Classical and augmentative biological control against ... - IOBC-WPRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Giorgini (Appendix for Chapter 2) Anagnou et al., 2003 Ifoulis & Savopoulou- Soultani, 2003 subsp. kurstaki subsp. aizawai L. botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae L. botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Roditakis, 2003 L. botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Samoilov, 2003 Sparganothis pilleriana (grape leafroller) Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Bakr, 2004 subsp. kurstaki Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Besnard et al., 2004 subsp. aizawai Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Hera et al., 2004 subsp. kurstaki Hyphantria cunea Lepidoptera: (fall webworm) Arctiidae Laccone et al., 2004 subsp. kurstaki Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Mazzocchetti et al., 2004 Moiraghi et al., 2004 Lobesia botrana L. botrana E. ambiguella Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Delbac et al., 2006 Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Marchesini et al., 2006 subsp. aizawai Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: subsp. kurstaki Tortricidae Laccone, 2007 Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Mescalchin, 2007 Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Mitrea et al., subsp. kurstaki Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: 2007 Tortricidae Lab + Several products incorporated into an artificial diet resulted in >90% larval mortality. The same formulations did not significantly affect the survival of Nephus includens. Greece Field + Two formulations of Bt are significantly more effective than the control, the dusting being more effective in most cultivars and the spraying in a few cultivars. Greece Field Pest control strategy involves B.t. application, mating disruption, botanical insecticides and minimal use of insecticides Odessa, Ukraine Field + Egypt Field + The addition of sugar as a feeding stimulant to a 50% reduced rate of Dipel-2X resulted in higher control rates (80%) compared to using the recommended field rates of Dipel-2X alone or Actellic [pirimiphos-methyl]. France Field + Xen Tari commercial product. Romania Field + Dipel 2x WP at 0.075% also showed good protection. The synergenism of mixtures (50:50) of chemical and biological insecticides was effective in controlling the pest. Calabria, Italy Field + Bt gave satisfactory control if applied at the onset of ovideposition and provided the canopy was managed in such a way as to expose the berries. Abruzzo, Italy Field Mating disruption was compared with the traditional methods generally used in the area: chemicals (phosphorganic molecules) and B. thuringiensis. Italy Field - In four years, trials were carried out using several commercial products (9 insecticides and Bt). The best control was obtained using insecticides. Control was lower for azadirachtin and less constant for etofenprox and B. thuringiensis. France Field + L. botrana was well-controlled by the use of B.t. or IGR’s, without mating disruption justification Veneto, Italy Field + Bta compared to Btk and chemicals. Molise and Calabria, Italy Field High efficacy of B.t. aizawai. Pest control with indoxacarb, spinosad and B. thuringiensis applied against the 2nd generation of insects parasitizing fruit is also outlined Trentino, Italy Field + 5-years study (2000-2005). Formulations based Bt can be used for controlling tortricids such as L. botrana. Romania Field + Chemical insecticides followed by Btk to control the second or the third generation. Efficiency of the control treatments ranged between 89.4% and 91.4%. 148
Appendix 8 Morandi-Filho et al., 2007 Pryke & Samways, 2007 Ruiz-de-Escudero et al., 2007 subsp. kurstaki Argyrotaenia sphaleropa (South American tortricid moth) Epichoristodes acerbella (South African carnation tortrix) Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Subic, 2007 subsp. kurstaki Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: Tortricidae Dongiovanni et al., subsp. kurstaki Lobesia botrana Lepidoptera: 2008 Tortricidae Brazil Lab Field + + Lab: reducition of the insect population by more than 90%. Field: reduced damage between 83.3 and 94.4%. The control efficacy of B.t was equal to that of chemicals. South Africa Field + DiPelReg commercial formulation Lab + The potential of Bt Cry proteins to control L. botrana was explored. Either Cry1Ia or Cry9C could be used in combination with Cry1Ab to control this pest, either as the active components of Bt sprays or expressed together in transgenic plants. Croatia Field + Over 90% control was achieved. Puglia, Italy Field + References Abd-Rabou S. 2005. The effect of augmentative releases of indigenous parasitoid, Anagyrus kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on populations of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Egypt. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 38: 129-132. Al Jboory I.J., Ismail I.A. & Al Dahwe S.S. 2006. Evaluation of two isolates of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. against some insects and mites and testing the efficiency of some culture media. University of Aden, Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 10(1): 23-29. Anagnou M., Kontodimas V. & Kontodimas D.C. 2003. Laboratory tests of the effect of Bacillus thuringiensis on grape berry moth Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and on the pseudococcids' predator Nephus includens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Bulletin OILB/SROP 26(8): 117-119. Bagnoli B. & Lucchi A. 2001. Bionomics of Cryptoblabes gnidiella (Milliere) (Pyralidae Phycitinae) in Tuscan vineyards. Bulletin OILB/SROP 24(7): 79-83. Bakr H.A. 2004. A feeding stimulant for improving the efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki in larval control of the grape moth, Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 14(2): 411-413. Basso C., Grille G., Pompanon F., Allemand R. & Pintureau B. 1998. Comparison of biological and ethological characters of Trichogramma pretiosum and T. exiguum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Revista Chilena de Entomologia 25: 45-53. Basso C., Grille G. & Pintureau B. 1999. Efficiency of Trichogramma exiguum Pinto & Platner and T. pretiosum Riley to control Argyrotaenia sphaleropa (Meyrick) and Bonagota cranaodes (Meyrick) in Uruguayan vineyard. Agrociencia Montevideo 3(1): 20-26 Begum M., Gurr G.M., Wratten S.D., Hedberg P.R. & Nicol H.I. 2006. Using selective food plants to maximize biological control of vineyard pests. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 547-554. Besnard Y. & Boudet M. 2004. Bacillus thuringiensis sp. aizawai? Insecticide against grape berry moths and noctuids. Phytoma 575: 46-47. Berner M. & Schnetter W. 2002. Field trials with the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora against white grubs of the European cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) in the southern part of Germany. Bulletin OILB/SROP 25(7): 29-34. Boller E.F., Remund U. & Candolfi,-M.P. 1988. Hedges as potential sources of Typhlodromus pyri, the most important predatory mite in vineyards of northern Switzerland. Entomophaga 33: 240-255. Boselli M.& Scannavini M. 2001. Control of grape moth in Emilia-Romagna. Informatore Agrario 57(19): 97-100. Boselli M., Scannavini M. & Melandri M. 2000. Comparison of control strategies against the grape moth. Informatore Agrario 56(19): 61-65. Camporese P. & Duso C. 1996. Different colonization patterns of phytophagous and predatory mites (Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae) on three grape varieties: a case study. Experimental and Applied Acarology 20: 1-22. Caroli L. & Boselli M. 1998. Evaluation of efficacy of a new Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai based product against the grape moth, Lobesia botrana. Atti Giornate fitopatologiche, Scicli e Ragusa,3-7 maggio,1998: 293-296. 149
Page 1 and 2:
IOBC OILB WPRS SROP In te rn atio n
Page 3 and 4:
Preface One of the Research Activit
Page 5 and 6:
LORITO Matteo UNINA, Dip. Arboricol
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables (continued) Table 17
Page 9 and 10:
Contents Chapter 1 Potential of bio
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 Potential of biological c
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 To allow for the analysis
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1 Table 4: Microbial specie
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1 Table 4 (continued) T. lo
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1 Table 4 (continued) Cupri
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 other was aiming at ident
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 2 Table 5: References extra
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2 Table 6: Biocontrol agent
Page 27 and 28:
Table 7 (continued) Chapter 2 Hemip
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2 Bacillus thuringiensis: 2
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 3 - financial; since the de
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 3 Pathogens and Nematodes a
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 3 [Remark: Estimating the s
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3 100% 80% 60% P = Phytopha
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3 0,25 4 0,20 % dedicated t
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3 Table 9: Recent introduct
Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3 Table 9: Recent introduct
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 4 The survey was limited to
Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 4 Table 11 (continued) Othe
Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 4 SCLPs are included in ann
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 4 laminarin is available on
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 5 (EC) No 1109/2009. Tests
Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 6 Identified difficulties a
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 6 Table 12: Evidence for, a
Page 59 and 60:
Table 13: Trichoderma-based prepara
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 6 Many preparations have be
Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 6 Persistence, physiologica
Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 6 Harman, G. E. (2006) Over
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 6 Sharon, E., Bar-Eyal, M.,
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 7 purification, formulation
Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 7 Business profitability Co
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 8 A survey was carried out
Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 8 80 70 60 %of supply %of a
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 8 efficacy and the price of
Page 79 and 80:
Conclusions and perspectives reduct
Page 81 and 82:
Appendices For Chapter 1 Appendix 1
Page 83 and 84:
Appendix 1 B O Milsana + Brevibacil
Page 85 and 86:
Appendix 1 Strawberry (target patho
Page 87 and 88:
Appendix 1 Fruits - postharvest (ap
Page 89 and 90:
Appendix 1 Legumes (Fabaceae) (targ
Page 91 and 92:
Appendix 1 Miscellaneous crops (tar
Page 93 and 94:
Appendix 1 Lecanicillium muscarium
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix 1 Bedini, S., Bagnoli, G.,
Page 97 and 98:
Appendix 1 Dik, A., and Wubben, J.
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix 1 Gerlagh, M., Amsing, J.
Page 101 and 102:
Appendix 1 Jing, W., Tu, K., Shao,
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix 1 Li, G. Q., Huang, H. C.,
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix 1 Morandi, M. A. B., Maffi
Page 107 and 108: Appendix 1 Rabea, E. I., Badawy, M.
Page 109 and 110: Appendix 1 Sutton, J. C., Liu, W.,
Page 111 and 112: Appendix 1 Zahavi, T., Cohen, L., W
Page 113 and 114: Appendix 2 Powdery mildew on grapes
Page 115 and 116: Appendix 2 Powdery mildew on cucurb
Page 117 and 118: Appendix 2 Askary, H. (1998). Patho
Page 119 and 120: Appendix 2 Malathrakis, N. E. (2002
Page 121 and 122: Appendix 3. Inventory of biocontrol
Page 123 and 124: Appendix 3 References on biocontrol
Page 125 and 126: Appendix 4. Inventory of biocontrol
Page 127 and 128: Appendix 4 Grapes (target pathogen
Page 129 and 130: Appendix 4 References on biocontrol
Page 131 and 132: Appendix 4 Robak, J., and Ostrowska
Page 133 and 134: Appendix 5 Cherry (target pathogens
Page 135 and 136: Appendix 5 Successful inhibition in
Page 137 and 138: Appendix 5 Smilanick, J. L., Denis-
Page 139 and 140: Appendix 6 showed protein content o
Page 141 and 142: Appendix 6 El-Khallal, S. M. (2007)
Page 143 and 144: Appendix 6 Liu, Q., J. C. Yu, et al
Page 145 and 146: Appendix 6 of tomato wilt pathogen
Page 147 and 148: Appendix 6 incognita, respectively.
Page 149 and 150: Appendix 7. Number of references re
Page 151 and 152: Appendix 8. Collection of data on a
Page 153 and 154: Appendix 8 Camporese & Duso, 1996 T
Page 155 and 156: Appendix 8 8.5 Fungi [5 species] Re
Page 157: Appendix 8 Berner & Schnetter, 2002
Page 161 and 162: Appendix 8 Marshall D.B. & Lester P
Page 163 and 164: Appendix 9 9.2. Details on the use
Page 165 and 166: Appendix 9 References 1. Abd-Rabou
Page 167 and 168: Appendix 9 50. Gariepy TD, Kuhlmann
Page 169 and 170: Appendix 9 97. Langewald J, Neuensc
Page 171 and 172: Appendix 9 146. Roltsch WJ, Meyerdi
Page 173 and 174: Appendix 10. Substances included in
Page 175 and 176: Appendix 10 Chemical Dimoxystrobin
Page 177 and 178: Appendix 10 Chemical Prosulfocarb '
Page 179 and 180: Appendix 10 Natural other Abamectin
Page 181 and 182: Appendix 11. Invertebrate beneficia
Page 183 and 184: Appendix 11 11.2. Invertebrate bioc
Page 185 and 186: Appendix 11 Coccinella septempuncta
Page 187 and 188: Appendix 11 Trichogramma brassicae
Page 193 and 194: Appendix 11 Diglyphus isaea Digline
show all

Classical and augmentative biological control against ... - IOBC-WPRS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?