Classical and augmentative biological control against ... - IOBC-WPRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 2 Potential of biological control based on published research. 2. Beneficials for augmentative biocontrol against insect pests. The grapevine case study Massimo Giorgini CNR, Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, via Università 133, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy Bibliographic survey on augmentative biological control against arthropod pests in selected crops We carried out a preliminary bibliographic survey to quantify the literature on augmentative biological control of pests published from 1973 to 2008. The survey was restricted to crops relevant to case studies of ENDURE. They included grapevine; orchards: apple and pear; arable crops: corn and wheat; field vegetables: carrot and onion. Augmentative biological control (Van Driesche & Bellows, 1996) comprises of inoculative augmentation (control being provided by the offspring of released organisms) and inundative augmentation (control expected to be performed by the organisms released, with little or no contribution by their offspring). Our bibliographic survey was conducted by using the CAB Abstracts database by entering the name of each crop and one key word selected from the following list in order to retrieve the maximum number of references. For each selected crop, the key words used for the bibliographic survey were: a) augmentative biological control; b) augmentation biological control; c) inoculative biological control; d) inundative biological control. The survey with these key words produced a very low number of results all of which were examined. For this reason we added two key words that were more general: e) insects biological control; f) mites biological control. For the searching criteria a to d, total records will be examined. In this case, given the extremely high number of records, only references within the period 1998-2008 were examined to select only the publications concerning the augmentative biological control. The results of this survey are reported in Appendix 7. The analytical review of the scientific literature on augmentative biological control, presented in the rest of this chapter, was then focused on grapevine. Status of researches on augmentation of natural enemies to control arthropod pests in grapevine The references extracted from the CAB Abstracts database, following the criteria described in the previous paragraph, were examined to identify those concerning the use of natural enemies in augmentation biological control in grapevine. The abstracts of 607 references were examined and only 70 papers reported data on application and efficiency of augmentative biocontrol (Table 5). 12
Chapter 2 Table 5: References extracted from the CAB Abstracts database and examined for reviewing augmentation biological control in grapevine. Key words Total records 1998-2008 (1973-2008) Augmentative biological control 7 6 Augmentation biological control 10 6 Inoculative biological control 4 1 Inundative biological control 7 3 Insects biological control 373 Mites biological control 190 Total references examined 28 579 Total references showing data on 70 augmentative biocontrol The survey includes records for grapevine, grape and vineyard. Results Very few papers (62) on augmentative biocontrol in grapevine have been published during the period 1998-2008, with an average of 5.6 publications per year. Most references (93.5%) showed data on biological control of insects and only 4 papers on the biological control of mites were published (Figure 3). Figure 3: Number of papers per year published during 1998-2008 concerning augmentative biological control of pests in grapevine. 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 biocontrol of insect pests biocontrol of mite pests The data extracted from the abstracts of the selected references were collected analytically in separate tables for each group of biocontrol agents (Appendix 8) and references were sorted chronologically (starting from the eldest). For each species of biocontrol agent, target species of pest, Country, type of augmentation (inundative, inoculative), type of test (laboratory, field), efficacy of biocontrol, additional information and results were reported. 13
Page 1 and 2: IOBC OILB WPRS SROP In te rn atio n
Page 3 and 4: Preface One of the Research Activit
Page 5 and 6: LORITO Matteo UNINA, Dip. Arboricol
Page 7 and 8: List of Tables (continued) Table 17
Page 9 and 10: Contents Chapter 1 Potential of bio
Page 11 and 12: Chapter 1 Potential of biological c
Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1 To allow for the analysis
Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1 Table 4: Microbial specie
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1 Table 4 (continued) T. lo
Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1 Table 4 (continued) Cupri
Page 21: Chapter 1 other was aiming at ident
Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2 Table 6: Biocontrol agent
Page 27 and 28: Table 7 (continued) Chapter 2 Hemip
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2 Bacillus thuringiensis: 2
Page 31 and 32: Chapter 3 - financial; since the de
Page 33 and 34: Chapter 3 Pathogens and Nematodes a
Page 35 and 36: Chapter 3 [Remark: Estimating the s
Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3 100% 80% 60% P = Phytopha
Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3 0,25 4 0,20 % dedicated t
Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3 Table 9: Recent introduct
Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3 Table 9: Recent introduct
Page 45 and 46: Chapter 4 The survey was limited to
Page 47 and 48: Chapter 4 Table 11 (continued) Othe
Page 49 and 50: Chapter 4 SCLPs are included in ann
Page 51 and 52: Chapter 4 laminarin is available on
Page 53 and 54: Chapter 5 (EC) No 1109/2009. Tests
Page 55 and 56: Chapter 6 Identified difficulties a
Page 57 and 58: Chapter 6 Table 12: Evidence for, a
Page 59 and 60: Table 13: Trichoderma-based prepara
Page 61 and 62: Chapter 6 Many preparations have be
Page 63 and 64: Chapter 6 Persistence, physiologica
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 6 Harman, G. E. (2006) Over
Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6 Sharon, E., Bar-Eyal, M.,
Page 69 and 70: Chapter 7 purification, formulation
Page 71 and 72: Chapter 7 Business profitability Co
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 8 A survey was carried out
Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 8 80 70 60 %of supply %of a
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 8 efficacy and the price of
Page 79 and 80:
Conclusions and perspectives reduct
Page 81 and 82:
Appendices For Chapter 1 Appendix 1
Page 83 and 84:
Appendix 1 B O Milsana + Brevibacil
Page 85 and 86:
Appendix 1 Strawberry (target patho
Page 87 and 88:
Appendix 1 Fruits - postharvest (ap
Page 89 and 90:
Appendix 1 Legumes (Fabaceae) (targ
Page 91 and 92:
Appendix 1 Miscellaneous crops (tar
Page 93 and 94:
Appendix 1 Lecanicillium muscarium
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix 1 Bedini, S., Bagnoli, G.,
Page 97 and 98:
Appendix 1 Dik, A., and Wubben, J.
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix 1 Gerlagh, M., Amsing, J.
Page 101 and 102:
Appendix 1 Jing, W., Tu, K., Shao,
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix 1 Li, G. Q., Huang, H. C.,
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix 1 Morandi, M. A. B., Maffi
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix 1 Rabea, E. I., Badawy, M.
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix 1 Sutton, J. C., Liu, W.,
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix 1 Zahavi, T., Cohen, L., W
Page 113 and 114:
Appendix 2 Powdery mildew on grapes
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix 2 Powdery mildew on cucurb
Page 117 and 118:
Appendix 2 Askary, H. (1998). Patho
Page 119 and 120:
Appendix 2 Malathrakis, N. E. (2002
Page 121 and 122:
Appendix 3. Inventory of biocontrol
Page 123 and 124:
Appendix 3 References on biocontrol
Page 125 and 126:
Appendix 4. Inventory of biocontrol
Page 127 and 128:
Appendix 4 Grapes (target pathogen
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix 4 References on biocontrol
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix 4 Robak, J., and Ostrowska
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix 5 Cherry (target pathogens
Page 135 and 136:
Appendix 5 Successful inhibition in
Page 137 and 138:
Appendix 5 Smilanick, J. L., Denis-
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix 6 showed protein content o
Page 141 and 142:
Appendix 6 El-Khallal, S. M. (2007)
Page 143 and 144:
Appendix 6 Liu, Q., J. C. Yu, et al
Page 145 and 146:
Appendix 6 of tomato wilt pathogen
Page 147 and 148:
Appendix 6 incognita, respectively.
Page 149 and 150:
Appendix 7. Number of references re
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix 8. Collection of data on a
Page 153 and 154:
Appendix 8 Camporese & Duso, 1996 T
Page 155 and 156:
Appendix 8 8.5 Fungi [5 species] Re
Page 157 and 158:
Appendix 8 Berner & Schnetter, 2002
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 8 Morandi-Filho et al., 20
Page 161 and 162:
Appendix 8 Marshall D.B. & Lester P
Page 163 and 164:
Appendix 9 9.2. Details on the use
Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 9 References 1. Abd-Rabou
Page 167 and 168:
Appendix 9 50. Gariepy TD, Kuhlmann
Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 9 97. Langewald J, Neuensc
Page 171 and 172:
Appendix 9 146. Roltsch WJ, Meyerdi
Page 173 and 174:
Appendix 10. Substances included in
Page 175 and 176:
Appendix 10 Chemical Dimoxystrobin
Page 177 and 178:
Appendix 10 Chemical Prosulfocarb '
Page 179 and 180:
Appendix 10 Natural other Abamectin
Page 181 and 182:
Appendix 11. Invertebrate beneficia
Page 183 and 184:
Appendix 11 11.2. Invertebrate bioc
Page 185 and 186:
Appendix 11 Coccinella septempuncta
Page 187 and 188:
Appendix 11 Trichogramma brassicae
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Appendix 11 Diglyphus isaea Digline
show all

Classical and augmentative biological control against ... - IOBC-WPRS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?