04.03.2014 Views

Abstracts of Oral Presentations Exhibitor & Sponsor Guide Schedule ...

Abstracts of Oral Presentations Exhibitor & Sponsor Guide Schedule ...

Abstracts of Oral Presentations Exhibitor & Sponsor Guide Schedule ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Ozone Association<br />

International Ultraviolet Association<br />

May 3-6, 2009<br />

Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Massachusetts<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Oral</strong> <strong>Presentations</strong><br />

<strong>Exhibitor</strong> & <strong>Sponsor</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

<strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>of</strong> Events<br />

Thanks to our Primary <strong>Sponsor</strong> :


International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />

Conference <strong>Schedule</strong> at a Glance<br />

Boston - 2009<br />

Primary Conference <strong>Sponsor</strong>: ITT Water & Wastewater<br />

Saturday, May 2 nd , 2009<br />

NOON - 5 PM<br />

IOA & IUVA Committee Meetings<br />

NOON - 5 PM<br />

IUVA & IOA PAG Task Force Meetings<br />

Sunday, May 3 rd , 2009<br />

7:30 AM - 4:30 PM<br />

Ozone & UV Technology Workshops<br />

**see order forms for these standalone events**<br />

<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed and Organized By: AECOM<br />

www.io3a.org/boston2009/ozone_workshop.pdf<br />

www.io3a.org/boston2009/uv_workshop.pdf<br />

9 AM - NOON<br />

IOA PAG Board Meeting<br />

1:30 PM - 4:30 PM<br />

IUVA Board Meeting<br />

7 PM - 9 PM<br />

WELCOME ATTENDEES - 2009 Opening Reception<br />

<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: CDM<br />

Monday, May 4 th , 2009<br />

8:15 AM - 9:30 AM<br />

General Opening Session<br />

9:30 AM - 10:15 AM<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

10:15 AM - 11:55 AM<br />

Session 1 - UV Validation<br />

Session 2 - UV Regulatory<br />

Session 3 - Ozone Design and Operation<br />

NOON - 1:15 PM<br />

Conference Luncheon<br />

<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Ozonia North America<br />

1:15 PM - 2:55 PM<br />

Session 4 - UV Case Studies<br />

Session 5 - Ozone Case Studies<br />

Session 6 - Ozone Design and Operation<br />

2:55 PM - 3:40 PM<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

3:40 PM - 5:20 PM<br />

Session 7 - UV Case Studies<br />

Session 8 - Ozone Case Studies<br />

Session 9 - Ozone Design and Operation<br />

5:30 PM - 7:30 PM<br />

SPRING FLING RECEPTION<br />

Please join us for refreshments & hors d'oeuvres<br />

as we celebrate springtime in Boston with our<br />

technical program speakers and exhibitors.<br />

<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Black & Veatch<br />

and Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />

Tuesday, May 5 th , 2009<br />

8:15 AM - 9:30 AM<br />

Session 10 - UV Disinfection Design<br />

Session 11 - Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants<br />

Session 12 - Perozone and AOP processes<br />

9:30 AM - 10:15 AM<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

10:15 AM - 11:55 AM<br />

Session 13 - UV Disinfection Research<br />

Session 14 - Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants<br />

Session 15 - Perozone and AOP processes<br />

NOON - 1:15 PM<br />

Conference Luncheon<br />

<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Fuji Electric<br />

1:15 PM - 2:55 PM<br />

Session 16 - UV Disinfection Research<br />

Session 17 - AOP and Ozone Byproducts<br />

Session 18 - Modeling UV Systems<br />

2:55 PM - 3:40 PM<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

3:40 PM - 5:20 PM<br />

Session 19 - UV Disinfection Research<br />

Session 20 - AOP and Ozone Byproducts<br />

Session 21 - Modeling UV Systems<br />

Wednesday, May 6 th , 2009<br />

8:00 AM - 4 PM<br />

Ozone Technical Tour (includes transport & lunch)<br />

- Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility<br />

at Cambridge Water Department<br />

- MWRA John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />

- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f by 3 PM at Logan Int’l Airport<br />

before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />

<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Fuji Electric<br />

UV Technical Tour (includes transport & lunch)<br />

- Brockton, MA Advanced Waste Water Treatment Plant<br />

- Pawtucket, RI Water Treatment Plant<br />

- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f by 3 PM at Logan Int’l Airport<br />

before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />

Ozone Operations Workshop<br />

- MWRA John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />

(includes transport & lunch)<br />

- REGISTRATION DESK HOURS -<br />

SUNDAY<br />

7:30 AM - 8:30 AM<br />

(Sunday Workshops Only!)<br />

NOON - 7 PM<br />

(Conference Registration<br />

Begins)<br />

MONDAY<br />

7:30 AM - 12:15 PM<br />

1:15 PM - 5 PM<br />

TUESDAY<br />

7:30 AM - 12:15 PM<br />

2


International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />

Upcoming Events<br />

2009/2010<br />

Singapore<br />

IUVA 1-Day Workshop<br />

June 22, 2009<br />

Suntec Singapore International<br />

Convention & Exhibition Centre<br />

http://docs.iuva.org/IUVA_SIWW_22_June.pdf<br />

Tokyo<br />

IOA 19 th World Congress<br />

August 31 - September 3, 2009<br />

Tower Hall Funabori<br />

Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan<br />

http://www.j-ozone.org/info/info001.html<br />

Amsterdam<br />

IUVA 5 th World Congress<br />

September 20-23, 2009<br />

NH Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky<br />

Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

http://docs.iuva.org/Registration_Amsterdam_2009.pdf<br />

Seattle / Bellevue<br />

IOA Annual Conference<br />

September, 20-22 2010<br />

Hyatt Regency Bellevue<br />

Washington, USA<br />

MORE INFORMATION - COMING SOON<br />

3


WELCOME MESSAGE & ORGANIZING COMMITTEE<br />

Dear Conference Participant,<br />

We welcome you to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge in Massachusetts, USA on behalf <strong>of</strong> the<br />

International Ozone Association – Pan American Group and the International Ultraviolet Association.<br />

We are pleased to have you join us for our 2009 North American Conference which features both UV<br />

and Ozone Basics Workshops, an Ozone Operations Workshop and both Ozone and UV Technical<br />

Tours that provide an inside look at some <strong>of</strong> New England’s most cutting edge Drinking Water and<br />

Wastewater Treatment Plants.<br />

UV and Ozone directly improve our quality <strong>of</strong> life. The strong technical contributions <strong>of</strong> this year’s<br />

speakers will make that abundantly clear. We proudly present this diverse and comprehensive look<br />

at each technology’s benefits, both stand-alone and when used in combination, and thank our<br />

talented speakers for their time and effort.<br />

We especially wish to acknowledge the work <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Mohamed Gamal El-Din, Ph.D., P.Eng., and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Karl Linden, Ph.D., who coordinated all <strong>of</strong> the sessions as well as organized and edited all<br />

<strong>of</strong> the abstracts and papers for this unique technical program. Many thanks to our hosts, the<br />

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA), for producing this year’s CD <strong>of</strong> conference<br />

proceedings and inviting us into their facilities. Thanks also to our Primary Conference <strong>Sponsor</strong>, ITT<br />

Water & Wastewater. We greatly appreciate the support <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> our generous exhibitors and<br />

sponsors, who make this annual event possible.<br />

Welcome and enjoy!<br />

Linda Gowman, Ph.D., P.Eng.<br />

IUVA President<br />

Jeff Neemann<br />

IOA PAG Chair<br />

Technical Program Committee<br />

- Mohamed Gamal El-Din, Ph.D., P.Eng., University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Co-Chair (IOA)<br />

- Karl Linden, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Colorado at Boulder, Co-Chair (IUVA)<br />

- Jim Bolton, Ph.D., Bolton Photosciences<br />

- Pamela Chelme-Ayala, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

- Theping Chen, AECOM<br />

- Jim Constantacos, Constant America<br />

- Larry Forney, Ph.D., Georgia Tech<br />

- Ronald Gehr, Ph.D., McGill University<br />

- Dennis Greene, Ph.D., AECOM Water<br />

- Mirat Gurol, Ph.D., San Diego State University<br />

- Dr. Ron H<strong>of</strong>mann, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Toronto<br />

- Paul Overbeck, IOA & IUVA<br />

- Erik Rosenfeldt, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-Amherst<br />

- Mike Santelli, Light Sources, Inc.<br />

- Diana Schoenberg, IOA & IUVA<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

4


TECHNICAL PROGRAM<br />

ORAL PRESENTATIONS<br />

Monday May 04 th 2009<br />

General Opening Session – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Charles View Ballroom (16 th Floor)<br />

Start<br />

End<br />

8:15 9:30 Welcome and Guest Speakers<br />

9:30 – 10:15 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

Session 1 – UV Validation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

10:15 10:40 A Uniform Protocol for Wastewater<br />

UV Validation Applications - IUVA<br />

Manufacturers Council Position<br />

Oliver Lawal 1 , Paul Ropic 1 ,<br />

Elliott Whitby 2 , Stan Shmia 3 ,<br />

and Bertrand Dussert 4<br />

10:40 11:05 Overcoming Validation Report Complexity Phyllis Posy 1 , Karl Scheible 2 ,<br />

and Chengyue Shen 2<br />

11:05 11:30 Validation <strong>of</strong> UV Reactors for Water<br />

and Wastewater Applications:<br />

What is the State-<strong>of</strong>-the-Art<br />

11:30 11:55 Standardized Lagrangian Actinometry<br />

Protocol for UV Reactor Validation<br />

O. Karl Scheible and<br />

Chengyue Shen<br />

Chengyue Shen 1 , Ernest R.<br />

Blatchley III 2 , Eric Cox 2 ,<br />

and O. Karl Scheible 1<br />

1 ITT-WEDECO. 2 Calgon Carbon Corp.<br />

3<br />

Severn Trent Water Purification.<br />

4<br />

Siemens Water Technologies.<br />

1<br />

Atlantium Technologies. 2 UV Validation<br />

Center, HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.<br />

HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.<br />

1<br />

HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ.<br />

2<br />

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.<br />

Session 2 – UV Regulatory – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

10:15 10:40 Commissioning and Obtaining Regulatory<br />

Approval for Drinking Water UV<br />

Disinfection Systems<br />

10:40 11:05 Biodosimetry <strong>of</strong> a Full-Scale UV<br />

Disinfection System to Achieve<br />

Regulatory Approval for Drinking<br />

Water Disinfection<br />

11:05 11:30 Integrating UVDGM Operational<br />

Requirements in Small System<br />

Regulatory Compliance:<br />

The People Perspective<br />

11:30 11:55 Achieving UV Disinfection Credit<br />

for Pre-UVDGM Era UV Facilities:<br />

Experiences <strong>of</strong> Two UV Facilities<br />

David Gaithuma, Harold Wright,<br />

and Mark Heath<br />

Bruno Ferran, Robert Kelly,<br />

and Wei Yang<br />

Phyllis Posy 1 , Ytzhak Rozenberg 2 ,<br />

and Peter Bugg 3<br />

Christine Cotton, P.E.,<br />

and James Collins<br />

Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer<br />

Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.<br />

Infilco Degremont, Inc., Degremont North<br />

American Research & Development Center<br />

510 East Jackson Street, Richmond,<br />

VA, 23219.<br />

1<br />

Atlantium Technologies.<br />

2<br />

R&D, Atlantium Technologies.<br />

3<br />

EWT.<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., S. Church Ave,<br />

Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Session 3 – Ozone Design and Operation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

10:15 10:40 Ozone Measurement and Control in<br />

Drinking Water Treatment Plants<br />

10:40 11:05 The Potential Use <strong>of</strong> Ozone<br />

in Municipal Waste Water<br />

11:05 11:30 Control <strong>of</strong> Iron and Manganese<br />

Ozone Removal by Differential<br />

Turbidity Measurements<br />

11:30 11:55 Optimizing an Intermediate Ozone<br />

System used for Primary Disinfection at a<br />

55 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant<br />

Andrew Wright, Ph.D.,<br />

and Victor Dosoretz<br />

A. Ried, J. Mielcke,<br />

and A. Wieland<br />

Vadim Malkov, Mike Sadar,<br />

Jon Schiller, and Eric Lehman<br />

Russ Navratil 1 , Chip England 1 ,<br />

and Glenn Hunter 2<br />

IN USA Inc., 100 Morse St., Norwood,<br />

MA, 02062.<br />

ITT W&WW WEDECO, Boschstr. 4-14,<br />

32051 Herford, Germany.<br />

Hach Company, 5600 Lindbergh Dr.<br />

Loveland, CO 80538, USA.<br />

1<br />

Henrico County, VA.<br />

2<br />

Process Applications Inc.<br />

11:55 – 13:15 Luncheon<br />

Session 4 – UV Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

13:15 13:40 UV System Technology Evaluation<br />

Using UV Cost Analysis Tool for<br />

Metro Vancouver’s Coquitlam UV<br />

Disinfection Project<br />

13:40 14:05 Brockton, Massachusetts Commissions<br />

a 60-mgd (227-ML/d) UV Wastewater<br />

Disinfection System<br />

14:05 14:30 Site Specific Testing <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection<br />

at a Trickling Filter Plant<br />

14:30 14:55 Ultraviolet Light Disinfection System<br />

Conceptual Design for the Massachusetts<br />

Water Resources Authority John J. Carroll<br />

Water Treatment Plant<br />

Ayman Shawwa, P.E., Ph.D.,<br />

BCEE 1 , Chris Schulz, P.E.,<br />

BCEE 2 , Inder Singh, M.A.Sc.<br />

P.Eng. 3 , and James Kim, P.E. 1<br />

William C. McConnell, P.E. 1 ,<br />

and David A. Norton 2<br />

Gary Hunter, P.E. 1 ,<br />

Anjana Kadava 1 , Jane Hood 2 ,<br />

and Don Gilpin 2<br />

Albert J. Capuzzi 1 ,<br />

Brian Loux 1 , Paul Swaim 1 ,<br />

and James P. Malley 2<br />

1 CDM, Walnut Creek, CA.<br />

2<br />

CDM, Denver, CO.<br />

3<br />

Metro Vancouver, BC, Canada.<br />

1<br />

CDM, 56 Exchange Terrace, Providence, RI<br />

02903. 2 City <strong>of</strong> Brockton, MA, 303 Oak Hill<br />

Way, Brockton, MA 02301.<br />

1<br />

Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas<br />

City, MO 64114. 2 City <strong>of</strong> St. Joseph, MO.<br />

1<br />

CH2M HILL. 2 University <strong>of</strong> New Hampshire.<br />

Session 5 – Ozone Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

13:15 13:40 Multi-function Sidestream<br />

Ozone Treatment at a Drinking<br />

Water Treatment Plant<br />

13:40 14:05 Rising Energy Costs and Frozen<br />

Budgets: Getting More from Our<br />

Operating Buck<br />

14:05 14:30 Key Water Quality Parameters<br />

that Determine Ozone Dose for<br />

Massachusetts Water<br />

Resources Authority<br />

14:30 14:55 Treatment <strong>of</strong> Wastewater with Ozone<br />

at the Southwest Wastewater<br />

Treatment Plant<br />

Maxime Beaulieu 1 ,<br />

Patrick Niquette 1 ,<br />

Pierre Cullen 2 ,<br />

and Denis Allard 2<br />

David W. Coppes<br />

Windsor Sung, Ph.D., P.E.<br />

Nick Burns 1 , Jeff Neemann 1 ,<br />

Tom Holst 2 , and Jim Burks 2<br />

1 Dessau Inc., Water, Industry and Waste<br />

Management, 1080, Côte du Beaver Hall,<br />

Suite 300, Quebec, Canada, H2Z 1S8.<br />

2<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Laval, Department <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

city management, Laval (Quebec), Canada,<br />

H7V 1A0.<br />

Western Operations, Massachusetts Water<br />

Resources Authority, 266 Boston Road,<br />

Southborough, MA 01772.<br />

MWRA, 260 Boston Road, Southborough,<br />

MA 01772.<br />

1<br />

Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas<br />

City, MO 64114. 2 Springfield Utilities,<br />

3301 S. FF Hwy, Springfield, MO 65807.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

6


Session 6 – Ozone Design and Operation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

13:15 13:40 Optimization Considerations for an<br />

Ozone Side Stream Injection System<br />

13:40 14:05 Evaluating Options for Retr<strong>of</strong>itting a Large<br />

Scale Ozonation System in Texas<br />

Bill Mundy, C.E.T. 1 ,<br />

Kerwin Rakness 2 ,<br />

and Glenn Hunter 2<br />

Jeff Neemann 1 , David<br />

Timmerman 1 , Robert Hulsey 1 ,<br />

Buford Green 2 , and Steve Long 2<br />

14:05 14:30 Keeping Ozone Generators Dry and Cool Kerwin L. Rakness 1<br />

and James Muri 2<br />

14:30 14:55 Application <strong>of</strong> Ozone for Contaminant<br />

Oxidation in Wastewater<br />

Eric C. Wert, Fernando Rosario-<br />

Ortiz, and Shane Snyder<br />

1 Regional Municipality Of Halton,<br />

1151 Bronte Road, Oakville, ON, Canada,<br />

L6M 3L1. 2 Process Applications Inc.,<br />

Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80526.<br />

1<br />

Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO. 2 North<br />

Texas Municipal Water District, Wylie, TX.<br />

1<br />

Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing<br />

Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, CO 80526.<br />

2<br />

John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant, 84<br />

D’Angelo Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752.<br />

Southern Nevada Water Authority,<br />

P.O. Box 99955, Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />

14:55 – 15:40 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

Session 7 – UV Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

15:40 16:05 Approach for Achieving Sustainable<br />

Operation <strong>of</strong> the 2-bgd Catskill/Delaware<br />

UV disinfection Facility<br />

16:05 16:30 Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet Disinfection<br />

<strong>of</strong> A WWTP Final (Blended) Effluent<br />

under Wet Weather Flow Conditions<br />

16:30 16:55 Bidding, Testing, and Start-Up <strong>of</strong> a Reuse<br />

UV Disinfection System in Florida<br />

16:55 17:20 Validation <strong>of</strong> the Catskill/Delaware UV<br />

Reactor: A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry<br />

and Lagrangian Actinometry Methods<br />

Matthew T. Valade, P.E. 1 ,<br />

Steven Farabaugh 2 ,<br />

Paul D. Smith, P.E. 3 ,<br />

and Gary Kroll, P.E. 4<br />

Khalil Z. Atasi, Ph.D.,<br />

P.E., BCEE, F.ASCE<br />

Josefin M. Edeback, E.I.<br />

and Melanie A. Mann, P.E.<br />

Chengyue Shen 1 and Karl<br />

Scheible 1 , Matthew Valade 2 ,<br />

and Ernest R. Blatchley 3<br />

1 Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 24 Federal Street,<br />

Suite 302, Boston, MA 02129. 2 Hazen and<br />

Sawyer, P.C., 498 Seventh Avenue, 11 th<br />

Floor, New York, NY 10018. 3 NYC Dept. <strong>of</strong><br />

Env. Protection, 96-05 Horace Harding Expy,<br />

Corona, NY 11368. 4 CDM, Raritan Plaza 1,<br />

Raritan Center, Edison, NJ 08817.<br />

Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., 2301 Maitland<br />

Center Parkway, Suite 300, Maitland,<br />

FL 32751.<br />

Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 10002 Princess<br />

Palm Avenue, Tampa, FL 33619.<br />

1<br />

HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ. 2 Hazen and<br />

Sawyer, P.C., Boston, MA. 3 Purdue<br />

University, West Lafayette, IN.<br />

Session 8 – Ozone Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

15:40 16:05 Updating Ozone for the<br />

Lincoln Water System<br />

16:05 16:30 Eastern Treatment Plant<br />

- Melbourne Water’s Approach to<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the World’s Most Complex<br />

Wastewater Technology Trials<br />

16:30 16:55 Operations Experience and<br />

Enhancements to the Two-stage<br />

Ozone System for the Cary/Apex, NC<br />

Water Treatment Plant<br />

16:55 17:20 Treated Water Quality<br />

Enhancements from Ozonation<br />

in a Tertiary Plant Upgrade<br />

Jeff Neemann 1 , Nick Burns 1 ,<br />

Robert Hulsey 1 , Andrew Hansen 1 ,<br />

Eric Lee 2 , and John Miriovsky 2<br />

Mark Lynch 1 , John Mieog 1 ,<br />

Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />

Sock-Hoon Koh 2 ,<br />

and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />

Bill Dowbiggin and Kelvin Creech<br />

John Mieog 1 , Mark Lynch 1 ,<br />

Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />

Sock-Hoon Koh 2 ,<br />

and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />

1 Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO.<br />

2<br />

Lincoln Water System, Lincoln, NE.<br />

1<br />

Melbourne Water Corporation;<br />

Melbourne, Australia. 2 Black & Veatch,<br />

Kansas City, MO. 3 Kellogg Brown & Root<br />

Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.<br />

1<br />

CDM.<br />

2<br />

Town <strong>of</strong> Cary.<br />

1<br />

Melbourne Water Corporation;<br />

Melbourne, Australia. 2 Black & Veatch,<br />

Kansas City, MO. 3 Kellogg Brown & Root<br />

Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.<br />

7<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Session 9 – Ozone Design and Operation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

15:40 16:05 Inline Multi-Jets Ozone Contactors:<br />

Performance and Scalability<br />

16:05 16:30 Operator-Friendly Technique and<br />

Quality Control Considerations for<br />

Indigo Colorimetric Measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ozone Residual<br />

16:30 16:55 Highly Efficient High Concentration<br />

Photochemical Ozone Generation<br />

16:55 17:20 The Study on the Ceramic Membrane<br />

Wastewater Reuse System with<br />

Pre Ozonation and Coagulation<br />

Mahad S. Baawain 1 ,<br />

Mohamed Gamal El-Din 2 ,<br />

Daniel W. Smith 2 ,<br />

and Angelo Mazzei 3<br />

Kerwin L. Rakness 1 ,<br />

Eric C. Wert 2 , Michael Elovitz 3 ,<br />

and Suzanne Mahoney 4<br />

Daniel E. Murnick<br />

M. Noguchi 1 , M. Aoki 1 ,<br />

H. Kozono 1 ,<br />

H. Kouchiwa 2 ,<br />

and Y.Yoda 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Civil & Architectural<br />

Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University,<br />

Muscat, Oman. 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Civil &<br />

Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3 Mazzei<br />

Injector Corporation, Bakersfield, CA.<br />

1<br />

Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing<br />

Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, CO 80526.<br />

2<br />

Southern Nevada Water System, Las Vegas,<br />

NV 89193. 3 Treatment Technology and<br />

Evaluation Branch, Water Supply & Water<br />

Res. Division, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH<br />

45268. 4 Little Falls Water Treatment Plant,<br />

Passaic Valley Water Commission, 800<br />

Union Boulevard, Totowa, NJ 07512.<br />

UV Solutions Inc. and Rutgers University,<br />

Newark NJ 07102.<br />

1<br />

Metawater Co., LTD., Shiroyama Trust<br />

Tower. 4-3-1 Toranomon, Minato-ku,<br />

Tokyo 105-6029, Japan. 2 Tokyo Metropolitan<br />

Government, 2-8-1 Nishishinjuku,<br />

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-8001, Japan.<br />

Tuesday May 05 th 2009<br />

Session 10 – UV Disinfection Design – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

8:15 8:40 Disinfection Alternatives and Sustainability:<br />

Energy Optimization, Disinfection Efficiency,<br />

and Sustainability<br />

8:40 9:05 Airing it Out: Design Considerations<br />

for UV Disinfection Installations<br />

9:05 9:30 Impact <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry-Based Validation<br />

on UV System Design Specifications<br />

Gary Hunter 1 , Andy Shaw 1 ,<br />

Dr. Leonard W. Casson 2 ,<br />

and Dr. Joe Marriott 2<br />

Aaron W. Duke, P.E.<br />

Bryan R. Townsend 1<br />

and Gary Hunter 2<br />

1 Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas<br />

City, MO 64114.<br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />

Engineering, 944 Benedum Engineering Hall,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.<br />

11242 Waples Mill Road, Suite 250, Fairfax,<br />

VA 22030.<br />

1<br />

Black & Veatch, 8520 Cliff Cameron Drive,<br />

Suite 210, Charlotte, NC 28269.<br />

2<br />

Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway,<br />

Kansas City, MO 64114.<br />

Session 11 – Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

8:15 8:40 A Bench-Scale Evaluation <strong>of</strong> UV and<br />

UV/H 2 O 2 Processes for the Removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> PPCPs in Secondary Treated Water<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sewage Treatment Plant<br />

8:40 9:05 The Effects <strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV Radiation<br />

on Natural Organic Matter<br />

9:05 9:30 Predicting Hydroxyl Radical Activity<br />

and Trace Contaminants Removal<br />

in Ozonated Water<br />

Ilho Kim, Naoyuki Yamashita,<br />

and Hiroaki Tanaka<br />

Gustavo E. Imoberdorf<br />

and Madjid Mohseni<br />

Simon Vincent, Abderrahim Kotbi<br />

and Benoit Barbeau<br />

Research Center for Environmental Quality<br />

Management, Kyoto University, 1-2<br />

Yumihama, Otsu, Shiga 520-0811, Japan.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological<br />

Engineering, The University <strong>of</strong> British<br />

Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.<br />

Industrial-NSERC Chair in Drinking Water,<br />

École Polytechnique de Montréal,<br />

Département des Génies Civil, Géologique<br />

et des Mines, Montréal, QC, H3C 3A7.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

8


Session 12 – Perozone and AOP Processes –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

8:15 8:40 In-Situ 1,4 Dioxane Remediation<br />

in HVOC Sites<br />

8:40 9:05 Experiences <strong>of</strong> Perozone ® and<br />

C-Sparge TM at Two Former Dry<br />

Cleaner Sites in The Netherlands<br />

9:05 9:30 Non-Thermal Plasma - A Novel and Cost<br />

Effective Advanced Oxidation System<br />

Andrew Brolowski<br />

and William B. Kerfoot<br />

Bert Scheffer 1<br />

and Edward van de Ven 2<br />

Dvir Solnik 1 , Andreas Kolch 2 ,<br />

Andrew Salveson 3 , Nitin Goel 3 ,<br />

Nicola Fontaine 4 ,<br />

Justin Sutherland 5 ,<br />

and Chris Fennessy 6<br />

Kerfoot Technologies, Inc., 766-B Falmouth<br />

Road, Mashpee, MA 02649.<br />

1<br />

Verhoeve Milieu bv, Dorpsstraat 32, P.O. Box<br />

4, 6997 ZG Hoog-Keppel, The Netherlands.<br />

2<br />

Verhoeve Milieu bv, Aventurijn 600, P.O. Box<br />

3073, 3301 DB Dordrecht, The Netherlands.<br />

1<br />

Aquapure Technologies Limited, Israel.<br />

2<br />

Hytecon, Germany. 3 Carollo Engineers,<br />

Walnut Creek, CA. 4 Carollo Engineers,<br />

Walnut Creek, CA. 5 Carollo Engineers,<br />

Austin, TX. 6 Aerojet, Sacrament, CA.<br />

9:30 – 10:15 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

Session 13 – UV Disinfection Design – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

10:15 10:40 Use <strong>of</strong> Velocity Pr<strong>of</strong>iling to Assess<br />

to Effect <strong>of</strong> Piping Configuration<br />

on UV Dose Delivery<br />

10:40 11:05 Ultraviolet System Design Considerations<br />

for Uncovered Reservoir versus Water<br />

Treatment Plant Applications<br />

11:05 11:30 Costs and Sustainability Comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chemical Disinfection and Medium<br />

Pressure Ultraviolet Disinfection for<br />

Virus Inactivation<br />

11:30 11:55 A Smart Way to Validate UV<br />

Systems for Reuse Applications<br />

Dennis J. Greene 1 ,<br />

Keith Bircher 2 ,<br />

and Harold B. Wright 3<br />

Jack Bebee, P.E. 1<br />

and Christine Cotton, P.E. 2<br />

James Collins 1 ,<br />

Christine Cotton 1 ,<br />

and Phyllis Posy 2<br />

1 AECOM Water, 276 Abby Road,<br />

Manchester, NH 03103. 2 UV Technologies<br />

Div., Calgon Carbon Corporation, 50 Mural<br />

Street, Unit#3, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada<br />

L4B 1E4. 3 Carollo Engineers, 12592 West<br />

Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.<br />

1<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue,<br />

Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008. 2 Malcolm<br />

Pirnie, Inc., One South Church Avenue, Suite<br />

1120, Tucson, AZ 85701.<br />

1<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave,<br />

Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ. 2 Atlantium<br />

Technologies, Har Tuv Industrial Park,<br />

POB 11071, Israel 99100.<br />

Matthias Boeker 1 ,<br />

1 ITT Water & Wastewater U.S.A., 14125<br />

Andrew Salveson 2 ,<br />

Madhukar Rapaka 3 ,<br />

and Ronnie Bemus 1<br />

South Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273.<br />

2<br />

Carollo Engineers, 2700 Ygnacio Valley<br />

Road, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94598.<br />

3<br />

ITT Water & Wastewater Germany,<br />

Boschstrasse 4, 32051 Herford, Germany.<br />

Session 14 – Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

10:15 10:40 A Kinetic Model for the Degradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Natural Organic Matter during the<br />

Ultraviolet Hydrogen Peroxide<br />

Advanced Oxidation Process<br />

10:40 11:05 UV Photolysis <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceuticals and<br />

Personal Care Products (PPCPs) and<br />

Endocrine Disrupting Substances<br />

(EDS) in Drinking Water<br />

11:05 11:30 Advanced Oxidation Processes for<br />

Contaminant Destruction: Selecting<br />

between Ozone-Peroxide or UV-Peroxide<br />

11:30 11:55 Rapid Measurement <strong>of</strong> Background<br />

Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging in Water<br />

Sarathy, S.R., Bazri, M.,<br />

and Mohseni, M.<br />

Jules Carlson 1 , Mihaela Stefan 2 ,<br />

and Chris Metcalfe 1<br />

James Collins<br />

and Christine Cotton, P.E.<br />

Matthew Hross<br />

and Erik J. Rosenfeldt<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological<br />

Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia,<br />

2360 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3<br />

Canada.<br />

1<br />

Trent University, Peterborough,<br />

ON, Canada.<br />

2<br />

Trojan Technologies, London, ON, Canada.<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave,<br />

Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ.<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering.<br />

9<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Session 15 – Perozone and AOP Processes –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

10:15 10:40 Perozone Groundwater Sparging at the<br />

Days Inn Lake City Pre-Approval Site<br />

10:40 11:05 Characterization <strong>of</strong> Ozone<br />

Mass Transfer in Model Soils<br />

11:05 11:30 Ozone Oxidation for Source<br />

Removal And Prevention Barrier<br />

at a Fire Training Academy<br />

11:30 11:55 A Simplified Method for Modeling<br />

Chemical Intermediates in<br />

Advanced Oxidation Processes<br />

Edward M. Kellar<br />

and Chris Mickler, P.E.<br />

Alejandro García 1 , Tatyana<br />

Poznyak 2 , Jesús Rodríguez 2 ,<br />

and Isaac Chairez 3<br />

Scott C. Michaud<br />

and Thomas C. Cambareri, LSP<br />

Joseph A. Drago, P.E., Ph.D.<br />

MACTEC, Inc., Gainesville, FL 32669.<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Automatic Control,<br />

CINVESTAV-IPN, Av. Instituto Politécnico<br />

Nacional, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco,<br />

C.P.07360, Mexico D.F., Mexico. 2 Superior<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering National<br />

Polytechnic Institute <strong>of</strong> Mexico (ESIQIE-<br />

IPN), Edif 7, UPALM, C.P. 07738, Mexico<br />

D.F., Mexico. 3 Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Interdisciplinary<br />

Unit <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology <strong>of</strong> National Polytechnic<br />

Institute (UPIBI-IPN), Av. Acueducto s/n.,<br />

C.P. 07480, México, D.F, México.<br />

Cape Cod Commission, 3225 Main Street,<br />

PO Box 226, Barnstable, MA 02630.<br />

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants,<br />

San Francisco, CA.<br />

11:55 – 13:15 Luncheon<br />

Session 16 – UV Disinfection Research – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

13:15 13:40 Effect <strong>of</strong> Pre- and Post- UV Disinfection<br />

Conditions on Photoreactivation <strong>of</strong><br />

Fecal Coliforms from a Physicochemical<br />

Wastewater Effluent<br />

13:40 14:05 Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Disinfection Effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV (VUV) and UV Light on<br />

Bacillus subtilis Spores at 172, 222,<br />

254 nm<br />

14:05 14:30 E. coli Repair in UV Water<br />

Treatment Conditions<br />

Catherine Hallmich<br />

and Ronald Gehr<br />

Ding Wang, 1,2<br />

Thomas Oppenländer, 3<br />

Mohamed Gamal El-Din, 1<br />

and James R. Bolton 1<br />

Bohrerova, Z. and Linden, K.G.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering and Applied<br />

Mechanics, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke<br />

Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6.<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />

Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton,<br />

AB, T6G 2W2, Canada. 2 Current address,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Toronto, Galbraith Building, 35 St. George St.,<br />

Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1A4.<br />

3<br />

Hochschule Furtwangen University (HFU),<br />

Campus Villingen-Schwenningen, Fakultät<br />

Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik,<br />

Jakob-Kienzle-Str. 17, 78054<br />

Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

10


Session 17 – AOP and Ozone Byproducts – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

13:15 13:40 Novel UV LED Advanced Oxidation<br />

System for Disinfection and Removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Organic and Heavy Metal<br />

Contaminants in Water<br />

13:40 14:05 UV Advanced Oxidation Processes<br />

for Taste and Odor Treatment:<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Assimilable Organic Carbon<br />

Formation Potential at an Indiana WTP<br />

14:05 14:30 Toxicity Assessment and Identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> Oxidation Byproducts Generated<br />

During the Ozonation <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />

Water Containing Pesticide<br />

14:30 14:55 Evaluating the Effects <strong>of</strong> Source<br />

Water Quality on Bromate<br />

Mitigation Performance<br />

Tom Hawkins, Ph.D, and Mark<br />

Owen<br />

James Collins 1 , Christine Cotton 1 ,<br />

Bruce Heeke 2 , David Dahl 3 ,<br />

and Alan Royce 4<br />

Pamela Chelme-Ayala,<br />

Mohamed Gamal El-Din,<br />

and Daniel W. Smith<br />

Zaid Chowdhury 1 , David Eberle 1 ,<br />

Laurel Passantino 1 , Joe Kurrus 2 ,<br />

and Linda Bezy-Botma 2<br />

Puralytics, 15250 NW Greenbrier Pkwy,<br />

Beaverton, OR, USA 97006-5764.<br />

1<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Tucson, AZ.<br />

2<br />

Patoka Lake Region Water and<br />

Sewer District. 3 Midwestern Engineers.<br />

4<br />

Trojan Technologies.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />

Engineering, 3-133 Markin/CNRL Natural<br />

Resources Engineering Facility, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada.<br />

1<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 2 City <strong>of</strong> Peoria, AZ.<br />

Session 18 – Modeling UV Systems –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

13:15 13:40 Monte Carlo Ray Trace Model:<br />

A New Approach in Determining<br />

Fluence Rates in UV Systems<br />

13:40 14:05 A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Two Methods for<br />

Measuring the UV Output <strong>of</strong> Low<br />

Pressure Mercury Lamps in Air<br />

14:05 14:30 Method for Measurement <strong>of</strong> Output<br />

<strong>of</strong> Low Pressure Mercury Lamps<br />

14:30 14:55 Controlling Mercury Release with<br />

UV Lamp Sleeve Breaks<br />

Khoi Nguyen and Jaewan Yoon<br />

Old Dominion University, Civil and<br />

Environmental Engineering, Norfolk, VA.<br />

G. Elliott Whitby 1* , Bill Sotirakos 1 ,<br />

1 Calgon Carbon Canada, 50 Mural St., Unit #3,<br />

and James R. Bolton 2 Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4B 1E4. 2 Bolton<br />

Photosciences Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres.,<br />

Edmonton, AB, Canada T6R 2M5.<br />

Volker Adam, Ralf Dreiskemper,<br />

Martin Kessler<br />

Harold Wright, Ed Wicklein,<br />

and Corianne Hart<br />

Heraeus Noblelight GmbH, Heraeusstr. 12-<br />

14, 63450 Hanau, Germany.<br />

Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer<br />

Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.<br />

14:55 – 15:40 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

Session 19 – UV Disinfection Research – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

15:40 16:05 High Energy Efficiency and<br />

Small Footprint with High-Wattage<br />

Low Pressure UV Disinfection for<br />

Water Reuse<br />

16:05 16:30 Impact <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection Combined<br />

with Chlorination/Chloramination on the<br />

Formation <strong>of</strong> Nitrogenous Disinfection<br />

Byproducts in Drinking Water<br />

16:30 16:55 High Intensity Pulsed Lamps for<br />

Water Treatment: Review and Status<br />

16:55 17:20 An Empirical Method for Accurately<br />

Sizing Wastewater UV Reactors for<br />

Disinfection <strong>of</strong> any Microorganism<br />

Andrew Salveson 1 ,<br />

Tavy Wade 1 , Keith G. Bircher 2 ,<br />

and Bill Sotirakos 2<br />

Amisha D. Shah 1 ,<br />

Aaron A. Dotson 2 , Karl G. Linden 2 ,<br />

Howard S. Weinberg 3 ,<br />

and William A. Mitch 1<br />

Ray Schaefer<br />

and Michael Grapperhaus<br />

1 Carollo Engineers.<br />

2<br />

Calgon Carbon Corporation.<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering, Yale<br />

University, 9 Hillhouse Ave., New Haven, CT<br />

06520. 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Civil, Environmental,<br />

and Architectural Engineering, Engineering<br />

Center ECOT, University <strong>of</strong> Colorado at<br />

Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309. 3 Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Environmental Sciences and Engineering,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill,<br />

1303 Michael Hooker Research Center,<br />

Chapel Hill, NC 27599.<br />

Phoenix Science & Technology, Inc.,<br />

Chelmsford, MA 01824.<br />

Harold Wright 1 , Andrew<br />

1 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300,<br />

Salveson 1 , Tavy Wade,<br />

Walnut Creek, CA 94598.<br />

Sean Poust 1 , Allan Slater 2 ,<br />

2 Severn Trent Services, 580 Virginia<br />

Duncan Collins 2 , Jeremy<br />

Drive, Suite 300, Ft. Washington,<br />

Meier 2 , and Ian Dearnley 2 PA 19034.<br />

11<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Session 20 – AOP and Ozone Byproducts – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

15:40 16:05 Advanced Oxidation Process<br />

– Effective and Technical Suitable<br />

for Micropollutant Removal in<br />

Contaminated Water Sources<br />

16:05 16:30 Bromate Pre-systemic Detoxification<br />

Metabolism Research Progress<br />

16:30 16:55 Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies<br />

on Decomposition Reactions <strong>of</strong><br />

Pyrrolidone Derivatives Using O 3<br />

16:55 17:20 Ozone Disinfection Reduces Disinfection<br />

Byproduct Formation to Comply with<br />

New Stage 2 DBP and LT2 Requirements<br />

J. Krüger1, A. Ried 1 ,<br />

1 ITT W&WW WEDECO GmbH, Boschstr. 6,<br />

K. Teunissen 2 , A.H. Knol 2 ,<br />

32051 Herford, Germany. 2 DZH & Delft<br />

and D. Csalovszki 3 University <strong>of</strong> Technology PO 34, 2270 AA<br />

Voorburg, The Netherlands. 3 ITT W&WW<br />

USA WEDECO Products, 14125 South<br />

Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273.<br />

Joseph Cotruvo 1* , Richard Bull 2 ,<br />

Brian Cummings 3 , Jeffrey Fisher 3 ,<br />

Zhongxian Guo 4 , Choon Nam<br />

Ong 5 , Oscar Quinones 6 ,<br />

Shane Snyder 6 , Jason Keith 7 ,<br />

Gilbert Gordon 7 ,<br />

and Gilbert Pacey 7<br />

Yu Tachibana, Masanobu Nogami,<br />

Yuichi Sugiyama,<br />

and Yasuhisa Ikeda<br />

1 Joseph Cotruvo & Associates LLC,<br />

Washington, DC, USA. 2 MoBull Consulting,<br />

Richland, WA, USA. 3 University <strong>of</strong> Georgia,<br />

Athens, GA, USA. 4 PUB Waterhub Centre for<br />

Advanced Water Technology, Singapore.<br />

5<br />

National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore. 6 Southern<br />

Nevada Water Authority, Henderson, NV, USA.<br />

7<br />

Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.<br />

Research Laboratory for Nuclear<br />

Reactors, Tokyo Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />

2-12-1-N1-34 Ookayama, Meguro-ku,<br />

Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.<br />

Michael A. Oneby 1 , Richard Lin 2 ,<br />

1 MWH Americas, 789 N. Water St, Suite 430,<br />

James H. Borchardt 2 ,<br />

Milwaukee, WI 53202-3558, USA.<br />

and Charles O. Bromley 3 2 MWH Americas, 618 Michillinda Ave.,<br />

Suite 200, Arcadia, CA 91007, USA.<br />

3<br />

MWH Americas, 3010 W. Charleston Blvd,<br />

Suite 100, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA.<br />

Session 21 – Modeling UV Systems –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

15:40 16:05 Comparison Testing <strong>of</strong> ‘Spot’ vs. ‘Pellet’<br />

LPHO UV Lamps<br />

16:05 16:30 Measurements <strong>of</strong> UV Lamp Performance<br />

in Near-Field and Far-Field Apparatus<br />

16:30 16:55 Application <strong>of</strong> Computational Fluid<br />

Dynamics to Support Design <strong>of</strong> Full-Scale<br />

Wastewater UV Disinfection Channels<br />

16:55 17:20 A Genomic Model for the Prediction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet Inactivation Rate<br />

Constants for RNA and DNA Viruses<br />

Mike Santelli 1*<br />

and James R. Bolton 2<br />

G. Fang, D.G. Knight,<br />

R. Kilgour, and T. Molyneux<br />

Shanshan Jin<br />

and Melanie A. Mann<br />

1 Light Sources Inc., 37 Robinson Blvd.,<br />

Orange, CT 06477. 2 Bolton Photosciences<br />

Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres., NW, Edmonton,<br />

AB, Canada, T6R 2M5.<br />

Trojan Technologies, 3020 Gore Road,<br />

London, ON, Canada N5V 4T7<br />

Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 11242 Waples Mill<br />

Road, Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22030.<br />

Wladyslaw J. Kowalski 1 ,<br />

1 Immune Building Systems, Inc., 575<br />

William P. Bahnfleth 2 ,<br />

Madison Ave., 10th Floor, New York,<br />

and Mark T. Hernandez 3 NY10022. 2 The Pennsylvania State<br />

University, Department <strong>of</strong> Architectural<br />

Engineering, University Park, PA 16802.<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Colorado, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil,<br />

Environmental, and Architectural<br />

Engineering, Boulder, CO 80309.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

12


POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

Session P1 – Monday May 04, 2009<br />

President’s Ballroom Prefunction Area<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

14:55 15:40 Passivation, Fabrication and Maintenance<br />

Issues in Ozone and Oxygen Systems<br />

14:55 15:40 Effect <strong>of</strong> additives on the degradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Reactive Black 5 (RB5)<br />

by simple ozonation<br />

Patrick Banes, Michel Dalglish,<br />

Brent Ekstrand, Ph.D.<br />

and Daryl Roll, P.E.<br />

Arizbeth A. Pérez Martínez<br />

and Tatyana Poznyak<br />

Astro Pak Corporation, 270 E. Baker Street,<br />

Suite 100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626.<br />

Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Química e<br />

Industrias Extractivas – Instituto Politécnico<br />

Nacional,(ESIQIE-IPN), Edif. 7, UPALM, C.P<br />

07738, DF, México.<br />

Session P2 – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

President’s Ballroom Prefunction Area<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

9:30 10:15 Electrolytic Ozone Generation<br />

Using Solid Diamond Anodes<br />

9:30 10:15 Ozone-Based Clean-In-Place<br />

(CIP) <strong>of</strong> Bioreactors<br />

9:30 10:15 Noteworthy Nuances <strong>of</strong> Constructing<br />

and Starting Up an Ozone System<br />

9:30 10:15 Pilot Test Results Perozone TM Injection<br />

Technology Kitchener, Ontario<br />

Bill Yost<br />

Hossein Zarrin 1 , Brian Hagopian 2 ,<br />

and Dr. Carl Lawton 3<br />

Ben Kuhne1 1 , Jack Bebee 1 ,<br />

Robert W. H<strong>of</strong>fman 2 ,<br />

and Stephanie Bishop 3<br />

Dave Montgomery<br />

and Darko Strajin<br />

Electrolytic Ozone Inc, Cambridge Innovation<br />

Center, One Broadway, Cambridge MA 02142.<br />

1<br />

MKS Instruments Inc. 2 Mar Cor Purification.<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-Lowell.<br />

1<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue,<br />

Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008.<br />

2<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 12400 Coit Road, Dallas,<br />

TX 75251. 3 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 2301<br />

Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 244, Maitland,<br />

FL 32751.<br />

Trow Associates, Inc., 1595 Clark Boulevard,<br />

Brampton, ON, Canada.<br />

Session P3 – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />

President’s Ballroom Prefunction Area<br />

Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />

14:55 15:40 The Bioassay Validation and Real-Time<br />

UV Dose Monitoring are Essential for<br />

Maintaining UV Disinfection Efficacy<br />

in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing<br />

14:55 15:40 Results <strong>of</strong> a CFD Simulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

UV/H 2 O 2 Advanced Oxidation Process<br />

14:55 15:40 Regenerating Spent Zeolites with UV<br />

and UV/H 2 O 2 to Enhance Removal <strong>of</strong><br />

Endocrine Disrupting Compounds<br />

14:55 15:40 Mixing Effects on the<br />

Chloramination Process<br />

Ismail Gobulukoglu, Ph.D.<br />

Scott M. Alpert, P.E. 1<br />

and Joel J. Ducoste, Ph.D. 2<br />

Safina Singh and Erik Rosenfeldt<br />

Khyati Jain 1 and Irvine Wei 2<br />

Science and Technology Department,<br />

Aquafine Corporation, 29010 Avenue<br />

Paine, Valencia, CA 91355, USA.<br />

1<br />

HDR Engineering, Inc. <strong>of</strong> the Carolinas,<br />

Charlotte, NC.<br />

2<br />

NC State University, Raleigh, NC.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />

Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-<br />

Amherst.<br />

1<br />

CDM Inc., Walnut Creek, CA. 2 Northeastern<br />

University, Civil and Environmental<br />

Engineering Department, Boston, MA.<br />

13<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


ORAL PRESENTATIONS<br />

Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-1<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

A Uniform Protocol for Wastewater UV Validation Applications<br />

- IUVA Manufacturers Council Position<br />

Oliver Lawal 1 , Paul Ropic 1 , Elliott Whitby 2 , Stan Shmia 3 , and Bertrand Dussert 4<br />

1. ITT-WEDECO<br />

2. Calgon Carbon Corporation<br />

3. Severn Trent Water Purification<br />

4. Siemens Water Technologies<br />

The treatment objective <strong>of</strong> an ultraviolet disinfection system used in a wastewater application is to protect aquatic<br />

and ecological environments. To ensure this objective is adequately met it is important to validate, or verify<br />

equipment performance for a specific application. The widely accepted method for completing this validation is by<br />

determining the dose delivery performance using biodosimetry. Whilst several protocols exist for completing<br />

biodosimetry tests, or bioassays, for different applications, only two methods are in wide scale use in the industry<br />

worldwide;<br />

• Ultraviolet Disinfection <strong>Guide</strong>lines for Drinking Water and Water Reuse, 2 nd Edition, published by the<br />

National Water Research Institute (NWRI) in collaboration with the Awwa Research Foundation<br />

(AwwaRF). Specifically, chapter two; Water Reuse and chapter three; Protocols. Hereafter referred to as<br />

NWRI/AwwaRF.<br />

• Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment<br />

Rule, published by the US EPA. Hereafter referred to as UVDGM.<br />

Both guidelines follow similar formats and are in wide scale use by UV Manufacturers, Engineering Consultants<br />

and Regulators. However, neither specifically makes reference to the particular challenges associated with<br />

completing bioassays in wastewater applications. Many stakeholders within the UV industry have called for such a<br />

uniform protocol for wastewater UV applications that can be widely adopted by the industry and regulatory bodies.<br />

In an effort to provide a positive contribution to the industry in this matter, the International Ultraviolet Association<br />

(IUVA) Manufacturers Council formed a task force in 2007. The objectives were to;<br />

• Evaluate the existing protocols to identify aspects that could be <strong>of</strong> use for a uniform wastewater protocol<br />

• Facilitate discussion with both regulators and engineering consultants on the issue <strong>of</strong> a uniform<br />

wastewater protocol<br />

• Outline a position on a potential solution for a uniform wastewater protocol<br />

After undertaking reviews and discussions with interested parties, this paper will represent the final portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

task force objectives in describing a potential solution for a uniform wastewater protocol.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

14


Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-2<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Overcoming Validation Report Complexity<br />

Phyllis Posy 1 , Karl Scheible 2 , and Chengyue Shen 2<br />

1. Atlantium Technologies<br />

2. UV ValidationCenter, HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah New Jersey<br />

Validation Report complexity has turned out to be a hidden Achilles heel <strong>of</strong> the UV industry. When the United<br />

States Environmental Protection Agency finalized and published the Ultra Violet Disinfection Guidance Manual<br />

(UVDGM) for use in validating UV reactors in the end <strong>of</strong> 2006, they specifically covered both setpoint and dose<br />

pacing validations with a broad net for T1, MS2 and other challenge organisms. In focusing on disinfection<br />

required by the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR) and the Groundwater Rule,<br />

they also gave the green light for the development <strong>of</strong> even more sophisticated validation techniques including dyed<br />

microspheres (DMS) validations and the direct use <strong>of</strong> target organisms (like adenovirus). The underlying message<br />

to regulators – who are generalists rather than UV specialists – is the more data the better.<br />

But turning an extensive data set into a simple enough report to support a decision-making process is another<br />

matter indeed. Validation reports must be understood by busy regulators and administered by small communities.<br />

This communication challenge falls on validators, manufacturers and the engineers who play a critical role in<br />

designing water treatment processes for regulatory compliance. And this is only the first step.<br />

The next step for a regulator or WTP operator is the persistent question <strong>of</strong> how to assure that the reactor received<br />

“conforms uniformly” to the reactor that had been validated without extensive and expensive retesting.<br />

Finally, without translating and converting the recordkeeping, calibration and correction factor requirements into an<br />

easy daily operating regimen, UV may become favored by larger systems, but never get to the small communities<br />

that need it.<br />

This paper will describe the following:<br />

• The critical factors in translating a validation dataset into a meaningful usable report<br />

• The development and use <strong>of</strong> a Validation Verification screen that enables the user to check that<br />

the reactor they installed “conforms uniformly” to the reactor that was validated.<br />

• Automating and integrating UVDGM operational requirements into WTP life.<br />

15<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-3<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Validation <strong>of</strong> UV Reactors for Water and Wastewater Applications:<br />

What is the State-<strong>of</strong>-the-Art<br />

O. Karl Scheible and Chengyue Shen<br />

HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ<br />

Considerable experience has been gained in the validation <strong>of</strong> UV reactors, addressing drinking water and wastewater<br />

applications with newly developed protocols, and new methods for analyzing the data and credited performance for a given<br />

reactor. This paper will compile and address the current state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art for validation, posed as a series <strong>of</strong> questions:<br />

What protocols are in play at this time, and how are they used in the industry? Status and comparison <strong>of</strong> the UVDGM<br />

(2006), ONORM and DVGW, NWRI, ETV and recent updates for a unified low-dose, reuse and related treated-wastewater<br />

validation applications. A formal protocol to validate with dyed-microspheres has also been drafted and demonstrated with<br />

several reactors.<br />

What is the status <strong>of</strong> biodosimetry for validation and what microbiological surrogates have been tested, or are being<br />

evaluated? We will review recent work and update the UVDGM biodosimetric approach, addressing advances with T1UV,<br />

T1, T7, Q, MS2 and other appropriate and practical surrogates. This will include work that is being reported regarding<br />

high-dose validations with A. niger, B. pumulus spores, and Adenovirus 2. A key advance has been the ability to access a<br />

wider variety <strong>of</strong> surrogates, the use <strong>of</strong> multiple surrogates and the concept <strong>of</strong> actual pathogen challenges to verify performance.<br />

What is Lagrangian actinometry using dyed microspheres and how does this method compare to biodosimetry? Cited<br />

as an emerging technique by the UVDGM, the use <strong>of</strong> dyed microspheres to directly measure dose-distribution has undergone<br />

considerable testing and demonstration, resulting in a new validation protocol for the UV industry. We will present an<br />

overview <strong>of</strong> this technique and how it compares to biodosimetry with respect to crediting log-inactivation and dose for<br />

alternative pathogens or pathogen indicators.<br />

Where is validation testing being done? Testing is being done both on-site at a commissioned facility, or <strong>of</strong>f-site<br />

at a dedicated test facility. We will provide an update on general validation practices, and considerations <strong>of</strong> on- versus<br />

<strong>of</strong>f-site locations.<br />

What are the more recent methods for analysis and use <strong>of</strong> the validation data and how are the validations being<br />

reviewed and accepted within the owner and regulator community? With continued experience and applications, the<br />

methods for testing and performance analysis are evolving. For example, the field is able to access alternate microbes and to<br />

use multiple microbes for biodosimetry, a practice that can effectively eliminate the RED bias promulgated by the UVDGM.<br />

Validation practices for wastewater applications are incorporating the approaches used by the UVDGM protocols for drinking<br />

water, allowing more and more for a uniform validation approach. Dyed-microspheres <strong>of</strong>fer the ability to address the<br />

inactivation <strong>of</strong> pathogens directly, without the use <strong>of</strong> surrogate microbes.<br />

What is the status <strong>of</strong> modeling as an alternative validation method? Extensive work is being done in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

CFD-intensity modeling to characterize UV reactors and related installation configurations. Will these techniques eventually<br />

supplant direct testing? We will review the current approaches and how they are affecting the validation process.<br />

What are the difficulties and bottlenecks that are being experienced with this validation process, and how can these be<br />

resolved? The intent <strong>of</strong> the process was to assure that the equipment being <strong>of</strong>fered can be fully evaluated as to its performance<br />

and when installed will perform successfully. Most critically, as we move beyond the development <strong>of</strong> these protocols into<br />

full-scale validations <strong>of</strong> a wide variety <strong>of</strong> UV systems, owners and regulators must accept the equipment for installation. We<br />

will discuss alternatives for streamlining the review process, preventing the potential for costly multiple reviews and the need<br />

for multiple submittals and acceptances within the regulatory community. There is a clear need to facilitate this in order to<br />

avoid slowing the industry simply because an onerous and unwieldy review and acceptance process.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

16


Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-4<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Standardized Lagrangian Actinometry Protocol for UV Reactor Validation<br />

Chengyue Shen 1 , Ernest R. Blatchley III 2 , Eric Cox 2 , and O. Karl Scheible 1<br />

1. HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ<br />

2. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN<br />

Validation <strong>of</strong> UV reactors is an established practice, which until recently has relied exclusively on biodosimetry to<br />

define the reduction equivalent dose (RED) delivered across a targeted operating range. This validation concept is<br />

driven by regulatory- and owner-related requirements and is used in both water and wastewater disinfection<br />

applications. In particular, the US EPA’s Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual (UVDGM) prescribes<br />

full-scale validation <strong>of</strong> UV reactors installed for Cryptosporidium, Giardia and viral disinfection credit. The<br />

UVDGM provides protocols for validation testing and the determination <strong>of</strong> credited RED and corresponding log<br />

inactivation. These rely solely on the use <strong>of</strong> biodosimetric techniques, although the UVDGM leaves open the<br />

possibility that new techniques may be developed for use at the validation level.<br />

This paper presents the final draft <strong>of</strong> a standardized protocol for application <strong>of</strong> Lagrangian actinometry in the<br />

validation <strong>of</strong> UV disinfection systems (it updates presentation given at the WQTC-2008, which addressed the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> the protocol development). The protocol allows measurement <strong>of</strong> the dose-distribution delivered by a<br />

reactor, which, when integrated with the dose-response kinetics <strong>of</strong> a targeted pathogen, predicts the log-inactivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the targeted pathogen. The new protocol responds to the regulatory validation requirements directly, and, in<br />

effect provides a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the performance and behavior <strong>of</strong> a reactor when addressing any pathogen<br />

<strong>of</strong> concern. Results <strong>of</strong> work done at Purdue University and the UV Center in New York have been presented<br />

at several venues, including, most recently at ACE 2008 and WQTC-2008. This new presentation builds on<br />

these prior discussions <strong>of</strong> the dyed-microspheres technology, providing the final protocol by which the<br />

dyed-microspheres approach can be used to validate a UV reactor.<br />

Supported by NYSERDA, AwwaRF, NYCDEP and others, the protocol has been developed in the context and<br />

format <strong>of</strong> the UVDGM. Field efforts to demonstrate and refine the method entailed three large scale validations<br />

that included T1 and MS2 coliphage biodosimetry in conformance with the US EPA Ultraviolet Disinfection<br />

Guidance Manual, and simultaneous actinometry with dyed-microspheres. The validation <strong>of</strong> the NYC DEP<br />

Catskill/Delaware UV reactor demonstrated the method. Some <strong>of</strong> these data will be presented as examples are<br />

carried through the body <strong>of</strong> the presentation. These will show the field and lab methods, the data analysis<br />

techniques to transform the raw dose-response and field test measurements to dose-distributions, and the<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> the dose distribution with the dose-response kinetics <strong>of</strong> targeted pathogens to determine<br />

log-inactivation as a function <strong>of</strong> the reactor operation variables. The QA protocols associated with the method will<br />

be presented, as will the development <strong>of</strong> the validation factor to determine credited log-inactivation.<br />

17<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-1<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Commissioning and Obtaining Regulatory Approval<br />

for Drinking Water UV Disinfection Systems<br />

David Gaithuma, Harold Wright, and Mark Heath<br />

Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713<br />

Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection has been used to treat drinking water in Europe since the 1950s and in North America<br />

for nearly two decades now. Over the last 10 years, the practice <strong>of</strong> UV disinfection has evolved considerably in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> regulations, commercial technologies, design and operation, and fundamental understanding. As a result,<br />

utilities, engineers and regulators see UV disinfection as an effective technology for inactivating chlorine-resistant<br />

pathogens such as Cryptosporidium and as an important process in achieving multi-barrier treatment and protecting<br />

public health.<br />

While this track record suggests UV disinfection is an established technology, most states have not established a<br />

framework for implementation <strong>of</strong> UV for disinfection credit almost three years after the promulgation <strong>of</strong> the US<br />

EPA Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR) and the completion <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection<br />

Guidance Manual (UVDGM). This is indicative <strong>of</strong> the progress that remains to be made in obtaining regulatory<br />

buy-in for this technology.<br />

This paper highlights the process <strong>of</strong> commissioning UV systems at two utilities to ensure compliant operation,<br />

coupled with the experience <strong>of</strong> obtaining regulatory approval for UV disinfection.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

18


Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-2<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Biodosimetry <strong>of</strong> a Full-Scale UV Disinfection System to Achieve<br />

Regulatory Approval for Drinking Water Disinfection<br />

Bruno Ferran, Robert Kelly, and Wei Yang<br />

Infilco Degremont, Inc., Degremont North American Research & Development Center<br />

510 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219<br />

This paper presents the findings <strong>of</strong> an extensive bioassay validation test that began last year at the UV Validation<br />

and Research Center <strong>of</strong> New York (UV Center) in Johnstown, New York with the objective to evaluate the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> a large full-scale UV reactor for the disinfection <strong>of</strong> drinking water. The UV reactor is a 36-inch<br />

diameter cross-flow in-line reactor operating medium pressure lamps as a light source. Bioassay testing was<br />

conducted following both the DVGW W294 and the US EPA UVDGM test guideline using MS-2 and T1 phage as<br />

surrogate microorganisms. Curves <strong>of</strong> sensor UV Intensity Setpoint (ISP) versus flow rate were obtained following<br />

the DVGW W294 test methods for delivered doses <strong>of</strong> 20, 30 and 40 mJ/cm 2 . These curves can be used to size and<br />

operate UV systems for applications where the DVGW W294 guideline is considered as the basis for design.<br />

A first set <strong>of</strong> T1 phage dose-flow runs was conducted under conditions <strong>of</strong> reduced lamp output power. The<br />

resulting T1 phage REDs were combined with those obtained from MS2 phage and the entire set <strong>of</strong> REDs was<br />

correlated versus flow rate, ISP and UV sensitivity (UVS). The resulting fit equation can be used to size and<br />

operate UV systems for applications where the US EPA UVDGM is considered as the basis for design. Design<br />

dose values for the disinfection <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium and Giardia can be calculated for a given set <strong>of</strong> flow and ISP<br />

by computing 5 mJ/cm 2 /logI in the fit equation UVS term. As a result, the US EPA RED bias uncertainty factor is<br />

equal to that <strong>of</strong> T1 phage. A final set <strong>of</strong> bioassay test runs is planned for the spring <strong>of</strong> 2009 to incorporate high<br />

UVT REDs into the dataset and strengthen the master fit equation, specifically for US EPA applications.<br />

19<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-3<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Integrating UVDGM Operational Requirements in<br />

Small System Regulatory Compliance: The People Perspective<br />

Phyllis Posy 1 , Ytzhak Rozenberg 2 , and Peter Bugg 3<br />

1. Atlantium Technologies<br />

2. R&D, Atlantium Technologies<br />

3. EWT<br />

When the United States Environmental Protection Agency finalized the Ultra Violet Disinfection Guidance Manual<br />

(UVDGM) to provide information about how to evaluate and use UV for public drinking water treatment,<br />

specifically to fulfill the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR)<br />

and the Groundwater Rule, much thought was given to how validated technology might be kept in operational<br />

compliance. How could the guidance help regulators trust and measure UV for drinking water disinfection and<br />

assure operational reliability and consistent performance over time?<br />

Clearly translating all <strong>of</strong> the precautions and testing that underlie the EPA validation protocol and guidance and<br />

converting all that into monitoring, recordkeeping, calibration and correction factor requirements was a substantial<br />

task. Several drafts were circulated until a set <strong>of</strong> monitoring, reporting, maintenance and other regimens was<br />

finalized as required or recommended.<br />

The question remains: Are these provisions really understood or honored by regulators, manufacturers, engineers or<br />

users? Do states see these provisions as protecting small systems or burdening them? How do the small systems<br />

look at these provisions? How can they be turned into a daily operating regimen that can be implemented with<br />

minimal disruption and effort by a small system?<br />

This paper will catalogue some operational experiences and cases and focus on:<br />

• How regulators consider the UVDGM operational guidance in making their<br />

decisions about UV<br />

• How engineers consider the UVDGM operational guidance in their designs and cost analysis<br />

• How these issues surface in actually operating a UV system in a small community.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

20


Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-4<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Achieving UV Disinfection Credit for Pre-UVDGM Era UV Facilities:<br />

Experiences <strong>of</strong> Two UV Facilities<br />

Christine Cotton, P.E., and James Collins<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., S. Church Ave, Suite 1120, Tucson, Arizona<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Ultraviolet Disinfection<br />

Guidance Manual (UVDGM) was a six-year process, and the Final UVDGM was released in November 2006.<br />

However, several drinking water utilities did not wait for the UVDGM to be finalized to install UV disinfection<br />

because they wanted to provide additional public health protection earlier. Therefore, these utilities were designed<br />

and operated while the UVDGM was under development.<br />

Now that the UVDGM is finalized, some <strong>of</strong> these utilities desire UV disinfection credit for their operating UV<br />

facilities. However, there are key differences in the UV facilities validation, and operation compared to the Final<br />

UVDGM recommendations. This paper will describe the following items and how these items affect receiving<br />

disinfection credit. Also, two case studies are briefly described.<br />

• Design criteria refinement<br />

• UV equipment changes and ramifications<br />

• Validation calculation technique changes<br />

• UV disinfection monitoring and recording<br />

• Potential regulatory agency coordination<br />

21<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-1<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Ozone Measurement and Control in Drinking Water Treatment Plants<br />

Andrew Wright, Ph.D., and Victor Dosoretz<br />

IN USA Inc., 100 Morse St., Norwood, MA, 02062<br />

Effective process measurement <strong>of</strong> ozone in water treatment facilities, where ozone is used to disinfect drinking<br />

water, enables optimized ozone usage and enormous resultant cost savings on a daily basis. Dedicated sensors for<br />

process measurement <strong>of</strong>ten exhibit limitations such as excessive noise, signal interferences, and down time. UV<br />

absorption by ozone <strong>of</strong>fers particular capabilities with regard to these limitations: Principles <strong>of</strong> measurement are<br />

presented, and sensor concepts for process measurement are discussed.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

22


Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-2<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

The Potential Use <strong>of</strong> Ozone in Municipal Waste Water<br />

A. Ried, J. Mielcke, and A. Wieland<br />

ITT W&WW WEDECO, Boschstr. 4-14, 32051 Herford, Germany<br />

This paper will summarize the potential options applying ozone for the improvement <strong>of</strong> effluents from waste water<br />

treatment plants. A specific focus will be on the technical aspects how to integrate ozone technique in existing or<br />

new conventional treatment plants. Additionally some large scale projects will be illustrated, where this technique<br />

is in operation yet. The following aspects are <strong>of</strong> interest and will be discussed:<br />

• necessary ozone dose range (depends on application, water matrix and contaminants)<br />

• required components <strong>of</strong> ozone systems (ozone generator, gas supply, reaction system, <strong>of</strong>f-gas handling)<br />

• process control, online measurement<br />

• potential parameters to be used for process control<br />

• design guidelines for the integration <strong>of</strong> ozone systems<br />

• cost calculations.<br />

23<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-3<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Control <strong>of</strong> Iron and Manganese Ozone Removal<br />

by Differential Turbidity Measurements<br />

Vadim Malkov, Mike Sadar, Jon Schiller, and Eric Lehman<br />

Hach Company, 5600 Lindbergh Dr. Loveland, CO 80538, USA<br />

A new method for continuous monitoring <strong>of</strong> ozone concentration and the effective removal <strong>of</strong> iron and manganese<br />

was tested.<br />

The <strong>of</strong>fered alternative to the ORP system was comprised <strong>of</strong> two self-cleaning turbidimeters. The turbidimeters<br />

were installed at the same locations as the ORP sensors and initial calibration test was performed with different<br />

ozone dosage.<br />

The conducted long term monitoring study showed stable performance <strong>of</strong> the differential turbidity system.<br />

The system confirmed the continuous and desired result <strong>of</strong> increased turbidity immediately after oxidation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unwanted iron and manganese species. Therefore, the method can be expanded to other similar applications<br />

involving ozone.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

24


Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-4<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Optimizing an Intermediate Ozone System used for Primary<br />

Disinfection at a 55 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant<br />

Russ Navratil 1 , Chip England 1 , and Glenn Hunter 2<br />

1. Henrico County, Virginia<br />

2. Process Applications Inc.<br />

The Henrico County VA Water Treatment Facility has been in operation since April 2004, making use <strong>of</strong><br />

intermediate ozone for primary disinfection to take advantage <strong>of</strong> both the disinfection and DBP benefits. Since the<br />

summer <strong>of</strong> 2007 the staff at the Henrico WTF have embarked on an optimizing journey with their ozone system.<br />

This paper summarizes the significant milestones accomplished on this journey as well as ongoing improvements.<br />

Optimizing efforts to reduce operating costs while achieving disinfection goals are reviewed relative to:<br />

• Staff training workshops<br />

• Automating ozone data collection and access<br />

• Operating ozone generators in optimum ozone concentration range<br />

• Optimizing ozone contactor operation including residual sampling locations and number<br />

<strong>of</strong> contactors<br />

• Overcoming minimum gas flow limitations<br />

• Contactor solenoid ozone residual sampling system issues and improvements<br />

• Cost savings achieved through optimization<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these items will be discussed following an overview <strong>of</strong> this 55 MGD surface water treatment facility.<br />

25<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-1<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

UV System Technology Evaluation Using UV Cost Analysis Tool<br />

for Metro Vancouver’s Coquitlam UV Disinfection Project<br />

Ayman Shawwa, P.E., Ph.D., BCEE 1 , Chris Schulz, P.E., BCEE 2 ,<br />

Inder Singh, M.A.Sc. P.Eng. 3 , and James Kim, P.E. 1<br />

1. CDM, Walnut Creek, CA<br />

2. CDM, Denver, CO<br />

3. Metro Vancouver, BC, Canada<br />

Metro Vancouver is planning a new 1,200 ML/day UV disinfection facility for the Coquitlam supply to meet<br />

Health Canada’s new requirements for 3-log Cryptosporidium inactivation. To select a UV system that will provide<br />

high disinfection performance cost effectively, medium-pressure (MP) and low-pressure high-output (LPHO) UV<br />

systems were evaluated using UV Cost Analysis Tool (UVCAT) computer model.<br />

UVCAT results confirmed that all UV systems could meet UV dose delivery requirement for 3-log<br />

Cryptosporidium inactivation for the full range <strong>of</strong> design flow and UVT and with a 10-unit train configuration.<br />

UVCAT also confirmed that capital and operations and maintenance costs for UV systems designed based on T1<br />

RED (reduction equivalent dose) were significantly lower than those based on MS2 RED design.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

26


Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-2<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Brockton, Massachusetts Commissions a 60-mgd (227-ML/d)<br />

UV Wastewater Disinfection System<br />

William C. McConnell, P.E., and David A. Norton 2<br />

1. CDM, 56 Exchange Terrace, Providence, RI 02903<br />

2. City <strong>of</strong> Brockton, MA, 303 Oak Hill Way, Brockton, MA 02301<br />

The Brockton Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) recently completed an $80 million capital<br />

improvement program increasing design capacity to 20.5 million gallons per day (mgd) (77.5 million liters per day<br />

(ML/d)). A key component <strong>of</strong> the facility improvements was replacing the effluent disinfection system. The<br />

existing sodium hypochlorite disinfection and sodium bisulfite dechlorination systems were replaced with an<br />

ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system capable <strong>of</strong> treating peak flows up to 60 mgd (227 ML/d). The new UV<br />

disinfection system became operational in August 2008 and has successfully completed its first disinfection season,<br />

which runs from April 1 through October 31 each year.<br />

27<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-3<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Site Specific Testing <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection at a Trickling Filter Plant<br />

Gary Hunter, P.E. 1 , Anjana Kadava 1 , Jane Hood 2 , and Don Gilpin 2<br />

1. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />

2. City <strong>of</strong> St. Joseph, MO<br />

The St. Joseph WPCP currently has no existing disinfection facilities. With the Missouri Department <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />

Resources (MDNR) moving toward requiring all National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)<br />

permit holders to disinfect plant effluent. The e Coli permit limit indicated in a proposed permit received by the<br />

City on February 26, 2009 is anticipated to be a 30 day mean <strong>of</strong> 206 E. coli colonies per 100 ml with no single<br />

sample maximum. Both bench scale and demonstration testing were conducted for both:<br />

• UV Low Pressure – High Intensity UV<br />

• Bulk Sodium Hypochlorite<br />

Additional water quality data was also collected during the testing to help establish the design parameters for the<br />

UV systems. UV demonstration study was completed comparing the Trojan 3000+ and WEDECO TAK 55 from<br />

May 21, 2009 to August 31, 2008. This technical memorandum provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> both the<br />

bench and demonstration scale testing. Results <strong>of</strong> this study indicate that UV can be effectively used to achieve the<br />

disinfection requirements at this plant.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

28


Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-4<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Ultraviolet Light Disinfection System Conceptual Design<br />

for the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority<br />

John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />

Albert J. Capuzzi 1 , Brian Loux 1 , Paul Swaim 1 , and James P. Malley 2<br />

1. CH2M HILL<br />

2. University <strong>of</strong> New Hampshire<br />

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) currently treats its water supply to 2.3 million people in the<br />

metropolitan Boston area at its 405 million gallon per day John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant located in<br />

Marlborough, Massachusetts. The plant came on-line in July 2005. The Carroll WTP does not include filtration<br />

due to the high quality <strong>of</strong> the source water. MWRA will add UV disinfection to comply with the Long Term 2<br />

Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule requirements for a second primary disinfectant and Cryptosporidium<br />

inactivation. This paper will discuss the Existing Ozonation Facility, Regulatory Requirements, Water Quality,<br />

including the impact <strong>of</strong> ozone on ultraviolet light transmittance, the overall Disinfection Strategy, the conceptual<br />

design, Ultraviolet Reactor Technology Comparative Analysis and UV reactor procurement, final design and<br />

construction process. The design is underway and construction <strong>of</strong> the UV facilities is scheduled to be completed in<br />

early 2014.<br />

29<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-1<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Multi-function Sidestream Ozone Treatment<br />

at a Drinking Water Treatment Plant<br />

Maxime Beaulieu 1 , Patrick Niquette 1 , Pierre Cullen 2 , and Denis Allard 2<br />

1. Dessau Inc., Water, Industry and Waste Management, 1080, Côte du Beaver Hall, Suite 300,<br />

Montreal (Quebec), Canada, H2Z 1S8.<br />

2. City <strong>of</strong> Laval, Department <strong>of</strong> environmental city management, 3810 Levesque West, Laval (Quebec),<br />

Canada, H7V 1A0.<br />

With the increasing demands placed upon water treatment plants to provide higher quality water and the advent <strong>of</strong><br />

high concentration oxygen fed ozone generators, ozone treatment is becoming ever more useful. This article looks<br />

at the design <strong>of</strong> a new multi-function intermediate ozonation system for a treatment plant in Laval, Quebec, that<br />

poses particular design challenges. A three sidestream, multiple injection manifold using variable speed pumps and<br />

oxygen degassing, was found to provide efficient disinfection, taste and odor control and pretreatment for<br />

downstream biological filtration. The ozone injection system is designed for maximum flexibility in order to meet<br />

the large flow rate and ozone dose range required at this particular plant.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

30


Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-2<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Rising Energy Costs and Frozen Budgets:<br />

Getting More from Our Operating Buck<br />

David W. Coppes<br />

Western Operations, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 266 Boston Road, Southborough, MA 01772<br />

The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) uses ozone at its 405-MGD John J. Carroll Water<br />

Treatment Plant. The purpose <strong>of</strong> ozonation is to attain primary disinfection to provide for Cryptosporidium<br />

inactivation, plus meet or exceed regulated values for Giardia and virus log inactivation credit.<br />

While ozone production has gotten more efficient with the advent <strong>of</strong> medium-frequency ozone generators, it still<br />

consumes a lot <strong>of</strong> power. A recent energy audit prepared for MWRA determined that ozone generation accounts<br />

for approximately 66% <strong>of</strong> the electricity used at the plant. MWRA has made a commitment to reducing energy<br />

consumption at its facilities in an effort to reduce both operating costs and the environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> its<br />

daily operations.<br />

This paper will describe the ways that MWRA tracks its ozone production costs, will describe some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

operating decisions made to improve efficiency, and show a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between efficiency and system reliability.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the items to be covered include: Dose control: improved performance reduces overall cost; Selecting the<br />

optimum ozone concentration operating point and modifying control strategy to maintain the selected target.<br />

31<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-3<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Key Water Quality Parameters that Determine Ozone Dose<br />

for Massachusetts Water Resources Authority<br />

Windsor Sung, Ph.D., P.E.<br />

MWRA, 260 Boston Road, Southborough, MA 01772<br />

MWRA supplies unfiltered surface water to over 2 million people in the metropolitan Boston area. Primary<br />

disinfection to inactivate giardia and crypto is achieved by ozone. Control <strong>of</strong> ozone dose is determined by<br />

a computer algorithm that uses a pre-determined ratio <strong>of</strong> required versus achieved CT and measured ozone<br />

residuals. On a monthly averaged basis the ozone dose is mainly dependent on only two main water quality<br />

parameters: temperature and ultra-violet absorbance at 254 nm. Development and use <strong>of</strong> the regression equation<br />

will be presented.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

32


Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-4<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> Wastewater with Ozone at the<br />

Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant<br />

Nick Burns 1 , Jeff Neemann 1 , Tom Holst 2 , and Jim Burks 2<br />

1. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />

2. Springfield Utilities, 3301 S. FF Hwy, Springfield, MO 65807<br />

The City <strong>of</strong> Springfield, MO has selected Black & Veatch to upgrade the ozonation facilities at its Southwest<br />

Wastewater Treatment Plant. Design challenges included a lack <strong>of</strong> operable instrumentation that prevented<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> historical operating data, and operation <strong>of</strong> upstream processes that resulted in rapid changes in ozone<br />

demand. The paper will include a discussion <strong>of</strong> the impacts <strong>of</strong> upstream processes on ozone demand; the results <strong>of</strong><br />

the bench-scale analyses in terms <strong>of</strong> log reductions <strong>of</strong> fecal coliforms and E-coli; and the impact <strong>of</strong> ozone on UVT<br />

in primary and tertiary treated wastewater.<br />

33<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-1<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Optimization Considerations for an Ozone Side Stream Injection System<br />

Bill Mundy, C.E.T. 1 , Kerwin Rakness 2 , and Glenn Hunter 2<br />

1. Regional Municipality Of Halton, 1151 Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6M 3L1<br />

2. Process Applications Inc., 2627 Redwing Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 80526<br />

The Oakville Water Purification Plant (OWPP), located in the Regional Municipality <strong>of</strong> Halton, Oakville, Ontario<br />

has a capacity <strong>of</strong> 110 ML/d. The OWPP has an ozonation sidestream injection system designed for<br />

cryptosporidium inactivation, including taste & odour removal capability.<br />

The OWPP side stream injection system has three side stream injection systems, (2 firm capacity and one standby)<br />

each with variable speed controllers for process optimization.<br />

It was demonstrated through optimized process control that the Gas/Liquid ratio can be adjusted to balance ozone<br />

transfer and cost effectiveness. Other sidestream parameters evaluated included outlet venturi pressure, ozone<br />

demand and initial residual.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

34


Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-2<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Evaluating Options for Retr<strong>of</strong>itting a Large Scale Ozonation System in Texas<br />

Jeff Neemann 1 , David Timmerman 1 , Robert Hulsey 1 , Buford Green 2 , and Steve Long 2<br />

1. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />

2. North Texas Municipal Water District, Wylie, TX<br />

The North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD) is in the process <strong>of</strong> preliminary engineering design <strong>of</strong><br />

ozonation at the 770 million-gallons-per-day Wylie Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Complex. The design will<br />

include the addition <strong>of</strong> ozone technology for drinking water disinfection as well as taste and odor control at the<br />

Wylie, Texas, complex that serves more than 1.5 million customers. Preliminary design was completed by April<br />

2009, and final design is expected to be completed in April 2010. The project should be operationally complete in<br />

2013.<br />

The preliminary design has included pilot testing <strong>of</strong> preozonation and intermediate ozonation to evaluate the<br />

advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> both application points. Testing was completed to evaluate the TOC removal,<br />

disinfection by-product formation potential, and filter productivity <strong>of</strong> both ozonation locations. Additional testing<br />

was done to evaluate the use <strong>of</strong> chlorine dioxide, chlorine/ammonia, ammonia only, and pH adjustment to limit<br />

bromate formation during background and spiked bromide concentrations. Taste and odor testing was conducted to<br />

determine the ozone dose required to remove MIB and Geosmin and sampling showed substantial removal in the<br />

biological filters with GAC.<br />

35<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-3<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Keeping Ozone Generators Dry and Cool<br />

Kerwin L. Rakness 1 and James Muri 2<br />

1. Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526<br />

2. John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant, 84 D’Angelo Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752<br />

Ozone generators perform efficiently and continuously (less maintenance) when kept dry and cool while in service,<br />

and dry when in standby condition. It is the authors’ experience that ozone generators at some plants operate years<br />

and years without maintenance, while generators at other plants require maintenance within months or a few years.<br />

In review, commonality <strong>of</strong> well performing ozone generators is dry operating condition.<br />

Feed-gas “wetness” is monitored during normal ozone operation via dew point temperature. Alarm and shut-down<br />

occurs at elevated dew point temperature, such as -60 o C, which is 7-ppm wt moisture content at 1-atm pressure.<br />

Normal operation is dew point temperature <strong>of</strong> -80 o C, which is 1-ppm wt moisture content.<br />

Generator “dryness” during standby and at startup when power is applied is also important. Off-line generators<br />

might become “wet” when idle due to improper standby conditions. Pre-purging with dry gas is normally<br />

implemented, but purge time might be insufficient for “wet” generators. Nitric acid is formed in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

dinitrogen pentoxide (formed during ozone production) and water, thus dry conditions are high priority at startup,<br />

during normal operation and when in standby. Methods to maintain dry conditions are discussed in this paper.<br />

Cooling water keeps generators “cool” and electrically efficient. Generator cooling water flow rate maintains<br />

generator inlet-versus-outlet cooling water below 10 o F temperature rise, and <strong>of</strong>ten below 5 o F rise. Non-corrosive<br />

and non-scaling cooling water is critically important for long-term (20+ years) maintenance-free performance.<br />

Closed-loop-open-loop cooling systems promote this desired outcome. Cooling water flow and temperature details<br />

are outlined in this paper.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

36


Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-4<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> Ozone for Contaminant Oxidation in Wastewater<br />

Eric C. Wert, Fernando Rosario-Ortiz, and Shane Snyder<br />

Southern Nevada Water Authority, P.O. Box 99955, Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />

Ozone has been shown to be a promising treatment technique for the oxidation <strong>of</strong> trace organic contaminants in<br />

wastewater. However, achieving significant ozone oxidation in wastewater can be challenging due to higher<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> total organic carbon (TOC). Greater TOC concentrations can increase ozone demand and<br />

accelerate ozone decay rates, which reduces ozone exposure. In the current study, several trace organic<br />

contaminants (i.e. pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds) were studied under a range <strong>of</strong> ozone<br />

exposures in three wastewaters. Contaminant oxidation was assessed using ozone exposure and the O 3 :TOC ratio.<br />

Results showed that the ozone exposure was different for each wastewater based upon the O 3 :TOC ratio. Second<br />

order reaction rate constants were used to identify whether contaminants were removed primarily by O 3 or<br />

hydroxyl radicals. When O 3 exposure was measurable, >95% removal was observed for contaminants that were<br />

fast-reacting with ozone. UV 254 removal was also found to be a good surrogate to assess contaminant oxidation in<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> measurable dissolved ozone residual (


Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-1<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Approach for Achieving Sustainable Operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

2-bgd Catskill/Delaware UV disinfection Facility<br />

Matthew T. Valade, P.E. 1 , Steven Farabaugh 2 , Paul D. Smith, P.E. 3 , and Gary Kroll, P.E. 4<br />

1. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 24 Federal Street, Suite 302, Boston, MA 02129<br />

2. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 498 Seventh Avenue, 11 th Floor, New York, NY 10018<br />

3. NYC Dept. <strong>of</strong> Env. Protection, 96-05 Horace Harding Expy, Corona, NY 11368<br />

4. CDM, Raritan Plaza 1, Raritan Center, Edison, NJ 08817<br />

Recent advances in testing methods are being applied to the validation <strong>of</strong> NYC’s Catskill/Delaware UV equipment.<br />

These advanced methods will allow the full scale facility to operate in a more sustainable manner with up to 50%<br />

reduction in operating power requirements (and corresponding reduction in carbon dioxide emissions) and savings<br />

<strong>of</strong> over $1 million annually.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

38


Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-2<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet Disinfection <strong>of</strong> A WWTP Final<br />

(Blended) Effluent under Wet Weather Flow Conditions<br />

Khalil Z. Atasi, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, F.ASCE<br />

Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., 2301 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 300, Maitland, FL 32751<br />

Ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection has gained tremendous popularity in wastewater disinfection over traditional<br />

chemical disinfection processes using chlorine gas and other chlorine compounds for many reasons. Mainly, UV<br />

disinfection <strong>of</strong>fers a safe process by eliminating the use <strong>of</strong> a dangerous gas and eliminates the production <strong>of</strong> toxic<br />

disinfection byproducts. UV also eliminates the need for chlorine residual removal (dechlorination) using another<br />

chemical reducing reagent. Thus, UV disinfection replaces two processes, eliminates completely the on-site storage<br />

<strong>of</strong> dangerous chemicals, and eliminates the whole effluent toxicity (WET) that may result from chlorine based<br />

disinfection process.<br />

A wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located in ten Midwest has conducted an evaluation for the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

UV disinfection to replace its existing chlorine disinfection process and dechlorination process. This large plant,<br />

nested in a residential area, handles by NPDES permit 36 MGD <strong>of</strong> dry weather flow and up to 60 MGD <strong>of</strong> wet<br />

weather flow. The plant is a tertiary treatment facility that employs multimedia gravity filtration to meet a tight<br />

NPDES permit effluent limits for total suspended solids, BOD5, and ammonia. Because <strong>of</strong> the significant wet<br />

weather flow component, the UV disinfection process has to be carefully evaluated as to its effectiveness. UV light<br />

transmission can be a limiting factor to achieve final effluent disinfection permit requirement.<br />

The presentation will provide information useful to other treatment plants, particularly those with significant wet<br />

weather flow component, considering UV disinfection as a replacement <strong>of</strong> the traditional chlorine disinfection<br />

process. Specifically, the presentation will discuss, among other things, the following:<br />

• Required testing to evaluate the UV transmission under worst case scenario <strong>of</strong> “blended” final<br />

effluent quality<br />

• Various technology <strong>of</strong> UV disinfection form the perspective <strong>of</strong> lamp pressure and light intensity<br />

• Impact <strong>of</strong> the process foot print and retr<strong>of</strong>it within the existing chlorine contact chamber<br />

• Life cycle cost <strong>of</strong> the various UV technology (pressure/intensity)<br />

• Impact on the plant hydraulic pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

39<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-3<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Bidding, Testing, and Start-Up <strong>of</strong> a Reuse UV Disinfection System in Florida<br />

Josefin M. Edeback, E.I. and Melanie A. Mann, P.E.<br />

Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 10002 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 200, Tampa, Florida 33619<br />

Hillsborough County, Florida recently installed a new UV disinfection system for reuse at the Falkenburg<br />

Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (AWTP) as part <strong>of</strong> a plant expansion from 9.0 MGD to 12.0 MGD annual<br />

average daily flow (AADF). The Falkenburg AWTP must meet Florida’s requirements for high level disinfection<br />

(HLD) for both its surface water discharge permit and its public access reuse permit. Construction plans and<br />

specifications allowed the UV facility to use equipment with either horizontal or vertical UV lamps and allowed<br />

bidders to select from three named manufacturers. During construction, before the bidder-selected UV equipment<br />

submittal was approved for fabrication, the UV manufacturer was required to prove the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its<br />

mechanism for controlling lamp sleeve fouling with a pilot-scale demonstration at the Falkenburg AWTP. Once<br />

installed, Hillsborough County was required to obtain approval from the Florida Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />

Protection (FDEP) <strong>of</strong> a UV Operating Protocol prior to placing the new UV system in service. Performance testing<br />

<strong>of</strong> the UV system is in progress and results to date are summarized.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

40


Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-4<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Validation <strong>of</strong> the Catskill/Delaware UV Reactor:<br />

A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry and Lagrangian Actinometry Methods<br />

Chengyue Shen 1 and Karl Scheible 1 , Matthew Valade 2 , and Ernest R. Blatchley 3<br />

1. HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ<br />

2. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., Boston, MA<br />

3. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN<br />

The LPHO UV disinfection system designed for the New York City Catskill/Delaware UV Disinfection Facility<br />

will be validated in parallel by UVDGM biodosimetric protocols and by Lagrangian actinometry using dyed<br />

microspheres. This validation will complement and supplement prior validation testing that had been performed on<br />

the unit, covering a broader operating range and allowing for improved operating efficiencies by directly measuring<br />

and characterizing the dose-distribution <strong>of</strong> the UV unit within its anticipated operating envelope. The ability<br />

to directly measure the dose-distribution in a UV reactor significantly impacts the UVDGM uncertainty factors<br />

(e.g., RED bias) associated with the design sizing and subsequent operating energy and lamp replacement costs <strong>of</strong><br />

an installation, particularly for larger water utilities. All testing was conducted at the UV Validation and Research<br />

Center in Johnstown, NY. This presentation will show the field data analysis techniques and a direct comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Lagrangian actinometry validation approach to that <strong>of</strong> conventional biodosimetry.<br />

This work has been conducted as a tailored collaboration supported by the NYCDEP, Trojan Technologies, Water<br />

Research Foundation (formerly Awwa Research Foundation). The project demonstrates the Lagrangian<br />

actinometry validation protocol that was developed with the support <strong>of</strong> AwwaRF in partnership with the New York<br />

State Energy Research and Development Authority. All biodosimetry and related technical testing is in<br />

conformance with the UVDGM. The validation test matrix encompasses simultaneous validation via Lagrangian<br />

actinometry using dyed microspheres and biodosimetry using MS2 and T1 coliphage. The test matrix was designed<br />

to validate an operating envelope defined by four operating variables: Flow, UVT, Power Input, and Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Lamps. QA protocols presented in the UVDGM are carried through to the Lagrangian actinometry protocols.<br />

These establish field and lab practices and QC limits with respect to microbiology, flow cytometry and field<br />

sampling activities.<br />

The advantages associated with the test series, particularly with respect to using the dyed microspheres to measure<br />

the dose distribution lie primarily in the ability to reduce the validation factor, which, in turn, reduces the system’s<br />

operating requirements. This does not represent a reduction in safety – rather, it is a reduction in the uncertainty <strong>of</strong><br />

the validation tests. Additionally, by having this information, one can determine the log inactivation <strong>of</strong> other<br />

pathogens and newly identified microorganisms <strong>of</strong> concern that can be accomplished by the UV units, without the<br />

need for extensive full-scale re-validation testing. Measuring the actual dose-distribution delivered by the UV unit<br />

across its validated operating range also allows one to validate CFD-intensity models that can be used for<br />

optimization <strong>of</strong> the system’s operations, and for interpolation <strong>of</strong> process performance at operating conditions that<br />

are intermediate to those applied in the test matrix.<br />

41<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-1<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Updating Ozone for the Lincoln Water System<br />

Jeff Neemann 1 , Nick Burns 1 , Robert Hulsey 1 , Andrew Hansen 1 , Eric Lee 2 , and John Miriovsky 2<br />

1. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />

2. Lincoln Water System, Lincoln, NE<br />

The Lincoln Water System (LWS) in the process <strong>of</strong> replacing their three existing ozone generators with two larger<br />

generators. The new, state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art ozone system will use less energy to produce more ozone for disinfection at<br />

their East Water Treatment Plant. The upgrade will increase the total ozone generation capacity at the treatment<br />

plant from 1,050 pounds per day (ppd) to 2,600 ppd. The new generators will use liquid oxygen rather than air to<br />

produce ozone, which will also increase efficiency. Another aspect <strong>of</strong> the project is replacement <strong>of</strong> all controls,<br />

computers and electronics in the plant. This work will be coordinated with the construction activities scheduled for<br />

a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system upgrade to improve system efficiency. The SCADA<br />

system monitors and controls transmission and distribution <strong>of</strong> raw and potable water supplies. Preliminary design<br />

and equipment procurement services were completed in 2008, with final design slated for completion in May 2009<br />

and construction set to begin September 2009. The project is anticipated to be complete in April 2010.<br />

The existing air fed system will be replaced with liquid oxygen and ambient vaporizers to generate ozone at high<br />

weight percent. A cost evaluation was conducted and it was determined that it was most cost effective to complete<br />

replace the existing ozone generators with new more efficient generators. The existing closed loop cooling water<br />

system will be expanded to handle the higher cooling water flows. The existing diffuser system will be replaced<br />

with a sidestream injection system that uses injectors and specially designed nozzles that will retr<strong>of</strong>itted in to the<br />

existing concrete contactors. The ozone destruct system will be modified to handle the reduced gas flows after the<br />

conversion to oxygen feed.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

42


Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-2<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Eastern Treatment Plant - Melbourne Water’s Approach to One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

World’s Most Complex Wastewater Technology Trials<br />

Mark Lynch 1 , John Mieog 1 , Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />

Sock-Hoon Koh 2 , and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />

1. Melbourne Water Corporation; Melbourne, Australia<br />

2. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />

3. Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia<br />

In October 2006 the Victorian Government announced that Melbourne Water’s Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP)<br />

would be upgraded to produce ‘Class A’ effluent by 2012. The ETP treats approximately 42 percent <strong>of</strong> the sewage<br />

from Melbourne’s southern and eastern suburbs. At average and peak flows <strong>of</strong> around 370 and 700 MLD<br />

respectively, the ETP tertiary treatment plant will be amongst the largest <strong>of</strong> its kind in the world.<br />

Tertiary filtration followed by UV and chlorine disinfection is capable <strong>of</strong> achieving Class A effluent quality;<br />

however it will not address the residual aesthetic issues <strong>of</strong> colour and odour associated with the ETP effluent.<br />

The opportunity exists to implement tertiary treatment in such a way that achieves Class A effluent quality, but also<br />

addresses the residual aesthetics through the use <strong>of</strong> advanced treatment processes such as ozone/ biologically<br />

activated carbon.<br />

Due to the scale <strong>of</strong> the tertiary treatment at ETP, the likely cost implications, and the need to assess the viability <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced treatment on ETP effluent, a trial facility was designed, constructed and commissioned within 12 months.<br />

The facility includes all feasible tertiary treatment technologies for a plant the scale <strong>of</strong> ETP, including dual, cloth<br />

and mono media filtration, micro and ultrafiltration membranes, ozone, biologically activated carbon, UV and<br />

chlorine disinfection and reverse osmosis.<br />

Through the innovative design and construction process <strong>of</strong> the plant, it is possible to operate multiple process train<br />

configurations and all 16 individual process units simultaneously. Each process train treats approximately 100kL/d<br />

making the total flow through the plant approximately 2ML/d.<br />

This paper will discuss the design <strong>of</strong> the trials, construction <strong>of</strong> the plant and operation <strong>of</strong> the site to achieve the key<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> deciding on a preferred process train for the full scale plant.<br />

43<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-3<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Operations Experience and Enhancements to the Two-stage<br />

Ozone System for the Cary/Apex, NC Water Treatment Plant<br />

Bill Dowbiggin and Kelvin Creech<br />

1. CDM<br />

2. Town <strong>of</strong> Cary<br />

Ozonation was added to the Cary/Apex North Carolina Water Treatment Plant in 2001 with the primary purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

taste and odor control and secondary desire to provide an extra treatment barrier in terms <strong>of</strong> oxidation/disinfection.<br />

This presentation will overview the results and recent enhancements that are being considered and some that have<br />

already been implemented. Ozone, for example, has allowed great reduction in the use <strong>of</strong> powdered activated<br />

carbon (PAC) for taste and odor control, which provided significant saving in terms <strong>of</strong> both PAC purchase and in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> sludge disposal.<br />

Recent enhancements to be overviewed relate to process control, system corrosion control including the results <strong>of</strong><br />

diagnostic testing <strong>of</strong> some corrosion, and considerations for control <strong>of</strong> taste and odor and for providing a<br />

disinfection barrier.<br />

Discussion <strong>of</strong> recent findings by others that ozone can provide a barrier to many endocrine disruptors,<br />

pharmaceuticals and personal care products will be discussed briefly with respect to how those results and doses<br />

compare to the Town’s typical ozone doses.<br />

The requirements <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> North Carolina for ozone primary disinfection will also be overviewed.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

44


Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-4<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Treated Water Quality Enhancements<br />

from Ozonation in a Tertiary Plant Upgrade<br />

John Mieog 1 , Mark Lynch 1 , Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />

Sock-Hoon Koh 2 , and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />

1. Melbourne Water Corporation; Melbourne, Australia<br />

2. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />

3. Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia<br />

The Victorian Government announced in 2006 that Melbourne Water would implement upgrades to its Eastern Treatment Plant<br />

(ETP) to enable it to produce ‘Class A’ recycled water quality in 2012 which will necessitate the implementation <strong>of</strong> a tertiary<br />

treatment plant comprising filtration and advanced disinfection.<br />

The ETP treats approximately 42 percent <strong>of</strong> the sewage from Melbourne’s southern and eastern suburbs. At average and<br />

peak flows <strong>of</strong> around 370 and 700 MLD respectively, the ETP tertiary treatment plant will be amongst the largest <strong>of</strong> its kind in<br />

the world.<br />

Melbourne Water elected to consider going beyond Class A criteria to address residual aesthetic parameters, colour and odour, in<br />

particular. This would address amenity impacts <strong>of</strong> the plant’s marine discharge, provide greater opportunities for reuse <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reclaimed water and thereby further reduce environmental impact through recycling diversions, and provide a valuable additional<br />

tool to help Victoria cope with extended drought periods such as the one being experienced today.<br />

Numerous treatment technologies were investigated and the most promising ones were chosen for application-specific testing.<br />

Due to the large scale at which these technologies would be applied, Melbourne Water elected to design and construct a<br />

tertiary technology trials plant in which to confirm the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> individual unit processes as well integrated process trains.<br />

Ozonation followed by biologically active media filtration (BMF) was selected to improve the aesthetic quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

treated water.<br />

Pilot trials run to date have demonstrated considerable water quality improvements as well as synergistic impacts on downstream<br />

treatment processes. Ozone doses between 8 and 15 mg/L have been tested and found to effect substantial reductions in true<br />

colour as well as increased UV transmittance (UVT). The 5 th percentile unfiltered secondary effluent UVT is increased from 33 %<br />

to 55% at ozone doses between 8 and 10 mg/L. This has a dramatic impact on the capital and operating costs for possible<br />

downstream UV irradiation. Cost comparisons <strong>of</strong> process trains that include ozone/BMF preceding UV irradiation compared with<br />

those that did not include ozone/BMF concluded that the ozone process more than pays for itself in reduced UV costs.<br />

Suspended solids challenge testing was performed to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> ozone at removing true colour and increasing<br />

UVT at elevated concentrations <strong>of</strong> feed water total suspended solids. Data revealed that equivalent amounts <strong>of</strong> true colour were<br />

removed per milligram <strong>of</strong> ozone transferred for influent suspended solids levels as high as 45 mg/L. The same performance was<br />

found for UVT increase at elevated influent suspended solids concentrations. At an influent suspended solids concentration <strong>of</strong> 214<br />

mg/L, the colour change reduced from 82 to 65%.<br />

Ozone/BMF together were also found to achieve a high degree <strong>of</strong> nitrification <strong>of</strong> influent ammonia. BMF effluent ammonia<br />

concentrations were achieved following filtration through either anthracite or granular activated carbon media and at empty bed<br />

contact times less than 10 minutes. This is a particularly significant benefit as it enables the use <strong>of</strong> free chlorine as an additional<br />

viricidal barrier for the production <strong>of</strong> high quality reclaimed water.<br />

Operation <strong>of</strong> ultrafiltration membranes before and after ozone/BMF has demonstrated the capability <strong>of</strong> these membranes to<br />

operate effectively at flux rates around double the sustainable flux when treating direct secondary effluent. Ozone followed by<br />

BMF has been found to be a valuable process addition to the treatment process trains we have trialed. The further effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

ozone at achieving substantial virus inactivation (as presented in a separate abstract submission) while concurrently achieving the<br />

multiple benefits described above has clearly demonstrated a valuable role that ozone can play in enhancing the acceptability <strong>of</strong><br />

reclaimed water schemes.<br />

45<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-1<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Inline Multi-Jets Ozone Contactors: Performance and Scalability<br />

Mahad S. Baawain 1 , Mohamed Gamal El-Din 2 , Daniel W. Smith 2 , and Angelo Mazzei 3<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil & Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman<br />

2. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil & Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton, Canada<br />

3. Mazzei Injector Corporation, Bakersfield, CA<br />

The hydrodynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> three scales <strong>of</strong> in-line multi-jets ozone contactors were studied by using<br />

a laser flow map particle image velocimetry coupled with planar laser induced fluorescence (PIV/PLIF). All<br />

measurements were conducted under total liquid flow rate <strong>of</strong> about 10 L/s (for 0.10 m diameter contactor), 5.5 L/s<br />

(for 0.075 m diameter contactor) and 2.5 L/s (for 0.051 m diameter contactor) with gas flow rate ranging from 0.05<br />

to 0.4 L/s (for 0.10 m diameter contactor), 0.03 to 0.24 L/s (for 0.075 m diameter contactor) and 0.05 to 0.1 L/s (for<br />

0.051 m diameter contactor). The gas was introduced to the contactors through side injectors aligned in opposing or<br />

alternating positions. Results showed that for the same number <strong>of</strong> jets and at the same gas flow rate, the liquid<br />

dispersion coefficient (D L ) was higher when the alternating alignment was applied. D L increased as the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reactor increased. On the hand, higher ozone mass transfer rates were observed when using opposing alignment.<br />

Furthermore, as the cross-sectional area (i.e., the size) <strong>of</strong> the reactor increases, the mass transfer rate increases.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

46


Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-2<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Operator-Friendly Technique and Quality Control Considerations<br />

for Indigo Colorimetric Measurement <strong>of</strong> Ozone Residual<br />

Kerwin L. Rakness 1 , Eric C. Wert 2 , Michael Elovitz 3 , and Suzanne Mahoney 4<br />

1. Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526<br />

2. Southern Nevada Water System, P.O. Box 99955, Las Vegas, NV 89193<br />

3. Treatment Technology and Evaluation Branch, Water Supply & Water Res. Division, U.S. EPA, 26 West<br />

M.L. King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268<br />

4. Little Falls Water Treatment Plant, Passaic Valley Water Commission, 800 Union Boulevard, Totowa, NJ<br />

07512<br />

Drinking water ozone disinfection systems document ozone residual concentration, C, for regulatory compliance<br />

reporting <strong>of</strong> concentration-times-time, CT, and resultant log inactivation <strong>of</strong> virus, Giardia and Cryptosporidium.<br />

The indigotrisulfonate (ITS) “colorimetric” procedure is the Standard Method for manually measuring ozone<br />

residual. Although the method as currently written in Standard Methods is relatively easy to implement, its<br />

accuracy nonetheless depends on specific ITS quality control considerations. Also, Standard Methods protocol is<br />

based on specific quantities <strong>of</strong> materials and sample volumes, making the method somewhat inflexible. Tests are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten performed in plant surroundings by operating staff, as opposed to in “certified” laboratories by analytical<br />

chemists. In this paper a more flexible, quality-assured and “operator-friendly” technique for the ITS method<br />

is presented.<br />

Indigo colorimetric testing described in this paper includes methods to account for apparent ozone residual due to<br />

oxidized manganese. Also described are special study results that document consequences for ignoring certain<br />

conditions. For example, ITS solution stored on a shelf for several days can cause an appreciable under-estimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> true ozone residual. Storage for several weeks can cause a major under-estimation <strong>of</strong> true ozone residual. Other<br />

special study results suggest increased flexibility is possible without negative consequence, as compared to the<br />

method currently outlined in Standard Methods.<br />

47<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-3<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Highly Efficient High Concentration Photochemical Ozone Generation<br />

Daniel E. Murnick<br />

UV Solutions Inc. and Rutgers University, Newark NJ 07102<br />

Using new highly efficient long lived 172 nm lamps we have demonstrated photochemical production <strong>of</strong> ozone at<br />

specific energy <strong>of</strong> 3 kWh/lb (6.6 kWh/kg, 150 gm/kWh) at 5% O 3 by weight with air as a feed gas. Similar results<br />

have been obtained using oxygen as a feed gas at 10% O 3 by weight. No NO x is produced as nitrogen is invisible to<br />

172 nm light.<br />

Test results agree well with theoretical predictions i and indicate significant O & M cost reduction opportunities for<br />

large facilities, and the potential <strong>of</strong> eliminating the need for LOX storage facilities. Capital costs are projected to be<br />

similar to, or less than those for discharge production systems- depending on system size.<br />

The all quartz 172 nm lamps operate in most gas or liquid environments resulting in the possibility <strong>of</strong> generating<br />

ozone with a wide range <strong>of</strong> concentrations and process parameters such as pressure and temperature. The lamps are<br />

instant start and stop, with VUV light production efficiency essentially independent <strong>of</strong> duty cycle. The high<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the lamps and the photochemical ozone production lower cooling requirements compared to those <strong>of</strong><br />

existing systems. As with existing ozone generators, ozone yield and upper ozone concentration limit are strongly<br />

influenced both by water vapor in the process gas stream and the ambient temperature.<br />

i<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Water Vapor on Photochemical Ozone Generation with Efficient 172nm Xenon Excimer Lamps,<br />

Manfred Salvermoser, Daniel E. Murnick and Ulrich Kogelschatz, Ozone Science and Engineering, 30, 228-237<br />

(2008)<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

48


Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-4<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

The Study on the Ceramic Membrane Wastewater Reuse System<br />

with Pre Ozonation and Coagulation<br />

M. Noguchi 1 , M. Aoki 1 , H. Kozono 1 , H. Kouchiwa 2 , and Y.Yoda 2<br />

1. Metawater ,Co., LTD., Shiroyama Trust Tower. 4-3-1 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-6029, Japan<br />

2. Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2-8-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-8001, Japan<br />

In recent years, reclaimed water from municipal wastewater treatment plants is becoming increasingly significant<br />

water resource around the urban areas in Japan. Therefore, new wastewater reuse system using ozonation,<br />

coagulation and ceramic MF membrane (0.1µm) was developed. This study is the collaborative development with<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Sewerage Tokyo Metropolitan Government. The testing equipment is located inside the Shibaura Water<br />

Reclamation Center in Tokyo Metropolitan Government. The testing was performed using secondary effluent<br />

treated at the center. The volume <strong>of</strong> treated water is about 90m 3 /day. We confirmed that a small amount <strong>of</strong> ozone<br />

addition and coagulation could significantly improve the membrane filtration performance. The combination <strong>of</strong> pre<br />

ozonation and coagulation processes achieves continuous stable membrane filtration with the high filtration flux <strong>of</strong><br />

4m 3 /m 2 /day (167 LMH). A stable membrane filtration could be maintained by controlling ozone dosing rate<br />

depending on raw water quality fluctuation. The removal <strong>of</strong> COD (Mn) in raw water was 50 to 60%, and the<br />

color removals satisfied 80% or higher. The filtrate that was obtained from our pilot study was better than<br />

Californian standards.<br />

49<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 10: UV Disinfection Design – S10-1<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Disinfection Alternatives and Sustainability:<br />

Energy Optimization, Disinfection Efficiency, and Sustainability<br />

Gary Hunter 1 , Andy Shaw 1 , Dr. Leonard W. Casson 2 , and Dr. Joe Marriott 2<br />

1. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />

2. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, 944 Benedum Engineering Hall,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261<br />

The dramatic rise in energy and chemical costs is spurring additional focus on optimizing efficiency <strong>of</strong> wastewater<br />

disinfection processes. At the same time, sustainability <strong>of</strong> disinfection in an increasingly-urbanized world will<br />

depend in part on the ability to reuse treated effluent as a resource instead <strong>of</strong> a waste product.<br />

Following the terrorist attacks <strong>of</strong> September 11, 2001, and devastation <strong>of</strong> Hurricane Katrina, the engineering design<br />

paradigm was broadened to include safety, security and a response to all hazards. The “3-S Design Concept” for<br />

drinking water and wastewater infrastructure systems was developed<br />

The “3-S Design Concept” can be used to provide practical guidance for the design and operation <strong>of</strong> disinfection<br />

processes and treatment systems in today’s economic environment in a manner that embraces sustainable solutions<br />

that benefit future generations instead <strong>of</strong> short-sighted solutions with hidden future costs. Sustainability<br />

incorporates a triple bottom line approach incorporating economic, environmental, and social factors in to the<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> a UV disinfection system.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

50


Tuesday AM – Session 10: UV Disinfection Design – S10-2<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Airing it Out: Design Considerations for UV Disinfection Installations<br />

Aaron W. Duke, P.E.<br />

11242 Waples Mill Road, Suite 250, Fairfax, Virginia 22030<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> ultraviolet light for disinfection in drinking water treatment has become increasingly prevalent since the<br />

findings <strong>of</strong> Clancy et al., were published in 1998. This increased use has been helped by the promulgation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule and the requirement for additional Cryptosporidium<br />

inactivation for certain source waters. UV disinfection use has also been aided by the increased awareness <strong>of</strong><br />

endocrine disruptors and potential for advanced oxidation to deal with these compounds. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper<br />

is to provide guidelines for UV disinfection designs relative to air entrainment based upon lessons learned from<br />

recent installations.<br />

51<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 10: UV Disinfection Design – S10-3<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry-Based Validation<br />

on UV System Design Specifications<br />

Bryan R. Townsend 1 and Gary Hunter 2<br />

1. Black & Veatch, 8520 Cliff Cameron Drive, Suite 210, Charlotte, NC 28269<br />

2. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />

Fueled by recent UV system validations that have been conducted in accordance with testing protocols based on the<br />

UV Disinfection Guidance Manual, the need for a modernized protocol for the validation, sizing and operation <strong>of</strong><br />

UV systems for the disinfection <strong>of</strong> secondary wastewater effluent has become increasingly evident. Although the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a modified validation protocol is an important first step in the advancement <strong>of</strong> wastewater UV<br />

system design, it is one <strong>of</strong> several key components to the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> advanced methods for more<br />

accurate and reliable UV system design and operation.<br />

An increasing amount <strong>of</strong> design specifications are allowing for or require UV system sizing based on validation<br />

testing, however, many <strong>of</strong> these specifications do not properly address requirements that should be applied to the<br />

design and operation <strong>of</strong> UV systems based on biodosimetry-derived performance models. Many concepts that are<br />

key to the proper application <strong>of</strong> biodosimetry results for UV system design are commonly overlooked or<br />

misunderstood, potentially resulting in under or over design <strong>of</strong> UV systems and inadequate or inefficient operating<br />

strategies. Fully understanding the impact <strong>of</strong> various validation approaches on UV system design will equip<br />

engineers with the added knowledge to develop proper specifications for safe, accurate and efficient design <strong>of</strong> UV<br />

systems that will attain required disinfection goals, while accounting for the site-specific UV dose-response<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> the target microorganism.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

52


Tuesday AM – Session 11: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S11-1<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

A Bench-Scale Evaluation <strong>of</strong> UV and UV/H 2 O 2 Processes for the Removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> PPCPs in Secondary Treated Water <strong>of</strong> Sewage Treatment Plant<br />

Ilho Kim, Naoyuki Yamashita, and Hiroaki Tanaka<br />

Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Kyoto University,<br />

1-2 Yumihama, Otsu, Shiga 520-0811, Japan<br />

The side effects <strong>of</strong> PPCPs on the aquatic environment and human body have not been known yet. However, PPCPs in<br />

water environment should be removed in aspect <strong>of</strong> precautionary principles. The performance <strong>of</strong> UV and UV/H 2 O 2<br />

processes for the PPCPs removal was investigated using secondary effluent. 38 PPCPs were detected in secondary<br />

effluent used for tested water in this study. Only 17 <strong>of</strong> 38 PPCPs were removed by more than 90% despite UV dose <strong>of</strong><br />

2,768 mJ/cm 2 during UV process, showing that considerable UV dose will be required for the effective PPCPs removal<br />

by UV alone process. This also shows that it will be difficult to accomplish good PPCPs removals by typical UV<br />

disinfection process (UV dose : 40 mJ/cm 2 ~ 140 mJ/cm 2 ). On the other hand, the PPCPs removal by UV alone process<br />

improved significantly by the combination <strong>of</strong> H 2 O 2 with UV process. Except naproxen (>89%), 37 PPCPs were removed<br />

by more than 90% at the operational condition <strong>of</strong> UV dose <strong>of</strong> 923 mJ/cm 2 (contact time : 5 min) and initial H 2 O 2<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> 6.2 mg/L. As a consequence, the combination <strong>of</strong> UV and H 2 O 2 made it possible to reduce UV dose at<br />

least by more than 3 times comparing with for UV alone process. Electrical energy required for the effective PPCPs<br />

removal by UV/H 2 O 2 process was 0.54 kW/m 3 target water (Operational condition : UV dose : 923 mJ/cm 2 , H 2 O 2 : 6.2<br />

mg/L), showing that UV/H 2 O 2 process can reduce energy consumption and operating cost considerably, comparing with<br />

UV process.<br />

53<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 11: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S11-2<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV Radiation on Natural Organic Matter<br />

Gustavo E. Imoberdorf and Madjid Mohseni<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological Engineering,<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. Canada<br />

This research focused on examining the efficacy <strong>of</strong> vacuum-UV (VUV and H 2 O 2 /VUV) processes to degrade NOM<br />

present in raw water. Both VUV and H 2 O 2 /VUV were very effective at mineralizing NOM. After 90 minutes <strong>of</strong><br />

irradiation, TOC <strong>of</strong> the water decreased from 4.95 ppm to 0.8 ppm. At shorter irradiation times, partial degradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> NOM led to significant changes in water characteristics, such as modifications in the molecular weight<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> NOM as well as formation <strong>of</strong> oxidation by-products (e.g., aldehydes).<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

54


Tuesday AM – Session 11: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S11-3<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Predicting Hydroxyl Radical Activity and<br />

Trace Contaminants Removal in Ozonated Water<br />

Simon Vincent, Abderrahim Kotbi and Benoit Barbeau<br />

Industrial-NSERC Chair in Drinking Water, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Département des Génies Civil,<br />

Géologique et des Mines, CP 6079, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3A7<br />

There is a renewed interest in predicting R CT following growing evidence that AOP is effective against many<br />

emerging contaminants. Five surface waters were investigated to evaluate the OH-radical activity using the R CT<br />

concept, predict R CT using traditional water quality characteristics and predict contaminants removal by ozonation<br />

and peroxone. It was shown that R CT was dependant on water quality characteristics and could be modeled<br />

(R 2 =0.97), for four out <strong>of</strong> five waters, using water characteristics and treatment conditions. Predictions <strong>of</strong> MIB<br />

oxidation closely matched the published data <strong>of</strong> Kawamura (2000) and bench-scale assays performed on one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

water under investigation.<br />

55<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 12: Perozone and AOP Processes – S12-1<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

In-Situ 1,4 Dioxane Remediation in HVOC Sites<br />

Andrew Brolowski and William B. Kerfoot<br />

Kerfoot Technologies, Inc., 766-B Falmouth Road, Mashpee, MA 02649<br />

Increasingly, 1,4 dioxane is found as a co-contaminant at chloroethene spill sites. The compound has shown limited<br />

removal (


Tuesday AM – Session 12: Perozone and AOP Processes – S12-2<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Experiences <strong>of</strong> Perozone ® and C-Sparge TM<br />

at Two Former Dry Cleaner Sites in the Netherlands<br />

Bert Scheffer 1 and Edward van de Ven 2<br />

1. Verhoeve Milieu bv, Dorpsstraat 32, P.O. Box 4, 6997 ZG Hoog-Keppel, The Netherlands<br />

2. Verhoeve Milieu bv, Aventurijn 600, P.O. Box 3073, 3301 DB Dordrecht, The Netherlands<br />

C-Sparge TM , better known as ozone sparging (microbubble ozone), is used for treatment <strong>of</strong> the plume zone area<br />

with VOCl, mainly PCE, at a former dry cleaner site in Utrecht . The City <strong>of</strong> Utrecht has had good results with<br />

C-Sparge TM in combination with pump and treat. Prior to the application <strong>of</strong> C-Sparge TM , pump and treat was used<br />

for removal <strong>of</strong> mass in the plume until tailing <strong>of</strong> the groundwater concentrations occurred. The concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

PCE in the extracted groundwater stagnated at 2,000 ppb. Before start-up <strong>of</strong> the C-Sparge TM system, a 3-week<br />

field pilot test funded by the Dutch organization SKB was conducted to study mobilization effects. In the plume<br />

area, no mobilization effects were found. After that, in September, 2005, C-Sparge TM was started. Together the<br />

pilot test and full-scale system lowered PCE groundwater concentrations from ppm-level (max. 15 ppm) to low<br />

ppb-level (400 ppb) in about 125 days. After about 700 days <strong>of</strong> treatment the PCE groundwater concentrations<br />

decreased to below the Dutch Intervention Level (40 ppb). At 13 m from the Spargepoints ® , a significant PCE<br />

concentration decrease was detected (from 2,000 ppb to 13 ppb). Currently, the source zone area is being treated<br />

with Perozone ® (peroxide-coated ozone) in conjunction with pump and treat.<br />

Perozone ® is also used on a former dry cleaner site in Terneuzen. After demolition <strong>of</strong> the dry cleaner facility and<br />

excavation <strong>of</strong> the hot spot in soil, MIP-CPT’s were done to investigate for possible DNAPL below the former dry<br />

cleaner facility. At least at one point on depth DNAPL was detected (PCE: 130,000 µg/L). Previous investigations<br />

indicate a large near-source zone area <strong>of</strong> 150 x 60 m. After installing 60 Laminar Spargepoints ® over<br />

approximately 100,000 m 3 soil volume, the system was started in October, 2005. The initial results indicate a quick<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> aqueous PCE concentrations. After allocation <strong>of</strong> the oxidant mass loading for the near-source zone<br />

treatment some rebound was found in the source zone area. Additional treatment is required to reach the cleanup<br />

goals. The experience indicates that treatment <strong>of</strong> the DNAPL with Perozone ® is possible. Mobilization effects<br />

were found in the source zone also. From extended monitoring appears a 99,8% reduction <strong>of</strong> this initial<br />

increased concentration.<br />

57<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 12: Perozone and AOP Processes – S12-3<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Non-Thermal Plasma - A Novel and<br />

Cost Effective Advanced Oxidation System<br />

Dvir Solnik 1 , Andreas Kolch 2 , Andrew Salveson 3 , Nitin Goel 3 ,<br />

Nicola Fontaine 4 , Justin Sutherland 5 , and Chris Fennessy 6<br />

1. Aquapure Technologies Limited, Israel<br />

2. Hytecon, Germany<br />

3. Carollo Engineers, Walnut Creek, CA<br />

4. Carollo Engineers, Walnut Creek, CA<br />

5. Carollo Engineers, Austin, TX<br />

6. Aerojet, Sacramento, CA<br />

Aquapure is a novel and energy efficient method for the generation and transfer <strong>of</strong> various oxidants into water,<br />

including the hydroxyl radical. This method is characterized as non-thermal plasma. Depending on the target<br />

compound, the EE O <strong>of</strong> UV/hydrogen peroxide system is 42% to 78% higher than the EE O <strong>of</strong> the Aquapure system.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

58


Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-1<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> Velocity Pr<strong>of</strong>iling to Assess to Effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> Piping Configuration on UV Dose Delivery<br />

Dennis J. Greene 1 , Keith Bircher 2 , and Harold B. Wright 3<br />

1. AECOM Water, 276 Abby Road, Manchester, NH 03103<br />

2. UV Technologies Div., Calgon Carbon Corporation, 50 Mural Street, Unit#3,<br />

Richmond Hill, ON, CAN L4B 1E4<br />

3. Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713<br />

The USEPA UVDGM allows for use <strong>of</strong> pre-validated reactors when point velocities measured upstream and<br />

downstream <strong>of</strong> a reactor fall within ± 20% <strong>of</strong> the average pipe velocity (v avg ) at the validation and WTP sites. This<br />

guidance is somewhat limited in application because internal reactor components typically create a reactor outlet<br />

velocity pr<strong>of</strong>ile with points that exceed the ± 20% V avg criterion. A method for applying pre-validated reactors<br />

based on alternative velocity criteria is presented: if measured velocity pr<strong>of</strong>iles at a WTP are closer to v avg than the<br />

validation velocity pr<strong>of</strong>iles based on statistical analysis, then pre-validation dose delivery results should apply to<br />

the WTP site.<br />

59<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-2<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Ultraviolet System Design Considerations for Uncovered Reservoir<br />

versus Water Treatment Plant Applications<br />

Jack Bebee, P.E. 1 and Christine Cotton, P.E. 2<br />

1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue, Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008<br />

2. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., One South Church Avenue, Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ 85701<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper is to summarize the applications and specific approaches used during design and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> operational strategies for both UV disinfection <strong>of</strong> uncovered reservoir and Water Treatment Plants<br />

(WTP). These projects are in California, which has more stringent <strong>of</strong>f-specification requirements than the Long<br />

Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR); therefore, the UV facility design needed<br />

additional controls and equipment to meet the requirements.<br />

This paper identifies key items that need to be evaluated during UV facility design for both WTP and uncovered<br />

reservoir applications and provide examples <strong>of</strong> how these items were addressed on real-world projects. Some key<br />

items that are discussed include:<br />

• Design modifications to improve hydraulic operation<br />

• Operation during reactor start-up/shut down<br />

• Operation during a power outage or interruption<br />

• Control and operation <strong>of</strong> UV reactor flow control valves<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

60


Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-3<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Costs and Sustainability Comparison <strong>of</strong> Chemical Disinfection and<br />

Medium Pressure Ultraviolet Disinfection for Virus Inactivation<br />

James Collins 1 , Christine Cotton 1 , and Phyllis Posy 2<br />

1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave, Suite 1120, Tucson, Arizona<br />

2. Atlantium Technologies, Har Tuv Industrial Park, POB 11071, Israel 99100<br />

Previously, it was thought that using UV disinfection for 4-log virus inactivation would be cost prohibitive due to<br />

the high doses required in the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR). However,<br />

recent studies (Linden, 2007) have shown that the dose necessary for 4-log adenovirus inactivation is<br />

approximately 40% to 50% lower than the doses published in the LT2ESWTR when polychromatic UV lamps are<br />

used (Linden et al 2007). A recent validation using adenovirus2 demonstrated this in full scale.<br />

This study evaluated the costs (i.e., capital and operation and maintenance costs) and sustainability <strong>of</strong> using<br />

chlorine or UV disinfection for virus inactivation <strong>of</strong> groundwater and surface waters. The results <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

show that UV disinfection is a cost effective option for select disinfection scenarios. UV disinfection was also<br />

shown to have environmental and risk benefits when compared to traditional chemical disinfection.<br />

61<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-4<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

A Smart Way to Validate UV Systems for Reuse Applications<br />

Matthias Boeker 1 , Andrew Salveson 2 , Madhukar Rapaka 3 , and Ronnie Bemus 1<br />

1. ITT Water & Wastewater U.S.A., 14125 South Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273<br />

2. Carollo Engineers, 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94598<br />

3. ITT Water & Wastewater Germany, Boschstrasse 4, 32051 Herford, Germany<br />

The NWRI/AwwaRF 2003 Ultraviolet Disinfection <strong>Guide</strong>lines describe a methodology for validating UV Systems<br />

for reuse applications.<br />

The validation testing <strong>of</strong> pilot plants using modular, open channel configurations allows for an easy upscale <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bioassay results to full-scale UV systems. Because closed vessel UV reactors employ different number <strong>of</strong> lamps<br />

and may have variations in lamp arrangement, individual reactor certification would be required.<br />

Sometimes viewed as “magic”, this paper describes a robust methodology for combining the use <strong>of</strong> CFD prediction<br />

models with full scale biodosimetric testing, to obtain sound, consistent results that allow a design engineer to<br />

dependability size a UV system within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the NWRI/AwwaRF guidelines.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

62


Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-1<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

A Kinetic Model for the Degradation <strong>of</strong> Natural Organic Matter during the<br />

Ultraviolet Hydrogen Peroxide Advanced Oxidation Process<br />

Sarathy, S.R., Bazri, M., and Mohseni, M.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia,<br />

2360 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada<br />

A completely dynamic, kinetic model was developed to predict the degradation <strong>of</strong> chromophoric natural organic<br />

matter (CNOM) and H 2 O 2 during the UV/H 2 O 2 . Model parameters were estimated numerically by optimizing<br />

fitting to experimental results obtained with a “synthetic water” using Suwannee River NOM. The reaction rate<br />

constant for the reaction between hydroxyl radicals ( • OH) and NOM was estimated at 1.14E4 L mg -1 s -1 , in close<br />

agreement with past literature reports. The reaction rate constant for the reaction between • OH and CNOM was<br />

estimated at 3.08E8 L mol -1 s -1 . Considering the change in CNOM helped improved prediction <strong>of</strong> H 2 O 2 degradation<br />

but the model still under predicted experimental measurements. This discrepancy is hypothesized to be due to the<br />

model’s neglect <strong>of</strong> the reaction between H 2 O 2 and carbon-centered radicals, formed when • OH react with NOM.<br />

63<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-2<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

UV Photolysis <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs)<br />

and Endocrine Disrupting Substances (EDS) in Drinking Water<br />

Jules Carlson 1 , Mihaela Stefan 2 , and Chris Metcalfe 1<br />

1. Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada<br />

2. Trojan Technologies, London, ON, Canada<br />

There is potential for contamination <strong>of</strong> drinking water by pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and<br />

endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs). UV treatment processes will be described along with the parameters<br />

needed to evaluate their efficacy for removal <strong>of</strong> 15 PPCPs and EDCs. UV irradiations were performed using both<br />

low- and medium pressure mercury light sources. Analytical methods involved solid phase extraction (SPE) and<br />

quantification by LC/MS/MS. The photo-degradation kinetics <strong>of</strong> investigated PPCPs and EDCs indicated that<br />

some compounds can be removed by direct photolysis. Characteristic UV absorption spectra were determined for<br />

both protonated and deprotonated forms <strong>of</strong> all compounds, along with pK a estimates determined using<br />

spectrophotometric titration procedures. The quantum yields at 254 nm and the OH radical rate constants were<br />

determined and used to interpret the experimental removal efficiency <strong>of</strong> these emerging contaminants through<br />

direct photolysis and advanced oxidation processes. Irradiation in the presence <strong>of</strong> 4 mg/L H 2 O 2 was an efficient<br />

removal method for all target compounds. With the exception <strong>of</strong> the sulphamethoxazole and triclosan which<br />

undergo rapid degradation by direct photolysis, reaction with OH radicals was the dominant removal pathway<br />

when the irradiations were performed in the presence <strong>of</strong> H 2 O 2 . The impact <strong>of</strong> water constituents, such as nitrate<br />

and dissolved organic matter were also investigated and will be presented.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

64


Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-3<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Advanced Oxidation Processes for Contaminant Destruction:<br />

Selecting between Ozone-Peroxide or UV-Peroxide<br />

James Collins and Christine Cotton, P.E.<br />

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave, Suite 1120, Tucson, Arizona<br />

Interest in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) has grown in recent years as water utilities considering the use<br />

impaired drinking water sources to meet system demand. The impaired sources can be contaminated with a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> contaminants (e.g., volatile organic compounds (VOCs), 1,4-dioxane, N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), and<br />

taste and odor compounds).<br />

AOPs are technologies that are capable <strong>of</strong> removing multiple contaminants simultaneously using the hydroxyl<br />

radical. Currently, the two most commonly used AOPs are UV/peroxide (UV AOPs) and ozone/peroxide<br />

(ozone AOPs). Both technologies have distinct advantages over more traditional treatment technologies. The<br />

paper discusses some <strong>of</strong> the design issues that should be considered when evaluating UV AOPs and ozone AOPs.<br />

65<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-4<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Rapid Measurement <strong>of</strong> Background Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging in Water<br />

Matthew Hross and Erik J. Rosenfeldt<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering<br />

A synthetic water was evaluated using the R OH,UV concept to determine the overall background hydroxyl radical<br />

scavenging. Two probe compounds were used, the first being para-chlorobenzoic acid (pCBA), and then using<br />

methylene blue (MB) at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 5 µM. The water contained scavenging equivalent to 4 mg/L dissolved<br />

organic carbon (DOC). The tests were performed to evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> using MB could be used a probe<br />

compound in place <strong>of</strong> pCBA in the R OH,UV concept. A new scavenging device was then introduced to determine the<br />

overall background scavenging <strong>of</strong> a water with the MB probe compound through a much quicker analysis. The new<br />

scavenging device predicted the overall background scavenging <strong>of</strong> the water as well as the original R OH,UV concept<br />

did. These predictions also agreed with theoretical calculations <strong>of</strong> the overall background scavenging.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

66


Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-1<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Perozone Groundwater Sparging at the Days Inn Lake City Pre-Approval Site<br />

Edward M. Kellar and Chris Mickler, P.E.<br />

MACTEC, Inc., Gainesville, FL 32669<br />

A full-scale microbubble Perozone sparging system using the patented Kerfoot Technologies, Inc. (KTI)<br />

C-Sparge process was installed on a former unleaded gas station site currently active as a Days Inn paved<br />

entrance. Gas phase ozone sparging with dilute liquid hydrogen peroxide injection was introduced in the source<br />

zone via five laminar spargepoints coupled with ozone only sparging into seven surrounding standard microbubble<br />

sparge points. The chemical oxidation system was fabricated in an 8-ft by 10-ft portable enclosure by MACTEC<br />

and installed with KTI startup assistance; operation was initiated in August, 2005. Groundwater volatile aromatic<br />

(BTEX) compound concentrations in source wells decreased from a historical maximum <strong>of</strong> 7,700 ug/L to<br />

non-detect in several monitor wells by the end <strong>of</strong> two quarters <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />

The site geology consisted <strong>of</strong> silty sand and fine sands with a treatment zone under asphalt paving extending from<br />

water table nominally at 3-ft bgs to the confining clay layer at 22-24 feet bgs. Past initial remedial actions included<br />

limited tank removal source excavation, and additional assessment under the FDEP Pre-approval program.<br />

Sparge point programming adjustments have focused oxidant application on a remaining area where limited<br />

sparging has shown the continued presence <strong>of</strong> desorbing BTEX mass. Two source zone wells with recalcitrant<br />

VOCs in an area <strong>of</strong> fine flowing sands are receiving additional attention to improve coverage because lower<br />

permeability with high formation back pressures has limited aggressive injection radius <strong>of</strong> influence. Perimeter<br />

ozone only sparge points have reduced groundwater to non-detectable BTEX and maintained an outer oxidative<br />

band with no re-bound; programmed operation has been reduced to a minimum.<br />

The presentation will focus on design and installation details, startup test sequences, in situ DO and ORP<br />

performance monitoring, remote telemetry alarm features, and lessons learned regarding maintenance<br />

requirements, materials <strong>of</strong> construction suitable with ozone in Florida heat, and the use <strong>of</strong> kinetics analysis to<br />

predict treatment time to endpoints. The system will be contrasted with a larger and more complex 28 point<br />

modular KTI Perozone system newly installed by MACTEC at a Mulberry, FL BTEX site.<br />

67<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-2<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Characterization <strong>of</strong> Ozone Mass Transfer in Model Soils<br />

Alejandro García 1 , Tatyana Poznyak 2 , Jesús Rodríguez 2 , and Isaac Chairez 3<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Automatic Control, CINVESTAV-IPN, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Col. San Pedro<br />

Zacatenco, C.P.07360, Mexico D.F., Mexico<br />

2. Superior School <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering National Polytechnic Institute <strong>of</strong> Mexico (ESIQIE-IPN), Edif 7,<br />

UPALM, C.P. 07738, Mexico D.F., Mexico, E-mail: tpoznyak@ipn.mx<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Interdisciplinary Unit <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology <strong>of</strong> National Polytechnic Institute (UPIBI-IPN), Av.<br />

Acueducto s/n., C.P. 07480, México, D.F, México.<br />

Many technological approaches based on ozone high oxidant capacity have been developed in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminated water. On the contrary, ozone application for the treatment <strong>of</strong> the contaminated air and soil has been<br />

few explored. In the particular case <strong>of</strong> soil treatment, there exist some important attempts that have been realized in<br />

order to determine the possible implementation <strong>of</strong> ozone as a component in a specific remediation technique in the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> polyaromatic organic compounds. This situation has led to the realization <strong>of</strong> some studies about ozone<br />

mass transfer in porous media. However, this is not a trivial problem, overall if we consider complexities involved<br />

in a heterogeneous solid phase, where humidity and organic matter presence can influence on the ozone transfer. In<br />

this sense, some researchers have presented their results using soil packed columns and mathematical models based<br />

on partial differential equations. Nevertheless, the validation <strong>of</strong> mathematical model depends on the determination<br />

<strong>of</strong> all parameters involved, experimental procedure and for the case <strong>of</strong> some parameters a “trial and error<br />

calibration”. In the present work the ozone mass transfer characterization for different model soils (glass spheres,<br />

sand, and burned soil) in a packed glass reactor was studied. We consider the solid phase as a lumped system,<br />

based on this idea a characteristic ozone mass transfer global parameter k sat was proposed. This parameter by an<br />

expression derived from the ozone mass balance in the system was calculated, and it can be obtained<br />

experimentally from the ozone concentration measures at the output <strong>of</strong> the reactor in the gas phase. The k sat values<br />

for the four proposed model solids were calculated, and also a sensibility analysis <strong>of</strong> k sat was carried out. Besides a<br />

simple mathematical model in ordinary differential equation to prove the validity <strong>of</strong> k sat in the process was<br />

simulated and compared with the experimental data.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

68


Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-3<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Ozone Oxidation for Source Removal<br />

And Prevention Barrier at a Fire Training Academy<br />

Scott C. Michaud and Thomas C. Cambareri, LSP<br />

Cape Cod Commission, 3225 Main Street, PO Box 226, Barnstable, MA 02630<br />

The Barnstable Fire Training Academy is a multi-plume site resulting from chronic releases <strong>of</strong> petroleum<br />

hydrocarbons to the environment during simulated fire-fighting conditions over several decades as an<br />

“industrial/commercial” use in a Zone II public water-supply area. Use <strong>of</strong> petroleum at the site ended in 1986.<br />

Multiple source removals were conducted over the subsequent 20 years. While a pump-and-treat containment<br />

system was successful in reducing the down-gradient extent <strong>of</strong> petroleum in groundwater, source areas continued to<br />

release slugs <strong>of</strong> contamination to groundwater from contaminated soil at the water table. The site is located in a<br />

highly permeable aquifer suitable for an air-sparging system. The C-Sparge/Perozone® system manufactured by<br />

Kerfoot Technologies, Inc. was selected to treat residual smear zones. The system consists <strong>of</strong> 12 sparge points that<br />

deliver ozone-amended air and peroxide to contaminated areas. The sparge points are dual-stacked in source areas<br />

in recognition that a deep sparge point can influence a wider lateral area, while a shallow sparge point concentrates<br />

treatment closer to the point. The system was brought on line in March 2006 and continuous peroxide injection<br />

commenced in April 2006. Over the subsequent 6 months, significant reductions in concentrations <strong>of</strong> BTEX,<br />

naphthalene and associated volatile organics (VOC) were reported for groundwater samples collected from<br />

contaminant source areas. In other source areas, low dissolved oxygen and redox measurements and limited VOC<br />

reductions point to blocked treatment pathways in sediments around some sparge wells. Where significant<br />

reductions in contaminant concentrations were achieved, a subsequent rebound <strong>of</strong> VOC concentrations observed<br />

while the sparge system was temporarily inoperable indicates that contaminated soil in smear zones continue to be<br />

a source <strong>of</strong> contaminants leaching to groundwater.<br />

69<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-4<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

A Simplified Method for Modeling Chemical<br />

Intermediates in Advanced Oxidation Processes<br />

Joseph A. Drago, P.E., Ph.D.<br />

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, San Francisco, California<br />

This paper describes a simplified method for modeling the formation and destruction <strong>of</strong> chemical intermediates that<br />

are formed during advanced oxidation processes, such as UV-peroxide and ozone-peroxide, where OH• radical is<br />

the dominant oxidant and pseudo-first order reaction conditions (e.g., OH• at steady state) exist. The model<br />

employs equations, developed to describe radioactivity decay chains, to calculate the formation and degradation <strong>of</strong><br />

chemical intermediates when the relative destruction rate and the decay scheme <strong>of</strong> a target compound are known.<br />

An example using methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) is included.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

70


Tuesday PM – Session 16: UV Disinfection Research – S16-1<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Pre- and Post- UV Disinfection Conditions on Photoreactivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Fecal Coliforms from a Physicochemical Wastewater Effluent<br />

Catherine Hallmich and Ronald Gehr<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University,<br />

817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6<br />

Decreasing photoreactivation after wastewater UV disinfection can lead to considerable savings in capital and<br />

operating costs. Objectives <strong>of</strong> this study were to determine pre- and post-UV irradiation conditions able to decrease<br />

fecal coliform photoreactivation from Montréal Wastewater Treatment Plant wastewater effluents. Results indicate<br />

that delaying exposure to photoreactivating light for 3 hours suppresses photoreactivation at UV doses <strong>of</strong> 10 and 20<br />

mJ/cm 2 . Moreover, at least 440 lux <strong>of</strong> visible light is needed to initiate photoreactivation. Additionally,<br />

photoreactivation decreases significantly when visible light is simultaneously emitted prior to or during UV<br />

irradiation. This is more significantly observed for winter samples, where photoreactivation is decreased by<br />

nearly 50%. Finally, summer populations are more sensitive to inactivation and less able to photoreactivate than<br />

winter populations.<br />

71<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 16: UV Disinfection Research – S16-2<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Disinfection Effects <strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV (VUV)<br />

and UV Light on Bacillus subtilis Spores at 172, 222, 254 nm<br />

Ding Wang, 1,2 Thomas Oppenländer, 3<br />

Mohamed Gamal El-Din, 1 and James R. Bolton 1<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton,<br />

AB, T6G 2W2, Canada.<br />

2. Current address, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Galbraith Building,<br />

35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1A4.<br />

3. Hochschule Furtwangen University (HFU), Campus Villingen-Schwenningen, Fakultät Maschinenbau<br />

und Verfahrenstechnik, Jakob-Kienzle-Str. 17, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.<br />

The efficacy <strong>of</strong> the ultraviolet (UV) disinfection <strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis spores in aqueous suspensions at wavelengths<br />

<strong>of</strong> 172, 222 and 254 nm was evaluated. A Xe 2 * excilamp, a KrCl * excilamp and a low-pressure mercury lamp were<br />

used as the UV light sources at these three wavelengths, respectively. The first-order inactivation rate constants at<br />

172, 222 and 254 nm were 0.0022, 0.122, 0.069 cm 2 mJ –1 , respectively. Therefore, the 2 log reduction <strong>of</strong> B. subtilis<br />

spores required fluences (UV doses) <strong>of</strong> 909, 21.6, and 40.4 mJ cm –2 at these respective wavelengths. This means<br />

that VUV exposure at 172 nm is much less efficient than the exposures at the other two wavelengths for<br />

the inactivation <strong>of</strong> B. subtilis spores, while UV exposure at 222 nm is more efficient than that at 254 nm. This<br />

research indicated quantitatively that VUV light is not practicable for microorganism disinfection in water and<br />

wastewater treatment.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

72


Tuesday PM – Session 16: UV Disinfection Research – S16-3<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

E. coli Repair in UV Water Treatment Conditions<br />

Bohrerova, Z. and Linden, K.G.<br />

The repair and regrowth <strong>of</strong> E. coli was followed in drinking and reuse water following LP and MP UV disinfection.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to perform repair experiments under more realistic conditions than has previously been<br />

attempted. The UV fluence levels used before repair were similar to fluences recommended for water disinfection<br />

(40 – 60 mJ/cm 2 and 100 – 120 mJ/cm 2 for drinking and reuse water, respectively). The relationship between UV<br />

fluence and the amount <strong>of</strong> repair was <strong>of</strong> particular interest, since it is known that with increasing UV fluence the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> repair decreases. The exact quantification <strong>of</strong> dark repair after 48 h was also investigated and compared to<br />

the regrowth potential <strong>of</strong> E. coli after post disinfection conditions (including high numbers <strong>of</strong> inactivated cells in<br />

water and potential chemical byproducts <strong>of</strong> disinfection). The results indicated limited E. coli repair with an<br />

average photorepair <strong>of</strong> 0.3 (+- 0.19) log and no dark repair after 48 h when corrected for regrowth. The regrowth<br />

<strong>of</strong> the E coli in the presence <strong>of</strong> inactivated bacteria followed a logarithmic trend in every case with a sharp increase<br />

in E. coli numbers when the initial bacterial concentration was low and slower increase with the initial bacterial<br />

concentration being higher. The initial E. coli concentration usually at least doubled after 48 h <strong>of</strong> liquid holding and<br />

in some cases increased up to 4 logs from the initial concentration. In the future, more detailed studies should be<br />

performed regarding the regrowth <strong>of</strong> disinfection survivors after treatment since some <strong>of</strong> the regrowth rates<br />

reported herein could have significant impact on the safety <strong>of</strong> treated water. On the other hand we contributed to<br />

the literature that indicates E. coli repair in treated water and after using UV fluences for water disinfection should<br />

not be <strong>of</strong> concern to operators <strong>of</strong> water treatment plants, since the repair rates are negligible.<br />

73<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-1<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Novel UV LED Advanced Oxidation System for Disinfection and<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in Water<br />

Tom Hawkins, Ph.D., and Mark Owen<br />

Puralytics, 15250 NW Greenbrier Pkwy, Beaverton, OR, USA 97006-5764<br />

A novel technology is described, suitable for point <strong>of</strong> use (POU)/point <strong>of</strong> entry (POE) water purification systems,<br />

that uses a dual wavelength UV LED system to excite a fixed-substrate photocatalyst. This advanced oxidation<br />

process rapidly mineralizes organic and inorganic contaminants in water without the chemicals, consumables, toxic<br />

waste, pressure drop, or water wastage <strong>of</strong> traditional solutions. With a self-cleaning fixed photocatalytic substrate,<br />

uniform LED illumination, and extremely high surface area, the system is inherently compact, lightweight,<br />

scalable, and low-maintenance. The process combines photolysis, germicidal disinfection, photocatalysis, and<br />

photo-adsorption to effectively eliminate many contaminants in water without creating any waste stream. Reported<br />

tests confirm successful disinfection <strong>of</strong> Raoultella Terrigena bacteria and MS2 phage virus, removal <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />

metals including arsenic and lead, and the elimination <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> organic chemicals from water, including<br />

phenol, MTBE, and PCE.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

74


Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-2<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

UV Advanced Oxidation Processes for Taste and Odor Treatment:<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Assimilable Organic Carbon<br />

Formation Potential at an Indiana WTP<br />

James Collins 1 , Christine Cotton 1 , Bruce Heeke 2 , David Dahl 3 , and Alan Royce 4<br />

1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Tucson, Arizona<br />

2. Patoka Lake Region Water and Sewer District<br />

3. Midwestern Engineers<br />

4. Trojan Technologies<br />

In recent years, the Patoka Lake Water Regional Water and Sewer District is a utility that has experienced seasonal<br />

taste and odor events that have become a major water quality concern. In 2007, the lake experienced a taste and<br />

odor event with 2-Methylisoborneol (MIB) levels measured as high as 240 nanograms per liter. The District<br />

evaluated various treatment techniques that would be capable <strong>of</strong> achieving up to a 1.8-log reduction <strong>of</strong> MIB.<br />

The treatment techniques considered include UV advanced oxidation process (AOP), ozone, peroxone, granular<br />

activated carbon, and powdered activated carbon.<br />

UV AOPs has been shown to reduce taste and odor compounds such as MIB and Geosmin. One advantage <strong>of</strong> UV<br />

AOPs is the ability <strong>of</strong> the UV equipment to operate in either disinfection mode or taste and odor mode with one<br />

manufacturer’s equipment. This ability reduces the overall operation and maintenance costs due to reduced power<br />

consumption during non-taste and odor events. However, for disinfection, UV reactors are typically installed after<br />

the filters to treat the highest quality water available, to meet LT2ESWTR requirements, and to minimize capital<br />

and operation costs. Oxidation processes can have the potential disadvantage <strong>of</strong> generating assimilable organic<br />

carbon (AOC) that can stimulate microbial growth in the distribution system. AOC generation can be controlled if<br />

bi<strong>of</strong>ilters are installed after the AOP process, as is typical with ozone treatment. However, for UV disinfection to<br />

achieve disinfection credit, the UV AOP system needs to be installed downstream <strong>of</strong> the filters.<br />

The overall effectiveness <strong>of</strong> UV AOPs has been documented in the literature. However, to date, no data regarding<br />

AOC formation following UV AOPs for taste and odor treatment have been published. For UV AOPs used for<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> other environmental pollutants, available data suggest that AOC can be created. However, the UV<br />

dose or Electrical Energy per Order <strong>of</strong> Destruction (EEOs) (typically used in UV AOP applications) for taste and<br />

odor compounds is lower for MIB and Geosmin compared to most environmental pollutants. Relatively, the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> AOC by UV AOPs is expected to be lower than that <strong>of</strong> other technologies (e.g. ozone) given the<br />

fundamental reaction mechanisms at work in UV AOP systems. In general, the impact on AOC generation at the<br />

EEOs required for taste and odor reduction is not well characterized, is water quality dependant, and will determine<br />

whether UV AOP is feasible at this WTPs.<br />

This paper will describe the following items:<br />

• Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> UV AOP for taste and odor reduction<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> UV AOP effectiveness for MIB reduction<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> AOC generation in relation to MIB reduction, its affect on UV AOP placement within the<br />

WTP, and potential effects in the distribution system<br />

• A cost comparison <strong>of</strong> UV AOPs, ozone, peroxone, granular activated carbon, and powdered activated<br />

carbon for taste and odor treatment based on this study<br />

75<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-3<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Toxicity Assessment and Identification <strong>of</strong> Oxidation Byproducts Generated<br />

During the Ozonation <strong>of</strong> Natural Water Containing Pesticide<br />

Pamela Chelme-Ayala, Mohamed Gamal El-Din, and Daniel W. Smith<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, 3-133 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2W2, Canada<br />

The generation <strong>of</strong> intermediates, in some cases more toxic than the parent compounds, that can appear in the<br />

treated water is one <strong>of</strong> the drawbacks <strong>of</strong> advanced oxidation processes. In this study, the formation <strong>of</strong> byproducts<br />

generated during the treatment <strong>of</strong> a natural water containing the pesticide trifluralin by ozonation and ozone<br />

plus hydrogen peroxide was investigated. The results indicated that the primary oxidation byproducts were<br />

2,6-dinitro-4-trifluoromethyaniline and 4-trifluoromethyaniline. To examine the treatment efficiency, the acute<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> untreated and ozonated samples was assessed using the Microtox ® bioassay. The results showed<br />

a toxicity decrease in the initial stages <strong>of</strong> treatment. Then, the toxicity <strong>of</strong> the samples was found to increase at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

76


Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-4<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Evaluating the Effects <strong>of</strong> Source Water Quality<br />

on Bromate Mitigation Performance<br />

Zaid Chowdhury 1 , David Eberle 1 , Laurel Passantino 1 , Joe Kurrus 2 , and Linda Bezy-Botma 2<br />

1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.<br />

2. City <strong>of</strong> Peoria, AZ<br />

Over the course <strong>of</strong> the past three years, mitigation <strong>of</strong> ozone-induced bromate by carbon dioxide and the innovative<br />

chlorine/ammonia processes was studied at the Greenway Water Treatment Plant located in Peoria, AZ. Following<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> a full-scale evaluation indicating that bromate mitigation via pH depression and chlorine/ammonia<br />

addition were able to reduce bromate formation by 35 percent or more, additional bench-scale testing was<br />

performed to assess the influence <strong>of</strong> source water quality on bromate formation, especially with respect to bromide<br />

concentrations. Results from the bench-scale testing indicated that, while both strategies were effective at<br />

mitigating bromate formation in some waters, neither process was expected to reduce bromate formation below<br />

8 µg/L on a consistent basis. Carbon dioxide addition appeared to perform slightly more consistently compared to<br />

the chlorine/ammonia process; however, based on other economic, social, and environmental considerations not<br />

discussed in this study, the chlorine/ammonia process appeared to be the best alternative to mitigate bromate<br />

formation in order to allow higher ozone dosages and thereby enhance taste, odor, and TOC removal.<br />

77<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-1<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Monte Carlo Ray Trace Model:<br />

A New Approach in Determining Fluence Rates in UV Systems<br />

Khoi Nguyen and Jaewan Yoon<br />

Old Dominion University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norfolk, Virginia<br />

A robust Monte Carlo Ray Trace algorithm and model were recently developed to determine fluence rates in a<br />

three-dimensional space <strong>of</strong> UV systems. Using this model, millions <strong>of</strong> random light energy bundles are simulated<br />

from each UV lamp and are traced through the system. The model accounts for inherent variation in emissions<br />

from lamps and UV systems, effects <strong>of</strong> multiple reflections, lamp shadowing in multiple lamp systems, and other<br />

geometric factors <strong>of</strong> the systems, to truthfully reflect realistic physical settings. Consistent fluence rate estimates<br />

were successfully obtained, and model results were found to be in excellent agreement with observed experimental<br />

data obtained from two independent sources and the PSS Model.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

78


Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-2<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Two Methods for Measuring the<br />

UV Output <strong>of</strong> Low Pressure Mercury Lamps in Air<br />

G. Elliott Whitby 1* , Bill Sotirakos 1 , and James R. Bolton 2<br />

1. Calgon Carbon Canada, 50 Mural St., Unit #3, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4B 1E4<br />

2. Bolton Photosciences Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres., Edmonton, AB, Canada T6R 2M5<br />

A standard bioassay has never been accepted for sizing UV systems for disinfecting non-reuse wastewaters. The majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> UV systems for non-water reuse applications are sized using a computer program called UVDIS. This requires the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the UV output <strong>of</strong> a lamp measured in air. Over estimates <strong>of</strong> lamp output can lead to undersized UV systems. A standard<br />

measurement method does not exist, but one has been proposed by the IUVA Manufacturers’ Council based on the Keitz<br />

method. This method and another method called ‘integration over a sphere’ were compared using a low pressure high<br />

output UV lamp. The two methods gave the same results within experimental error. The results also showed that the<br />

conditions for testing a lamp must be carefully defined for that particular lamp. A standard bioassay must be developed for<br />

UV systems for non-reuse wastewater.<br />

79<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-3<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Method for Measurement <strong>of</strong> Output <strong>of</strong> Low Pressure Mercury Lamps [1]<br />

Volker Adam, Ralf Dreiskemper, Martin Kessler<br />

Heraeus Noblelight GmbH, Heraeusstr. 12-14, 63450 Hanau, Germany<br />

Facing the challenge <strong>of</strong> designing UV systems to meet specific disinfection requirements has become increasingly<br />

more complex with the various lamp technologies and configurations available. Whether the chosen design method<br />

is a calculated sizing model, such as point source summation, or biological verification, it is important to adhere to<br />

strictly defined experimental protocols and quality controls. This is most apparent when considering technology<br />

comparisons from different manufacturers. In particular the lamp output measurement procedure used can<br />

significantly affect the outcome <strong>of</strong> measurement results. If the tests are conducted under identical protocols, a<br />

proper and fair comparison between competing lamps is feasible. Therefore the IUVA Manufacturers Council<br />

organized a taskforce in 2007, with the aim <strong>of</strong> preparing a consistent method for the determination and<br />

benchmarking <strong>of</strong> UV lamp output from monochromatic (254 nm) lamps operated by a corresponding power supply<br />

(ballast). The goal was for this method to be used for testing and comparing testing results from different<br />

laboratories. As a further step the taskforce arranged an intercomparison program for laboratory testing <strong>of</strong> a sample<br />

batch <strong>of</strong> LPM lamps in a number <strong>of</strong> locations in Europe and North America. This round robin test will help<br />

determine the suitability <strong>of</strong> this testing method and provide an indication <strong>of</strong> the measurement uncertainty.<br />

This paper outlines the lamp measurement method drafted by the task force and subsequently published in the<br />

IUVA News. In addition this paper will present the method and the results <strong>of</strong> the LPML intercomparison program.<br />

The paper which gave the basis for the talk and is cited here was published previously in the IUVA news<br />

April 2008 [1]<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

80


Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-4<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Controlling Mercury Release with UV Lamp Sleeve Breaks<br />

Harold Wright, Ed Wicklein, and Corianne Hart<br />

Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho 83713<br />

The Water Research Foundation funded an evaluation <strong>of</strong> mercury release and control with drinking water<br />

UV disinfection. Experimental studies show that the mass <strong>of</strong> mercury released when an amalgam low-pressure<br />

high-output lamp breaks is orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude less than when a MP lamp breaks. The difference is likely related<br />

to the amount <strong>of</strong> mercury in the vapor phase during lamp operation, which is notably greater with MP lamps<br />

because they operate at high temperatures. The advective-dispersion equation can be used to model mercury<br />

transport in pipes while tracer studies or CFD can be used to model transport through basins and other structures.<br />

Transport models can be used to locate valves to contain mercury release and define water-sampling plans.<br />

Low velocity zones, however, will not contain the initial mercury release.<br />

81<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-1<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

High Energy Efficiency and Small Footprint with High-Wattage<br />

Low Pressure UV Disinfection for Water Reuse<br />

Andrew Salveson 1 , Tavy Wade1, Keith G. Bircher 2 , and Bill Sotirakos 2<br />

1. Carollo Engineers<br />

2. Calgon Carbon Corporation<br />

Wastewater treatment plants <strong>of</strong>ten use lamp racks oriented horizontally in the direction <strong>of</strong> flow in an open channel. The lamps<br />

emit Ultraviolet Light (UV) that inactivates pathogenic microorganisms rendering the water safe for discharge to a receiving<br />

water body or for re-use <strong>of</strong> the water (irrigation, indirect potable re-use, industrial use, gray water for non-potable use, etc.)<br />

The racks hold lamps in an array dispersed over the cross section <strong>of</strong> the channel such that none <strong>of</strong> the water flowing down the<br />

channel passes too far from any one lamp.<br />

Early UV systems using conventional low pressure mercury arc lamps have a lamp spacing <strong>of</strong> approximately 7.5 cm in a<br />

square array. With 2.5 cm diameter quartz tubes this means that the maximum distance from any lamp is approximately 4 cm.<br />

This provides sufficient space for the water to pass between the lamps without undue head loss and is close enough to achieve<br />

adequate penetration <strong>of</strong> the UV to all areas and hence adequate disinfection. These low pressure systems have lamps with a<br />

total power consumption <strong>of</strong> under 100 Watts and a UVC (germicidal UV) output <strong>of</strong> under 50 Watts.<br />

Subsequent advancement in lamp technology has produced low pressure lamps with higher output. Higher lamp output means<br />

that more water can be disinfected per lamp, and hence the flow <strong>of</strong> water must be increased proportional to the lamp UVC<br />

output. However due to head loss limits across a bank <strong>of</strong> lamps (too high a head loss means that the level <strong>of</strong> water upstream <strong>of</strong><br />

the bank must increase and some <strong>of</strong> the water will spill over the top <strong>of</strong> the lamp bank and not be adequately treated), the lamp<br />

spacing must be increased to accommodate the greater water flow. For example lamps with an electrical consumption <strong>of</strong> 250<br />

Watts and UVC output <strong>of</strong> approximately 100 Watts must be accommodated in arrays with 10 cm lamp spacing. The additional<br />

area for the flow <strong>of</strong> water limits the velocity and hence head loss across the lamp bank. However this increased lamp spacing<br />

reduces the irradiance at the furthest point from the lamps resulting in some decrease in the performance efficiency.<br />

More recent development <strong>of</strong> even higher powered lamps (500 Watts, with 200 Watts UVC output) would potentially result in<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> lamps needed being reduced to half that <strong>of</strong> systems employing 250 Watt lamps. However this means that the<br />

flow per lamp must be doubled, resulting in a quadrupling in the head loss across a lamp bank unless the spacing <strong>of</strong> the lamps<br />

is increased further still. Increasing the spacing beyond 10 cm potentially results in a further reduction in treatment efficiency,<br />

negating the potential advantages <strong>of</strong> fewer higher power lamps.<br />

This paper presents results <strong>of</strong> bioassay testing at a WWTP in California <strong>of</strong> a Calgon Carbon C3500 system with 500 Watt Low<br />

Pressure amalgam lamps that has overcome this lamp spacing/pressure drop barrier.<br />

The pilot test consisted <strong>of</strong> 2 banks <strong>of</strong> lamps each with a 4 x 4 lamp array for a total <strong>of</strong> 32 lamps. Flow rates from 250 to 4000<br />

gpm and UVT’s from 35 to 70%T were tested.<br />

The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this system are that fewer lamps are needed than previous systems while still maintaining high<br />

electrical efficiency. This results in a system with a smaller footprint, reducing installation costs, and lower operating and<br />

maintenance costs.<br />

An economic analysis at a California Title 22 reuse site will be presented comparing the installed and operating costs <strong>of</strong> this<br />

system with a conventional lower powered LP system and a closed pipe medium pressure lamp system.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

82


Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-2<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection Combined with Chlorination/Chloramination on<br />

the Formation <strong>of</strong> Nitrogenous Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water<br />

Amisha D. Shah 1 , Aaron A. Dotson 2 , Karl G. Linden 2 , Howard S. Weinberg 3 , and William A. Mitch 1<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering, Yale University, 9 Hillhouse Ave., New Haven, CT 06520,<br />

2. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Engineering Center ECOT,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309<br />

3. Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill,<br />

1303 Michael Hooker Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599<br />

Our study’s focus was to understand the role UV treatment had on forming selected nitrogenous DBPs, including<br />

haloacetonitriles, halonitromethanes, and nitrosamines under various operating and water quality conditions.<br />

Preliminary experiments investigated DOM isolates dosed with elevated nitrate concentrations. These samples<br />

were exposed to either low pressure (LP) or medium pressure (MP) UV sources combined with<br />

chlorination/chloramination where their order was varied. In certain cases, dichloroacetonitrile (DCAN) formation<br />

decreased when UV exposure was followed by chloramination in comparison to chloramination alone but remained<br />

constant when chloramination was added prior to UV exposure. Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and<br />

dimethylnitramine (DMNA) concentrations were found to increase upon similar MP 1000 mJ/cm 2 UV exposure<br />

followed by chlorination in comparison to chlorination alone. We are pursuing bench scale experiments to better<br />

understand formation mechanisms. Overall, this study will assist in understanding the potential various<br />

UV/chlorination/chloramination treatment schemes will have on forming nitrogenous DBPs and therefore provide<br />

guidance for utilities considering UV treatment.<br />

83<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-3<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

High Intensity Pulsed Lamps for Water Treatment: Review and Status<br />

Ray Schaefer and Michael Grapperhaus<br />

Phoenix Science & Technology, Inc., Chelmsford, MA 01824<br />

This talk reviews the characteristics <strong>of</strong> pulsed lamps and the limitations <strong>of</strong> commercial flash lamps for practical<br />

water treatment. Selected research on enhanced treatment rates from pulsed light is included. A status report<br />

is given on recent and ongoing research to increase lifetime and reduce the life-cycle cost <strong>of</strong> pulsed lamps.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

84


Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-4<br />

Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />

An Empirical Method for Accurately Sizing Wastewater<br />

UV Reactors for Disinfection <strong>of</strong> any Microorganism<br />

Harold Wright 1 , Andrew Salveson 1 , Tavy Wade, Sean Poust 1 , Allan Slater 2 ,<br />

Duncan Collins 2 , Jeremy Meier 2 , and Ian Dearnley 2<br />

1. 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94598<br />

2. Severn Trent Services, 580 Virginia Drive, Suite 300, Ft. Washington, PA 19034<br />

The reduction equivalent dose (RED) measured during biodosimetric UV validation depends on the test microbe’s<br />

UV dose-response kinetics as well as the reactor’s UV dose distribution. Because <strong>of</strong> these effects, the RED<br />

delivered to the test microbe will differ from the RED delivered to a target pathogen or indicator microbe if the<br />

dose-response <strong>of</strong> the test microbe differs from that <strong>of</strong> the pathogen or indicator. The difference is referred to as the<br />

RED bias. Recently, two approaches have been developed and demonstrated with drinking water UV reactors for<br />

analyzing validation data that accounts for the RED bias. This paper reports on the application <strong>of</strong> these methods<br />

with a wastewater UV reactor. The first approach incorporates a term for the UV sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the microbe into the<br />

equation used to fit the validation data. The second approach incorporates a lognormal prediction <strong>of</strong> the UV<br />

reactor’s dose distribution into the dose-monitoring algorithm and predicts log inactivation using the microbe’s UV<br />

dose-response curve. Both approaches calibrated using validation data measured using MS2 and T1 phage provided<br />

accurate predictions <strong>of</strong> the log inactivation <strong>of</strong> QB phage, fecal coliform, and total coliform.<br />

85<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-1<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Advanced Oxidation Process – Effective and Technical Suitable for<br />

Micropollutant Removal in Contaminated Water Sources<br />

J. Krüger1, A. Ried 1 , K. Teunissen 2 , A.H. Knol 2 , and D. Csalovszki 3<br />

1. ITT W&WW WEDECO GmbH, Boschstr. 6, 32051 Herford, Germany<br />

2. DZH & Delft University <strong>of</strong> Technology PO 34, 2270 AA Voorburg, Netherlands<br />

3. ITT W&WW USA WEDECO Products, 14125 South Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273<br />

Treatment concepts for drinking water supplies are <strong>of</strong>ten limited by their potential to remove emerging<br />

contaminants. Contamination <strong>of</strong> different water sources, e.g. river water, bank filtrate, lake water or ground water<br />

by micropollutants is a growing concern and is under investigation by several programs.<br />

Future treatment concepts need to be able to remove preferably all <strong>of</strong> the new discussed micropollutants. Therefore<br />

the right multiple barrier approach is required. Advanced oxidation is one option to upgrade treatment processes.<br />

Consulting engineers and end users are in need <strong>of</strong> a cost-effective solution to treat micropollutants <strong>of</strong> concern.<br />

As the concern about emerging contaminants grows, it is only a matter <strong>of</strong> time until they become regulated.<br />

Ozone treatment and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation are well known as individual treatment steps for oxidation or<br />

disinfection purposes. The combination <strong>of</strong> ozone and UV-radiation on one hand or ozone or UV and hydrogen<br />

peroxide on the other hand results in a more powerful process. These combined processes are able to remove many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the investigated micropollutants efficiently and in accordance with applicable regulations.<br />

Mobile pilot units were designed to test the different advanced oxidation processes based on ozone, UV and<br />

hydrogen peroxide. Pilot trials were conducted with different types <strong>of</strong> waters and varying contaminants.<br />

One groundwater studied was contaminated with 1.4 Dioxane and Trichlorethene, and pretreated river water was<br />

synthetically polluted by Atrazine, Isoproturone, Carbamazepine, Dicl<strong>of</strong>enac, Ibupr<strong>of</strong>ene, Amidotrizoic acid,<br />

Iohexol and MTBE.<br />

The achieved results indicated that all <strong>of</strong> these micropollutants could be removed by the advanced oxidation<br />

processes. The AOP O 3 /H 2 O 2 showed in both cases the best performance regarding the operational costs and the<br />

achieved degradation rates.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

86


Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-2<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Bromate Pre-systemic Detoxification Metabolism Research Progress<br />

Joseph Cotruvo 1* , Richard Bull 2 , Brian Cummings 3 , Jeffrey Fisher 3 , Zhongxian Guo 4 ,<br />

Choon Nam Ong 5 , Oscar Quinones 6 , Shane Snyder 6 , Jason Keith 7 ,<br />

Gilbert Gordon 7 , and Gilbert Pacey 7<br />

1. Joseph Cotruvo & Associates LLC, Washington, DC, USA.<br />

2. MoBull Consulting, Richland, Washington, USA.<br />

3. University <strong>of</strong> Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.<br />

4. PUB Waterhub Centre for Advanced Water Technology, Singapore.<br />

5. National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore.<br />

6. Southern Nevada Water Authority, Henderson, Nevada, USA.<br />

7. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.<br />

Bromate causes cancer in test animals at high doses and it limits use <strong>of</strong> ozone in desalination, indirect or direct water<br />

recycling, bottled water production and ground source drinking waters due to ozone’s ability to convert natural bromide to<br />

bromate. Bromate is also a contaminant in hypochlorite produced from electrolysis <strong>of</strong> salt that contains small amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

bromide. National standards and the WHO <strong>Guide</strong>lines for bromate are 10 ug/l based upon a hypothetical incremental<br />

lifetime cancer risk <strong>of</strong> approximately 1/10,000 depending upon which risk model is applied. All <strong>of</strong> the standards are subject<br />

to being lowered as the result <strong>of</strong> improved analytical methods and quantitation that is now on the order <strong>of</strong> 1 ug/l.<br />

The critical issue for current and future standards is the potential cancer risk at low drinking water doses. We are<br />

conducting studies aimed at producing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for the rat and humans<br />

quantifying the detoxification after ingestion and before it would reach a target organ like the kidney. A revised risk<br />

assessment will be computed using that mechanistic information at environmentally relevant doses. Pre-systemic<br />

metabolism can occur to varying degrees at least in the stomach. Significant metabolism occurs in the liver and blood. We<br />

have studied the kinetics and conditions <strong>of</strong> bromate decomposition in simulated stomach acid, by intravenous injection and<br />

after ingestion. It would be ideal if ingestion doses could be identified where bromate will be virtually completely<br />

detoxified before reaching a target organ so that the more accurate dose response can be determined at low doses. If the<br />

initial results are verified it is possible that bromate might ultimately be considered to be a practical threshold carcinogen<br />

with essentially no risk below the threshold metabolism dose.<br />

87<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-3<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies on Decomposition<br />

Reactions <strong>of</strong> Pyrrolidone Derivatives Using O 3<br />

Yu Tachibana, Masanobu Nogami, Yuichi Sugiyama, and Yasuhisa Ikeda<br />

Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors, Tokyo Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />

2-12-1-N1-34 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan<br />

Decomposition reactions <strong>of</strong> pyrrolidone derivatives (NRPs: R = methyl(M), ethyl(E), propyl(Pro), n-butyl(B),<br />

pentyl(P), iso-butyl(iB), cyclohexyl(C) groups) using O 3 have been studied at pH 2.0 and 288 K. The reaction rate<br />

was found to be expressed as k[NRPs][O 3 ] D ([O 3 ] D = the concentrations <strong>of</strong> dissolved O 3 ). It was found that the rate<br />

constants (k) slightly increase with increasing the length <strong>of</strong> alkyl groups and that the k value (2.93 ± 0.01 M -1 s -1 )<br />

<strong>of</strong> NBP is larger than that (2.67 ± 0.10 M -1 s -1 ) <strong>of</strong> more bulky NiBP. These results suggest that the decomposition<br />

reactions <strong>of</strong> NRPs with O 3 proceed through the attack <strong>of</strong> O 3 to N atom in NRPs.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

88


Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-4<br />

Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />

Ozone Disinfection Reduces Disinfection Byproduct Formation<br />

to Comply with New Stage 2 DBP and LT2 Requirements<br />

Michael A. Oneby 1 , Richard Lin 2 , James H. Borchardt 2 ,<br />

and Charles O. Bromley 3<br />

1. MWH Americas, 789 N. Water St, Suite 430, Milwaukee, WI 53202-3558, USA<br />

2. MWH Americas, 618 Michillinda Ave., Suite 200, Arcadia, CA 91007, USA<br />

3. MWH Americas, 3010 W. Charleston Blvd, Suite 100, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA<br />

Four conventional surface water treatment plants owned and operated by a California water agency (Agency)<br />

integrated an ozone disinfection process into existing conventional treatment trains that produce potable water for<br />

several communities. Ozone replaced chlorine gas enabling the agency to meet regulated disinfection byproduct<br />

(DBP) limits for regulated trihalomethane (THM) and haloacetic acid (HAA) compounds at all sample locations in<br />

the respective distribution systems as required by the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule<br />

(Stage 2 DBP). The Stage 1 and Stage 2 DBP Rules, intended to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> adverse health effects, regulate<br />

two groups <strong>of</strong> chlorinated organic compound which are byproducts <strong>of</strong> chlorine disinfection, specifically four<br />

trihalomethane compounds known as total trihalomethane (TTHM) and five haloacetic acid compounds (HAA5).<br />

The existing treatment plants were able to meet the DBP limits with chlorine disinfection under the Stage 1 DBP<br />

Rule which allowed averaging <strong>of</strong> TTHM and HAA5 across all the distribution system sample points. Under the<br />

Stage 2 DBP Rule, community water systems must meet TTHM and HAA5 limits at each sample point using a<br />

calculation known as the locational running annual average (LRAA). To comply with the Stage 2 DBP Rule, the<br />

Agency authorized on a DBP control project which included construction <strong>of</strong> an ozone facility at each <strong>of</strong> its<br />

treatment plants. The agency’s treatment plants, classified as Bin 1 in the Long Term 2 Surface Water Treatment<br />

Rule (LT2), achieve inactivation requirements for Giardia lamblia and viruses using intermediate ozone. Under<br />

Bin 1, water systems are not required to achieve inactivation credits for Cryptosporidium in the primary<br />

disinfection process. Operation <strong>of</strong> the treatment plants employ control strategies that minimize the applied<br />

ozone dose and limit bromate formation. The ozone facilities were constructed in 2008 and began operation in<br />

early 2009.<br />

89<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-1<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Comparison Testing <strong>of</strong> ‘Spot’ vs. ‘Pellet’ LPHO UV Lamps<br />

Mike Santelli 1* and James R. Bolton 2<br />

1. Light Sources Inc., 37 Robinson Blvd., Orange, CT 06477<br />

2. Bolton Photosciences Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres., NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6R 2M5<br />

Two types <strong>of</strong> amalgam low pressure high output lamps (one with a ‘spot’ amalgam and another with a ‘pellet’<br />

amalgam) have been examined in a simulated UV reactor with a quartz sleeve and water flowing outside the quartz<br />

sleeve. These lamps were operated at 100%, 80% and 60% full power. It was found that the ‘pellet’ type amalgam<br />

lamps had superior performance at reduced power levels as compared to the ‘spot’ type lamps.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

90


Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-2<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> UV Lamp Performance<br />

in Near-Field and Far-Field Apparatus<br />

G. Fang, D.G. Knight, R. Kilgour, and T. Molyneux<br />

Trojan Technologies, 3020 Gore Road, London, Ontario, Canada N5V 4T7<br />

Low pressure mercury arc lamps have been widely used as an effective ultraviolet (UV) light source for<br />

disinfection <strong>of</strong> water. The UV flux <strong>of</strong> a lamp is normally measured in air, and referred as far-field (FF)<br />

measurement. When a UV lamp is operating in a sleeve in water, the measurement <strong>of</strong> the UV irradiance in water is<br />

referred as near-field (NF) measurement. The advantage <strong>of</strong> the NF measurement is that it represents the true lamp<br />

operating conditions, and the NF method has become acceptable in the UV industry. However, the NF<br />

measurement only detects the UV irradiance from a portion <strong>of</strong> the lamp, and it is difficult to directly obtain the UV<br />

flux <strong>of</strong> the lamp. The relationship between the NF and the FF measurements could be a key to determine how a<br />

lamp is performing under field operating conditions. It has been previously demonstrated that a NF measurement<br />

technique can reliably determine the UV lamp relative output, and there are several methods that could be applied<br />

to relate the FF results to those in the NF measurement. This paper examines the relationship between the UV flux<br />

from the FF measurement and the UV irradiance from the NF measurement when the lamp is overheated. The<br />

study includes the relationship at different water temperatures and at different input powers. It demonstrates that<br />

the maximum NF irradiance <strong>of</strong> a lamp in water is proportional to the maximum UVC flux <strong>of</strong> a lamp. The better<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the lamp performance when operating in water in terms <strong>of</strong> UV flux and efficiency could lead to<br />

further optimization in UV lamp and reactor design.<br />

91<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-3<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> Computational Fluid Dynamics to Support Design<br />

<strong>of</strong> Full-Scale Wastewater UV Disinfection Channels<br />

Shanshan Jin and Melanie A. Mann<br />

Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 11242 Waples Mill Road, Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22030<br />

An open channel UV disinfection facility using horizontal lamps was designed for disinfection <strong>of</strong> tertiary filter<br />

effluent at a peak flow <strong>of</strong> 37.5 MGD. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis was conducted to evaluate<br />

various UV channel configurations that could impact the velocity distribution approaching the UV lamps and affect<br />

UV dose delivery. Features evaluated included depth <strong>of</strong> the UV channel inlet, approach length upstream <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

UV bank, location <strong>of</strong> inlet isolation valves, and width <strong>of</strong> the UV channel inlet. For the configurations studied,<br />

the channel inlet depth and width affected the velocity distribution more than valve location and channel length.<br />

The final channel configuration was based on both modeling results and practical considerations.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

92


Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-4<br />

Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />

A Genomic Model for the Prediction <strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet<br />

Inactivation Rate Constants for RNA and DNA Viruses<br />

Wladyslaw J. Kowalski 1 , William P. Bahnfleth 2 , and Mark T. Hernandez 3<br />

1. Immune Building Systems, Inc., 575 Madison Ave., 10th Floor, New York, NY10022<br />

2. The Pennsylvania State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Architectural Engineering, University Park, PA 16802<br />

3. University <strong>of</strong> Colorado, UCB 428, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering,<br />

1111 Engineering Drive #441, Boulder, CO 80309<br />

A mathematical model is presented to explain the ultraviolet susceptibility <strong>of</strong> viruses in terms <strong>of</strong> genomic<br />

sequences that have a high potential for photodimerization. The specific sequences with high dimerization potential<br />

include doublets <strong>of</strong> thymine (TT), thymine-cytosine (TC), cytosine (CC), and triplets composed <strong>of</strong> single purines<br />

combined with pyrimidine doublets. The complete genomes <strong>of</strong> 49 animal viruses and bacteriophages were<br />

evaluated using base-counting s<strong>of</strong>tware to establish the frequencies <strong>of</strong> dimerizable doublets and triplets. The model<br />

also accounts for the effects <strong>of</strong> ultraviolet scattering. Constants defining the relative lethality <strong>of</strong> the four dimer<br />

types were determined via curve-fitting. A total 77 water-based UV rate constant data sets were used to represent<br />

22 DNA viruses. A total <strong>of</strong> 70 data sets were used to represent 27 RNA viruses. Predictions are provided for<br />

dozens <strong>of</strong> viruses <strong>of</strong> importance to human health that have not previously been tested for UV susceptibility.<br />

93<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

Monday PM – Session P1 – P1-1<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Passivation, Fabrication and Maintenance Issues<br />

in Ozone and Oxygen Systems<br />

Patrick Banes, Michel Dalglish, Brent Ekstrand, Ph.D. and Daryl Roll, P.E.<br />

Astro Pak Corporation, 270 E. Baker Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626<br />

This paper addresses the corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> stainless steel in ozone and oxygen systems as affected by<br />

fabrication, operation and passivation. Oxygen cleaning, passivation, proper fabrication techniques and<br />

maintenance will extend the life and improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> ozone systems. Corrosion products and rouge are<br />

discussed regarding damage, remediation, maintenance and effective system monitoring.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

94


Monday PM – Session P1 – P1-2<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> additives on the degradation <strong>of</strong><br />

Reactive Black 5 (RB5) by simple ozonation<br />

Arizbeth A. Pérez Martínez and Tatyana Poznyak<br />

Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Química e Industrias Extractivas – Instituto Politécnico Nacional,<br />

(ESIQIE-IPN), Edif. 7, UPALM, C.P 07738, D.F, México.<br />

In this study, the oxidation with ozone <strong>of</strong> Reactive Black 5 (RB5) was performed. To simulate dye bath effluents<br />

from dyeing processes, Na 2 CO 3 (30 g/L) and Na 2 SO 4 (100 g/L) each one separately and in mixture were used. The<br />

operation conditions were following: ozonation in a semibatch reactor (250 mL) with a glass diffuser in the bottom<br />

was performed; the dye concentrations <strong>of</strong> 50 mg/L, with the initial ozone concentration <strong>of</strong> 35 mg/L and ozone flow<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.5 L/min at the initial pH <strong>of</strong> solution (5.10). Ozonation procedure was carried out in two stages: first, the dye<br />

ozonation without additives and second, in the presence <strong>of</strong> additives. In both cases, the dye degradation dynamic<br />

was obtained by UV/VIS spectroscopy at λ=311 nm. To control the ozonation efficiency the ozone consuming,<br />

pH and the electrical conductivity (just for the first case) were measured. In base <strong>of</strong> the results obtained we can<br />

conclude that the effect <strong>of</strong> the additives is most evident in presence <strong>of</strong> Na 2 CO 3 (30 g/L), so, the decoloration time<br />

decrease at 82% (from 4.0 to 0.75 min) in comparison to dye solution without additives, also the pH remained<br />

constant along the ozonation (pH=11.0) and the UV/VIS spectroscopy showed that the total degradation was<br />

achieved at 30 seconds <strong>of</strong> the reaction.<br />

95<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session P2 – P2-1<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Electrolytic Ozone Generation Using Solid Diamond Anodes<br />

Bill Yost<br />

Electrolytic Ozone Inc, Cambridge Innovation Center, One Broadway, Cambridge MA 02142<br />

Electrolytic ozone generation has been understood as a concept for many years and has been the focus <strong>of</strong> a<br />

substantial amount <strong>of</strong> practical research. Creating ozone directly in a stream <strong>of</strong> water from the water itself holds the<br />

promise <strong>of</strong> reducing system complexity when compared with conventional corona discharge technology. Indeed,<br />

many potential applications that cannot bear the expense <strong>of</strong> corona discharge systems could be addressed with<br />

small and inexpensive electrolytic cells. Unfortunately, efforts to commercialize electrolytic generators have been<br />

hampered by the lack <strong>of</strong> a suitable anode material.<br />

This paper explores the material properties essential to choosing an anode for use within an ozone generating cell.<br />

The specific criteria used for evaluation are: over-potential with respect to oxygen evolution, resistance to chemical<br />

wear, material stability and environmental impact. While noble metals (such as platinum) and lead dioxide exhibit<br />

sufficient over-potential to drive the reaction leading to the formation <strong>of</strong> O 3 from H 2 O, both suffer from reliability<br />

issues. Further the use <strong>of</strong> lead dioxide is restricted by the European Reduction <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Substances (RoHS)<br />

Directive <strong>of</strong> 2002.<br />

While diamond in its intrinsic state is a good electrical insulator, synthetic diamond can be doped with boron to a<br />

level that it exhibits metallic conduction. The combination <strong>of</strong> a strong resistance to chemical attack, electrical<br />

conductivity and a high over-potential makes diamond an ideal candidate for an anode material. This paper<br />

details the benefits <strong>of</strong> using boron-doped diamond and provides data on ozone output stability and expected<br />

anode lifetime.<br />

Since depositing diamond films on conductive substrates raises a series <strong>of</strong> concerns over coating integrity, adhesion<br />

and CTE mismatch, the focus <strong>of</strong> this paper is on thick-film (>400 µm) free-standing plates <strong>of</strong> CVD diamond.<br />

A novel cell configuration incorporating free-standing plates is shown to be a robust and cost-effective means<br />

for reliable, long-term electrolytic ozone generation.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

96


Tuesday AM – Session P2 – P2-2<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Ozone-Based Clean-In-Place (CIP) <strong>of</strong> Bioreactors<br />

Hossein Zarrin 1 , Brian Hagopian 2 , and Dr. Carl Lawton 3<br />

1. MKS Instruments Inc.<br />

2. Mar Cor Purification<br />

3. University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Lowell<br />

Ozone can replace chemicals, hot water, and steam in Clean-In-Place (CIP) <strong>of</strong> bioreactors, reducing rinse water and<br />

chemical usage while saving energy costs. CIP is a time-saving method <strong>of</strong> cleaning the interior surfaces <strong>of</strong> pipes,<br />

vessels, and process equipment, without disassembly. Conventional CIP processes require high temperatures and<br />

significant amounts <strong>of</strong> energy to heat the entire system for sanitization. Chemical detergents are <strong>of</strong>ten required for<br />

effective cleaning followed by large quantities <strong>of</strong> rinse water. Dissolved Ozone can improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

CIP at reduced temperatures, saving energy. This report describes a CIP system that demonstrates Ozonation as an<br />

effective alternative cleaning agent for CIP processes in biopharmaceutical applications. A practical example <strong>of</strong><br />

the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> an Ozone-based CIP system using a typical mammalian cell culture media and a<br />

microbial cell culture media is discussed. Cleanness is measured by testing the final rinse water for traces <strong>of</strong><br />

materials from the media using HPLC in comparison to traditional chemical CIP methods.<br />

97<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday AM – Session P2– P2-3<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Noteworthy Nuances <strong>of</strong> Constructing and Starting Up an Ozone System<br />

Ben Kuhne1 1 , Jack Bebee 1 , Robert W. H<strong>of</strong>fman 2 , and Stephanie Bishop 3<br />

1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue, Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008<br />

2. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 12400 Coit Road, Dallas, TX 75251<br />

3. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 2301 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 244, Maitland, FL 32751<br />

Ozone systems have a number <strong>of</strong> critical system components that require specific attention throughout construction<br />

and start-up. These components are <strong>of</strong>ten critical to the overall success <strong>of</strong> the project and even if clearly detailed in<br />

the design documents, specific attention must be given to these items during construction and start-up. Three case<br />

studies will identify some <strong>of</strong> the key items and how they were addressed in an effort to increase awareness in<br />

planning for and implementing future ozone systems. The first case study involved the expansion <strong>of</strong> a 72 million<br />

gallon per day (mgd) water treatment plant (WTP) to 87 mgd including the addition <strong>of</strong> sidestream raw water<br />

ozonation for enhanced coagulation and settled water ozonation in a concrete contactor structure for primary<br />

disinfection and taste and odor control. The second case study includes the construction <strong>of</strong> a 200 mgd concrete<br />

ozone contactor structure and ozone system for primary disinfection and taste and odor control. The third study<br />

involved installation <strong>of</strong> a 9 mgd sidestream ozone injection system for hydrogen sulfide removal.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned case studies had its own unique purpose however they presented similar challenges<br />

during construction and start-up <strong>of</strong> the ozone systems. Several items encountered that required attention during<br />

construction include:<br />

• Delineation <strong>of</strong> Programming Responsibilities and Location <strong>of</strong> Programming.<br />

• Placement <strong>of</strong> Concrete for the Contactors to Ensure Successful Testing <strong>of</strong> the Concrete Contactor Structure<br />

and Ozone Piping to Ensure that it is an Airtight System.<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> a Strategy to Transfer Operation after Completion <strong>of</strong> the System Installation and Testing.<br />

• Coordination <strong>of</strong> Piping, Valves and Instrumentation with the Ozone Equipment Provided.<br />

Several items encountered that required attention during start-up include:<br />

• Programming <strong>of</strong> Control System<br />

• Determination <strong>of</strong> Alarm Setpoints<br />

• Calibration <strong>of</strong> Instruments (Flowmeters, Temperature, Pressure, Dewpoint, Etc.)<br />

• Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Ozone Analyzer Instruments<br />

• Transfer <strong>of</strong> Analyzer Maintenance Responsibility from Ozone System Supplier (OSS) to Owner<br />

• Approach for Phased Release <strong>of</strong> Constituents <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Existing Filter Media<br />

This paper will discuss the common challenges faced with ozone systems during construction and start-up while<br />

focusing on the resolutions that were necessary to implement ozone systems that provide robust controls and are<br />

properly maintained.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

98


Tuesday AM – Session P2 – P2-4<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Pilot Test Results Perozone TM Injection Technology Kitchener, Ontario<br />

Dave Montgomery and Darko Strajin<br />

Trow Associates, Inc., 1595 Clark Boulevard, Brampton, Ontario, Canada<br />

The subject property is located in Kitchener, Ontario. It houses a single storey shopping mall constructed in<br />

the 1950s. The building has a partial basement.<br />

Environmental investigations revealed the presence <strong>of</strong> Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) above the current standards in<br />

soil and groundwater. The PCE impacts originated from historical operation <strong>of</strong> a dry cleaning facility. The lateral<br />

and vertical extents <strong>of</strong> the impacts had been delineated. The groundwater plume is mostly located beneath the<br />

building and is approximately 120m in diameter. Predominant soil type is sandy silt with sand layers and some<br />

silty clay lenses.<br />

Based on the site conditions, Trow conducted a pilot test implementing the Perozone technology.<br />

The Perozone injection technology is an in-Situ process which involves the injection <strong>of</strong> two chemical oxidants,<br />

gas phase ozone and an aqueous phase hydrogen peroxide by means <strong>of</strong> a micro-bubble sparging system.<br />

To start the process an air/ozone mixture and aqueous hydrogen peroxide mixture are delivered separately via<br />

individual supply lines to strategically placed subsurface sparge points where they are mixed. This causes fine<br />

micro-bubbles <strong>of</strong> ozone-containing air coated by a thin film <strong>of</strong> aqueous hydrogen peroxide liquid to be released<br />

from the sparge points. These air micro-bubbles, by means <strong>of</strong> conventional sparging, act to strip dissolved and<br />

adsorbed volatile chemicals as they begin to migrate through the subsurface soil. Since both the ozone and<br />

hydrogen peroxide are both strong chemical oxidants, as the VOCs contract and diffuse within the air bubbles, they<br />

are then oxidized and broken down by the ozone and hydrogen peroxide into carbon dioxide or less harmful<br />

compounds which can be found in the natural environment.<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> the two oxidants also forms hydroxyl radicals, a very reactive non-selective chemical species,<br />

which readily breaks down a number <strong>of</strong> organic contaminants. The ozone and hydrogen peroxide degrade into<br />

molecular oxygen, which is beneficial both as an oxidant and for enhancing biodegradation mediated by aerobic<br />

microbes present in the subsurface environment. The combination <strong>of</strong> the ozone and hydrogen peroxide is used as<br />

an advanced oxidation process to destroy slow-to-degrade and recalcitrant organic compounds in both soil and<br />

groundwater. The Perozone injection system runs continuously following a pre-programmed injection sequence<br />

and duration for each injection point.<br />

In order to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the Perozone TM injection technology, Trow designed a pilot test consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> four sub-surface sparge points and conducted controlled injections <strong>of</strong> ozone and hydrogen peroxide over a two<br />

month period.<br />

After a review <strong>of</strong> the groundwater monitoring and analytical results related to the Pilot Test <strong>of</strong> the Perozone TM<br />

injection/sparge point system, it is evident that application <strong>of</strong> this injection system has the potential to significantly<br />

lower the concentrations <strong>of</strong> VOCs in groundwater within a reasonable timeframe. Trow recommended the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> a full-scale remediation system.<br />

99<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-1<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

The Bioassay Validation and Real-Time UV Dose Monitoring are Essential<br />

for Maintaining UV Disinfection Efficacy in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing<br />

Ismail Gobulukoglu, Ph.D.<br />

Science and Technology Department, Aquafine Corporation, 29010 Avenue Paine, Valencia, CA 91355, USA.<br />

Water is commonly used as a raw material and ingredient in the processing, formulation and manufacture <strong>of</strong><br />

pharmaceutical products. Microbial control at various points in the process loop is achieved by UV water<br />

disinfection systems. It is critical that these UV systems are properly sized for the water process parameters, and<br />

monitored for ensuring their continuous desired disinfection efficiencies. However, equipment design, reactor<br />

efficiency and performance vary with each manufacturer’s reactor. Therefore, bioassay validation is a safeguard to<br />

ensure the disinfection performance achieved by UV systems is equal to, or better than, theoretical predictions <strong>of</strong><br />

their performance and it is a physical verification that UV systems will perform as expected since their<br />

performance data is generated from real-world testing at a UV dose <strong>of</strong> 40 mJ/cm2 over a range <strong>of</strong> flows using<br />

EPA/DVGW validation protocol. The importance <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> bioassay validated UV systems along with their real<br />

time UV dose monitoring in the pharmaceutical applications will be discussed.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

100


Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-2<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> a CFD Simulation <strong>of</strong> the UV/H 2 O 2 Advanced Oxidation Process<br />

Scott M. Alpert, P.E. 1 and Joel J. Ducoste, Ph.D. 2<br />

1. HDR Engineering, Inc. <strong>of</strong> the Carolinas, Charlotte, NC<br />

2. NC State University, Raleigh, NC<br />

In order to meet the growing needs <strong>of</strong> the water treatment community in the treatment <strong>of</strong> emerging organic<br />

contaminants, a CFD model was developed to simulate the UV/hydrogen peroxide advanced oxidation process.<br />

Design and optimization <strong>of</strong> UV/H2O 2 systems must incorporate both reactor design (i.e., hydrodynamics and lamp<br />

orientation) and chemical kinetics (reaction mechanisms and kinetic rate constants). In this CFD model, the<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> turbulence sub-models, fluence rate sub-models, and kinetic rate equations results in a<br />

comprehensive and flexible design tool for predicting the effluent chemical composition from a UV-initiated AOP<br />

reactor. To validate the CFD simulation, the results <strong>of</strong> the model under various operating conditions were<br />

compared to pilot reactor trials for the target contaminants <strong>of</strong> an organic dye (methylene blue) and an antibiotic<br />

(sulfamethoxazole). The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the model to design conditions such as lamp output power and flow rate was<br />

determined. In addition, the effluent concentration dependence on the turbulence closure model, the fluence rate<br />

distribution model, and the reaction mechanism kinetics was evaluated. CFD for advanced oxidation process<br />

analysis is an important numerical tool for engineers in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> systems designed to degrade organic<br />

contaminants within water, wastewater, or industrial discharge systems. The optimization <strong>of</strong> such processes,<br />

including energy usage and hydrogen peroxide dosage, will be instrumental in allowing utilities to incorporate<br />

advanced oxidation systems for the removal <strong>of</strong> emerging contaminants.<br />

101<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-3<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Regenerating Spent Zeolites with UV and UV/H 2 O 2 to<br />

Enhance Removal <strong>of</strong> Endocrine Disrupting Compounds<br />

Safina Singh and Erik Rosenfeldt<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-Amherst<br />

Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) have become contaminants <strong>of</strong> emerging concern due to their harmful<br />

effects on human and ecological heath, even at lower level <strong>of</strong> concentrations (ppb). EDCs have been detected in<br />

national surface waters (Kolpin et al., 2002) as they are continually discharged into surface waters by everyday<br />

agricultural, municipal and industrial activities. One <strong>of</strong> the methods currently being explored to attenuate EDCs in<br />

water includes adsorption <strong>of</strong> hydrophobic EDCs onto solid phase media such as activated carbon (AC) (Snyder et<br />

al., 2007, Zhang YP et al., 2005; Wintgens et al., 2003). Alternatively, high-silica zeolites provide a hydrophobic<br />

adsorption surface which may present some advantages over traditional AC sorption. Such sorption processes using<br />

hydrophobic media play a critical role in the fate and transport <strong>of</strong> toxic contaminants including EDCs.<br />

Zeolites are crystalline, porous alumino-silicate with well defined pore structures, and tetrahedral framework.<br />

The tetrahedral units can be arranged in numerous ways to engineer varying pore size and shapes <strong>of</strong> channels<br />

within a zeolite molecule. When the sorption capacity <strong>of</strong> activated carbon has been exhausted, a complicated,<br />

energy intensive process is required for regeneration. Conversely, some evidence has been shown that zeolites can<br />

be regenerated multiple times through relatively inexpensive methods using advanced oxidation process (AOP)<br />

(Koryabkina et al., 2007) and possibly even ultraviolet (UV) photolysis (Wen et al, 2008). The regeneration<br />

process not only presents potential for multiple uses <strong>of</strong> the sorption media, but provides the additional benefit <strong>of</strong><br />

oxidative treatment <strong>of</strong> back wash water produced from zeolite regeneration. This treatment may result in a<br />

reduction in hazardous waste production than that associated with traditional sorption methods.<br />

Bench scale adsorption studies are being performed to collect baseline adsorption data for each <strong>of</strong> the EDCs in<br />

Table 1 on three zeolytes (ranging from low to high hydrophobicity) shown in Table 2. Freundlich and Langmuir<br />

isotherms models are being considered to test the adsorption capacity and strength <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these zeolites. Results<br />

obtained have shown that equilibrium was reached within an hour when E2 and EE2 were separately adsorbed onto<br />

each zeolites- CBV-901 and CBV-780. Although CBV-780 has larger surface area it reduced EE2 by 75% as<br />

compared to 92% reduction by CBV-901. Despite surface area comparable to other two zeolites, CBV-400 showed<br />

only about 20% reduction; this may be explained by its lower SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio and lower hydrophobicity.<br />

Although CBV-901 initially showed higher adsorption capacity, it did not necessarily show higher regeneration<br />

capacity when UV/H2O2 AOP was used. Approximately, 24% <strong>of</strong> its initial adsorption capacity was retrieved after<br />

one regeneration run, whereas CBV-780 consistently showed retrieval <strong>of</strong> 33% <strong>of</strong> its initial adsorption capacity for<br />

at least two regeneration runs. EE2 solution was used for these regeneration tests.<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />

102


Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-4<br />

President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />

Mixing Effects on the Chloramination Process<br />

Khyati Jain 1 and Irvine Wei 2<br />

1. CDM Inc., Walnut Creek, CA.<br />

2. Northeastern University, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Boston, MA.<br />

According to a recent study (AwwaRF Report 2760, 2004), more than 90 percent <strong>of</strong> water treatment plants utilizing<br />

chloramination for distribution system residuals indicate a certain level <strong>of</strong> dissatisfaction towards the process<br />

performance. One factor that may lead to such dissatisfaction is the inadequacy <strong>of</strong> mixing when ammonia is added<br />

to chlorinated water. If mixing is not uniform, the actual chlorine to ammonia nitrogen molar ratio will become<br />

variable at a micro-level, even though the overall ratio at the macro-level is close to the desired 1:1 ratio. Because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the non-uniform mixing, certain portions <strong>of</strong> the mixture might have a molar ratio exceeding the stoichiometric<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:1. In such instances, certain unintended reactions (e.g., breakpoint type <strong>of</strong> chlorine chemistry) can occur.<br />

This will lead to the resultant monochloramine concentration being significantly less than the stoichiometric<br />

concentration, based upon the calculation using the overall molar ratio. Other factors, such as pH variation in<br />

the micro environment, could also affect the final chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the chloramination process.<br />

In this study, the effect <strong>of</strong> mixing was studied by conducting breakpoint chlorination experiments under different<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> mixing, represented by the average velocity gradient, G in s -1 . A rather unique way <strong>of</strong> plotting breakpoint<br />

chlorination curve was utilized to analyze the data, which allowed a clear delineation whether the monochloramine<br />

formation was according to the stoichiometry. A quantitative comparison between experimental data and<br />

stoichiometry can clearly indicate the impact <strong>of</strong> non-uniform mixing. The experimental data clearly showed that<br />

as the G value increased from 35 to 500 s -1 and the monochloramine formation increased from 75 percent to<br />

87 percent <strong>of</strong> the stoichiometric value. The location <strong>of</strong> the breakpoint, correspondingly, increased from a molar<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.25 to 1.75.<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> 50rpm and 200rpm experimental data was conducted and a breakpoint curve was plotted imposing<br />

one over the other. It has been observed from previous literature that in ideal conditions, breakpoint occurs<br />

at chlorine to ammonia nitrogen molar ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.5:1, and the peak <strong>of</strong> monochloramine is expected at a molar ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1:1. Hence, breakpoint curve was plotted at mixing speed <strong>of</strong> 50 and 200 rpm, indicating free chlorine,<br />

monochloramine, dichloramine, trichloramine, and total chlorine concentration at contact time <strong>of</strong> 45 minutes.<br />

Few studies were found in literature on mixing effects in chloramination. Data from a previous study (Yamamoto<br />

et al., Wat. Res.,1990) was re-analyzed and compared with the current study, and a similar trend was observed.<br />

In another case study, the design G value for a modern water treatment plant in metropolitan Boston was found to<br />

be 800 s -1 , which was higher than the maximum G value used in this study (500 s -1 ), and is likely to be sufficient.<br />

In conclusion, when chlorine and ammonia are combined to produce monochloramine, the degree <strong>of</strong> mixing indeed<br />

has significant impact on the performance <strong>of</strong> the chloramination process, and therefore must be a critical<br />

consideration in its design and operation. This paper will discuss the results <strong>of</strong> this study and provide practical<br />

guidance for those utilities currently using chloramination to optimize their disinfection process, and for design<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in designing new chloramination facilities.<br />

103<br />

IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA


International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />

Wednesday Events<br />

May 6, 2009<br />

Visit us at the Registration Desk & ask about remaining availability for this BONUS interactive programming!<br />

Wednesday programming is NOT included in a full conference registration, and are separate events<br />

intended for those interested in seeing UV and Ozone applications firsthand. Each tour/workshop<br />

registration includes transportation and a luncheon.<br />

Ozone Technical Tour<br />

Tour stops include:<br />

- Cambridge, MA Water Treatment Plant (24 MGD)<br />

- MWRA John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant (405 MGD)<br />

- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f (before or by 3pm) at Logan Int’l Airport<br />

before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />

Depart 8:30 AM, Return 3:30 PM<br />

Onsite Price: $60<br />

UV Technical Tour<br />

Onsite Price: $60<br />

Tour stops include:<br />

- Pawtucket, RI Water Treatment Plant (25 MGD DW)<br />

- Brockton, MA Advanced Waste Water Treatment Plant (60 MGD WW)<br />

- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f (before or by 3pm) at Logan Int’l Airport<br />

before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />

Depart 8:30 AM, Return 3:30 PM<br />

Ozone Municipal Operations Workshop<br />

Onsite Price: $130<br />

Intended for water treatment pr<strong>of</strong>essionals including plant operators,<br />

instrument and maintenance staff and utility managers who use, or<br />

may use, ozone for disinfection or other purposes, engineers who<br />

design ozone systems for water treatment and ozone system<br />

suppliers and technicians who install and start up ozone equipment.<br />

Join us as we conduct demonstrations and "hands-on" examples <strong>of</strong><br />

several activities encountered in water treatment plant, including<br />

Ozone systems operations and maintenance.<br />

Attendees will be driven by coach bus from the Hyatt Regency Cambridge to the<br />

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />

in Marlborough, MA for approximately 6 hours, including refreshment breaks and luncheon.<br />

Depart 8:00 AM, Return 4:00 PM<br />

104


International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />

<strong>Exhibitor</strong>s<br />

Boston - 2009<br />

Ozone Water Systems, Inc.<br />

www.ozonewatersystems.com<br />

Booth #25<br />

Calgon Carbon Corporation<br />

www.calgoncarbon-us.com<br />

Booth #11<br />

Severn Trent Services<br />

www.severntrentservices.com<br />

Booth #15<br />

Mazzei Injector Company, LLC<br />

www.mazzei.net<br />

Booth #24<br />

ITT Water & Wastewater<br />

www.us.ittwww.com<br />

Booths #21-23<br />

Light Sources, Inc.<br />

www.light-sources.com<br />

Booth #1<br />

AirSep Corporation<br />

www.airsepcpd.com<br />

Booth #26<br />

The Ozone Man, Inc.<br />

www.theozoneman.com<br />

Booth #27<br />

Astro Pak Corporation<br />

www.astropak.com<br />

Booth #2<br />

Oxygen Generating Systems Int'l<br />

www.ogsi.com<br />

Booth #16<br />

Trojan Technologies<br />

www.trojanuv.com<br />

Booth #28<br />

Ozonia North America<br />

www.ozonia.com<br />

Booths #29-30<br />

IN USA Inc.<br />

www.inusacorp.com<br />

Booth #20<br />

Electrolytic Ozone, Inc.<br />

www.eoi-ozone.com<br />

Booth #10<br />

Mitsubishi Power Products, Inc.<br />

www.meppi.com<br />

Booths #6-7<br />

Guardian Manufacturing<br />

www.guardianmfg.com<br />

Booth #5<br />

Aquafine Corporation<br />

www.aquafineuv.com<br />

Booth #8<br />

Aquionics, Inc.<br />

www.aquionics.com<br />

Booth #3<br />

Plasma Technics, Inc.<br />

www.plasmatechnics.com<br />

Booth #4<br />

Teledyne - API<br />

www.teledyne-api.com<br />

Booth #9<br />

Ozone Solutions, Inc.<br />

www.ozonesupplies.com<br />

Booth #17<br />

OSTI, Inc.<br />

www.osti-inc.com<br />

Booth #14<br />

Nedap Light Controls<br />

www.nedaplightcontrols.com<br />

Booth #13<br />

Fuji - Water Treatment Division<br />

www.fujielectric.com<br />

Booth #19<br />

Statiflo Corporation<br />

www.statiflo.net<br />

Booth #12<br />

105<br />

Kerfoot Technologies, Inc.<br />

www.kerfoottech.com<br />

Booth #18<br />

Pacific Consolidated Industries<br />

www.pci-intl.com<br />

Booth #31


International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />

Thanks to our <strong>Sponsor</strong>s<br />

Boston - 2009<br />

The 2009 Boston Conference Technical Program Committee extends their thanks and<br />

appreciation to the following sponsors who made this educational event possible!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!