (torsion of pods). The usefulness of the instrument<br />
has been stated, for simple and fast evaluation of rape pods cracking susceptibility<br />
in the conditions of an indifferently equipped laboratory.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Jakubiec J., Grochowski L.: 1963, Polowa i laboratoryjna ocena odporności dwóch<br />
odmian rzepaku jarego na pękanie łuszczyn. Zesz. Nauk SGGW – Rolnictwo, 7, 49-65.<br />
2. Josefsson E.: 1968, Investigations on shattering resistance of cruciferous oil crops.<br />
Zeitschrift fur Pflancenzuchtung 59/4, 384 - 395. Communic from Swedish Seed Association<br />
No.306.<br />
3. Kadkol G. P., Mac Millan R. H., Burrow R. P., Halloran G. M.: 1984, Evaluation of<br />
brassica genotypes for resistance to shatter. I. Development of a laboratory test.<br />
EUPHYTIA. Netherlands J. of plant breeding. Vol 33: 63 - 73.<br />
4. Loof B.: 1961, Platzfestigkeit als zuchtproblem bei olipflanzen der familie Cruciferae.<br />
Zeitschlift fur Pflanzen - zuchtung, 46, 405 - 416.<br />
5. Morgan C.L., Bruce D.M., Child R., Ladbrooke Z.L., Arthur A.E.: 1998, Genetic<br />
variation for pod shatter resistance among lines of oilseed rape developed from synthetic<br />
B. Napus. Field Crops Research 58, 153-165.<br />
6. Reznicek R. 1973 Vysterovani Agrofizikalnych vlasnosti repky. Zem. Tech. 2, 87 - 92.<br />
7. Rudko T.: 2000, Próba zastosowania testu zginania do oceny podatności łuszczyn<br />
rzepaku jarego na pękanie. Acta Agrophysica, 37, 193-198.<br />
8. Rudko T., Sokołowska Z., Hajnos M.: 2003, Zastosowanie metody porozymetrii rtęciowej<br />
do badania mikrostruktury łuszczyn rzepaku. Konferencja Naukowa. Olsztyn.<br />
Właściwości geometryczne, mechaniczne i strukturalne surowców i produktów spożywczych.<br />
Referaty i doniesienia, 64.<br />
9. Szot B., Tys J.: 1987, Metodyka badań mechanicznych właściwości łuszczyn i łodyg<br />
rzepaku. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych. 321, 193-202.<br />
10. Tomaszewska Z.: 1964, Badania morfologiczne i anatomiczne łuszczyn kilku odmian<br />
rzepaku i rzepiku ozimego oraz przyczyny i mechanizm ich pękania. Hodowla Roślin,<br />
Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo. tom 8, z. 2, 147 - 180.<br />
121