Classical and augmentative biological control against ... - IOBC-WPRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ris & Malausa (Appendix for Chapter 3) 24. Boyd EA, Hoddle MS. 2007. Host specificity testing of Gonatocerus spp. egg-parasitoids used in a classical biological control program against Homalodisca vitripennis: a retrospective analysis for non-target impacts in southern California. Biological Control 43: 56-70 25. Briano JA, Williams DF. 2002. Natural occurrence and laboratory studies of the fire ant pathogen Vairimorpha invictae (Microsporida: Burenellidae) in Argentina. Environmental Entomology 31: 887-94 26. Casagrande RA, Tewksbury LA. 2005. Lily leaf beetle biological control: research report to the North American Lily Society - January 4, 2006. Lily Yearbook of the North American Lily Society, Inc.: 35-41 27. Chacon JM, Landis DA, Heimpel GE. 2008. Potential for biotic interference of a classical biological control agent of the soybean aphid. Biological Control 46: 216-25 28. Charles J. 2001. Introduction of a parasitoid for mealybug biocontrol: a case study under new environmental legislation. New Zealand Plant Protection Volume 54, 2001. Proceedings of a conference, Quality Hotel, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 14-16 August 2001: 37-41 29. Charles JG, Allan DJ. 2002. An ecological perspective to host-specificity testing of biocontrol agents. New Zealand Plant Protection Volume 55, 2002. Proceedings of a conference, Centra Hotel, Rotorua, New Zealand, 13-15 August 2002 30. Chinajariyawong A, Clarke AR, Jirasurat M, Kritsaneepiboon S, Lahey HA, et al. 2000. Survey of opiine parasitoids of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Thailand and Malaysia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 48: 71-101 31. Conlong DE, Goebel R. 2002. Biological control of Chilo sacchariphagus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Mocanbique: the first steps. Proceedings of the Annual Congress - South African Sugar Technologists' Association 32. Cossentine JE, Kuhlmann U. 2007. Introductions of parasitoids to control the apple ermine moth in British Columbia. In Biological control: a global perspective, pp. 13-9 33. Costanzi M, Frassetti F, Malausa JC. 2003. Biological control of the psyllid Ctenarytaina eucalypti Maskell in eucalyptus plantations of Ligurian Riviera. Informatore Fitopatologico 53: 52-6 34. Coutinot D, Hoelmer K. 1999. Parasitoids of Lygus spp. in Europe and their potential for biological control of Lygus spp. in North America. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Pests in Agriculture, Part 3, Montpellier, France, 7-9 December, 1999. 35. Culliney TW, Grace JK. 2000. Prospects for the biological control of subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), with special reference to Coptotermes formosanus. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90: 9-21 36. Daane KM, Cooper ML, Triapitsyn SV, Andrews JW, Jr., Ripa R. 2008. Parasitoids of obscure mealybug, Pseudococcus viburni (Hem.: Pseudococcidae) in California: establishment of Pseudaphycus flavidulus (Hym.: Encyrtidae) and discussion of related parasitoid species. Biocontrol Science and Technology 18: 43-57 37. Daane KM, Sime KR, Wang XG, Nadel H, Johnson MW, et al. 2008. Psyttalia lounsburyi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), potential biological control agent for the olive fruit fly in California. Biological Control 44: 79-89 38. Day WH. 2005. Changes in abundance of native and introduced parasites (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and of the target and non-target plant bug species (Hemiptera: Miridae), during two classical biological control programs in alfalfa. Biological Control 33: 368-74 39. Delalibera I, Jr., Humber RA, Hajek AE. 2004. Preservation of in vitro cultures of the mite pathogenic fungus Neozygites tanajoae. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 50: 579-86 40. Dillon AB, Rolston AN, Meade CV, Downes MJ, Griffin CT. 2008. Establishment, persistence, and introgression of entomopathogenic nematodes in a forest ecosystem. Ecological Applications 18: 735-47 41. Dimitrov A, Karadjova O, Sengalevich G. 2008. Investigation on the potential of a new imported parasitoid against aphids in Bulgaria. Rasteniev'dni Nauki 45: 25-7 42. Elliot SL, Moraes GJd, Delalibera I, Jr., Silva CADd, Tamai MA, Mumford JD. 2000. Potential of the mite-pathogenic fungus Neozygites floridana (Entomophthorales: Neozygitaceae) for control of the cassava green mite Mononychellus tanajoa (Acari: Tetranychidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 90: 191-200 43. Elliot SL, Mumford JD, Moraes GJd. 2003. The role of resting spores in the survival of the mite-pathogenic fungus Neozygites floridana from Mononychellus tanajoa during dry periods in Brazil. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 81: 148-57 44. Emana G. 2005. Suitability of Chilo partellus, Sesamia calamistis and Busseola fusca for the development of Cotesia flavipes in Ethiopia: implication for biological control. Ethiopian Journal of Biological Sciences 4: 123-34 45. Fiaboe KKM, Fonseca RL, Moraes GJd, Ogol CKPO, Knapp M. 2006. Identification of priority areas in South America for exploration of natural enemies for classical biological control of Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Africa. Biological Control 38: 373-9 46. Folgarait PJ, Patrock RJW, Gilbert LE. 2006. Development of Pseudacteon nocens (Diptera: Phoridae) on Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 99: 295-307 47. Franco JC, Suma P, Borges da Silva E, Mendel Z. 2003. Management strategies of mealybug pests of citrus in Mediterranean countries. Bulletin OILB/SROP 26: 137 48. Fuxa JR, Richter AR. 1999. Classical biological control in an ephemeral crop habitat with Anticarsia gemmatalis nucleopolyhedrovirus. BioControl 44: 403-19 49. Garcia-Mari F, Vercher R, Costa-Comelles J, Marzal C, Villalba M. 2004. Establishment of Citrostichus phyllocnistoides (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) as a biological control agent for the citrus leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Spain. Biological Control 29: 215-26 156
Appendix 9 50. Gariepy TD, Kuhlmann U, Gillott C, Erlandson M. 2008. Does host plant influence parasitism and parasitoid species composition in Lygus rugulipennis? A molecular approach. Bulletin of Entomological Research 98: 217-21 51. Gautam RD. 2003. Classical biological control of pink hibiscus mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (green) in the Caribbean. Plant Protection Bulletin (Faridabad) 55: 1-8 52. Gibson GAP, Gillespie DR, Dosdall L. 2006. The species of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) introduced to North America for biological control of the cabbage seedpod weevil, and the first recovery of Stenomalina gracilis (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae). Canadian Entomologist 138: 285-91 53. Gilbert LE, Barr CL, Calixto AA, Cook JL, Drees BM, et al. 2008. Introducing phorid fly parasitoids of red imported fire ant workers from South America to Texas: Outcomes vary by region and by pseudacteon species released. Southwestern Entomologist 33: 15-29 54. Gillespie DR, Mason PG, Dosdall LM, Bouchard P, Gibson GAP. 2006. Importance of long-term research in classical biological control: an analytical review of a release against the cabbage seedpod weevil in North America. Journal of Applied Entomology 130: 401-9 55. Gnanvossou D, Hanna R, Yaninek JS, Toko M. 2005. Comparative life history traits of three neotropical phytoseiid mites maintained on plant-based diets. Biological Control 35: 32-9 56. Gold CS, Pena JE, Karamura EB. 2001. Biology and integrated pest management for the banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Integrated Pest Management Reviews 6: 79-155 57. Goolsby JA, DeBarro PJ, Kirk AA, Sutherst RW, Canas L, et al. 2005. Post-release evaluation of biological control of Bemisia tabaci biotype "B" in the USA and the development of predictive tools to guide introductions for other countries. Biological Control 32: 70-7 58. Grandgirard J, Hoddle MS, Petit JN, Percy DM, Roderick GK, Davies N. 2007. Pre-introductory risk assessment studies of Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) for use as a classical biological control agent against Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in the Society Islands of French Polynesia. Biocontrol Science and Technology 17: 809-22 59. Grandgirard J, Hoddle MS, Petit JN, Roderick GK, Davies N. 2008. Engineering an invasion: classical biological control of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis, by the egg parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi in Tahiti and Moorea, French Polynesia. Biological Invasions 10: 135-48 60. Grandgirard J, Hoddle MS, Triapitsyn SV, Petit JN, Roderick GK, Davies N. 2007. First records of Gonatocerus dolichocerus Ashmead, Palaeoneura sp., Anagrus sp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), and Centrodora sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in French Polynesia, with notes on egg parasitism of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 83: 177-84 61. Gwiazdowski RA, Driesche RGv, Desnoyers A, Lyon S, Wu S, et al. 2006. Possible geographic origin of beech scale, Cryptococcus fagisuga (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae), an invasive pest in North America. Biological Control 39: 9-18 62. Hajek A, McManus M, Delalibera I. 2005. Catalogue of introductions of pathogens and nematodes for classical biological control of insect and mites, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team 63. Hajek AE, McManus ML, Delalibera Junior I. 2007. A review of introductions of pathogens and nematodes for classical biological control of insects and mites. Biological Control 41: 1-13 64. Hanks LM, Millar JG, Paine TD, Campbell CD. 2000. Classical biological control of the Australian weevil Gonipterus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in California. Environmental Entomology 29: 369-75 65. Haye T, Achterberg Cv, Goulet H, Barratt BIP, Kuhlmann U. 2006. Potential for classical biological control of the potato bug Closterotomus norwegicus (Hemiptera: Miridae): description, parasitism and host specificity of Peristenus closterotomae sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 96: 421-31 66. Hemachandra KS, Holliday NJ, Klimaszewski J, Mason PG, Kuhlmann U. 2005. Erroneous records of Aleochara bipustulata from North America: an assessment of the evidence. Canadian Entomologist 137: 182-7 67. Hemachandra KS, Holliday NJ, Mason PG, Soroka JJ, Kuhlmann U. 2007. Comparative assessment of the parasitoid community of Delia radicum in the Canadian prairies and Europe: a search for classical biological control agents. Biological Control 43: 85-94 68. Henne DC, Johnson SJ, Cronin JT. 2007. Population spread of the introduced red imported fire ant parasitoid, Pseudacteon tricuspis Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae), in Louisiana. Biological Control 42: 97-104 69. Hill SL, Hoy MA. 2003. Interactions between the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta and the parasitoid Lipolexis scutellaris potentially affect classical biological control of the aphid Toxoptera citricida. Biological Control 27: 11-9 70. Hoddle MS. 2005. Identifying the donor region within the home range of an invasive species: implications for classical biological control of arthropod pests. Second International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, Davos, Switzerland, 12-16 September, 2005 71. Hoddle MS. 2006. Historical review of control programs for Levuana iridescens (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae) in Fiji and examination of possible extinction of this moth by Bessa remota (Diptera: Tachinidae). Pacific Science 60: 439-53 72. Hoddle MS, Nakahara S, Phillips PA. 2002. Foreign exploration for Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and associated natural enemies on avocado (Persea americana Miller). Biological Control 24: 251-65 157
Page 1 and 2:
IOBC OILB WPRS SROP In te rn atio n
Page 3 and 4:
Preface One of the Research Activit
Page 5 and 6:
LORITO Matteo UNINA, Dip. Arboricol
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables (continued) Table 17
Page 9 and 10:
Contents Chapter 1 Potential of bio
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 Potential of biological c
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 To allow for the analysis
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1 Table 4: Microbial specie
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1 Table 4 (continued) T. lo
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1 Table 4 (continued) Cupri
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 other was aiming at ident
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 2 Table 5: References extra
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2 Table 6: Biocontrol agent
Page 27 and 28:
Table 7 (continued) Chapter 2 Hemip
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2 Bacillus thuringiensis: 2
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 3 - financial; since the de
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 3 Pathogens and Nematodes a
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 3 [Remark: Estimating the s
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3 100% 80% 60% P = Phytopha
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3 0,25 4 0,20 % dedicated t
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3 Table 9: Recent introduct
Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3 Table 9: Recent introduct
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 4 The survey was limited to
Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 4 Table 11 (continued) Othe
Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 4 SCLPs are included in ann
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 4 laminarin is available on
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 5 (EC) No 1109/2009. Tests
Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 6 Identified difficulties a
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 6 Table 12: Evidence for, a
Page 59 and 60:
Table 13: Trichoderma-based prepara
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 6 Many preparations have be
Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 6 Persistence, physiologica
Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 6 Harman, G. E. (2006) Over
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 6 Sharon, E., Bar-Eyal, M.,
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 7 purification, formulation
Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 7 Business profitability Co
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 8 A survey was carried out
Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 8 80 70 60 %of supply %of a
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 8 efficacy and the price of
Page 79 and 80:
Conclusions and perspectives reduct
Page 81 and 82:
Appendices For Chapter 1 Appendix 1
Page 83 and 84:
Appendix 1 B O Milsana + Brevibacil
Page 85 and 86:
Appendix 1 Strawberry (target patho
Page 87 and 88:
Appendix 1 Fruits - postharvest (ap
Page 89 and 90:
Appendix 1 Legumes (Fabaceae) (targ
Page 91 and 92:
Appendix 1 Miscellaneous crops (tar
Page 93 and 94:
Appendix 1 Lecanicillium muscarium
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix 1 Bedini, S., Bagnoli, G.,
Page 97 and 98:
Appendix 1 Dik, A., and Wubben, J.
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix 1 Gerlagh, M., Amsing, J.
Page 101 and 102:
Appendix 1 Jing, W., Tu, K., Shao,
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix 1 Li, G. Q., Huang, H. C.,
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix 1 Morandi, M. A. B., Maffi
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix 1 Rabea, E. I., Badawy, M.
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix 1 Sutton, J. C., Liu, W.,
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix 1 Zahavi, T., Cohen, L., W
Page 113 and 114:
Appendix 2 Powdery mildew on grapes
Page 115 and 116: Appendix 2 Powdery mildew on cucurb
Page 117 and 118: Appendix 2 Askary, H. (1998). Patho
Page 119 and 120: Appendix 2 Malathrakis, N. E. (2002
Page 121 and 122: Appendix 3. Inventory of biocontrol
Page 123 and 124: Appendix 3 References on biocontrol
Page 125 and 126: Appendix 4. Inventory of biocontrol
Page 127 and 128: Appendix 4 Grapes (target pathogen
Page 129 and 130: Appendix 4 References on biocontrol
Page 131 and 132: Appendix 4 Robak, J., and Ostrowska
Page 133 and 134: Appendix 5 Cherry (target pathogens
Page 135 and 136: Appendix 5 Successful inhibition in
Page 137 and 138: Appendix 5 Smilanick, J. L., Denis-
Page 139 and 140: Appendix 6 showed protein content o
Page 141 and 142: Appendix 6 El-Khallal, S. M. (2007)
Page 143 and 144: Appendix 6 Liu, Q., J. C. Yu, et al
Page 145 and 146: Appendix 6 of tomato wilt pathogen
Page 147 and 148: Appendix 6 incognita, respectively.
Page 149 and 150: Appendix 7. Number of references re
Page 151 and 152: Appendix 8. Collection of data on a
Page 153 and 154: Appendix 8 Camporese & Duso, 1996 T
Page 155 and 156: Appendix 8 8.5 Fungi [5 species] Re
Page 157 and 158: Appendix 8 Berner & Schnetter, 2002
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 8 Morandi-Filho et al., 20
Page 161 and 162: Appendix 8 Marshall D.B. & Lester P
Page 163 and 164: Appendix 9 9.2. Details on the use
Page 165: Appendix 9 References 1. Abd-Rabou
Page 169 and 170: Appendix 9 97. Langewald J, Neuensc
Page 171 and 172: Appendix 9 146. Roltsch WJ, Meyerdi
Page 173 and 174: Appendix 10. Substances included in
Page 175 and 176: Appendix 10 Chemical Dimoxystrobin
Page 177 and 178: Appendix 10 Chemical Prosulfocarb '
Page 179 and 180: Appendix 10 Natural other Abamectin
Page 181 and 182: Appendix 11. Invertebrate beneficia
Page 183 and 184: Appendix 11 11.2. Invertebrate bioc
Page 185 and 186: Appendix 11 Coccinella septempuncta
Page 187 and 188: Appendix 11 Trichogramma brassicae
Page 193 and 194: Appendix 11 Diglyphus isaea Digline
show all

Classical and augmentative biological control against ... - IOBC-WPRS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?