Abstracts of Oral Presentations Exhibitor & Sponsor Guide Schedule ...
Abstracts of Oral Presentations Exhibitor & Sponsor Guide Schedule ...
Abstracts of Oral Presentations Exhibitor & Sponsor Guide Schedule ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
International Ozone Association<br />
International Ultraviolet Association<br />
May 3-6, 2009<br />
Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Massachusetts<br />
<strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Oral</strong> <strong>Presentations</strong><br />
<strong>Exhibitor</strong> & <strong>Sponsor</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />
<strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>of</strong> Events<br />
Thanks to our Primary <strong>Sponsor</strong> :
International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />
Conference <strong>Schedule</strong> at a Glance<br />
Boston - 2009<br />
Primary Conference <strong>Sponsor</strong>: ITT Water & Wastewater<br />
Saturday, May 2 nd , 2009<br />
NOON - 5 PM<br />
IOA & IUVA Committee Meetings<br />
NOON - 5 PM<br />
IUVA & IOA PAG Task Force Meetings<br />
Sunday, May 3 rd , 2009<br />
7:30 AM - 4:30 PM<br />
Ozone & UV Technology Workshops<br />
**see order forms for these standalone events**<br />
<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed and Organized By: AECOM<br />
www.io3a.org/boston2009/ozone_workshop.pdf<br />
www.io3a.org/boston2009/uv_workshop.pdf<br />
9 AM - NOON<br />
IOA PAG Board Meeting<br />
1:30 PM - 4:30 PM<br />
IUVA Board Meeting<br />
7 PM - 9 PM<br />
WELCOME ATTENDEES - 2009 Opening Reception<br />
<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: CDM<br />
Monday, May 4 th , 2009<br />
8:15 AM - 9:30 AM<br />
General Opening Session<br />
9:30 AM - 10:15 AM<br />
C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
10:15 AM - 11:55 AM<br />
Session 1 - UV Validation<br />
Session 2 - UV Regulatory<br />
Session 3 - Ozone Design and Operation<br />
NOON - 1:15 PM<br />
Conference Luncheon<br />
<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Ozonia North America<br />
1:15 PM - 2:55 PM<br />
Session 4 - UV Case Studies<br />
Session 5 - Ozone Case Studies<br />
Session 6 - Ozone Design and Operation<br />
2:55 PM - 3:40 PM<br />
C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
3:40 PM - 5:20 PM<br />
Session 7 - UV Case Studies<br />
Session 8 - Ozone Case Studies<br />
Session 9 - Ozone Design and Operation<br />
5:30 PM - 7:30 PM<br />
SPRING FLING RECEPTION<br />
Please join us for refreshments & hors d'oeuvres<br />
as we celebrate springtime in Boston with our<br />
technical program speakers and exhibitors.<br />
<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Black & Veatch<br />
and Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />
Tuesday, May 5 th , 2009<br />
8:15 AM - 9:30 AM<br />
Session 10 - UV Disinfection Design<br />
Session 11 - Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants<br />
Session 12 - Perozone and AOP processes<br />
9:30 AM - 10:15 AM<br />
C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
10:15 AM - 11:55 AM<br />
Session 13 - UV Disinfection Research<br />
Session 14 - Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants<br />
Session 15 - Perozone and AOP processes<br />
NOON - 1:15 PM<br />
Conference Luncheon<br />
<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Fuji Electric<br />
1:15 PM - 2:55 PM<br />
Session 16 - UV Disinfection Research<br />
Session 17 - AOP and Ozone Byproducts<br />
Session 18 - Modeling UV Systems<br />
2:55 PM - 3:40 PM<br />
C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
3:40 PM - 5:20 PM<br />
Session 19 - UV Disinfection Research<br />
Session 20 - AOP and Ozone Byproducts<br />
Session 21 - Modeling UV Systems<br />
Wednesday, May 6 th , 2009<br />
8:00 AM - 4 PM<br />
Ozone Technical Tour (includes transport & lunch)<br />
- Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility<br />
at Cambridge Water Department<br />
- MWRA John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />
- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f by 3 PM at Logan Int’l Airport<br />
before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />
<strong>Sponsor</strong>ed By: Fuji Electric<br />
UV Technical Tour (includes transport & lunch)<br />
- Brockton, MA Advanced Waste Water Treatment Plant<br />
- Pawtucket, RI Water Treatment Plant<br />
- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f by 3 PM at Logan Int’l Airport<br />
before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />
Ozone Operations Workshop<br />
- MWRA John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />
(includes transport & lunch)<br />
- REGISTRATION DESK HOURS -<br />
SUNDAY<br />
7:30 AM - 8:30 AM<br />
(Sunday Workshops Only!)<br />
NOON - 7 PM<br />
(Conference Registration<br />
Begins)<br />
MONDAY<br />
7:30 AM - 12:15 PM<br />
1:15 PM - 5 PM<br />
TUESDAY<br />
7:30 AM - 12:15 PM<br />
2
International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />
Upcoming Events<br />
2009/2010<br />
Singapore<br />
IUVA 1-Day Workshop<br />
June 22, 2009<br />
Suntec Singapore International<br />
Convention & Exhibition Centre<br />
http://docs.iuva.org/IUVA_SIWW_22_June.pdf<br />
Tokyo<br />
IOA 19 th World Congress<br />
August 31 - September 3, 2009<br />
Tower Hall Funabori<br />
Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan<br />
http://www.j-ozone.org/info/info001.html<br />
Amsterdam<br />
IUVA 5 th World Congress<br />
September 20-23, 2009<br />
NH Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky<br />
Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
http://docs.iuva.org/Registration_Amsterdam_2009.pdf<br />
Seattle / Bellevue<br />
IOA Annual Conference<br />
September, 20-22 2010<br />
Hyatt Regency Bellevue<br />
Washington, USA<br />
MORE INFORMATION - COMING SOON<br />
3
WELCOME MESSAGE & ORGANIZING COMMITTEE<br />
Dear Conference Participant,<br />
We welcome you to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge in Massachusetts, USA on behalf <strong>of</strong> the<br />
International Ozone Association – Pan American Group and the International Ultraviolet Association.<br />
We are pleased to have you join us for our 2009 North American Conference which features both UV<br />
and Ozone Basics Workshops, an Ozone Operations Workshop and both Ozone and UV Technical<br />
Tours that provide an inside look at some <strong>of</strong> New England’s most cutting edge Drinking Water and<br />
Wastewater Treatment Plants.<br />
UV and Ozone directly improve our quality <strong>of</strong> life. The strong technical contributions <strong>of</strong> this year’s<br />
speakers will make that abundantly clear. We proudly present this diverse and comprehensive look<br />
at each technology’s benefits, both stand-alone and when used in combination, and thank our<br />
talented speakers for their time and effort.<br />
We especially wish to acknowledge the work <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Mohamed Gamal El-Din, Ph.D., P.Eng., and<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Karl Linden, Ph.D., who coordinated all <strong>of</strong> the sessions as well as organized and edited all<br />
<strong>of</strong> the abstracts and papers for this unique technical program. Many thanks to our hosts, the<br />
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA), for producing this year’s CD <strong>of</strong> conference<br />
proceedings and inviting us into their facilities. Thanks also to our Primary Conference <strong>Sponsor</strong>, ITT<br />
Water & Wastewater. We greatly appreciate the support <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> our generous exhibitors and<br />
sponsors, who make this annual event possible.<br />
Welcome and enjoy!<br />
Linda Gowman, Ph.D., P.Eng.<br />
IUVA President<br />
Jeff Neemann<br />
IOA PAG Chair<br />
Technical Program Committee<br />
- Mohamed Gamal El-Din, Ph.D., P.Eng., University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Co-Chair (IOA)<br />
- Karl Linden, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Colorado at Boulder, Co-Chair (IUVA)<br />
- Jim Bolton, Ph.D., Bolton Photosciences<br />
- Pamela Chelme-Ayala, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />
- Theping Chen, AECOM<br />
- Jim Constantacos, Constant America<br />
- Larry Forney, Ph.D., Georgia Tech<br />
- Ronald Gehr, Ph.D., McGill University<br />
- Dennis Greene, Ph.D., AECOM Water<br />
- Mirat Gurol, Ph.D., San Diego State University<br />
- Dr. Ron H<strong>of</strong>mann, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Toronto<br />
- Paul Overbeck, IOA & IUVA<br />
- Erik Rosenfeldt, Ph.D., University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-Amherst<br />
- Mike Santelli, Light Sources, Inc.<br />
- Diana Schoenberg, IOA & IUVA<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
4
TECHNICAL PROGRAM<br />
ORAL PRESENTATIONS<br />
Monday May 04 th 2009<br />
General Opening Session – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Charles View Ballroom (16 th Floor)<br />
Start<br />
End<br />
8:15 9:30 Welcome and Guest Speakers<br />
9:30 – 10:15 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
Session 1 – UV Validation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
10:15 10:40 A Uniform Protocol for Wastewater<br />
UV Validation Applications - IUVA<br />
Manufacturers Council Position<br />
Oliver Lawal 1 , Paul Ropic 1 ,<br />
Elliott Whitby 2 , Stan Shmia 3 ,<br />
and Bertrand Dussert 4<br />
10:40 11:05 Overcoming Validation Report Complexity Phyllis Posy 1 , Karl Scheible 2 ,<br />
and Chengyue Shen 2<br />
11:05 11:30 Validation <strong>of</strong> UV Reactors for Water<br />
and Wastewater Applications:<br />
What is the State-<strong>of</strong>-the-Art<br />
11:30 11:55 Standardized Lagrangian Actinometry<br />
Protocol for UV Reactor Validation<br />
O. Karl Scheible and<br />
Chengyue Shen<br />
Chengyue Shen 1 , Ernest R.<br />
Blatchley III 2 , Eric Cox 2 ,<br />
and O. Karl Scheible 1<br />
1 ITT-WEDECO. 2 Calgon Carbon Corp.<br />
3<br />
Severn Trent Water Purification.<br />
4<br />
Siemens Water Technologies.<br />
1<br />
Atlantium Technologies. 2 UV Validation<br />
Center, HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.<br />
HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.<br />
1<br />
HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ.<br />
2<br />
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.<br />
Session 2 – UV Regulatory – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
10:15 10:40 Commissioning and Obtaining Regulatory<br />
Approval for Drinking Water UV<br />
Disinfection Systems<br />
10:40 11:05 Biodosimetry <strong>of</strong> a Full-Scale UV<br />
Disinfection System to Achieve<br />
Regulatory Approval for Drinking<br />
Water Disinfection<br />
11:05 11:30 Integrating UVDGM Operational<br />
Requirements in Small System<br />
Regulatory Compliance:<br />
The People Perspective<br />
11:30 11:55 Achieving UV Disinfection Credit<br />
for Pre-UVDGM Era UV Facilities:<br />
Experiences <strong>of</strong> Two UV Facilities<br />
David Gaithuma, Harold Wright,<br />
and Mark Heath<br />
Bruno Ferran, Robert Kelly,<br />
and Wei Yang<br />
Phyllis Posy 1 , Ytzhak Rozenberg 2 ,<br />
and Peter Bugg 3<br />
Christine Cotton, P.E.,<br />
and James Collins<br />
Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer<br />
Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.<br />
Infilco Degremont, Inc., Degremont North<br />
American Research & Development Center<br />
510 East Jackson Street, Richmond,<br />
VA, 23219.<br />
1<br />
Atlantium Technologies.<br />
2<br />
R&D, Atlantium Technologies.<br />
3<br />
EWT.<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., S. Church Ave,<br />
Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Session 3 – Ozone Design and Operation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
10:15 10:40 Ozone Measurement and Control in<br />
Drinking Water Treatment Plants<br />
10:40 11:05 The Potential Use <strong>of</strong> Ozone<br />
in Municipal Waste Water<br />
11:05 11:30 Control <strong>of</strong> Iron and Manganese<br />
Ozone Removal by Differential<br />
Turbidity Measurements<br />
11:30 11:55 Optimizing an Intermediate Ozone<br />
System used for Primary Disinfection at a<br />
55 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant<br />
Andrew Wright, Ph.D.,<br />
and Victor Dosoretz<br />
A. Ried, J. Mielcke,<br />
and A. Wieland<br />
Vadim Malkov, Mike Sadar,<br />
Jon Schiller, and Eric Lehman<br />
Russ Navratil 1 , Chip England 1 ,<br />
and Glenn Hunter 2<br />
IN USA Inc., 100 Morse St., Norwood,<br />
MA, 02062.<br />
ITT W&WW WEDECO, Boschstr. 4-14,<br />
32051 Herford, Germany.<br />
Hach Company, 5600 Lindbergh Dr.<br />
Loveland, CO 80538, USA.<br />
1<br />
Henrico County, VA.<br />
2<br />
Process Applications Inc.<br />
11:55 – 13:15 Luncheon<br />
Session 4 – UV Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
13:15 13:40 UV System Technology Evaluation<br />
Using UV Cost Analysis Tool for<br />
Metro Vancouver’s Coquitlam UV<br />
Disinfection Project<br />
13:40 14:05 Brockton, Massachusetts Commissions<br />
a 60-mgd (227-ML/d) UV Wastewater<br />
Disinfection System<br />
14:05 14:30 Site Specific Testing <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection<br />
at a Trickling Filter Plant<br />
14:30 14:55 Ultraviolet Light Disinfection System<br />
Conceptual Design for the Massachusetts<br />
Water Resources Authority John J. Carroll<br />
Water Treatment Plant<br />
Ayman Shawwa, P.E., Ph.D.,<br />
BCEE 1 , Chris Schulz, P.E.,<br />
BCEE 2 , Inder Singh, M.A.Sc.<br />
P.Eng. 3 , and James Kim, P.E. 1<br />
William C. McConnell, P.E. 1 ,<br />
and David A. Norton 2<br />
Gary Hunter, P.E. 1 ,<br />
Anjana Kadava 1 , Jane Hood 2 ,<br />
and Don Gilpin 2<br />
Albert J. Capuzzi 1 ,<br />
Brian Loux 1 , Paul Swaim 1 ,<br />
and James P. Malley 2<br />
1 CDM, Walnut Creek, CA.<br />
2<br />
CDM, Denver, CO.<br />
3<br />
Metro Vancouver, BC, Canada.<br />
1<br />
CDM, 56 Exchange Terrace, Providence, RI<br />
02903. 2 City <strong>of</strong> Brockton, MA, 303 Oak Hill<br />
Way, Brockton, MA 02301.<br />
1<br />
Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas<br />
City, MO 64114. 2 City <strong>of</strong> St. Joseph, MO.<br />
1<br />
CH2M HILL. 2 University <strong>of</strong> New Hampshire.<br />
Session 5 – Ozone Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
13:15 13:40 Multi-function Sidestream<br />
Ozone Treatment at a Drinking<br />
Water Treatment Plant<br />
13:40 14:05 Rising Energy Costs and Frozen<br />
Budgets: Getting More from Our<br />
Operating Buck<br />
14:05 14:30 Key Water Quality Parameters<br />
that Determine Ozone Dose for<br />
Massachusetts Water<br />
Resources Authority<br />
14:30 14:55 Treatment <strong>of</strong> Wastewater with Ozone<br />
at the Southwest Wastewater<br />
Treatment Plant<br />
Maxime Beaulieu 1 ,<br />
Patrick Niquette 1 ,<br />
Pierre Cullen 2 ,<br />
and Denis Allard 2<br />
David W. Coppes<br />
Windsor Sung, Ph.D., P.E.<br />
Nick Burns 1 , Jeff Neemann 1 ,<br />
Tom Holst 2 , and Jim Burks 2<br />
1 Dessau Inc., Water, Industry and Waste<br />
Management, 1080, Côte du Beaver Hall,<br />
Suite 300, Quebec, Canada, H2Z 1S8.<br />
2<br />
City <strong>of</strong> Laval, Department <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />
city management, Laval (Quebec), Canada,<br />
H7V 1A0.<br />
Western Operations, Massachusetts Water<br />
Resources Authority, 266 Boston Road,<br />
Southborough, MA 01772.<br />
MWRA, 260 Boston Road, Southborough,<br />
MA 01772.<br />
1<br />
Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas<br />
City, MO 64114. 2 Springfield Utilities,<br />
3301 S. FF Hwy, Springfield, MO 65807.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
6
Session 6 – Ozone Design and Operation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
13:15 13:40 Optimization Considerations for an<br />
Ozone Side Stream Injection System<br />
13:40 14:05 Evaluating Options for Retr<strong>of</strong>itting a Large<br />
Scale Ozonation System in Texas<br />
Bill Mundy, C.E.T. 1 ,<br />
Kerwin Rakness 2 ,<br />
and Glenn Hunter 2<br />
Jeff Neemann 1 , David<br />
Timmerman 1 , Robert Hulsey 1 ,<br />
Buford Green 2 , and Steve Long 2<br />
14:05 14:30 Keeping Ozone Generators Dry and Cool Kerwin L. Rakness 1<br />
and James Muri 2<br />
14:30 14:55 Application <strong>of</strong> Ozone for Contaminant<br />
Oxidation in Wastewater<br />
Eric C. Wert, Fernando Rosario-<br />
Ortiz, and Shane Snyder<br />
1 Regional Municipality Of Halton,<br />
1151 Bronte Road, Oakville, ON, Canada,<br />
L6M 3L1. 2 Process Applications Inc.,<br />
Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80526.<br />
1<br />
Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO. 2 North<br />
Texas Municipal Water District, Wylie, TX.<br />
1<br />
Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing<br />
Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, CO 80526.<br />
2<br />
John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant, 84<br />
D’Angelo Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752.<br />
Southern Nevada Water Authority,<br />
P.O. Box 99955, Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />
14:55 – 15:40 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
Session 7 – UV Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
15:40 16:05 Approach for Achieving Sustainable<br />
Operation <strong>of</strong> the 2-bgd Catskill/Delaware<br />
UV disinfection Facility<br />
16:05 16:30 Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet Disinfection<br />
<strong>of</strong> A WWTP Final (Blended) Effluent<br />
under Wet Weather Flow Conditions<br />
16:30 16:55 Bidding, Testing, and Start-Up <strong>of</strong> a Reuse<br />
UV Disinfection System in Florida<br />
16:55 17:20 Validation <strong>of</strong> the Catskill/Delaware UV<br />
Reactor: A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry<br />
and Lagrangian Actinometry Methods<br />
Matthew T. Valade, P.E. 1 ,<br />
Steven Farabaugh 2 ,<br />
Paul D. Smith, P.E. 3 ,<br />
and Gary Kroll, P.E. 4<br />
Khalil Z. Atasi, Ph.D.,<br />
P.E., BCEE, F.ASCE<br />
Josefin M. Edeback, E.I.<br />
and Melanie A. Mann, P.E.<br />
Chengyue Shen 1 and Karl<br />
Scheible 1 , Matthew Valade 2 ,<br />
and Ernest R. Blatchley 3<br />
1 Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 24 Federal Street,<br />
Suite 302, Boston, MA 02129. 2 Hazen and<br />
Sawyer, P.C., 498 Seventh Avenue, 11 th<br />
Floor, New York, NY 10018. 3 NYC Dept. <strong>of</strong><br />
Env. Protection, 96-05 Horace Harding Expy,<br />
Corona, NY 11368. 4 CDM, Raritan Plaza 1,<br />
Raritan Center, Edison, NJ 08817.<br />
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., 2301 Maitland<br />
Center Parkway, Suite 300, Maitland,<br />
FL 32751.<br />
Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 10002 Princess<br />
Palm Avenue, Tampa, FL 33619.<br />
1<br />
HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ. 2 Hazen and<br />
Sawyer, P.C., Boston, MA. 3 Purdue<br />
University, West Lafayette, IN.<br />
Session 8 – Ozone Case Studies – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
15:40 16:05 Updating Ozone for the<br />
Lincoln Water System<br />
16:05 16:30 Eastern Treatment Plant<br />
- Melbourne Water’s Approach to<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the World’s Most Complex<br />
Wastewater Technology Trials<br />
16:30 16:55 Operations Experience and<br />
Enhancements to the Two-stage<br />
Ozone System for the Cary/Apex, NC<br />
Water Treatment Plant<br />
16:55 17:20 Treated Water Quality<br />
Enhancements from Ozonation<br />
in a Tertiary Plant Upgrade<br />
Jeff Neemann 1 , Nick Burns 1 ,<br />
Robert Hulsey 1 , Andrew Hansen 1 ,<br />
Eric Lee 2 , and John Miriovsky 2<br />
Mark Lynch 1 , John Mieog 1 ,<br />
Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />
Sock-Hoon Koh 2 ,<br />
and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />
Bill Dowbiggin and Kelvin Creech<br />
John Mieog 1 , Mark Lynch 1 ,<br />
Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />
Sock-Hoon Koh 2 ,<br />
and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />
1 Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO.<br />
2<br />
Lincoln Water System, Lincoln, NE.<br />
1<br />
Melbourne Water Corporation;<br />
Melbourne, Australia. 2 Black & Veatch,<br />
Kansas City, MO. 3 Kellogg Brown & Root<br />
Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.<br />
1<br />
CDM.<br />
2<br />
Town <strong>of</strong> Cary.<br />
1<br />
Melbourne Water Corporation;<br />
Melbourne, Australia. 2 Black & Veatch,<br />
Kansas City, MO. 3 Kellogg Brown & Root<br />
Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.<br />
7<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Session 9 – Ozone Design and Operation – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
15:40 16:05 Inline Multi-Jets Ozone Contactors:<br />
Performance and Scalability<br />
16:05 16:30 Operator-Friendly Technique and<br />
Quality Control Considerations for<br />
Indigo Colorimetric Measurement<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ozone Residual<br />
16:30 16:55 Highly Efficient High Concentration<br />
Photochemical Ozone Generation<br />
16:55 17:20 The Study on the Ceramic Membrane<br />
Wastewater Reuse System with<br />
Pre Ozonation and Coagulation<br />
Mahad S. Baawain 1 ,<br />
Mohamed Gamal El-Din 2 ,<br />
Daniel W. Smith 2 ,<br />
and Angelo Mazzei 3<br />
Kerwin L. Rakness 1 ,<br />
Eric C. Wert 2 , Michael Elovitz 3 ,<br />
and Suzanne Mahoney 4<br />
Daniel E. Murnick<br />
M. Noguchi 1 , M. Aoki 1 ,<br />
H. Kozono 1 ,<br />
H. Kouchiwa 2 ,<br />
and Y.Yoda 2<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Civil & Architectural<br />
Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University,<br />
Muscat, Oman. 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Civil &<br />
Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3 Mazzei<br />
Injector Corporation, Bakersfield, CA.<br />
1<br />
Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing<br />
Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, CO 80526.<br />
2<br />
Southern Nevada Water System, Las Vegas,<br />
NV 89193. 3 Treatment Technology and<br />
Evaluation Branch, Water Supply & Water<br />
Res. Division, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH<br />
45268. 4 Little Falls Water Treatment Plant,<br />
Passaic Valley Water Commission, 800<br />
Union Boulevard, Totowa, NJ 07512.<br />
UV Solutions Inc. and Rutgers University,<br />
Newark NJ 07102.<br />
1<br />
Metawater Co., LTD., Shiroyama Trust<br />
Tower. 4-3-1 Toranomon, Minato-ku,<br />
Tokyo 105-6029, Japan. 2 Tokyo Metropolitan<br />
Government, 2-8-1 Nishishinjuku,<br />
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-8001, Japan.<br />
Tuesday May 05 th 2009<br />
Session 10 – UV Disinfection Design – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
8:15 8:40 Disinfection Alternatives and Sustainability:<br />
Energy Optimization, Disinfection Efficiency,<br />
and Sustainability<br />
8:40 9:05 Airing it Out: Design Considerations<br />
for UV Disinfection Installations<br />
9:05 9:30 Impact <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry-Based Validation<br />
on UV System Design Specifications<br />
Gary Hunter 1 , Andy Shaw 1 ,<br />
Dr. Leonard W. Casson 2 ,<br />
and Dr. Joe Marriott 2<br />
Aaron W. Duke, P.E.<br />
Bryan R. Townsend 1<br />
and Gary Hunter 2<br />
1 Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas<br />
City, MO 64114.<br />
2<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />
Engineering, 944 Benedum Engineering Hall,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.<br />
11242 Waples Mill Road, Suite 250, Fairfax,<br />
VA 22030.<br />
1<br />
Black & Veatch, 8520 Cliff Cameron Drive,<br />
Suite 210, Charlotte, NC 28269.<br />
2<br />
Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway,<br />
Kansas City, MO 64114.<br />
Session 11 – Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
8:15 8:40 A Bench-Scale Evaluation <strong>of</strong> UV and<br />
UV/H 2 O 2 Processes for the Removal<br />
<strong>of</strong> PPCPs in Secondary Treated Water<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sewage Treatment Plant<br />
8:40 9:05 The Effects <strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV Radiation<br />
on Natural Organic Matter<br />
9:05 9:30 Predicting Hydroxyl Radical Activity<br />
and Trace Contaminants Removal<br />
in Ozonated Water<br />
Ilho Kim, Naoyuki Yamashita,<br />
and Hiroaki Tanaka<br />
Gustavo E. Imoberdorf<br />
and Madjid Mohseni<br />
Simon Vincent, Abderrahim Kotbi<br />
and Benoit Barbeau<br />
Research Center for Environmental Quality<br />
Management, Kyoto University, 1-2<br />
Yumihama, Otsu, Shiga 520-0811, Japan.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological<br />
Engineering, The University <strong>of</strong> British<br />
Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.<br />
Industrial-NSERC Chair in Drinking Water,<br />
École Polytechnique de Montréal,<br />
Département des Génies Civil, Géologique<br />
et des Mines, Montréal, QC, H3C 3A7.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
8
Session 12 – Perozone and AOP Processes –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
8:15 8:40 In-Situ 1,4 Dioxane Remediation<br />
in HVOC Sites<br />
8:40 9:05 Experiences <strong>of</strong> Perozone ® and<br />
C-Sparge TM at Two Former Dry<br />
Cleaner Sites in The Netherlands<br />
9:05 9:30 Non-Thermal Plasma - A Novel and Cost<br />
Effective Advanced Oxidation System<br />
Andrew Brolowski<br />
and William B. Kerfoot<br />
Bert Scheffer 1<br />
and Edward van de Ven 2<br />
Dvir Solnik 1 , Andreas Kolch 2 ,<br />
Andrew Salveson 3 , Nitin Goel 3 ,<br />
Nicola Fontaine 4 ,<br />
Justin Sutherland 5 ,<br />
and Chris Fennessy 6<br />
Kerfoot Technologies, Inc., 766-B Falmouth<br />
Road, Mashpee, MA 02649.<br />
1<br />
Verhoeve Milieu bv, Dorpsstraat 32, P.O. Box<br />
4, 6997 ZG Hoog-Keppel, The Netherlands.<br />
2<br />
Verhoeve Milieu bv, Aventurijn 600, P.O. Box<br />
3073, 3301 DB Dordrecht, The Netherlands.<br />
1<br />
Aquapure Technologies Limited, Israel.<br />
2<br />
Hytecon, Germany. 3 Carollo Engineers,<br />
Walnut Creek, CA. 4 Carollo Engineers,<br />
Walnut Creek, CA. 5 Carollo Engineers,<br />
Austin, TX. 6 Aerojet, Sacrament, CA.<br />
9:30 – 10:15 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
Session 13 – UV Disinfection Design – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
10:15 10:40 Use <strong>of</strong> Velocity Pr<strong>of</strong>iling to Assess<br />
to Effect <strong>of</strong> Piping Configuration<br />
on UV Dose Delivery<br />
10:40 11:05 Ultraviolet System Design Considerations<br />
for Uncovered Reservoir versus Water<br />
Treatment Plant Applications<br />
11:05 11:30 Costs and Sustainability Comparison<br />
<strong>of</strong> Chemical Disinfection and Medium<br />
Pressure Ultraviolet Disinfection for<br />
Virus Inactivation<br />
11:30 11:55 A Smart Way to Validate UV<br />
Systems for Reuse Applications<br />
Dennis J. Greene 1 ,<br />
Keith Bircher 2 ,<br />
and Harold B. Wright 3<br />
Jack Bebee, P.E. 1<br />
and Christine Cotton, P.E. 2<br />
James Collins 1 ,<br />
Christine Cotton 1 ,<br />
and Phyllis Posy 2<br />
1 AECOM Water, 276 Abby Road,<br />
Manchester, NH 03103. 2 UV Technologies<br />
Div., Calgon Carbon Corporation, 50 Mural<br />
Street, Unit#3, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada<br />
L4B 1E4. 3 Carollo Engineers, 12592 West<br />
Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.<br />
1<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue,<br />
Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008. 2 Malcolm<br />
Pirnie, Inc., One South Church Avenue, Suite<br />
1120, Tucson, AZ 85701.<br />
1<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave,<br />
Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ. 2 Atlantium<br />
Technologies, Har Tuv Industrial Park,<br />
POB 11071, Israel 99100.<br />
Matthias Boeker 1 ,<br />
1 ITT Water & Wastewater U.S.A., 14125<br />
Andrew Salveson 2 ,<br />
Madhukar Rapaka 3 ,<br />
and Ronnie Bemus 1<br />
South Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273.<br />
2<br />
Carollo Engineers, 2700 Ygnacio Valley<br />
Road, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94598.<br />
3<br />
ITT Water & Wastewater Germany,<br />
Boschstrasse 4, 32051 Herford, Germany.<br />
Session 14 – Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
10:15 10:40 A Kinetic Model for the Degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Natural Organic Matter during the<br />
Ultraviolet Hydrogen Peroxide<br />
Advanced Oxidation Process<br />
10:40 11:05 UV Photolysis <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceuticals and<br />
Personal Care Products (PPCPs) and<br />
Endocrine Disrupting Substances<br />
(EDS) in Drinking Water<br />
11:05 11:30 Advanced Oxidation Processes for<br />
Contaminant Destruction: Selecting<br />
between Ozone-Peroxide or UV-Peroxide<br />
11:30 11:55 Rapid Measurement <strong>of</strong> Background<br />
Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging in Water<br />
Sarathy, S.R., Bazri, M.,<br />
and Mohseni, M.<br />
Jules Carlson 1 , Mihaela Stefan 2 ,<br />
and Chris Metcalfe 1<br />
James Collins<br />
and Christine Cotton, P.E.<br />
Matthew Hross<br />
and Erik J. Rosenfeldt<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological<br />
Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia,<br />
2360 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3<br />
Canada.<br />
1<br />
Trent University, Peterborough,<br />
ON, Canada.<br />
2<br />
Trojan Technologies, London, ON, Canada.<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave,<br />
Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ.<br />
The University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering.<br />
9<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Session 15 – Perozone and AOP Processes –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
10:15 10:40 Perozone Groundwater Sparging at the<br />
Days Inn Lake City Pre-Approval Site<br />
10:40 11:05 Characterization <strong>of</strong> Ozone<br />
Mass Transfer in Model Soils<br />
11:05 11:30 Ozone Oxidation for Source<br />
Removal And Prevention Barrier<br />
at a Fire Training Academy<br />
11:30 11:55 A Simplified Method for Modeling<br />
Chemical Intermediates in<br />
Advanced Oxidation Processes<br />
Edward M. Kellar<br />
and Chris Mickler, P.E.<br />
Alejandro García 1 , Tatyana<br />
Poznyak 2 , Jesús Rodríguez 2 ,<br />
and Isaac Chairez 3<br />
Scott C. Michaud<br />
and Thomas C. Cambareri, LSP<br />
Joseph A. Drago, P.E., Ph.D.<br />
MACTEC, Inc., Gainesville, FL 32669.<br />
1<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Automatic Control,<br />
CINVESTAV-IPN, Av. Instituto Politécnico<br />
Nacional, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco,<br />
C.P.07360, Mexico D.F., Mexico. 2 Superior<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering National<br />
Polytechnic Institute <strong>of</strong> Mexico (ESIQIE-<br />
IPN), Edif 7, UPALM, C.P. 07738, Mexico<br />
D.F., Mexico. 3 Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Interdisciplinary<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology <strong>of</strong> National Polytechnic<br />
Institute (UPIBI-IPN), Av. Acueducto s/n.,<br />
C.P. 07480, México, D.F, México.<br />
Cape Cod Commission, 3225 Main Street,<br />
PO Box 226, Barnstable, MA 02630.<br />
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants,<br />
San Francisco, CA.<br />
11:55 – 13:15 Luncheon<br />
Session 16 – UV Disinfection Research – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
13:15 13:40 Effect <strong>of</strong> Pre- and Post- UV Disinfection<br />
Conditions on Photoreactivation <strong>of</strong><br />
Fecal Coliforms from a Physicochemical<br />
Wastewater Effluent<br />
13:40 14:05 Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Disinfection Effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV (VUV) and UV Light on<br />
Bacillus subtilis Spores at 172, 222,<br />
254 nm<br />
14:05 14:30 E. coli Repair in UV Water<br />
Treatment Conditions<br />
Catherine Hallmich<br />
and Ronald Gehr<br />
Ding Wang, 1,2<br />
Thomas Oppenländer, 3<br />
Mohamed Gamal El-Din, 1<br />
and James R. Bolton 1<br />
Bohrerova, Z. and Linden, K.G.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering and Applied<br />
Mechanics, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke<br />
Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6.<br />
1<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />
Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton,<br />
AB, T6G 2W2, Canada. 2 Current address,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Toronto, Galbraith Building, 35 St. George St.,<br />
Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1A4.<br />
3<br />
Hochschule Furtwangen University (HFU),<br />
Campus Villingen-Schwenningen, Fakultät<br />
Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik,<br />
Jakob-Kienzle-Str. 17, 78054<br />
Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
10
Session 17 – AOP and Ozone Byproducts – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
13:15 13:40 Novel UV LED Advanced Oxidation<br />
System for Disinfection and Removal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Organic and Heavy Metal<br />
Contaminants in Water<br />
13:40 14:05 UV Advanced Oxidation Processes<br />
for Taste and Odor Treatment:<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Assimilable Organic Carbon<br />
Formation Potential at an Indiana WTP<br />
14:05 14:30 Toxicity Assessment and Identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> Oxidation Byproducts Generated<br />
During the Ozonation <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />
Water Containing Pesticide<br />
14:30 14:55 Evaluating the Effects <strong>of</strong> Source<br />
Water Quality on Bromate<br />
Mitigation Performance<br />
Tom Hawkins, Ph.D, and Mark<br />
Owen<br />
James Collins 1 , Christine Cotton 1 ,<br />
Bruce Heeke 2 , David Dahl 3 ,<br />
and Alan Royce 4<br />
Pamela Chelme-Ayala,<br />
Mohamed Gamal El-Din,<br />
and Daniel W. Smith<br />
Zaid Chowdhury 1 , David Eberle 1 ,<br />
Laurel Passantino 1 , Joe Kurrus 2 ,<br />
and Linda Bezy-Botma 2<br />
Puralytics, 15250 NW Greenbrier Pkwy,<br />
Beaverton, OR, USA 97006-5764.<br />
1<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Tucson, AZ.<br />
2<br />
Patoka Lake Region Water and<br />
Sewer District. 3 Midwestern Engineers.<br />
4<br />
Trojan Technologies.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />
Engineering, 3-133 Markin/CNRL Natural<br />
Resources Engineering Facility, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada.<br />
1<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 2 City <strong>of</strong> Peoria, AZ.<br />
Session 18 – Modeling UV Systems –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
13:15 13:40 Monte Carlo Ray Trace Model:<br />
A New Approach in Determining<br />
Fluence Rates in UV Systems<br />
13:40 14:05 A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Two Methods for<br />
Measuring the UV Output <strong>of</strong> Low<br />
Pressure Mercury Lamps in Air<br />
14:05 14:30 Method for Measurement <strong>of</strong> Output<br />
<strong>of</strong> Low Pressure Mercury Lamps<br />
14:30 14:55 Controlling Mercury Release with<br />
UV Lamp Sleeve Breaks<br />
Khoi Nguyen and Jaewan Yoon<br />
Old Dominion University, Civil and<br />
Environmental Engineering, Norfolk, VA.<br />
G. Elliott Whitby 1* , Bill Sotirakos 1 ,<br />
1 Calgon Carbon Canada, 50 Mural St., Unit #3,<br />
and James R. Bolton 2 Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4B 1E4. 2 Bolton<br />
Photosciences Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres.,<br />
Edmonton, AB, Canada T6R 2M5.<br />
Volker Adam, Ralf Dreiskemper,<br />
Martin Kessler<br />
Harold Wright, Ed Wicklein,<br />
and Corianne Hart<br />
Heraeus Noblelight GmbH, Heraeusstr. 12-<br />
14, 63450 Hanau, Germany.<br />
Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer<br />
Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.<br />
14:55 – 15:40 C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />
Session 19 – UV Disinfection Research – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
15:40 16:05 High Energy Efficiency and<br />
Small Footprint with High-Wattage<br />
Low Pressure UV Disinfection for<br />
Water Reuse<br />
16:05 16:30 Impact <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection Combined<br />
with Chlorination/Chloramination on the<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> Nitrogenous Disinfection<br />
Byproducts in Drinking Water<br />
16:30 16:55 High Intensity Pulsed Lamps for<br />
Water Treatment: Review and Status<br />
16:55 17:20 An Empirical Method for Accurately<br />
Sizing Wastewater UV Reactors for<br />
Disinfection <strong>of</strong> any Microorganism<br />
Andrew Salveson 1 ,<br />
Tavy Wade 1 , Keith G. Bircher 2 ,<br />
and Bill Sotirakos 2<br />
Amisha D. Shah 1 ,<br />
Aaron A. Dotson 2 , Karl G. Linden 2 ,<br />
Howard S. Weinberg 3 ,<br />
and William A. Mitch 1<br />
Ray Schaefer<br />
and Michael Grapperhaus<br />
1 Carollo Engineers.<br />
2<br />
Calgon Carbon Corporation.<br />
1<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering, Yale<br />
University, 9 Hillhouse Ave., New Haven, CT<br />
06520. 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Civil, Environmental,<br />
and Architectural Engineering, Engineering<br />
Center ECOT, University <strong>of</strong> Colorado at<br />
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309. 3 Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Environmental Sciences and Engineering,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill,<br />
1303 Michael Hooker Research Center,<br />
Chapel Hill, NC 27599.<br />
Phoenix Science & Technology, Inc.,<br />
Chelmsford, MA 01824.<br />
Harold Wright 1 , Andrew<br />
1 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300,<br />
Salveson 1 , Tavy Wade,<br />
Walnut Creek, CA 94598.<br />
Sean Poust 1 , Allan Slater 2 ,<br />
2 Severn Trent Services, 580 Virginia<br />
Duncan Collins 2 , Jeremy<br />
Drive, Suite 300, Ft. Washington,<br />
Meier 2 , and Ian Dearnley 2 PA 19034.<br />
11<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Session 20 – AOP and Ozone Byproducts – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
15:40 16:05 Advanced Oxidation Process<br />
– Effective and Technical Suitable<br />
for Micropollutant Removal in<br />
Contaminated Water Sources<br />
16:05 16:30 Bromate Pre-systemic Detoxification<br />
Metabolism Research Progress<br />
16:30 16:55 Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies<br />
on Decomposition Reactions <strong>of</strong><br />
Pyrrolidone Derivatives Using O 3<br />
16:55 17:20 Ozone Disinfection Reduces Disinfection<br />
Byproduct Formation to Comply with<br />
New Stage 2 DBP and LT2 Requirements<br />
J. Krüger1, A. Ried 1 ,<br />
1 ITT W&WW WEDECO GmbH, Boschstr. 6,<br />
K. Teunissen 2 , A.H. Knol 2 ,<br />
32051 Herford, Germany. 2 DZH & Delft<br />
and D. Csalovszki 3 University <strong>of</strong> Technology PO 34, 2270 AA<br />
Voorburg, The Netherlands. 3 ITT W&WW<br />
USA WEDECO Products, 14125 South<br />
Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273.<br />
Joseph Cotruvo 1* , Richard Bull 2 ,<br />
Brian Cummings 3 , Jeffrey Fisher 3 ,<br />
Zhongxian Guo 4 , Choon Nam<br />
Ong 5 , Oscar Quinones 6 ,<br />
Shane Snyder 6 , Jason Keith 7 ,<br />
Gilbert Gordon 7 ,<br />
and Gilbert Pacey 7<br />
Yu Tachibana, Masanobu Nogami,<br />
Yuichi Sugiyama,<br />
and Yasuhisa Ikeda<br />
1 Joseph Cotruvo & Associates LLC,<br />
Washington, DC, USA. 2 MoBull Consulting,<br />
Richland, WA, USA. 3 University <strong>of</strong> Georgia,<br />
Athens, GA, USA. 4 PUB Waterhub Centre for<br />
Advanced Water Technology, Singapore.<br />
5<br />
National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore. 6 Southern<br />
Nevada Water Authority, Henderson, NV, USA.<br />
7<br />
Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.<br />
Research Laboratory for Nuclear<br />
Reactors, Tokyo Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />
2-12-1-N1-34 Ookayama, Meguro-ku,<br />
Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.<br />
Michael A. Oneby 1 , Richard Lin 2 ,<br />
1 MWH Americas, 789 N. Water St, Suite 430,<br />
James H. Borchardt 2 ,<br />
Milwaukee, WI 53202-3558, USA.<br />
and Charles O. Bromley 3 2 MWH Americas, 618 Michillinda Ave.,<br />
Suite 200, Arcadia, CA 91007, USA.<br />
3<br />
MWH Americas, 3010 W. Charleston Blvd,<br />
Suite 100, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA.<br />
Session 21 – Modeling UV Systems –Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
15:40 16:05 Comparison Testing <strong>of</strong> ‘Spot’ vs. ‘Pellet’<br />
LPHO UV Lamps<br />
16:05 16:30 Measurements <strong>of</strong> UV Lamp Performance<br />
in Near-Field and Far-Field Apparatus<br />
16:30 16:55 Application <strong>of</strong> Computational Fluid<br />
Dynamics to Support Design <strong>of</strong> Full-Scale<br />
Wastewater UV Disinfection Channels<br />
16:55 17:20 A Genomic Model for the Prediction<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet Inactivation Rate<br />
Constants for RNA and DNA Viruses<br />
Mike Santelli 1*<br />
and James R. Bolton 2<br />
G. Fang, D.G. Knight,<br />
R. Kilgour, and T. Molyneux<br />
Shanshan Jin<br />
and Melanie A. Mann<br />
1 Light Sources Inc., 37 Robinson Blvd.,<br />
Orange, CT 06477. 2 Bolton Photosciences<br />
Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres., NW, Edmonton,<br />
AB, Canada, T6R 2M5.<br />
Trojan Technologies, 3020 Gore Road,<br />
London, ON, Canada N5V 4T7<br />
Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 11242 Waples Mill<br />
Road, Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22030.<br />
Wladyslaw J. Kowalski 1 ,<br />
1 Immune Building Systems, Inc., 575<br />
William P. Bahnfleth 2 ,<br />
Madison Ave., 10th Floor, New York,<br />
and Mark T. Hernandez 3 NY10022. 2 The Pennsylvania State<br />
University, Department <strong>of</strong> Architectural<br />
Engineering, University Park, PA 16802.<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Colorado, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil,<br />
Environmental, and Architectural<br />
Engineering, Boulder, CO 80309.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
12
POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />
Session P1 – Monday May 04, 2009<br />
President’s Ballroom Prefunction Area<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
14:55 15:40 Passivation, Fabrication and Maintenance<br />
Issues in Ozone and Oxygen Systems<br />
14:55 15:40 Effect <strong>of</strong> additives on the degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Reactive Black 5 (RB5)<br />
by simple ozonation<br />
Patrick Banes, Michel Dalglish,<br />
Brent Ekstrand, Ph.D.<br />
and Daryl Roll, P.E.<br />
Arizbeth A. Pérez Martínez<br />
and Tatyana Poznyak<br />
Astro Pak Corporation, 270 E. Baker Street,<br />
Suite 100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626.<br />
Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Química e<br />
Industrias Extractivas – Instituto Politécnico<br />
Nacional,(ESIQIE-IPN), Edif. 7, UPALM, C.P<br />
07738, DF, México.<br />
Session P2 – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
President’s Ballroom Prefunction Area<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
9:30 10:15 Electrolytic Ozone Generation<br />
Using Solid Diamond Anodes<br />
9:30 10:15 Ozone-Based Clean-In-Place<br />
(CIP) <strong>of</strong> Bioreactors<br />
9:30 10:15 Noteworthy Nuances <strong>of</strong> Constructing<br />
and Starting Up an Ozone System<br />
9:30 10:15 Pilot Test Results Perozone TM Injection<br />
Technology Kitchener, Ontario<br />
Bill Yost<br />
Hossein Zarrin 1 , Brian Hagopian 2 ,<br />
and Dr. Carl Lawton 3<br />
Ben Kuhne1 1 , Jack Bebee 1 ,<br />
Robert W. H<strong>of</strong>fman 2 ,<br />
and Stephanie Bishop 3<br />
Dave Montgomery<br />
and Darko Strajin<br />
Electrolytic Ozone Inc, Cambridge Innovation<br />
Center, One Broadway, Cambridge MA 02142.<br />
1<br />
MKS Instruments Inc. 2 Mar Cor Purification.<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-Lowell.<br />
1<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue,<br />
Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008.<br />
2<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 12400 Coit Road, Dallas,<br />
TX 75251. 3 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 2301<br />
Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 244, Maitland,<br />
FL 32751.<br />
Trow Associates, Inc., 1595 Clark Boulevard,<br />
Brampton, ON, Canada.<br />
Session P3 – Tuesday May 05, 2009<br />
President’s Ballroom Prefunction Area<br />
Start End Title Authors Affiliations<br />
14:55 15:40 The Bioassay Validation and Real-Time<br />
UV Dose Monitoring are Essential for<br />
Maintaining UV Disinfection Efficacy<br />
in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing<br />
14:55 15:40 Results <strong>of</strong> a CFD Simulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
UV/H 2 O 2 Advanced Oxidation Process<br />
14:55 15:40 Regenerating Spent Zeolites with UV<br />
and UV/H 2 O 2 to Enhance Removal <strong>of</strong><br />
Endocrine Disrupting Compounds<br />
14:55 15:40 Mixing Effects on the<br />
Chloramination Process<br />
Ismail Gobulukoglu, Ph.D.<br />
Scott M. Alpert, P.E. 1<br />
and Joel J. Ducoste, Ph.D. 2<br />
Safina Singh and Erik Rosenfeldt<br />
Khyati Jain 1 and Irvine Wei 2<br />
Science and Technology Department,<br />
Aquafine Corporation, 29010 Avenue<br />
Paine, Valencia, CA 91355, USA.<br />
1<br />
HDR Engineering, Inc. <strong>of</strong> the Carolinas,<br />
Charlotte, NC.<br />
2<br />
NC State University, Raleigh, NC.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental<br />
Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-<br />
Amherst.<br />
1<br />
CDM Inc., Walnut Creek, CA. 2 Northeastern<br />
University, Civil and Environmental<br />
Engineering Department, Boston, MA.<br />
13<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
ORAL PRESENTATIONS<br />
Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-1<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
A Uniform Protocol for Wastewater UV Validation Applications<br />
- IUVA Manufacturers Council Position<br />
Oliver Lawal 1 , Paul Ropic 1 , Elliott Whitby 2 , Stan Shmia 3 , and Bertrand Dussert 4<br />
1. ITT-WEDECO<br />
2. Calgon Carbon Corporation<br />
3. Severn Trent Water Purification<br />
4. Siemens Water Technologies<br />
The treatment objective <strong>of</strong> an ultraviolet disinfection system used in a wastewater application is to protect aquatic<br />
and ecological environments. To ensure this objective is adequately met it is important to validate, or verify<br />
equipment performance for a specific application. The widely accepted method for completing this validation is by<br />
determining the dose delivery performance using biodosimetry. Whilst several protocols exist for completing<br />
biodosimetry tests, or bioassays, for different applications, only two methods are in wide scale use in the industry<br />
worldwide;<br />
• Ultraviolet Disinfection <strong>Guide</strong>lines for Drinking Water and Water Reuse, 2 nd Edition, published by the<br />
National Water Research Institute (NWRI) in collaboration with the Awwa Research Foundation<br />
(AwwaRF). Specifically, chapter two; Water Reuse and chapter three; Protocols. Hereafter referred to as<br />
NWRI/AwwaRF.<br />
• Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment<br />
Rule, published by the US EPA. Hereafter referred to as UVDGM.<br />
Both guidelines follow similar formats and are in wide scale use by UV Manufacturers, Engineering Consultants<br />
and Regulators. However, neither specifically makes reference to the particular challenges associated with<br />
completing bioassays in wastewater applications. Many stakeholders within the UV industry have called for such a<br />
uniform protocol for wastewater UV applications that can be widely adopted by the industry and regulatory bodies.<br />
In an effort to provide a positive contribution to the industry in this matter, the International Ultraviolet Association<br />
(IUVA) Manufacturers Council formed a task force in 2007. The objectives were to;<br />
• Evaluate the existing protocols to identify aspects that could be <strong>of</strong> use for a uniform wastewater protocol<br />
• Facilitate discussion with both regulators and engineering consultants on the issue <strong>of</strong> a uniform<br />
wastewater protocol<br />
• Outline a position on a potential solution for a uniform wastewater protocol<br />
After undertaking reviews and discussions with interested parties, this paper will represent the final portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
task force objectives in describing a potential solution for a uniform wastewater protocol.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
14
Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-2<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Overcoming Validation Report Complexity<br />
Phyllis Posy 1 , Karl Scheible 2 , and Chengyue Shen 2<br />
1. Atlantium Technologies<br />
2. UV ValidationCenter, HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah New Jersey<br />
Validation Report complexity has turned out to be a hidden Achilles heel <strong>of</strong> the UV industry. When the United<br />
States Environmental Protection Agency finalized and published the Ultra Violet Disinfection Guidance Manual<br />
(UVDGM) for use in validating UV reactors in the end <strong>of</strong> 2006, they specifically covered both setpoint and dose<br />
pacing validations with a broad net for T1, MS2 and other challenge organisms. In focusing on disinfection<br />
required by the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR) and the Groundwater Rule,<br />
they also gave the green light for the development <strong>of</strong> even more sophisticated validation techniques including dyed<br />
microspheres (DMS) validations and the direct use <strong>of</strong> target organisms (like adenovirus). The underlying message<br />
to regulators – who are generalists rather than UV specialists – is the more data the better.<br />
But turning an extensive data set into a simple enough report to support a decision-making process is another<br />
matter indeed. Validation reports must be understood by busy regulators and administered by small communities.<br />
This communication challenge falls on validators, manufacturers and the engineers who play a critical role in<br />
designing water treatment processes for regulatory compliance. And this is only the first step.<br />
The next step for a regulator or WTP operator is the persistent question <strong>of</strong> how to assure that the reactor received<br />
“conforms uniformly” to the reactor that had been validated without extensive and expensive retesting.<br />
Finally, without translating and converting the recordkeeping, calibration and correction factor requirements into an<br />
easy daily operating regimen, UV may become favored by larger systems, but never get to the small communities<br />
that need it.<br />
This paper will describe the following:<br />
• The critical factors in translating a validation dataset into a meaningful usable report<br />
• The development and use <strong>of</strong> a Validation Verification screen that enables the user to check that<br />
the reactor they installed “conforms uniformly” to the reactor that was validated.<br />
• Automating and integrating UVDGM operational requirements into WTP life.<br />
15<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-3<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Validation <strong>of</strong> UV Reactors for Water and Wastewater Applications:<br />
What is the State-<strong>of</strong>-the-Art<br />
O. Karl Scheible and Chengyue Shen<br />
HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ<br />
Considerable experience has been gained in the validation <strong>of</strong> UV reactors, addressing drinking water and wastewater<br />
applications with newly developed protocols, and new methods for analyzing the data and credited performance for a given<br />
reactor. This paper will compile and address the current state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art for validation, posed as a series <strong>of</strong> questions:<br />
What protocols are in play at this time, and how are they used in the industry? Status and comparison <strong>of</strong> the UVDGM<br />
(2006), ONORM and DVGW, NWRI, ETV and recent updates for a unified low-dose, reuse and related treated-wastewater<br />
validation applications. A formal protocol to validate with dyed-microspheres has also been drafted and demonstrated with<br />
several reactors.<br />
What is the status <strong>of</strong> biodosimetry for validation and what microbiological surrogates have been tested, or are being<br />
evaluated? We will review recent work and update the UVDGM biodosimetric approach, addressing advances with T1UV,<br />
T1, T7, Q, MS2 and other appropriate and practical surrogates. This will include work that is being reported regarding<br />
high-dose validations with A. niger, B. pumulus spores, and Adenovirus 2. A key advance has been the ability to access a<br />
wider variety <strong>of</strong> surrogates, the use <strong>of</strong> multiple surrogates and the concept <strong>of</strong> actual pathogen challenges to verify performance.<br />
What is Lagrangian actinometry using dyed microspheres and how does this method compare to biodosimetry? Cited<br />
as an emerging technique by the UVDGM, the use <strong>of</strong> dyed microspheres to directly measure dose-distribution has undergone<br />
considerable testing and demonstration, resulting in a new validation protocol for the UV industry. We will present an<br />
overview <strong>of</strong> this technique and how it compares to biodosimetry with respect to crediting log-inactivation and dose for<br />
alternative pathogens or pathogen indicators.<br />
Where is validation testing being done? Testing is being done both on-site at a commissioned facility, or <strong>of</strong>f-site<br />
at a dedicated test facility. We will provide an update on general validation practices, and considerations <strong>of</strong> on- versus<br />
<strong>of</strong>f-site locations.<br />
What are the more recent methods for analysis and use <strong>of</strong> the validation data and how are the validations being<br />
reviewed and accepted within the owner and regulator community? With continued experience and applications, the<br />
methods for testing and performance analysis are evolving. For example, the field is able to access alternate microbes and to<br />
use multiple microbes for biodosimetry, a practice that can effectively eliminate the RED bias promulgated by the UVDGM.<br />
Validation practices for wastewater applications are incorporating the approaches used by the UVDGM protocols for drinking<br />
water, allowing more and more for a uniform validation approach. Dyed-microspheres <strong>of</strong>fer the ability to address the<br />
inactivation <strong>of</strong> pathogens directly, without the use <strong>of</strong> surrogate microbes.<br />
What is the status <strong>of</strong> modeling as an alternative validation method? Extensive work is being done in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
CFD-intensity modeling to characterize UV reactors and related installation configurations. Will these techniques eventually<br />
supplant direct testing? We will review the current approaches and how they are affecting the validation process.<br />
What are the difficulties and bottlenecks that are being experienced with this validation process, and how can these be<br />
resolved? The intent <strong>of</strong> the process was to assure that the equipment being <strong>of</strong>fered can be fully evaluated as to its performance<br />
and when installed will perform successfully. Most critically, as we move beyond the development <strong>of</strong> these protocols into<br />
full-scale validations <strong>of</strong> a wide variety <strong>of</strong> UV systems, owners and regulators must accept the equipment for installation. We<br />
will discuss alternatives for streamlining the review process, preventing the potential for costly multiple reviews and the need<br />
for multiple submittals and acceptances within the regulatory community. There is a clear need to facilitate this in order to<br />
avoid slowing the industry simply because an onerous and unwieldy review and acceptance process.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
16
Monday AM – Session 1: UV Validation – S1-4<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Standardized Lagrangian Actinometry Protocol for UV Reactor Validation<br />
Chengyue Shen 1 , Ernest R. Blatchley III 2 , Eric Cox 2 , and O. Karl Scheible 1<br />
1. HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ<br />
2. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN<br />
Validation <strong>of</strong> UV reactors is an established practice, which until recently has relied exclusively on biodosimetry to<br />
define the reduction equivalent dose (RED) delivered across a targeted operating range. This validation concept is<br />
driven by regulatory- and owner-related requirements and is used in both water and wastewater disinfection<br />
applications. In particular, the US EPA’s Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual (UVDGM) prescribes<br />
full-scale validation <strong>of</strong> UV reactors installed for Cryptosporidium, Giardia and viral disinfection credit. The<br />
UVDGM provides protocols for validation testing and the determination <strong>of</strong> credited RED and corresponding log<br />
inactivation. These rely solely on the use <strong>of</strong> biodosimetric techniques, although the UVDGM leaves open the<br />
possibility that new techniques may be developed for use at the validation level.<br />
This paper presents the final draft <strong>of</strong> a standardized protocol for application <strong>of</strong> Lagrangian actinometry in the<br />
validation <strong>of</strong> UV disinfection systems (it updates presentation given at the WQTC-2008, which addressed the<br />
status <strong>of</strong> the protocol development). The protocol allows measurement <strong>of</strong> the dose-distribution delivered by a<br />
reactor, which, when integrated with the dose-response kinetics <strong>of</strong> a targeted pathogen, predicts the log-inactivation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the targeted pathogen. The new protocol responds to the regulatory validation requirements directly, and, in<br />
effect provides a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the performance and behavior <strong>of</strong> a reactor when addressing any pathogen<br />
<strong>of</strong> concern. Results <strong>of</strong> work done at Purdue University and the UV Center in New York have been presented<br />
at several venues, including, most recently at ACE 2008 and WQTC-2008. This new presentation builds on<br />
these prior discussions <strong>of</strong> the dyed-microspheres technology, providing the final protocol by which the<br />
dyed-microspheres approach can be used to validate a UV reactor.<br />
Supported by NYSERDA, AwwaRF, NYCDEP and others, the protocol has been developed in the context and<br />
format <strong>of</strong> the UVDGM. Field efforts to demonstrate and refine the method entailed three large scale validations<br />
that included T1 and MS2 coliphage biodosimetry in conformance with the US EPA Ultraviolet Disinfection<br />
Guidance Manual, and simultaneous actinometry with dyed-microspheres. The validation <strong>of</strong> the NYC DEP<br />
Catskill/Delaware UV reactor demonstrated the method. Some <strong>of</strong> these data will be presented as examples are<br />
carried through the body <strong>of</strong> the presentation. These will show the field and lab methods, the data analysis<br />
techniques to transform the raw dose-response and field test measurements to dose-distributions, and the<br />
integration <strong>of</strong> the dose distribution with the dose-response kinetics <strong>of</strong> targeted pathogens to determine<br />
log-inactivation as a function <strong>of</strong> the reactor operation variables. The QA protocols associated with the method will<br />
be presented, as will the development <strong>of</strong> the validation factor to determine credited log-inactivation.<br />
17<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-1<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Commissioning and Obtaining Regulatory Approval<br />
for Drinking Water UV Disinfection Systems<br />
David Gaithuma, Harold Wright, and Mark Heath<br />
Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713<br />
Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection has been used to treat drinking water in Europe since the 1950s and in North America<br />
for nearly two decades now. Over the last 10 years, the practice <strong>of</strong> UV disinfection has evolved considerably in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> regulations, commercial technologies, design and operation, and fundamental understanding. As a result,<br />
utilities, engineers and regulators see UV disinfection as an effective technology for inactivating chlorine-resistant<br />
pathogens such as Cryptosporidium and as an important process in achieving multi-barrier treatment and protecting<br />
public health.<br />
While this track record suggests UV disinfection is an established technology, most states have not established a<br />
framework for implementation <strong>of</strong> UV for disinfection credit almost three years after the promulgation <strong>of</strong> the US<br />
EPA Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR) and the completion <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection<br />
Guidance Manual (UVDGM). This is indicative <strong>of</strong> the progress that remains to be made in obtaining regulatory<br />
buy-in for this technology.<br />
This paper highlights the process <strong>of</strong> commissioning UV systems at two utilities to ensure compliant operation,<br />
coupled with the experience <strong>of</strong> obtaining regulatory approval for UV disinfection.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
18
Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-2<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Biodosimetry <strong>of</strong> a Full-Scale UV Disinfection System to Achieve<br />
Regulatory Approval for Drinking Water Disinfection<br />
Bruno Ferran, Robert Kelly, and Wei Yang<br />
Infilco Degremont, Inc., Degremont North American Research & Development Center<br />
510 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219<br />
This paper presents the findings <strong>of</strong> an extensive bioassay validation test that began last year at the UV Validation<br />
and Research Center <strong>of</strong> New York (UV Center) in Johnstown, New York with the objective to evaluate the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> a large full-scale UV reactor for the disinfection <strong>of</strong> drinking water. The UV reactor is a 36-inch<br />
diameter cross-flow in-line reactor operating medium pressure lamps as a light source. Bioassay testing was<br />
conducted following both the DVGW W294 and the US EPA UVDGM test guideline using MS-2 and T1 phage as<br />
surrogate microorganisms. Curves <strong>of</strong> sensor UV Intensity Setpoint (ISP) versus flow rate were obtained following<br />
the DVGW W294 test methods for delivered doses <strong>of</strong> 20, 30 and 40 mJ/cm 2 . These curves can be used to size and<br />
operate UV systems for applications where the DVGW W294 guideline is considered as the basis for design.<br />
A first set <strong>of</strong> T1 phage dose-flow runs was conducted under conditions <strong>of</strong> reduced lamp output power. The<br />
resulting T1 phage REDs were combined with those obtained from MS2 phage and the entire set <strong>of</strong> REDs was<br />
correlated versus flow rate, ISP and UV sensitivity (UVS). The resulting fit equation can be used to size and<br />
operate UV systems for applications where the US EPA UVDGM is considered as the basis for design. Design<br />
dose values for the disinfection <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium and Giardia can be calculated for a given set <strong>of</strong> flow and ISP<br />
by computing 5 mJ/cm 2 /logI in the fit equation UVS term. As a result, the US EPA RED bias uncertainty factor is<br />
equal to that <strong>of</strong> T1 phage. A final set <strong>of</strong> bioassay test runs is planned for the spring <strong>of</strong> 2009 to incorporate high<br />
UVT REDs into the dataset and strengthen the master fit equation, specifically for US EPA applications.<br />
19<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-3<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Integrating UVDGM Operational Requirements in<br />
Small System Regulatory Compliance: The People Perspective<br />
Phyllis Posy 1 , Ytzhak Rozenberg 2 , and Peter Bugg 3<br />
1. Atlantium Technologies<br />
2. R&D, Atlantium Technologies<br />
3. EWT<br />
When the United States Environmental Protection Agency finalized the Ultra Violet Disinfection Guidance Manual<br />
(UVDGM) to provide information about how to evaluate and use UV for public drinking water treatment,<br />
specifically to fulfill the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR)<br />
and the Groundwater Rule, much thought was given to how validated technology might be kept in operational<br />
compliance. How could the guidance help regulators trust and measure UV for drinking water disinfection and<br />
assure operational reliability and consistent performance over time?<br />
Clearly translating all <strong>of</strong> the precautions and testing that underlie the EPA validation protocol and guidance and<br />
converting all that into monitoring, recordkeeping, calibration and correction factor requirements was a substantial<br />
task. Several drafts were circulated until a set <strong>of</strong> monitoring, reporting, maintenance and other regimens was<br />
finalized as required or recommended.<br />
The question remains: Are these provisions really understood or honored by regulators, manufacturers, engineers or<br />
users? Do states see these provisions as protecting small systems or burdening them? How do the small systems<br />
look at these provisions? How can they be turned into a daily operating regimen that can be implemented with<br />
minimal disruption and effort by a small system?<br />
This paper will catalogue some operational experiences and cases and focus on:<br />
• How regulators consider the UVDGM operational guidance in making their<br />
decisions about UV<br />
• How engineers consider the UVDGM operational guidance in their designs and cost analysis<br />
• How these issues surface in actually operating a UV system in a small community.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
20
Monday AM – Session 2: UV Regulatory – S2-4<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Achieving UV Disinfection Credit for Pre-UVDGM Era UV Facilities:<br />
Experiences <strong>of</strong> Two UV Facilities<br />
Christine Cotton, P.E., and James Collins<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., S. Church Ave, Suite 1120, Tucson, Arizona<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Ultraviolet Disinfection<br />
Guidance Manual (UVDGM) was a six-year process, and the Final UVDGM was released in November 2006.<br />
However, several drinking water utilities did not wait for the UVDGM to be finalized to install UV disinfection<br />
because they wanted to provide additional public health protection earlier. Therefore, these utilities were designed<br />
and operated while the UVDGM was under development.<br />
Now that the UVDGM is finalized, some <strong>of</strong> these utilities desire UV disinfection credit for their operating UV<br />
facilities. However, there are key differences in the UV facilities validation, and operation compared to the Final<br />
UVDGM recommendations. This paper will describe the following items and how these items affect receiving<br />
disinfection credit. Also, two case studies are briefly described.<br />
• Design criteria refinement<br />
• UV equipment changes and ramifications<br />
• Validation calculation technique changes<br />
• UV disinfection monitoring and recording<br />
• Potential regulatory agency coordination<br />
21<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-1<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Ozone Measurement and Control in Drinking Water Treatment Plants<br />
Andrew Wright, Ph.D., and Victor Dosoretz<br />
IN USA Inc., 100 Morse St., Norwood, MA, 02062<br />
Effective process measurement <strong>of</strong> ozone in water treatment facilities, where ozone is used to disinfect drinking<br />
water, enables optimized ozone usage and enormous resultant cost savings on a daily basis. Dedicated sensors for<br />
process measurement <strong>of</strong>ten exhibit limitations such as excessive noise, signal interferences, and down time. UV<br />
absorption by ozone <strong>of</strong>fers particular capabilities with regard to these limitations: Principles <strong>of</strong> measurement are<br />
presented, and sensor concepts for process measurement are discussed.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
22
Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-2<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
The Potential Use <strong>of</strong> Ozone in Municipal Waste Water<br />
A. Ried, J. Mielcke, and A. Wieland<br />
ITT W&WW WEDECO, Boschstr. 4-14, 32051 Herford, Germany<br />
This paper will summarize the potential options applying ozone for the improvement <strong>of</strong> effluents from waste water<br />
treatment plants. A specific focus will be on the technical aspects how to integrate ozone technique in existing or<br />
new conventional treatment plants. Additionally some large scale projects will be illustrated, where this technique<br />
is in operation yet. The following aspects are <strong>of</strong> interest and will be discussed:<br />
• necessary ozone dose range (depends on application, water matrix and contaminants)<br />
• required components <strong>of</strong> ozone systems (ozone generator, gas supply, reaction system, <strong>of</strong>f-gas handling)<br />
• process control, online measurement<br />
• potential parameters to be used for process control<br />
• design guidelines for the integration <strong>of</strong> ozone systems<br />
• cost calculations.<br />
23<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-3<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Control <strong>of</strong> Iron and Manganese Ozone Removal<br />
by Differential Turbidity Measurements<br />
Vadim Malkov, Mike Sadar, Jon Schiller, and Eric Lehman<br />
Hach Company, 5600 Lindbergh Dr. Loveland, CO 80538, USA<br />
A new method for continuous monitoring <strong>of</strong> ozone concentration and the effective removal <strong>of</strong> iron and manganese<br />
was tested.<br />
The <strong>of</strong>fered alternative to the ORP system was comprised <strong>of</strong> two self-cleaning turbidimeters. The turbidimeters<br />
were installed at the same locations as the ORP sensors and initial calibration test was performed with different<br />
ozone dosage.<br />
The conducted long term monitoring study showed stable performance <strong>of</strong> the differential turbidity system.<br />
The system confirmed the continuous and desired result <strong>of</strong> increased turbidity immediately after oxidation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
unwanted iron and manganese species. Therefore, the method can be expanded to other similar applications<br />
involving ozone.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
24
Monday AM – Session 3: Ozone Design and Operation – S3-4<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Optimizing an Intermediate Ozone System used for Primary<br />
Disinfection at a 55 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant<br />
Russ Navratil 1 , Chip England 1 , and Glenn Hunter 2<br />
1. Henrico County, Virginia<br />
2. Process Applications Inc.<br />
The Henrico County VA Water Treatment Facility has been in operation since April 2004, making use <strong>of</strong><br />
intermediate ozone for primary disinfection to take advantage <strong>of</strong> both the disinfection and DBP benefits. Since the<br />
summer <strong>of</strong> 2007 the staff at the Henrico WTF have embarked on an optimizing journey with their ozone system.<br />
This paper summarizes the significant milestones accomplished on this journey as well as ongoing improvements.<br />
Optimizing efforts to reduce operating costs while achieving disinfection goals are reviewed relative to:<br />
• Staff training workshops<br />
• Automating ozone data collection and access<br />
• Operating ozone generators in optimum ozone concentration range<br />
• Optimizing ozone contactor operation including residual sampling locations and number<br />
<strong>of</strong> contactors<br />
• Overcoming minimum gas flow limitations<br />
• Contactor solenoid ozone residual sampling system issues and improvements<br />
• Cost savings achieved through optimization<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> these items will be discussed following an overview <strong>of</strong> this 55 MGD surface water treatment facility.<br />
25<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-1<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
UV System Technology Evaluation Using UV Cost Analysis Tool<br />
for Metro Vancouver’s Coquitlam UV Disinfection Project<br />
Ayman Shawwa, P.E., Ph.D., BCEE 1 , Chris Schulz, P.E., BCEE 2 ,<br />
Inder Singh, M.A.Sc. P.Eng. 3 , and James Kim, P.E. 1<br />
1. CDM, Walnut Creek, CA<br />
2. CDM, Denver, CO<br />
3. Metro Vancouver, BC, Canada<br />
Metro Vancouver is planning a new 1,200 ML/day UV disinfection facility for the Coquitlam supply to meet<br />
Health Canada’s new requirements for 3-log Cryptosporidium inactivation. To select a UV system that will provide<br />
high disinfection performance cost effectively, medium-pressure (MP) and low-pressure high-output (LPHO) UV<br />
systems were evaluated using UV Cost Analysis Tool (UVCAT) computer model.<br />
UVCAT results confirmed that all UV systems could meet UV dose delivery requirement for 3-log<br />
Cryptosporidium inactivation for the full range <strong>of</strong> design flow and UVT and with a 10-unit train configuration.<br />
UVCAT also confirmed that capital and operations and maintenance costs for UV systems designed based on T1<br />
RED (reduction equivalent dose) were significantly lower than those based on MS2 RED design.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
26
Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-2<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Brockton, Massachusetts Commissions a 60-mgd (227-ML/d)<br />
UV Wastewater Disinfection System<br />
William C. McConnell, P.E., and David A. Norton 2<br />
1. CDM, 56 Exchange Terrace, Providence, RI 02903<br />
2. City <strong>of</strong> Brockton, MA, 303 Oak Hill Way, Brockton, MA 02301<br />
The Brockton Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) recently completed an $80 million capital<br />
improvement program increasing design capacity to 20.5 million gallons per day (mgd) (77.5 million liters per day<br />
(ML/d)). A key component <strong>of</strong> the facility improvements was replacing the effluent disinfection system. The<br />
existing sodium hypochlorite disinfection and sodium bisulfite dechlorination systems were replaced with an<br />
ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system capable <strong>of</strong> treating peak flows up to 60 mgd (227 ML/d). The new UV<br />
disinfection system became operational in August 2008 and has successfully completed its first disinfection season,<br />
which runs from April 1 through October 31 each year.<br />
27<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-3<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Site Specific Testing <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection at a Trickling Filter Plant<br />
Gary Hunter, P.E. 1 , Anjana Kadava 1 , Jane Hood 2 , and Don Gilpin 2<br />
1. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />
2. City <strong>of</strong> St. Joseph, MO<br />
The St. Joseph WPCP currently has no existing disinfection facilities. With the Missouri Department <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />
Resources (MDNR) moving toward requiring all National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)<br />
permit holders to disinfect plant effluent. The e Coli permit limit indicated in a proposed permit received by the<br />
City on February 26, 2009 is anticipated to be a 30 day mean <strong>of</strong> 206 E. coli colonies per 100 ml with no single<br />
sample maximum. Both bench scale and demonstration testing were conducted for both:<br />
• UV Low Pressure – High Intensity UV<br />
• Bulk Sodium Hypochlorite<br />
Additional water quality data was also collected during the testing to help establish the design parameters for the<br />
UV systems. UV demonstration study was completed comparing the Trojan 3000+ and WEDECO TAK 55 from<br />
May 21, 2009 to August 31, 2008. This technical memorandum provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> both the<br />
bench and demonstration scale testing. Results <strong>of</strong> this study indicate that UV can be effectively used to achieve the<br />
disinfection requirements at this plant.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
28
Monday PM – Session 4: UV Case Studies – S4-4<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Ultraviolet Light Disinfection System Conceptual Design<br />
for the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority<br />
John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />
Albert J. Capuzzi 1 , Brian Loux 1 , Paul Swaim 1 , and James P. Malley 2<br />
1. CH2M HILL<br />
2. University <strong>of</strong> New Hampshire<br />
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) currently treats its water supply to 2.3 million people in the<br />
metropolitan Boston area at its 405 million gallon per day John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant located in<br />
Marlborough, Massachusetts. The plant came on-line in July 2005. The Carroll WTP does not include filtration<br />
due to the high quality <strong>of</strong> the source water. MWRA will add UV disinfection to comply with the Long Term 2<br />
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule requirements for a second primary disinfectant and Cryptosporidium<br />
inactivation. This paper will discuss the Existing Ozonation Facility, Regulatory Requirements, Water Quality,<br />
including the impact <strong>of</strong> ozone on ultraviolet light transmittance, the overall Disinfection Strategy, the conceptual<br />
design, Ultraviolet Reactor Technology Comparative Analysis and UV reactor procurement, final design and<br />
construction process. The design is underway and construction <strong>of</strong> the UV facilities is scheduled to be completed in<br />
early 2014.<br />
29<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-1<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Multi-function Sidestream Ozone Treatment<br />
at a Drinking Water Treatment Plant<br />
Maxime Beaulieu 1 , Patrick Niquette 1 , Pierre Cullen 2 , and Denis Allard 2<br />
1. Dessau Inc., Water, Industry and Waste Management, 1080, Côte du Beaver Hall, Suite 300,<br />
Montreal (Quebec), Canada, H2Z 1S8.<br />
2. City <strong>of</strong> Laval, Department <strong>of</strong> environmental city management, 3810 Levesque West, Laval (Quebec),<br />
Canada, H7V 1A0.<br />
With the increasing demands placed upon water treatment plants to provide higher quality water and the advent <strong>of</strong><br />
high concentration oxygen fed ozone generators, ozone treatment is becoming ever more useful. This article looks<br />
at the design <strong>of</strong> a new multi-function intermediate ozonation system for a treatment plant in Laval, Quebec, that<br />
poses particular design challenges. A three sidestream, multiple injection manifold using variable speed pumps and<br />
oxygen degassing, was found to provide efficient disinfection, taste and odor control and pretreatment for<br />
downstream biological filtration. The ozone injection system is designed for maximum flexibility in order to meet<br />
the large flow rate and ozone dose range required at this particular plant.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
30
Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-2<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Rising Energy Costs and Frozen Budgets:<br />
Getting More from Our Operating Buck<br />
David W. Coppes<br />
Western Operations, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 266 Boston Road, Southborough, MA 01772<br />
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) uses ozone at its 405-MGD John J. Carroll Water<br />
Treatment Plant. The purpose <strong>of</strong> ozonation is to attain primary disinfection to provide for Cryptosporidium<br />
inactivation, plus meet or exceed regulated values for Giardia and virus log inactivation credit.<br />
While ozone production has gotten more efficient with the advent <strong>of</strong> medium-frequency ozone generators, it still<br />
consumes a lot <strong>of</strong> power. A recent energy audit prepared for MWRA determined that ozone generation accounts<br />
for approximately 66% <strong>of</strong> the electricity used at the plant. MWRA has made a commitment to reducing energy<br />
consumption at its facilities in an effort to reduce both operating costs and the environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> its<br />
daily operations.<br />
This paper will describe the ways that MWRA tracks its ozone production costs, will describe some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
operating decisions made to improve efficiency, and show a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between efficiency and system reliability.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the items to be covered include: Dose control: improved performance reduces overall cost; Selecting the<br />
optimum ozone concentration operating point and modifying control strategy to maintain the selected target.<br />
31<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-3<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Key Water Quality Parameters that Determine Ozone Dose<br />
for Massachusetts Water Resources Authority<br />
Windsor Sung, Ph.D., P.E.<br />
MWRA, 260 Boston Road, Southborough, MA 01772<br />
MWRA supplies unfiltered surface water to over 2 million people in the metropolitan Boston area. Primary<br />
disinfection to inactivate giardia and crypto is achieved by ozone. Control <strong>of</strong> ozone dose is determined by<br />
a computer algorithm that uses a pre-determined ratio <strong>of</strong> required versus achieved CT and measured ozone<br />
residuals. On a monthly averaged basis the ozone dose is mainly dependent on only two main water quality<br />
parameters: temperature and ultra-violet absorbance at 254 nm. Development and use <strong>of</strong> the regression equation<br />
will be presented.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
32
Monday PM – Session 5: Ozone Case Studies – S5-4<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Treatment <strong>of</strong> Wastewater with Ozone at the<br />
Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant<br />
Nick Burns 1 , Jeff Neemann 1 , Tom Holst 2 , and Jim Burks 2<br />
1. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />
2. Springfield Utilities, 3301 S. FF Hwy, Springfield, MO 65807<br />
The City <strong>of</strong> Springfield, MO has selected Black & Veatch to upgrade the ozonation facilities at its Southwest<br />
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Design challenges included a lack <strong>of</strong> operable instrumentation that prevented<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> historical operating data, and operation <strong>of</strong> upstream processes that resulted in rapid changes in ozone<br />
demand. The paper will include a discussion <strong>of</strong> the impacts <strong>of</strong> upstream processes on ozone demand; the results <strong>of</strong><br />
the bench-scale analyses in terms <strong>of</strong> log reductions <strong>of</strong> fecal coliforms and E-coli; and the impact <strong>of</strong> ozone on UVT<br />
in primary and tertiary treated wastewater.<br />
33<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-1<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Optimization Considerations for an Ozone Side Stream Injection System<br />
Bill Mundy, C.E.T. 1 , Kerwin Rakness 2 , and Glenn Hunter 2<br />
1. Regional Municipality Of Halton, 1151 Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6M 3L1<br />
2. Process Applications Inc., 2627 Redwing Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 80526<br />
The Oakville Water Purification Plant (OWPP), located in the Regional Municipality <strong>of</strong> Halton, Oakville, Ontario<br />
has a capacity <strong>of</strong> 110 ML/d. The OWPP has an ozonation sidestream injection system designed for<br />
cryptosporidium inactivation, including taste & odour removal capability.<br />
The OWPP side stream injection system has three side stream injection systems, (2 firm capacity and one standby)<br />
each with variable speed controllers for process optimization.<br />
It was demonstrated through optimized process control that the Gas/Liquid ratio can be adjusted to balance ozone<br />
transfer and cost effectiveness. Other sidestream parameters evaluated included outlet venturi pressure, ozone<br />
demand and initial residual.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
34
Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-2<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Evaluating Options for Retr<strong>of</strong>itting a Large Scale Ozonation System in Texas<br />
Jeff Neemann 1 , David Timmerman 1 , Robert Hulsey 1 , Buford Green 2 , and Steve Long 2<br />
1. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />
2. North Texas Municipal Water District, Wylie, TX<br />
The North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD) is in the process <strong>of</strong> preliminary engineering design <strong>of</strong><br />
ozonation at the 770 million-gallons-per-day Wylie Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Complex. The design will<br />
include the addition <strong>of</strong> ozone technology for drinking water disinfection as well as taste and odor control at the<br />
Wylie, Texas, complex that serves more than 1.5 million customers. Preliminary design was completed by April<br />
2009, and final design is expected to be completed in April 2010. The project should be operationally complete in<br />
2013.<br />
The preliminary design has included pilot testing <strong>of</strong> preozonation and intermediate ozonation to evaluate the<br />
advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> both application points. Testing was completed to evaluate the TOC removal,<br />
disinfection by-product formation potential, and filter productivity <strong>of</strong> both ozonation locations. Additional testing<br />
was done to evaluate the use <strong>of</strong> chlorine dioxide, chlorine/ammonia, ammonia only, and pH adjustment to limit<br />
bromate formation during background and spiked bromide concentrations. Taste and odor testing was conducted to<br />
determine the ozone dose required to remove MIB and Geosmin and sampling showed substantial removal in the<br />
biological filters with GAC.<br />
35<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-3<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Keeping Ozone Generators Dry and Cool<br />
Kerwin L. Rakness 1 and James Muri 2<br />
1. Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526<br />
2. John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant, 84 D’Angelo Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752<br />
Ozone generators perform efficiently and continuously (less maintenance) when kept dry and cool while in service,<br />
and dry when in standby condition. It is the authors’ experience that ozone generators at some plants operate years<br />
and years without maintenance, while generators at other plants require maintenance within months or a few years.<br />
In review, commonality <strong>of</strong> well performing ozone generators is dry operating condition.<br />
Feed-gas “wetness” is monitored during normal ozone operation via dew point temperature. Alarm and shut-down<br />
occurs at elevated dew point temperature, such as -60 o C, which is 7-ppm wt moisture content at 1-atm pressure.<br />
Normal operation is dew point temperature <strong>of</strong> -80 o C, which is 1-ppm wt moisture content.<br />
Generator “dryness” during standby and at startup when power is applied is also important. Off-line generators<br />
might become “wet” when idle due to improper standby conditions. Pre-purging with dry gas is normally<br />
implemented, but purge time might be insufficient for “wet” generators. Nitric acid is formed in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
dinitrogen pentoxide (formed during ozone production) and water, thus dry conditions are high priority at startup,<br />
during normal operation and when in standby. Methods to maintain dry conditions are discussed in this paper.<br />
Cooling water keeps generators “cool” and electrically efficient. Generator cooling water flow rate maintains<br />
generator inlet-versus-outlet cooling water below 10 o F temperature rise, and <strong>of</strong>ten below 5 o F rise. Non-corrosive<br />
and non-scaling cooling water is critically important for long-term (20+ years) maintenance-free performance.<br />
Closed-loop-open-loop cooling systems promote this desired outcome. Cooling water flow and temperature details<br />
are outlined in this paper.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
36
Monday PM – Session 6: Ozone Design and Operation – S6-4<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> Ozone for Contaminant Oxidation in Wastewater<br />
Eric C. Wert, Fernando Rosario-Ortiz, and Shane Snyder<br />
Southern Nevada Water Authority, P.O. Box 99955, Las Vegas, NV USA.<br />
Ozone has been shown to be a promising treatment technique for the oxidation <strong>of</strong> trace organic contaminants in<br />
wastewater. However, achieving significant ozone oxidation in wastewater can be challenging due to higher<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> total organic carbon (TOC). Greater TOC concentrations can increase ozone demand and<br />
accelerate ozone decay rates, which reduces ozone exposure. In the current study, several trace organic<br />
contaminants (i.e. pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds) were studied under a range <strong>of</strong> ozone<br />
exposures in three wastewaters. Contaminant oxidation was assessed using ozone exposure and the O 3 :TOC ratio.<br />
Results showed that the ozone exposure was different for each wastewater based upon the O 3 :TOC ratio. Second<br />
order reaction rate constants were used to identify whether contaminants were removed primarily by O 3 or<br />
hydroxyl radicals. When O 3 exposure was measurable, >95% removal was observed for contaminants that were<br />
fast-reacting with ozone. UV 254 removal was also found to be a good surrogate to assess contaminant oxidation in<br />
the absence <strong>of</strong> measurable dissolved ozone residual (
Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-1<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Approach for Achieving Sustainable Operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
2-bgd Catskill/Delaware UV disinfection Facility<br />
Matthew T. Valade, P.E. 1 , Steven Farabaugh 2 , Paul D. Smith, P.E. 3 , and Gary Kroll, P.E. 4<br />
1. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 24 Federal Street, Suite 302, Boston, MA 02129<br />
2. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 498 Seventh Avenue, 11 th Floor, New York, NY 10018<br />
3. NYC Dept. <strong>of</strong> Env. Protection, 96-05 Horace Harding Expy, Corona, NY 11368<br />
4. CDM, Raritan Plaza 1, Raritan Center, Edison, NJ 08817<br />
Recent advances in testing methods are being applied to the validation <strong>of</strong> NYC’s Catskill/Delaware UV equipment.<br />
These advanced methods will allow the full scale facility to operate in a more sustainable manner with up to 50%<br />
reduction in operating power requirements (and corresponding reduction in carbon dioxide emissions) and savings<br />
<strong>of</strong> over $1 million annually.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
38
Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-2<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet Disinfection <strong>of</strong> A WWTP Final<br />
(Blended) Effluent under Wet Weather Flow Conditions<br />
Khalil Z. Atasi, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, F.ASCE<br />
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., 2301 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 300, Maitland, FL 32751<br />
Ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection has gained tremendous popularity in wastewater disinfection over traditional<br />
chemical disinfection processes using chlorine gas and other chlorine compounds for many reasons. Mainly, UV<br />
disinfection <strong>of</strong>fers a safe process by eliminating the use <strong>of</strong> a dangerous gas and eliminates the production <strong>of</strong> toxic<br />
disinfection byproducts. UV also eliminates the need for chlorine residual removal (dechlorination) using another<br />
chemical reducing reagent. Thus, UV disinfection replaces two processes, eliminates completely the on-site storage<br />
<strong>of</strong> dangerous chemicals, and eliminates the whole effluent toxicity (WET) that may result from chlorine based<br />
disinfection process.<br />
A wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located in ten Midwest has conducted an evaluation for the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />
UV disinfection to replace its existing chlorine disinfection process and dechlorination process. This large plant,<br />
nested in a residential area, handles by NPDES permit 36 MGD <strong>of</strong> dry weather flow and up to 60 MGD <strong>of</strong> wet<br />
weather flow. The plant is a tertiary treatment facility that employs multimedia gravity filtration to meet a tight<br />
NPDES permit effluent limits for total suspended solids, BOD5, and ammonia. Because <strong>of</strong> the significant wet<br />
weather flow component, the UV disinfection process has to be carefully evaluated as to its effectiveness. UV light<br />
transmission can be a limiting factor to achieve final effluent disinfection permit requirement.<br />
The presentation will provide information useful to other treatment plants, particularly those with significant wet<br />
weather flow component, considering UV disinfection as a replacement <strong>of</strong> the traditional chlorine disinfection<br />
process. Specifically, the presentation will discuss, among other things, the following:<br />
• Required testing to evaluate the UV transmission under worst case scenario <strong>of</strong> “blended” final<br />
effluent quality<br />
• Various technology <strong>of</strong> UV disinfection form the perspective <strong>of</strong> lamp pressure and light intensity<br />
• Impact <strong>of</strong> the process foot print and retr<strong>of</strong>it within the existing chlorine contact chamber<br />
• Life cycle cost <strong>of</strong> the various UV technology (pressure/intensity)<br />
• Impact on the plant hydraulic pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
39<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-3<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Bidding, Testing, and Start-Up <strong>of</strong> a Reuse UV Disinfection System in Florida<br />
Josefin M. Edeback, E.I. and Melanie A. Mann, P.E.<br />
Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 10002 Princess Palm Avenue, Suite 200, Tampa, Florida 33619<br />
Hillsborough County, Florida recently installed a new UV disinfection system for reuse at the Falkenburg<br />
Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (AWTP) as part <strong>of</strong> a plant expansion from 9.0 MGD to 12.0 MGD annual<br />
average daily flow (AADF). The Falkenburg AWTP must meet Florida’s requirements for high level disinfection<br />
(HLD) for both its surface water discharge permit and its public access reuse permit. Construction plans and<br />
specifications allowed the UV facility to use equipment with either horizontal or vertical UV lamps and allowed<br />
bidders to select from three named manufacturers. During construction, before the bidder-selected UV equipment<br />
submittal was approved for fabrication, the UV manufacturer was required to prove the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its<br />
mechanism for controlling lamp sleeve fouling with a pilot-scale demonstration at the Falkenburg AWTP. Once<br />
installed, Hillsborough County was required to obtain approval from the Florida Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />
Protection (FDEP) <strong>of</strong> a UV Operating Protocol prior to placing the new UV system in service. Performance testing<br />
<strong>of</strong> the UV system is in progress and results to date are summarized.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
40
Monday PM – Session 7: UV Case Studies – S7-4<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Validation <strong>of</strong> the Catskill/Delaware UV Reactor:<br />
A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry and Lagrangian Actinometry Methods<br />
Chengyue Shen 1 and Karl Scheible 1 , Matthew Valade 2 , and Ernest R. Blatchley 3<br />
1. HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ<br />
2. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., Boston, MA<br />
3. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN<br />
The LPHO UV disinfection system designed for the New York City Catskill/Delaware UV Disinfection Facility<br />
will be validated in parallel by UVDGM biodosimetric protocols and by Lagrangian actinometry using dyed<br />
microspheres. This validation will complement and supplement prior validation testing that had been performed on<br />
the unit, covering a broader operating range and allowing for improved operating efficiencies by directly measuring<br />
and characterizing the dose-distribution <strong>of</strong> the UV unit within its anticipated operating envelope. The ability<br />
to directly measure the dose-distribution in a UV reactor significantly impacts the UVDGM uncertainty factors<br />
(e.g., RED bias) associated with the design sizing and subsequent operating energy and lamp replacement costs <strong>of</strong><br />
an installation, particularly for larger water utilities. All testing was conducted at the UV Validation and Research<br />
Center in Johnstown, NY. This presentation will show the field data analysis techniques and a direct comparison<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Lagrangian actinometry validation approach to that <strong>of</strong> conventional biodosimetry.<br />
This work has been conducted as a tailored collaboration supported by the NYCDEP, Trojan Technologies, Water<br />
Research Foundation (formerly Awwa Research Foundation). The project demonstrates the Lagrangian<br />
actinometry validation protocol that was developed with the support <strong>of</strong> AwwaRF in partnership with the New York<br />
State Energy Research and Development Authority. All biodosimetry and related technical testing is in<br />
conformance with the UVDGM. The validation test matrix encompasses simultaneous validation via Lagrangian<br />
actinometry using dyed microspheres and biodosimetry using MS2 and T1 coliphage. The test matrix was designed<br />
to validate an operating envelope defined by four operating variables: Flow, UVT, Power Input, and Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Lamps. QA protocols presented in the UVDGM are carried through to the Lagrangian actinometry protocols.<br />
These establish field and lab practices and QC limits with respect to microbiology, flow cytometry and field<br />
sampling activities.<br />
The advantages associated with the test series, particularly with respect to using the dyed microspheres to measure<br />
the dose distribution lie primarily in the ability to reduce the validation factor, which, in turn, reduces the system’s<br />
operating requirements. This does not represent a reduction in safety – rather, it is a reduction in the uncertainty <strong>of</strong><br />
the validation tests. Additionally, by having this information, one can determine the log inactivation <strong>of</strong> other<br />
pathogens and newly identified microorganisms <strong>of</strong> concern that can be accomplished by the UV units, without the<br />
need for extensive full-scale re-validation testing. Measuring the actual dose-distribution delivered by the UV unit<br />
across its validated operating range also allows one to validate CFD-intensity models that can be used for<br />
optimization <strong>of</strong> the system’s operations, and for interpolation <strong>of</strong> process performance at operating conditions that<br />
are intermediate to those applied in the test matrix.<br />
41<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-1<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Updating Ozone for the Lincoln Water System<br />
Jeff Neemann 1 , Nick Burns 1 , Robert Hulsey 1 , Andrew Hansen 1 , Eric Lee 2 , and John Miriovsky 2<br />
1. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />
2. Lincoln Water System, Lincoln, NE<br />
The Lincoln Water System (LWS) in the process <strong>of</strong> replacing their three existing ozone generators with two larger<br />
generators. The new, state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art ozone system will use less energy to produce more ozone for disinfection at<br />
their East Water Treatment Plant. The upgrade will increase the total ozone generation capacity at the treatment<br />
plant from 1,050 pounds per day (ppd) to 2,600 ppd. The new generators will use liquid oxygen rather than air to<br />
produce ozone, which will also increase efficiency. Another aspect <strong>of</strong> the project is replacement <strong>of</strong> all controls,<br />
computers and electronics in the plant. This work will be coordinated with the construction activities scheduled for<br />
a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system upgrade to improve system efficiency. The SCADA<br />
system monitors and controls transmission and distribution <strong>of</strong> raw and potable water supplies. Preliminary design<br />
and equipment procurement services were completed in 2008, with final design slated for completion in May 2009<br />
and construction set to begin September 2009. The project is anticipated to be complete in April 2010.<br />
The existing air fed system will be replaced with liquid oxygen and ambient vaporizers to generate ozone at high<br />
weight percent. A cost evaluation was conducted and it was determined that it was most cost effective to complete<br />
replace the existing ozone generators with new more efficient generators. The existing closed loop cooling water<br />
system will be expanded to handle the higher cooling water flows. The existing diffuser system will be replaced<br />
with a sidestream injection system that uses injectors and specially designed nozzles that will retr<strong>of</strong>itted in to the<br />
existing concrete contactors. The ozone destruct system will be modified to handle the reduced gas flows after the<br />
conversion to oxygen feed.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
42
Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-2<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Eastern Treatment Plant - Melbourne Water’s Approach to One <strong>of</strong> the<br />
World’s Most Complex Wastewater Technology Trials<br />
Mark Lynch 1 , John Mieog 1 , Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />
Sock-Hoon Koh 2 , and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />
1. Melbourne Water Corporation; Melbourne, Australia<br />
2. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />
3. Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia<br />
In October 2006 the Victorian Government announced that Melbourne Water’s Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP)<br />
would be upgraded to produce ‘Class A’ effluent by 2012. The ETP treats approximately 42 percent <strong>of</strong> the sewage<br />
from Melbourne’s southern and eastern suburbs. At average and peak flows <strong>of</strong> around 370 and 700 MLD<br />
respectively, the ETP tertiary treatment plant will be amongst the largest <strong>of</strong> its kind in the world.<br />
Tertiary filtration followed by UV and chlorine disinfection is capable <strong>of</strong> achieving Class A effluent quality;<br />
however it will not address the residual aesthetic issues <strong>of</strong> colour and odour associated with the ETP effluent.<br />
The opportunity exists to implement tertiary treatment in such a way that achieves Class A effluent quality, but also<br />
addresses the residual aesthetics through the use <strong>of</strong> advanced treatment processes such as ozone/ biologically<br />
activated carbon.<br />
Due to the scale <strong>of</strong> the tertiary treatment at ETP, the likely cost implications, and the need to assess the viability <strong>of</strong><br />
advanced treatment on ETP effluent, a trial facility was designed, constructed and commissioned within 12 months.<br />
The facility includes all feasible tertiary treatment technologies for a plant the scale <strong>of</strong> ETP, including dual, cloth<br />
and mono media filtration, micro and ultrafiltration membranes, ozone, biologically activated carbon, UV and<br />
chlorine disinfection and reverse osmosis.<br />
Through the innovative design and construction process <strong>of</strong> the plant, it is possible to operate multiple process train<br />
configurations and all 16 individual process units simultaneously. Each process train treats approximately 100kL/d<br />
making the total flow through the plant approximately 2ML/d.<br />
This paper will discuss the design <strong>of</strong> the trials, construction <strong>of</strong> the plant and operation <strong>of</strong> the site to achieve the key<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> deciding on a preferred process train for the full scale plant.<br />
43<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-3<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Operations Experience and Enhancements to the Two-stage<br />
Ozone System for the Cary/Apex, NC Water Treatment Plant<br />
Bill Dowbiggin and Kelvin Creech<br />
1. CDM<br />
2. Town <strong>of</strong> Cary<br />
Ozonation was added to the Cary/Apex North Carolina Water Treatment Plant in 2001 with the primary purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
taste and odor control and secondary desire to provide an extra treatment barrier in terms <strong>of</strong> oxidation/disinfection.<br />
This presentation will overview the results and recent enhancements that are being considered and some that have<br />
already been implemented. Ozone, for example, has allowed great reduction in the use <strong>of</strong> powdered activated<br />
carbon (PAC) for taste and odor control, which provided significant saving in terms <strong>of</strong> both PAC purchase and in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> sludge disposal.<br />
Recent enhancements to be overviewed relate to process control, system corrosion control including the results <strong>of</strong><br />
diagnostic testing <strong>of</strong> some corrosion, and considerations for control <strong>of</strong> taste and odor and for providing a<br />
disinfection barrier.<br />
Discussion <strong>of</strong> recent findings by others that ozone can provide a barrier to many endocrine disruptors,<br />
pharmaceuticals and personal care products will be discussed briefly with respect to how those results and doses<br />
compare to the Town’s typical ozone doses.<br />
The requirements <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> North Carolina for ozone primary disinfection will also be overviewed.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
44
Monday PM – Session 8: Ozone Case Studies – S8-4<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Treated Water Quality Enhancements<br />
from Ozonation in a Tertiary Plant Upgrade<br />
John Mieog 1 , Mark Lynch 1 , Clare McAuliffe 1 , Bruce Long 2 ,<br />
Sock-Hoon Koh 2 , and Johanna Steegstra 3<br />
1. Melbourne Water Corporation; Melbourne, Australia<br />
2. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Missouri<br />
3. Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia<br />
The Victorian Government announced in 2006 that Melbourne Water would implement upgrades to its Eastern Treatment Plant<br />
(ETP) to enable it to produce ‘Class A’ recycled water quality in 2012 which will necessitate the implementation <strong>of</strong> a tertiary<br />
treatment plant comprising filtration and advanced disinfection.<br />
The ETP treats approximately 42 percent <strong>of</strong> the sewage from Melbourne’s southern and eastern suburbs. At average and<br />
peak flows <strong>of</strong> around 370 and 700 MLD respectively, the ETP tertiary treatment plant will be amongst the largest <strong>of</strong> its kind in<br />
the world.<br />
Melbourne Water elected to consider going beyond Class A criteria to address residual aesthetic parameters, colour and odour, in<br />
particular. This would address amenity impacts <strong>of</strong> the plant’s marine discharge, provide greater opportunities for reuse <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reclaimed water and thereby further reduce environmental impact through recycling diversions, and provide a valuable additional<br />
tool to help Victoria cope with extended drought periods such as the one being experienced today.<br />
Numerous treatment technologies were investigated and the most promising ones were chosen for application-specific testing.<br />
Due to the large scale at which these technologies would be applied, Melbourne Water elected to design and construct a<br />
tertiary technology trials plant in which to confirm the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> individual unit processes as well integrated process trains.<br />
Ozonation followed by biologically active media filtration (BMF) was selected to improve the aesthetic quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
treated water.<br />
Pilot trials run to date have demonstrated considerable water quality improvements as well as synergistic impacts on downstream<br />
treatment processes. Ozone doses between 8 and 15 mg/L have been tested and found to effect substantial reductions in true<br />
colour as well as increased UV transmittance (UVT). The 5 th percentile unfiltered secondary effluent UVT is increased from 33 %<br />
to 55% at ozone doses between 8 and 10 mg/L. This has a dramatic impact on the capital and operating costs for possible<br />
downstream UV irradiation. Cost comparisons <strong>of</strong> process trains that include ozone/BMF preceding UV irradiation compared with<br />
those that did not include ozone/BMF concluded that the ozone process more than pays for itself in reduced UV costs.<br />
Suspended solids challenge testing was performed to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> ozone at removing true colour and increasing<br />
UVT at elevated concentrations <strong>of</strong> feed water total suspended solids. Data revealed that equivalent amounts <strong>of</strong> true colour were<br />
removed per milligram <strong>of</strong> ozone transferred for influent suspended solids levels as high as 45 mg/L. The same performance was<br />
found for UVT increase at elevated influent suspended solids concentrations. At an influent suspended solids concentration <strong>of</strong> 214<br />
mg/L, the colour change reduced from 82 to 65%.<br />
Ozone/BMF together were also found to achieve a high degree <strong>of</strong> nitrification <strong>of</strong> influent ammonia. BMF effluent ammonia<br />
concentrations were achieved following filtration through either anthracite or granular activated carbon media and at empty bed<br />
contact times less than 10 minutes. This is a particularly significant benefit as it enables the use <strong>of</strong> free chlorine as an additional<br />
viricidal barrier for the production <strong>of</strong> high quality reclaimed water.<br />
Operation <strong>of</strong> ultrafiltration membranes before and after ozone/BMF has demonstrated the capability <strong>of</strong> these membranes to<br />
operate effectively at flux rates around double the sustainable flux when treating direct secondary effluent. Ozone followed by<br />
BMF has been found to be a valuable process addition to the treatment process trains we have trialed. The further effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
ozone at achieving substantial virus inactivation (as presented in a separate abstract submission) while concurrently achieving the<br />
multiple benefits described above has clearly demonstrated a valuable role that ozone can play in enhancing the acceptability <strong>of</strong><br />
reclaimed water schemes.<br />
45<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-1<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Inline Multi-Jets Ozone Contactors: Performance and Scalability<br />
Mahad S. Baawain 1 , Mohamed Gamal El-Din 2 , Daniel W. Smith 2 , and Angelo Mazzei 3<br />
1. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil & Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman<br />
2. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil & Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton, Canada<br />
3. Mazzei Injector Corporation, Bakersfield, CA<br />
The hydrodynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> three scales <strong>of</strong> in-line multi-jets ozone contactors were studied by using<br />
a laser flow map particle image velocimetry coupled with planar laser induced fluorescence (PIV/PLIF). All<br />
measurements were conducted under total liquid flow rate <strong>of</strong> about 10 L/s (for 0.10 m diameter contactor), 5.5 L/s<br />
(for 0.075 m diameter contactor) and 2.5 L/s (for 0.051 m diameter contactor) with gas flow rate ranging from 0.05<br />
to 0.4 L/s (for 0.10 m diameter contactor), 0.03 to 0.24 L/s (for 0.075 m diameter contactor) and 0.05 to 0.1 L/s (for<br />
0.051 m diameter contactor). The gas was introduced to the contactors through side injectors aligned in opposing or<br />
alternating positions. Results showed that for the same number <strong>of</strong> jets and at the same gas flow rate, the liquid<br />
dispersion coefficient (D L ) was higher when the alternating alignment was applied. D L increased as the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reactor increased. On the hand, higher ozone mass transfer rates were observed when using opposing alignment.<br />
Furthermore, as the cross-sectional area (i.e., the size) <strong>of</strong> the reactor increases, the mass transfer rate increases.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
46
Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-2<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Operator-Friendly Technique and Quality Control Considerations<br />
for Indigo Colorimetric Measurement <strong>of</strong> Ozone Residual<br />
Kerwin L. Rakness 1 , Eric C. Wert 2 , Michael Elovitz 3 , and Suzanne Mahoney 4<br />
1. Process Applications, Inc., 2627 Redwing Rd., Suite 340, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526<br />
2. Southern Nevada Water System, P.O. Box 99955, Las Vegas, NV 89193<br />
3. Treatment Technology and Evaluation Branch, Water Supply & Water Res. Division, U.S. EPA, 26 West<br />
M.L. King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268<br />
4. Little Falls Water Treatment Plant, Passaic Valley Water Commission, 800 Union Boulevard, Totowa, NJ<br />
07512<br />
Drinking water ozone disinfection systems document ozone residual concentration, C, for regulatory compliance<br />
reporting <strong>of</strong> concentration-times-time, CT, and resultant log inactivation <strong>of</strong> virus, Giardia and Cryptosporidium.<br />
The indigotrisulfonate (ITS) “colorimetric” procedure is the Standard Method for manually measuring ozone<br />
residual. Although the method as currently written in Standard Methods is relatively easy to implement, its<br />
accuracy nonetheless depends on specific ITS quality control considerations. Also, Standard Methods protocol is<br />
based on specific quantities <strong>of</strong> materials and sample volumes, making the method somewhat inflexible. Tests are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten performed in plant surroundings by operating staff, as opposed to in “certified” laboratories by analytical<br />
chemists. In this paper a more flexible, quality-assured and “operator-friendly” technique for the ITS method<br />
is presented.<br />
Indigo colorimetric testing described in this paper includes methods to account for apparent ozone residual due to<br />
oxidized manganese. Also described are special study results that document consequences for ignoring certain<br />
conditions. For example, ITS solution stored on a shelf for several days can cause an appreciable under-estimation<br />
<strong>of</strong> true ozone residual. Storage for several weeks can cause a major under-estimation <strong>of</strong> true ozone residual. Other<br />
special study results suggest increased flexibility is possible without negative consequence, as compared to the<br />
method currently outlined in Standard Methods.<br />
47<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-3<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Highly Efficient High Concentration Photochemical Ozone Generation<br />
Daniel E. Murnick<br />
UV Solutions Inc. and Rutgers University, Newark NJ 07102<br />
Using new highly efficient long lived 172 nm lamps we have demonstrated photochemical production <strong>of</strong> ozone at<br />
specific energy <strong>of</strong> 3 kWh/lb (6.6 kWh/kg, 150 gm/kWh) at 5% O 3 by weight with air as a feed gas. Similar results<br />
have been obtained using oxygen as a feed gas at 10% O 3 by weight. No NO x is produced as nitrogen is invisible to<br />
172 nm light.<br />
Test results agree well with theoretical predictions i and indicate significant O & M cost reduction opportunities for<br />
large facilities, and the potential <strong>of</strong> eliminating the need for LOX storage facilities. Capital costs are projected to be<br />
similar to, or less than those for discharge production systems- depending on system size.<br />
The all quartz 172 nm lamps operate in most gas or liquid environments resulting in the possibility <strong>of</strong> generating<br />
ozone with a wide range <strong>of</strong> concentrations and process parameters such as pressure and temperature. The lamps are<br />
instant start and stop, with VUV light production efficiency essentially independent <strong>of</strong> duty cycle. The high<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> the lamps and the photochemical ozone production lower cooling requirements compared to those <strong>of</strong><br />
existing systems. As with existing ozone generators, ozone yield and upper ozone concentration limit are strongly<br />
influenced both by water vapor in the process gas stream and the ambient temperature.<br />
i<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Water Vapor on Photochemical Ozone Generation with Efficient 172nm Xenon Excimer Lamps,<br />
Manfred Salvermoser, Daniel E. Murnick and Ulrich Kogelschatz, Ozone Science and Engineering, 30, 228-237<br />
(2008)<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
48
Monday PM – Session 9: Ozone Design and Operation – S9-4<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
The Study on the Ceramic Membrane Wastewater Reuse System<br />
with Pre Ozonation and Coagulation<br />
M. Noguchi 1 , M. Aoki 1 , H. Kozono 1 , H. Kouchiwa 2 , and Y.Yoda 2<br />
1. Metawater ,Co., LTD., Shiroyama Trust Tower. 4-3-1 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-6029, Japan<br />
2. Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2-8-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-8001, Japan<br />
In recent years, reclaimed water from municipal wastewater treatment plants is becoming increasingly significant<br />
water resource around the urban areas in Japan. Therefore, new wastewater reuse system using ozonation,<br />
coagulation and ceramic MF membrane (0.1µm) was developed. This study is the collaborative development with<br />
Bureau <strong>of</strong> Sewerage Tokyo Metropolitan Government. The testing equipment is located inside the Shibaura Water<br />
Reclamation Center in Tokyo Metropolitan Government. The testing was performed using secondary effluent<br />
treated at the center. The volume <strong>of</strong> treated water is about 90m 3 /day. We confirmed that a small amount <strong>of</strong> ozone<br />
addition and coagulation could significantly improve the membrane filtration performance. The combination <strong>of</strong> pre<br />
ozonation and coagulation processes achieves continuous stable membrane filtration with the high filtration flux <strong>of</strong><br />
4m 3 /m 2 /day (167 LMH). A stable membrane filtration could be maintained by controlling ozone dosing rate<br />
depending on raw water quality fluctuation. The removal <strong>of</strong> COD (Mn) in raw water was 50 to 60%, and the<br />
color removals satisfied 80% or higher. The filtrate that was obtained from our pilot study was better than<br />
Californian standards.<br />
49<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 10: UV Disinfection Design – S10-1<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Disinfection Alternatives and Sustainability:<br />
Energy Optimization, Disinfection Efficiency, and Sustainability<br />
Gary Hunter 1 , Andy Shaw 1 , Dr. Leonard W. Casson 2 , and Dr. Joe Marriott 2<br />
1. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />
2. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, 944 Benedum Engineering Hall,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261<br />
The dramatic rise in energy and chemical costs is spurring additional focus on optimizing efficiency <strong>of</strong> wastewater<br />
disinfection processes. At the same time, sustainability <strong>of</strong> disinfection in an increasingly-urbanized world will<br />
depend in part on the ability to reuse treated effluent as a resource instead <strong>of</strong> a waste product.<br />
Following the terrorist attacks <strong>of</strong> September 11, 2001, and devastation <strong>of</strong> Hurricane Katrina, the engineering design<br />
paradigm was broadened to include safety, security and a response to all hazards. The “3-S Design Concept” for<br />
drinking water and wastewater infrastructure systems was developed<br />
The “3-S Design Concept” can be used to provide practical guidance for the design and operation <strong>of</strong> disinfection<br />
processes and treatment systems in today’s economic environment in a manner that embraces sustainable solutions<br />
that benefit future generations instead <strong>of</strong> short-sighted solutions with hidden future costs. Sustainability<br />
incorporates a triple bottom line approach incorporating economic, environmental, and social factors in to the<br />
selection <strong>of</strong> a UV disinfection system.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
50
Tuesday AM – Session 10: UV Disinfection Design – S10-2<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Airing it Out: Design Considerations for UV Disinfection Installations<br />
Aaron W. Duke, P.E.<br />
11242 Waples Mill Road, Suite 250, Fairfax, Virginia 22030<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> ultraviolet light for disinfection in drinking water treatment has become increasingly prevalent since the<br />
findings <strong>of</strong> Clancy et al., were published in 1998. This increased use has been helped by the promulgation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule and the requirement for additional Cryptosporidium<br />
inactivation for certain source waters. UV disinfection use has also been aided by the increased awareness <strong>of</strong><br />
endocrine disruptors and potential for advanced oxidation to deal with these compounds. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper<br />
is to provide guidelines for UV disinfection designs relative to air entrainment based upon lessons learned from<br />
recent installations.<br />
51<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 10: UV Disinfection Design – S10-3<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Biodosimetry-Based Validation<br />
on UV System Design Specifications<br />
Bryan R. Townsend 1 and Gary Hunter 2<br />
1. Black & Veatch, 8520 Cliff Cameron Drive, Suite 210, Charlotte, NC 28269<br />
2. Black & Veatch, 8400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114<br />
Fueled by recent UV system validations that have been conducted in accordance with testing protocols based on the<br />
UV Disinfection Guidance Manual, the need for a modernized protocol for the validation, sizing and operation <strong>of</strong><br />
UV systems for the disinfection <strong>of</strong> secondary wastewater effluent has become increasingly evident. Although the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a modified validation protocol is an important first step in the advancement <strong>of</strong> wastewater UV<br />
system design, it is one <strong>of</strong> several key components to the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> advanced methods for more<br />
accurate and reliable UV system design and operation.<br />
An increasing amount <strong>of</strong> design specifications are allowing for or require UV system sizing based on validation<br />
testing, however, many <strong>of</strong> these specifications do not properly address requirements that should be applied to the<br />
design and operation <strong>of</strong> UV systems based on biodosimetry-derived performance models. Many concepts that are<br />
key to the proper application <strong>of</strong> biodosimetry results for UV system design are commonly overlooked or<br />
misunderstood, potentially resulting in under or over design <strong>of</strong> UV systems and inadequate or inefficient operating<br />
strategies. Fully understanding the impact <strong>of</strong> various validation approaches on UV system design will equip<br />
engineers with the added knowledge to develop proper specifications for safe, accurate and efficient design <strong>of</strong> UV<br />
systems that will attain required disinfection goals, while accounting for the site-specific UV dose-response<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> the target microorganism.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
52
Tuesday AM – Session 11: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S11-1<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
A Bench-Scale Evaluation <strong>of</strong> UV and UV/H 2 O 2 Processes for the Removal<br />
<strong>of</strong> PPCPs in Secondary Treated Water <strong>of</strong> Sewage Treatment Plant<br />
Ilho Kim, Naoyuki Yamashita, and Hiroaki Tanaka<br />
Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Kyoto University,<br />
1-2 Yumihama, Otsu, Shiga 520-0811, Japan<br />
The side effects <strong>of</strong> PPCPs on the aquatic environment and human body have not been known yet. However, PPCPs in<br />
water environment should be removed in aspect <strong>of</strong> precautionary principles. The performance <strong>of</strong> UV and UV/H 2 O 2<br />
processes for the PPCPs removal was investigated using secondary effluent. 38 PPCPs were detected in secondary<br />
effluent used for tested water in this study. Only 17 <strong>of</strong> 38 PPCPs were removed by more than 90% despite UV dose <strong>of</strong><br />
2,768 mJ/cm 2 during UV process, showing that considerable UV dose will be required for the effective PPCPs removal<br />
by UV alone process. This also shows that it will be difficult to accomplish good PPCPs removals by typical UV<br />
disinfection process (UV dose : 40 mJ/cm 2 ~ 140 mJ/cm 2 ). On the other hand, the PPCPs removal by UV alone process<br />
improved significantly by the combination <strong>of</strong> H 2 O 2 with UV process. Except naproxen (>89%), 37 PPCPs were removed<br />
by more than 90% at the operational condition <strong>of</strong> UV dose <strong>of</strong> 923 mJ/cm 2 (contact time : 5 min) and initial H 2 O 2<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> 6.2 mg/L. As a consequence, the combination <strong>of</strong> UV and H 2 O 2 made it possible to reduce UV dose at<br />
least by more than 3 times comparing with for UV alone process. Electrical energy required for the effective PPCPs<br />
removal by UV/H 2 O 2 process was 0.54 kW/m 3 target water (Operational condition : UV dose : 923 mJ/cm 2 , H 2 O 2 : 6.2<br />
mg/L), showing that UV/H 2 O 2 process can reduce energy consumption and operating cost considerably, comparing with<br />
UV process.<br />
53<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 11: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S11-2<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
The Effects <strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV Radiation on Natural Organic Matter<br />
Gustavo E. Imoberdorf and Madjid Mohseni<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological Engineering,<br />
The University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. Canada<br />
This research focused on examining the efficacy <strong>of</strong> vacuum-UV (VUV and H 2 O 2 /VUV) processes to degrade NOM<br />
present in raw water. Both VUV and H 2 O 2 /VUV were very effective at mineralizing NOM. After 90 minutes <strong>of</strong><br />
irradiation, TOC <strong>of</strong> the water decreased from 4.95 ppm to 0.8 ppm. At shorter irradiation times, partial degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> NOM led to significant changes in water characteristics, such as modifications in the molecular weight<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> NOM as well as formation <strong>of</strong> oxidation by-products (e.g., aldehydes).<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
54
Tuesday AM – Session 11: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S11-3<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Predicting Hydroxyl Radical Activity and<br />
Trace Contaminants Removal in Ozonated Water<br />
Simon Vincent, Abderrahim Kotbi and Benoit Barbeau<br />
Industrial-NSERC Chair in Drinking Water, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Département des Génies Civil,<br />
Géologique et des Mines, CP 6079, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3A7<br />
There is a renewed interest in predicting R CT following growing evidence that AOP is effective against many<br />
emerging contaminants. Five surface waters were investigated to evaluate the OH-radical activity using the R CT<br />
concept, predict R CT using traditional water quality characteristics and predict contaminants removal by ozonation<br />
and peroxone. It was shown that R CT was dependant on water quality characteristics and could be modeled<br />
(R 2 =0.97), for four out <strong>of</strong> five waters, using water characteristics and treatment conditions. Predictions <strong>of</strong> MIB<br />
oxidation closely matched the published data <strong>of</strong> Kawamura (2000) and bench-scale assays performed on one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
water under investigation.<br />
55<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 12: Perozone and AOP Processes – S12-1<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
In-Situ 1,4 Dioxane Remediation in HVOC Sites<br />
Andrew Brolowski and William B. Kerfoot<br />
Kerfoot Technologies, Inc., 766-B Falmouth Road, Mashpee, MA 02649<br />
Increasingly, 1,4 dioxane is found as a co-contaminant at chloroethene spill sites. The compound has shown limited<br />
removal (
Tuesday AM – Session 12: Perozone and AOP Processes – S12-2<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Experiences <strong>of</strong> Perozone ® and C-Sparge TM<br />
at Two Former Dry Cleaner Sites in the Netherlands<br />
Bert Scheffer 1 and Edward van de Ven 2<br />
1. Verhoeve Milieu bv, Dorpsstraat 32, P.O. Box 4, 6997 ZG Hoog-Keppel, The Netherlands<br />
2. Verhoeve Milieu bv, Aventurijn 600, P.O. Box 3073, 3301 DB Dordrecht, The Netherlands<br />
C-Sparge TM , better known as ozone sparging (microbubble ozone), is used for treatment <strong>of</strong> the plume zone area<br />
with VOCl, mainly PCE, at a former dry cleaner site in Utrecht . The City <strong>of</strong> Utrecht has had good results with<br />
C-Sparge TM in combination with pump and treat. Prior to the application <strong>of</strong> C-Sparge TM , pump and treat was used<br />
for removal <strong>of</strong> mass in the plume until tailing <strong>of</strong> the groundwater concentrations occurred. The concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
PCE in the extracted groundwater stagnated at 2,000 ppb. Before start-up <strong>of</strong> the C-Sparge TM system, a 3-week<br />
field pilot test funded by the Dutch organization SKB was conducted to study mobilization effects. In the plume<br />
area, no mobilization effects were found. After that, in September, 2005, C-Sparge TM was started. Together the<br />
pilot test and full-scale system lowered PCE groundwater concentrations from ppm-level (max. 15 ppm) to low<br />
ppb-level (400 ppb) in about 125 days. After about 700 days <strong>of</strong> treatment the PCE groundwater concentrations<br />
decreased to below the Dutch Intervention Level (40 ppb). At 13 m from the Spargepoints ® , a significant PCE<br />
concentration decrease was detected (from 2,000 ppb to 13 ppb). Currently, the source zone area is being treated<br />
with Perozone ® (peroxide-coated ozone) in conjunction with pump and treat.<br />
Perozone ® is also used on a former dry cleaner site in Terneuzen. After demolition <strong>of</strong> the dry cleaner facility and<br />
excavation <strong>of</strong> the hot spot in soil, MIP-CPT’s were done to investigate for possible DNAPL below the former dry<br />
cleaner facility. At least at one point on depth DNAPL was detected (PCE: 130,000 µg/L). Previous investigations<br />
indicate a large near-source zone area <strong>of</strong> 150 x 60 m. After installing 60 Laminar Spargepoints ® over<br />
approximately 100,000 m 3 soil volume, the system was started in October, 2005. The initial results indicate a quick<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> aqueous PCE concentrations. After allocation <strong>of</strong> the oxidant mass loading for the near-source zone<br />
treatment some rebound was found in the source zone area. Additional treatment is required to reach the cleanup<br />
goals. The experience indicates that treatment <strong>of</strong> the DNAPL with Perozone ® is possible. Mobilization effects<br />
were found in the source zone also. From extended monitoring appears a 99,8% reduction <strong>of</strong> this initial<br />
increased concentration.<br />
57<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 12: Perozone and AOP Processes – S12-3<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Non-Thermal Plasma - A Novel and<br />
Cost Effective Advanced Oxidation System<br />
Dvir Solnik 1 , Andreas Kolch 2 , Andrew Salveson 3 , Nitin Goel 3 ,<br />
Nicola Fontaine 4 , Justin Sutherland 5 , and Chris Fennessy 6<br />
1. Aquapure Technologies Limited, Israel<br />
2. Hytecon, Germany<br />
3. Carollo Engineers, Walnut Creek, CA<br />
4. Carollo Engineers, Walnut Creek, CA<br />
5. Carollo Engineers, Austin, TX<br />
6. Aerojet, Sacramento, CA<br />
Aquapure is a novel and energy efficient method for the generation and transfer <strong>of</strong> various oxidants into water,<br />
including the hydroxyl radical. This method is characterized as non-thermal plasma. Depending on the target<br />
compound, the EE O <strong>of</strong> UV/hydrogen peroxide system is 42% to 78% higher than the EE O <strong>of</strong> the Aquapure system.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
58
Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-1<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> Velocity Pr<strong>of</strong>iling to Assess to Effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> Piping Configuration on UV Dose Delivery<br />
Dennis J. Greene 1 , Keith Bircher 2 , and Harold B. Wright 3<br />
1. AECOM Water, 276 Abby Road, Manchester, NH 03103<br />
2. UV Technologies Div., Calgon Carbon Corporation, 50 Mural Street, Unit#3,<br />
Richmond Hill, ON, CAN L4B 1E4<br />
3. Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713<br />
The USEPA UVDGM allows for use <strong>of</strong> pre-validated reactors when point velocities measured upstream and<br />
downstream <strong>of</strong> a reactor fall within ± 20% <strong>of</strong> the average pipe velocity (v avg ) at the validation and WTP sites. This<br />
guidance is somewhat limited in application because internal reactor components typically create a reactor outlet<br />
velocity pr<strong>of</strong>ile with points that exceed the ± 20% V avg criterion. A method for applying pre-validated reactors<br />
based on alternative velocity criteria is presented: if measured velocity pr<strong>of</strong>iles at a WTP are closer to v avg than the<br />
validation velocity pr<strong>of</strong>iles based on statistical analysis, then pre-validation dose delivery results should apply to<br />
the WTP site.<br />
59<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-2<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Ultraviolet System Design Considerations for Uncovered Reservoir<br />
versus Water Treatment Plant Applications<br />
Jack Bebee, P.E. 1 and Christine Cotton, P.E. 2<br />
1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue, Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008<br />
2. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., One South Church Avenue, Suite 1120, Tucson, AZ 85701<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper is to summarize the applications and specific approaches used during design and<br />
development <strong>of</strong> operational strategies for both UV disinfection <strong>of</strong> uncovered reservoir and Water Treatment Plants<br />
(WTP). These projects are in California, which has more stringent <strong>of</strong>f-specification requirements than the Long<br />
Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR); therefore, the UV facility design needed<br />
additional controls and equipment to meet the requirements.<br />
This paper identifies key items that need to be evaluated during UV facility design for both WTP and uncovered<br />
reservoir applications and provide examples <strong>of</strong> how these items were addressed on real-world projects. Some key<br />
items that are discussed include:<br />
• Design modifications to improve hydraulic operation<br />
• Operation during reactor start-up/shut down<br />
• Operation during a power outage or interruption<br />
• Control and operation <strong>of</strong> UV reactor flow control valves<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
60
Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-3<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Costs and Sustainability Comparison <strong>of</strong> Chemical Disinfection and<br />
Medium Pressure Ultraviolet Disinfection for Virus Inactivation<br />
James Collins 1 , Christine Cotton 1 , and Phyllis Posy 2<br />
1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave, Suite 1120, Tucson, Arizona<br />
2. Atlantium Technologies, Har Tuv Industrial Park, POB 11071, Israel 99100<br />
Previously, it was thought that using UV disinfection for 4-log virus inactivation would be cost prohibitive due to<br />
the high doses required in the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR). However,<br />
recent studies (Linden, 2007) have shown that the dose necessary for 4-log adenovirus inactivation is<br />
approximately 40% to 50% lower than the doses published in the LT2ESWTR when polychromatic UV lamps are<br />
used (Linden et al 2007). A recent validation using adenovirus2 demonstrated this in full scale.<br />
This study evaluated the costs (i.e., capital and operation and maintenance costs) and sustainability <strong>of</strong> using<br />
chlorine or UV disinfection for virus inactivation <strong>of</strong> groundwater and surface waters. The results <strong>of</strong> this study<br />
show that UV disinfection is a cost effective option for select disinfection scenarios. UV disinfection was also<br />
shown to have environmental and risk benefits when compared to traditional chemical disinfection.<br />
61<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 13: UV Disinfection Design – S13-4<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
A Smart Way to Validate UV Systems for Reuse Applications<br />
Matthias Boeker 1 , Andrew Salveson 2 , Madhukar Rapaka 3 , and Ronnie Bemus 1<br />
1. ITT Water & Wastewater U.S.A., 14125 South Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273<br />
2. Carollo Engineers, 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94598<br />
3. ITT Water & Wastewater Germany, Boschstrasse 4, 32051 Herford, Germany<br />
The NWRI/AwwaRF 2003 Ultraviolet Disinfection <strong>Guide</strong>lines describe a methodology for validating UV Systems<br />
for reuse applications.<br />
The validation testing <strong>of</strong> pilot plants using modular, open channel configurations allows for an easy upscale <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bioassay results to full-scale UV systems. Because closed vessel UV reactors employ different number <strong>of</strong> lamps<br />
and may have variations in lamp arrangement, individual reactor certification would be required.<br />
Sometimes viewed as “magic”, this paper describes a robust methodology for combining the use <strong>of</strong> CFD prediction<br />
models with full scale biodosimetric testing, to obtain sound, consistent results that allow a design engineer to<br />
dependability size a UV system within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the NWRI/AwwaRF guidelines.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
62
Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-1<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
A Kinetic Model for the Degradation <strong>of</strong> Natural Organic Matter during the<br />
Ultraviolet Hydrogen Peroxide Advanced Oxidation Process<br />
Sarathy, S.R., Bazri, M., and Mohseni, M.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical and Biological Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia,<br />
2360 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada<br />
A completely dynamic, kinetic model was developed to predict the degradation <strong>of</strong> chromophoric natural organic<br />
matter (CNOM) and H 2 O 2 during the UV/H 2 O 2 . Model parameters were estimated numerically by optimizing<br />
fitting to experimental results obtained with a “synthetic water” using Suwannee River NOM. The reaction rate<br />
constant for the reaction between hydroxyl radicals ( • OH) and NOM was estimated at 1.14E4 L mg -1 s -1 , in close<br />
agreement with past literature reports. The reaction rate constant for the reaction between • OH and CNOM was<br />
estimated at 3.08E8 L mol -1 s -1 . Considering the change in CNOM helped improved prediction <strong>of</strong> H 2 O 2 degradation<br />
but the model still under predicted experimental measurements. This discrepancy is hypothesized to be due to the<br />
model’s neglect <strong>of</strong> the reaction between H 2 O 2 and carbon-centered radicals, formed when • OH react with NOM.<br />
63<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-2<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
UV Photolysis <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs)<br />
and Endocrine Disrupting Substances (EDS) in Drinking Water<br />
Jules Carlson 1 , Mihaela Stefan 2 , and Chris Metcalfe 1<br />
1. Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada<br />
2. Trojan Technologies, London, ON, Canada<br />
There is potential for contamination <strong>of</strong> drinking water by pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and<br />
endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs). UV treatment processes will be described along with the parameters<br />
needed to evaluate their efficacy for removal <strong>of</strong> 15 PPCPs and EDCs. UV irradiations were performed using both<br />
low- and medium pressure mercury light sources. Analytical methods involved solid phase extraction (SPE) and<br />
quantification by LC/MS/MS. The photo-degradation kinetics <strong>of</strong> investigated PPCPs and EDCs indicated that<br />
some compounds can be removed by direct photolysis. Characteristic UV absorption spectra were determined for<br />
both protonated and deprotonated forms <strong>of</strong> all compounds, along with pK a estimates determined using<br />
spectrophotometric titration procedures. The quantum yields at 254 nm and the OH radical rate constants were<br />
determined and used to interpret the experimental removal efficiency <strong>of</strong> these emerging contaminants through<br />
direct photolysis and advanced oxidation processes. Irradiation in the presence <strong>of</strong> 4 mg/L H 2 O 2 was an efficient<br />
removal method for all target compounds. With the exception <strong>of</strong> the sulphamethoxazole and triclosan which<br />
undergo rapid degradation by direct photolysis, reaction with OH radicals was the dominant removal pathway<br />
when the irradiations were performed in the presence <strong>of</strong> H 2 O 2 . The impact <strong>of</strong> water constituents, such as nitrate<br />
and dissolved organic matter were also investigated and will be presented.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
64
Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-3<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Advanced Oxidation Processes for Contaminant Destruction:<br />
Selecting between Ozone-Peroxide or UV-Peroxide<br />
James Collins and Christine Cotton, P.E.<br />
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1 S. Church Ave, Suite 1120, Tucson, Arizona<br />
Interest in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) has grown in recent years as water utilities considering the use<br />
impaired drinking water sources to meet system demand. The impaired sources can be contaminated with a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> contaminants (e.g., volatile organic compounds (VOCs), 1,4-dioxane, N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), and<br />
taste and odor compounds).<br />
AOPs are technologies that are capable <strong>of</strong> removing multiple contaminants simultaneously using the hydroxyl<br />
radical. Currently, the two most commonly used AOPs are UV/peroxide (UV AOPs) and ozone/peroxide<br />
(ozone AOPs). Both technologies have distinct advantages over more traditional treatment technologies. The<br />
paper discusses some <strong>of</strong> the design issues that should be considered when evaluating UV AOPs and ozone AOPs.<br />
65<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 14: Advanced Oxidation <strong>of</strong> Contaminants – S14-4<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Rapid Measurement <strong>of</strong> Background Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging in Water<br />
Matthew Hross and Erik J. Rosenfeldt<br />
The University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering<br />
A synthetic water was evaluated using the R OH,UV concept to determine the overall background hydroxyl radical<br />
scavenging. Two probe compounds were used, the first being para-chlorobenzoic acid (pCBA), and then using<br />
methylene blue (MB) at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 5 µM. The water contained scavenging equivalent to 4 mg/L dissolved<br />
organic carbon (DOC). The tests were performed to evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> using MB could be used a probe<br />
compound in place <strong>of</strong> pCBA in the R OH,UV concept. A new scavenging device was then introduced to determine the<br />
overall background scavenging <strong>of</strong> a water with the MB probe compound through a much quicker analysis. The new<br />
scavenging device predicted the overall background scavenging <strong>of</strong> the water as well as the original R OH,UV concept<br />
did. These predictions also agreed with theoretical calculations <strong>of</strong> the overall background scavenging.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
66
Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-1<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Perozone Groundwater Sparging at the Days Inn Lake City Pre-Approval Site<br />
Edward M. Kellar and Chris Mickler, P.E.<br />
MACTEC, Inc., Gainesville, FL 32669<br />
A full-scale microbubble Perozone sparging system using the patented Kerfoot Technologies, Inc. (KTI)<br />
C-Sparge process was installed on a former unleaded gas station site currently active as a Days Inn paved<br />
entrance. Gas phase ozone sparging with dilute liquid hydrogen peroxide injection was introduced in the source<br />
zone via five laminar spargepoints coupled with ozone only sparging into seven surrounding standard microbubble<br />
sparge points. The chemical oxidation system was fabricated in an 8-ft by 10-ft portable enclosure by MACTEC<br />
and installed with KTI startup assistance; operation was initiated in August, 2005. Groundwater volatile aromatic<br />
(BTEX) compound concentrations in source wells decreased from a historical maximum <strong>of</strong> 7,700 ug/L to<br />
non-detect in several monitor wells by the end <strong>of</strong> two quarters <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />
The site geology consisted <strong>of</strong> silty sand and fine sands with a treatment zone under asphalt paving extending from<br />
water table nominally at 3-ft bgs to the confining clay layer at 22-24 feet bgs. Past initial remedial actions included<br />
limited tank removal source excavation, and additional assessment under the FDEP Pre-approval program.<br />
Sparge point programming adjustments have focused oxidant application on a remaining area where limited<br />
sparging has shown the continued presence <strong>of</strong> desorbing BTEX mass. Two source zone wells with recalcitrant<br />
VOCs in an area <strong>of</strong> fine flowing sands are receiving additional attention to improve coverage because lower<br />
permeability with high formation back pressures has limited aggressive injection radius <strong>of</strong> influence. Perimeter<br />
ozone only sparge points have reduced groundwater to non-detectable BTEX and maintained an outer oxidative<br />
band with no re-bound; programmed operation has been reduced to a minimum.<br />
The presentation will focus on design and installation details, startup test sequences, in situ DO and ORP<br />
performance monitoring, remote telemetry alarm features, and lessons learned regarding maintenance<br />
requirements, materials <strong>of</strong> construction suitable with ozone in Florida heat, and the use <strong>of</strong> kinetics analysis to<br />
predict treatment time to endpoints. The system will be contrasted with a larger and more complex 28 point<br />
modular KTI Perozone system newly installed by MACTEC at a Mulberry, FL BTEX site.<br />
67<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-2<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Characterization <strong>of</strong> Ozone Mass Transfer in Model Soils<br />
Alejandro García 1 , Tatyana Poznyak 2 , Jesús Rodríguez 2 , and Isaac Chairez 3<br />
1. Department <strong>of</strong> Automatic Control, CINVESTAV-IPN, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Col. San Pedro<br />
Zacatenco, C.P.07360, Mexico D.F., Mexico<br />
2. Superior School <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering National Polytechnic Institute <strong>of</strong> Mexico (ESIQIE-IPN), Edif 7,<br />
UPALM, C.P. 07738, Mexico D.F., Mexico, E-mail: tpoznyak@ipn.mx<br />
3. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Interdisciplinary Unit <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology <strong>of</strong> National Polytechnic Institute (UPIBI-IPN), Av.<br />
Acueducto s/n., C.P. 07480, México, D.F, México.<br />
Many technological approaches based on ozone high oxidant capacity have been developed in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
contaminated water. On the contrary, ozone application for the treatment <strong>of</strong> the contaminated air and soil has been<br />
few explored. In the particular case <strong>of</strong> soil treatment, there exist some important attempts that have been realized in<br />
order to determine the possible implementation <strong>of</strong> ozone as a component in a specific remediation technique in the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> polyaromatic organic compounds. This situation has led to the realization <strong>of</strong> some studies about ozone<br />
mass transfer in porous media. However, this is not a trivial problem, overall if we consider complexities involved<br />
in a heterogeneous solid phase, where humidity and organic matter presence can influence on the ozone transfer. In<br />
this sense, some researchers have presented their results using soil packed columns and mathematical models based<br />
on partial differential equations. Nevertheless, the validation <strong>of</strong> mathematical model depends on the determination<br />
<strong>of</strong> all parameters involved, experimental procedure and for the case <strong>of</strong> some parameters a “trial and error<br />
calibration”. In the present work the ozone mass transfer characterization for different model soils (glass spheres,<br />
sand, and burned soil) in a packed glass reactor was studied. We consider the solid phase as a lumped system,<br />
based on this idea a characteristic ozone mass transfer global parameter k sat was proposed. This parameter by an<br />
expression derived from the ozone mass balance in the system was calculated, and it can be obtained<br />
experimentally from the ozone concentration measures at the output <strong>of</strong> the reactor in the gas phase. The k sat values<br />
for the four proposed model solids were calculated, and also a sensibility analysis <strong>of</strong> k sat was carried out. Besides a<br />
simple mathematical model in ordinary differential equation to prove the validity <strong>of</strong> k sat in the process was<br />
simulated and compared with the experimental data.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
68
Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-3<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Ozone Oxidation for Source Removal<br />
And Prevention Barrier at a Fire Training Academy<br />
Scott C. Michaud and Thomas C. Cambareri, LSP<br />
Cape Cod Commission, 3225 Main Street, PO Box 226, Barnstable, MA 02630<br />
The Barnstable Fire Training Academy is a multi-plume site resulting from chronic releases <strong>of</strong> petroleum<br />
hydrocarbons to the environment during simulated fire-fighting conditions over several decades as an<br />
“industrial/commercial” use in a Zone II public water-supply area. Use <strong>of</strong> petroleum at the site ended in 1986.<br />
Multiple source removals were conducted over the subsequent 20 years. While a pump-and-treat containment<br />
system was successful in reducing the down-gradient extent <strong>of</strong> petroleum in groundwater, source areas continued to<br />
release slugs <strong>of</strong> contamination to groundwater from contaminated soil at the water table. The site is located in a<br />
highly permeable aquifer suitable for an air-sparging system. The C-Sparge/Perozone® system manufactured by<br />
Kerfoot Technologies, Inc. was selected to treat residual smear zones. The system consists <strong>of</strong> 12 sparge points that<br />
deliver ozone-amended air and peroxide to contaminated areas. The sparge points are dual-stacked in source areas<br />
in recognition that a deep sparge point can influence a wider lateral area, while a shallow sparge point concentrates<br />
treatment closer to the point. The system was brought on line in March 2006 and continuous peroxide injection<br />
commenced in April 2006. Over the subsequent 6 months, significant reductions in concentrations <strong>of</strong> BTEX,<br />
naphthalene and associated volatile organics (VOC) were reported for groundwater samples collected from<br />
contaminant source areas. In other source areas, low dissolved oxygen and redox measurements and limited VOC<br />
reductions point to blocked treatment pathways in sediments around some sparge wells. Where significant<br />
reductions in contaminant concentrations were achieved, a subsequent rebound <strong>of</strong> VOC concentrations observed<br />
while the sparge system was temporarily inoperable indicates that contaminated soil in smear zones continue to be<br />
a source <strong>of</strong> contaminants leaching to groundwater.<br />
69<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session 15: Perozone and AOP Processes – S15-4<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
A Simplified Method for Modeling Chemical<br />
Intermediates in Advanced Oxidation Processes<br />
Joseph A. Drago, P.E., Ph.D.<br />
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, San Francisco, California<br />
This paper describes a simplified method for modeling the formation and destruction <strong>of</strong> chemical intermediates that<br />
are formed during advanced oxidation processes, such as UV-peroxide and ozone-peroxide, where OH• radical is<br />
the dominant oxidant and pseudo-first order reaction conditions (e.g., OH• at steady state) exist. The model<br />
employs equations, developed to describe radioactivity decay chains, to calculate the formation and degradation <strong>of</strong><br />
chemical intermediates when the relative destruction rate and the decay scheme <strong>of</strong> a target compound are known.<br />
An example using methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) is included.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
70
Tuesday PM – Session 16: UV Disinfection Research – S16-1<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Pre- and Post- UV Disinfection Conditions on Photoreactivation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Fecal Coliforms from a Physicochemical Wastewater Effluent<br />
Catherine Hallmich and Ronald Gehr<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University,<br />
817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6<br />
Decreasing photoreactivation after wastewater UV disinfection can lead to considerable savings in capital and<br />
operating costs. Objectives <strong>of</strong> this study were to determine pre- and post-UV irradiation conditions able to decrease<br />
fecal coliform photoreactivation from Montréal Wastewater Treatment Plant wastewater effluents. Results indicate<br />
that delaying exposure to photoreactivating light for 3 hours suppresses photoreactivation at UV doses <strong>of</strong> 10 and 20<br />
mJ/cm 2 . Moreover, at least 440 lux <strong>of</strong> visible light is needed to initiate photoreactivation. Additionally,<br />
photoreactivation decreases significantly when visible light is simultaneously emitted prior to or during UV<br />
irradiation. This is more significantly observed for winter samples, where photoreactivation is decreased by<br />
nearly 50%. Finally, summer populations are more sensitive to inactivation and less able to photoreactivate than<br />
winter populations.<br />
71<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 16: UV Disinfection Research – S16-2<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Disinfection Effects <strong>of</strong> Vacuum-UV (VUV)<br />
and UV Light on Bacillus subtilis Spores at 172, 222, 254 nm<br />
Ding Wang, 1,2 Thomas Oppenländer, 3<br />
Mohamed Gamal El-Din, 1 and James R. Bolton 1<br />
1. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton,<br />
AB, T6G 2W2, Canada.<br />
2. Current address, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Galbraith Building,<br />
35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1A4.<br />
3. Hochschule Furtwangen University (HFU), Campus Villingen-Schwenningen, Fakultät Maschinenbau<br />
und Verfahrenstechnik, Jakob-Kienzle-Str. 17, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.<br />
The efficacy <strong>of</strong> the ultraviolet (UV) disinfection <strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis spores in aqueous suspensions at wavelengths<br />
<strong>of</strong> 172, 222 and 254 nm was evaluated. A Xe 2 * excilamp, a KrCl * excilamp and a low-pressure mercury lamp were<br />
used as the UV light sources at these three wavelengths, respectively. The first-order inactivation rate constants at<br />
172, 222 and 254 nm were 0.0022, 0.122, 0.069 cm 2 mJ –1 , respectively. Therefore, the 2 log reduction <strong>of</strong> B. subtilis<br />
spores required fluences (UV doses) <strong>of</strong> 909, 21.6, and 40.4 mJ cm –2 at these respective wavelengths. This means<br />
that VUV exposure at 172 nm is much less efficient than the exposures at the other two wavelengths for<br />
the inactivation <strong>of</strong> B. subtilis spores, while UV exposure at 222 nm is more efficient than that at 254 nm. This<br />
research indicated quantitatively that VUV light is not practicable for microorganism disinfection in water and<br />
wastewater treatment.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
72
Tuesday PM – Session 16: UV Disinfection Research – S16-3<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
E. coli Repair in UV Water Treatment Conditions<br />
Bohrerova, Z. and Linden, K.G.<br />
The repair and regrowth <strong>of</strong> E. coli was followed in drinking and reuse water following LP and MP UV disinfection.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to perform repair experiments under more realistic conditions than has previously been<br />
attempted. The UV fluence levels used before repair were similar to fluences recommended for water disinfection<br />
(40 – 60 mJ/cm 2 and 100 – 120 mJ/cm 2 for drinking and reuse water, respectively). The relationship between UV<br />
fluence and the amount <strong>of</strong> repair was <strong>of</strong> particular interest, since it is known that with increasing UV fluence the<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> repair decreases. The exact quantification <strong>of</strong> dark repair after 48 h was also investigated and compared to<br />
the regrowth potential <strong>of</strong> E. coli after post disinfection conditions (including high numbers <strong>of</strong> inactivated cells in<br />
water and potential chemical byproducts <strong>of</strong> disinfection). The results indicated limited E. coli repair with an<br />
average photorepair <strong>of</strong> 0.3 (+- 0.19) log and no dark repair after 48 h when corrected for regrowth. The regrowth<br />
<strong>of</strong> the E coli in the presence <strong>of</strong> inactivated bacteria followed a logarithmic trend in every case with a sharp increase<br />
in E. coli numbers when the initial bacterial concentration was low and slower increase with the initial bacterial<br />
concentration being higher. The initial E. coli concentration usually at least doubled after 48 h <strong>of</strong> liquid holding and<br />
in some cases increased up to 4 logs from the initial concentration. In the future, more detailed studies should be<br />
performed regarding the regrowth <strong>of</strong> disinfection survivors after treatment since some <strong>of</strong> the regrowth rates<br />
reported herein could have significant impact on the safety <strong>of</strong> treated water. On the other hand we contributed to<br />
the literature that indicates E. coli repair in treated water and after using UV fluences for water disinfection should<br />
not be <strong>of</strong> concern to operators <strong>of</strong> water treatment plants, since the repair rates are negligible.<br />
73<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-1<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Novel UV LED Advanced Oxidation System for Disinfection and<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> Organic and Heavy Metal Contaminants in Water<br />
Tom Hawkins, Ph.D., and Mark Owen<br />
Puralytics, 15250 NW Greenbrier Pkwy, Beaverton, OR, USA 97006-5764<br />
A novel technology is described, suitable for point <strong>of</strong> use (POU)/point <strong>of</strong> entry (POE) water purification systems,<br />
that uses a dual wavelength UV LED system to excite a fixed-substrate photocatalyst. This advanced oxidation<br />
process rapidly mineralizes organic and inorganic contaminants in water without the chemicals, consumables, toxic<br />
waste, pressure drop, or water wastage <strong>of</strong> traditional solutions. With a self-cleaning fixed photocatalytic substrate,<br />
uniform LED illumination, and extremely high surface area, the system is inherently compact, lightweight,<br />
scalable, and low-maintenance. The process combines photolysis, germicidal disinfection, photocatalysis, and<br />
photo-adsorption to effectively eliminate many contaminants in water without creating any waste stream. Reported<br />
tests confirm successful disinfection <strong>of</strong> Raoultella Terrigena bacteria and MS2 phage virus, removal <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />
metals including arsenic and lead, and the elimination <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> organic chemicals from water, including<br />
phenol, MTBE, and PCE.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
74
Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-2<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
UV Advanced Oxidation Processes for Taste and Odor Treatment:<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Assimilable Organic Carbon<br />
Formation Potential at an Indiana WTP<br />
James Collins 1 , Christine Cotton 1 , Bruce Heeke 2 , David Dahl 3 , and Alan Royce 4<br />
1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Tucson, Arizona<br />
2. Patoka Lake Region Water and Sewer District<br />
3. Midwestern Engineers<br />
4. Trojan Technologies<br />
In recent years, the Patoka Lake Water Regional Water and Sewer District is a utility that has experienced seasonal<br />
taste and odor events that have become a major water quality concern. In 2007, the lake experienced a taste and<br />
odor event with 2-Methylisoborneol (MIB) levels measured as high as 240 nanograms per liter. The District<br />
evaluated various treatment techniques that would be capable <strong>of</strong> achieving up to a 1.8-log reduction <strong>of</strong> MIB.<br />
The treatment techniques considered include UV advanced oxidation process (AOP), ozone, peroxone, granular<br />
activated carbon, and powdered activated carbon.<br />
UV AOPs has been shown to reduce taste and odor compounds such as MIB and Geosmin. One advantage <strong>of</strong> UV<br />
AOPs is the ability <strong>of</strong> the UV equipment to operate in either disinfection mode or taste and odor mode with one<br />
manufacturer’s equipment. This ability reduces the overall operation and maintenance costs due to reduced power<br />
consumption during non-taste and odor events. However, for disinfection, UV reactors are typically installed after<br />
the filters to treat the highest quality water available, to meet LT2ESWTR requirements, and to minimize capital<br />
and operation costs. Oxidation processes can have the potential disadvantage <strong>of</strong> generating assimilable organic<br />
carbon (AOC) that can stimulate microbial growth in the distribution system. AOC generation can be controlled if<br />
bi<strong>of</strong>ilters are installed after the AOP process, as is typical with ozone treatment. However, for UV disinfection to<br />
achieve disinfection credit, the UV AOP system needs to be installed downstream <strong>of</strong> the filters.<br />
The overall effectiveness <strong>of</strong> UV AOPs has been documented in the literature. However, to date, no data regarding<br />
AOC formation following UV AOPs for taste and odor treatment have been published. For UV AOPs used for<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> other environmental pollutants, available data suggest that AOC can be created. However, the UV<br />
dose or Electrical Energy per Order <strong>of</strong> Destruction (EEOs) (typically used in UV AOP applications) for taste and<br />
odor compounds is lower for MIB and Geosmin compared to most environmental pollutants. Relatively, the<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> AOC by UV AOPs is expected to be lower than that <strong>of</strong> other technologies (e.g. ozone) given the<br />
fundamental reaction mechanisms at work in UV AOP systems. In general, the impact on AOC generation at the<br />
EEOs required for taste and odor reduction is not well characterized, is water quality dependant, and will determine<br />
whether UV AOP is feasible at this WTPs.<br />
This paper will describe the following items:<br />
• Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> UV AOP for taste and odor reduction<br />
• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> UV AOP effectiveness for MIB reduction<br />
• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> AOC generation in relation to MIB reduction, its affect on UV AOP placement within the<br />
WTP, and potential effects in the distribution system<br />
• A cost comparison <strong>of</strong> UV AOPs, ozone, peroxone, granular activated carbon, and powdered activated<br />
carbon for taste and odor treatment based on this study<br />
75<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-3<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Toxicity Assessment and Identification <strong>of</strong> Oxidation Byproducts Generated<br />
During the Ozonation <strong>of</strong> Natural Water Containing Pesticide<br />
Pamela Chelme-Ayala, Mohamed Gamal El-Din, and Daniel W. Smith<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, 3-133 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2W2, Canada<br />
The generation <strong>of</strong> intermediates, in some cases more toxic than the parent compounds, that can appear in the<br />
treated water is one <strong>of</strong> the drawbacks <strong>of</strong> advanced oxidation processes. In this study, the formation <strong>of</strong> byproducts<br />
generated during the treatment <strong>of</strong> a natural water containing the pesticide trifluralin by ozonation and ozone<br />
plus hydrogen peroxide was investigated. The results indicated that the primary oxidation byproducts were<br />
2,6-dinitro-4-trifluoromethyaniline and 4-trifluoromethyaniline. To examine the treatment efficiency, the acute<br />
toxicity <strong>of</strong> untreated and ozonated samples was assessed using the Microtox ® bioassay. The results showed<br />
a toxicity decrease in the initial stages <strong>of</strong> treatment. Then, the toxicity <strong>of</strong> the samples was found to increase at the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
76
Tuesday PM – Session 17: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S17-4<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Evaluating the Effects <strong>of</strong> Source Water Quality<br />
on Bromate Mitigation Performance<br />
Zaid Chowdhury 1 , David Eberle 1 , Laurel Passantino 1 , Joe Kurrus 2 , and Linda Bezy-Botma 2<br />
1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.<br />
2. City <strong>of</strong> Peoria, AZ<br />
Over the course <strong>of</strong> the past three years, mitigation <strong>of</strong> ozone-induced bromate by carbon dioxide and the innovative<br />
chlorine/ammonia processes was studied at the Greenway Water Treatment Plant located in Peoria, AZ. Following<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> a full-scale evaluation indicating that bromate mitigation via pH depression and chlorine/ammonia<br />
addition were able to reduce bromate formation by 35 percent or more, additional bench-scale testing was<br />
performed to assess the influence <strong>of</strong> source water quality on bromate formation, especially with respect to bromide<br />
concentrations. Results from the bench-scale testing indicated that, while both strategies were effective at<br />
mitigating bromate formation in some waters, neither process was expected to reduce bromate formation below<br />
8 µg/L on a consistent basis. Carbon dioxide addition appeared to perform slightly more consistently compared to<br />
the chlorine/ammonia process; however, based on other economic, social, and environmental considerations not<br />
discussed in this study, the chlorine/ammonia process appeared to be the best alternative to mitigate bromate<br />
formation in order to allow higher ozone dosages and thereby enhance taste, odor, and TOC removal.<br />
77<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-1<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Monte Carlo Ray Trace Model:<br />
A New Approach in Determining Fluence Rates in UV Systems<br />
Khoi Nguyen and Jaewan Yoon<br />
Old Dominion University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norfolk, Virginia<br />
A robust Monte Carlo Ray Trace algorithm and model were recently developed to determine fluence rates in a<br />
three-dimensional space <strong>of</strong> UV systems. Using this model, millions <strong>of</strong> random light energy bundles are simulated<br />
from each UV lamp and are traced through the system. The model accounts for inherent variation in emissions<br />
from lamps and UV systems, effects <strong>of</strong> multiple reflections, lamp shadowing in multiple lamp systems, and other<br />
geometric factors <strong>of</strong> the systems, to truthfully reflect realistic physical settings. Consistent fluence rate estimates<br />
were successfully obtained, and model results were found to be in excellent agreement with observed experimental<br />
data obtained from two independent sources and the PSS Model.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
78
Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-2<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Two Methods for Measuring the<br />
UV Output <strong>of</strong> Low Pressure Mercury Lamps in Air<br />
G. Elliott Whitby 1* , Bill Sotirakos 1 , and James R. Bolton 2<br />
1. Calgon Carbon Canada, 50 Mural St., Unit #3, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4B 1E4<br />
2. Bolton Photosciences Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres., Edmonton, AB, Canada T6R 2M5<br />
A standard bioassay has never been accepted for sizing UV systems for disinfecting non-reuse wastewaters. The majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> UV systems for non-water reuse applications are sized using a computer program called UVDIS. This requires the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> the UV output <strong>of</strong> a lamp measured in air. Over estimates <strong>of</strong> lamp output can lead to undersized UV systems. A standard<br />
measurement method does not exist, but one has been proposed by the IUVA Manufacturers’ Council based on the Keitz<br />
method. This method and another method called ‘integration over a sphere’ were compared using a low pressure high<br />
output UV lamp. The two methods gave the same results within experimental error. The results also showed that the<br />
conditions for testing a lamp must be carefully defined for that particular lamp. A standard bioassay must be developed for<br />
UV systems for non-reuse wastewater.<br />
79<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-3<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Method for Measurement <strong>of</strong> Output <strong>of</strong> Low Pressure Mercury Lamps [1]<br />
Volker Adam, Ralf Dreiskemper, Martin Kessler<br />
Heraeus Noblelight GmbH, Heraeusstr. 12-14, 63450 Hanau, Germany<br />
Facing the challenge <strong>of</strong> designing UV systems to meet specific disinfection requirements has become increasingly<br />
more complex with the various lamp technologies and configurations available. Whether the chosen design method<br />
is a calculated sizing model, such as point source summation, or biological verification, it is important to adhere to<br />
strictly defined experimental protocols and quality controls. This is most apparent when considering technology<br />
comparisons from different manufacturers. In particular the lamp output measurement procedure used can<br />
significantly affect the outcome <strong>of</strong> measurement results. If the tests are conducted under identical protocols, a<br />
proper and fair comparison between competing lamps is feasible. Therefore the IUVA Manufacturers Council<br />
organized a taskforce in 2007, with the aim <strong>of</strong> preparing a consistent method for the determination and<br />
benchmarking <strong>of</strong> UV lamp output from monochromatic (254 nm) lamps operated by a corresponding power supply<br />
(ballast). The goal was for this method to be used for testing and comparing testing results from different<br />
laboratories. As a further step the taskforce arranged an intercomparison program for laboratory testing <strong>of</strong> a sample<br />
batch <strong>of</strong> LPM lamps in a number <strong>of</strong> locations in Europe and North America. This round robin test will help<br />
determine the suitability <strong>of</strong> this testing method and provide an indication <strong>of</strong> the measurement uncertainty.<br />
This paper outlines the lamp measurement method drafted by the task force and subsequently published in the<br />
IUVA News. In addition this paper will present the method and the results <strong>of</strong> the LPML intercomparison program.<br />
The paper which gave the basis for the talk and is cited here was published previously in the IUVA news<br />
April 2008 [1]<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
80
Tuesday PM – Session 18: Modeling UV Systems – S18-4<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Controlling Mercury Release with UV Lamp Sleeve Breaks<br />
Harold Wright, Ed Wicklein, and Corianne Hart<br />
Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho 83713<br />
The Water Research Foundation funded an evaluation <strong>of</strong> mercury release and control with drinking water<br />
UV disinfection. Experimental studies show that the mass <strong>of</strong> mercury released when an amalgam low-pressure<br />
high-output lamp breaks is orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude less than when a MP lamp breaks. The difference is likely related<br />
to the amount <strong>of</strong> mercury in the vapor phase during lamp operation, which is notably greater with MP lamps<br />
because they operate at high temperatures. The advective-dispersion equation can be used to model mercury<br />
transport in pipes while tracer studies or CFD can be used to model transport through basins and other structures.<br />
Transport models can be used to locate valves to contain mercury release and define water-sampling plans.<br />
Low velocity zones, however, will not contain the initial mercury release.<br />
81<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-1<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
High Energy Efficiency and Small Footprint with High-Wattage<br />
Low Pressure UV Disinfection for Water Reuse<br />
Andrew Salveson 1 , Tavy Wade1, Keith G. Bircher 2 , and Bill Sotirakos 2<br />
1. Carollo Engineers<br />
2. Calgon Carbon Corporation<br />
Wastewater treatment plants <strong>of</strong>ten use lamp racks oriented horizontally in the direction <strong>of</strong> flow in an open channel. The lamps<br />
emit Ultraviolet Light (UV) that inactivates pathogenic microorganisms rendering the water safe for discharge to a receiving<br />
water body or for re-use <strong>of</strong> the water (irrigation, indirect potable re-use, industrial use, gray water for non-potable use, etc.)<br />
The racks hold lamps in an array dispersed over the cross section <strong>of</strong> the channel such that none <strong>of</strong> the water flowing down the<br />
channel passes too far from any one lamp.<br />
Early UV systems using conventional low pressure mercury arc lamps have a lamp spacing <strong>of</strong> approximately 7.5 cm in a<br />
square array. With 2.5 cm diameter quartz tubes this means that the maximum distance from any lamp is approximately 4 cm.<br />
This provides sufficient space for the water to pass between the lamps without undue head loss and is close enough to achieve<br />
adequate penetration <strong>of</strong> the UV to all areas and hence adequate disinfection. These low pressure systems have lamps with a<br />
total power consumption <strong>of</strong> under 100 Watts and a UVC (germicidal UV) output <strong>of</strong> under 50 Watts.<br />
Subsequent advancement in lamp technology has produced low pressure lamps with higher output. Higher lamp output means<br />
that more water can be disinfected per lamp, and hence the flow <strong>of</strong> water must be increased proportional to the lamp UVC<br />
output. However due to head loss limits across a bank <strong>of</strong> lamps (too high a head loss means that the level <strong>of</strong> water upstream <strong>of</strong><br />
the bank must increase and some <strong>of</strong> the water will spill over the top <strong>of</strong> the lamp bank and not be adequately treated), the lamp<br />
spacing must be increased to accommodate the greater water flow. For example lamps with an electrical consumption <strong>of</strong> 250<br />
Watts and UVC output <strong>of</strong> approximately 100 Watts must be accommodated in arrays with 10 cm lamp spacing. The additional<br />
area for the flow <strong>of</strong> water limits the velocity and hence head loss across the lamp bank. However this increased lamp spacing<br />
reduces the irradiance at the furthest point from the lamps resulting in some decrease in the performance efficiency.<br />
More recent development <strong>of</strong> even higher powered lamps (500 Watts, with 200 Watts UVC output) would potentially result in<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> lamps needed being reduced to half that <strong>of</strong> systems employing 250 Watt lamps. However this means that the<br />
flow per lamp must be doubled, resulting in a quadrupling in the head loss across a lamp bank unless the spacing <strong>of</strong> the lamps<br />
is increased further still. Increasing the spacing beyond 10 cm potentially results in a further reduction in treatment efficiency,<br />
negating the potential advantages <strong>of</strong> fewer higher power lamps.<br />
This paper presents results <strong>of</strong> bioassay testing at a WWTP in California <strong>of</strong> a Calgon Carbon C3500 system with 500 Watt Low<br />
Pressure amalgam lamps that has overcome this lamp spacing/pressure drop barrier.<br />
The pilot test consisted <strong>of</strong> 2 banks <strong>of</strong> lamps each with a 4 x 4 lamp array for a total <strong>of</strong> 32 lamps. Flow rates from 250 to 4000<br />
gpm and UVT’s from 35 to 70%T were tested.<br />
The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this system are that fewer lamps are needed than previous systems while still maintaining high<br />
electrical efficiency. This results in a system with a smaller footprint, reducing installation costs, and lower operating and<br />
maintenance costs.<br />
An economic analysis at a California Title 22 reuse site will be presented comparing the installed and operating costs <strong>of</strong> this<br />
system with a conventional lower powered LP system and a closed pipe medium pressure lamp system.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
82
Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-2<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> UV Disinfection Combined with Chlorination/Chloramination on<br />
the Formation <strong>of</strong> Nitrogenous Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water<br />
Amisha D. Shah 1 , Aaron A. Dotson 2 , Karl G. Linden 2 , Howard S. Weinberg 3 , and William A. Mitch 1<br />
1. Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering, Yale University, 9 Hillhouse Ave., New Haven, CT 06520,<br />
2. Department <strong>of</strong> Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Engineering Center ECOT,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309<br />
3. Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill,<br />
1303 Michael Hooker Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599<br />
Our study’s focus was to understand the role UV treatment had on forming selected nitrogenous DBPs, including<br />
haloacetonitriles, halonitromethanes, and nitrosamines under various operating and water quality conditions.<br />
Preliminary experiments investigated DOM isolates dosed with elevated nitrate concentrations. These samples<br />
were exposed to either low pressure (LP) or medium pressure (MP) UV sources combined with<br />
chlorination/chloramination where their order was varied. In certain cases, dichloroacetonitrile (DCAN) formation<br />
decreased when UV exposure was followed by chloramination in comparison to chloramination alone but remained<br />
constant when chloramination was added prior to UV exposure. Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and<br />
dimethylnitramine (DMNA) concentrations were found to increase upon similar MP 1000 mJ/cm 2 UV exposure<br />
followed by chlorination in comparison to chlorination alone. We are pursuing bench scale experiments to better<br />
understand formation mechanisms. Overall, this study will assist in understanding the potential various<br />
UV/chlorination/chloramination treatment schemes will have on forming nitrogenous DBPs and therefore provide<br />
guidance for utilities considering UV treatment.<br />
83<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-3<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
High Intensity Pulsed Lamps for Water Treatment: Review and Status<br />
Ray Schaefer and Michael Grapperhaus<br />
Phoenix Science & Technology, Inc., Chelmsford, MA 01824<br />
This talk reviews the characteristics <strong>of</strong> pulsed lamps and the limitations <strong>of</strong> commercial flash lamps for practical<br />
water treatment. Selected research on enhanced treatment rates from pulsed light is included. A status report<br />
is given on recent and ongoing research to increase lifetime and reduce the life-cycle cost <strong>of</strong> pulsed lamps.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
84
Tuesday PM – Session 19: UV Disinfection Research – S19-4<br />
Meeting Room: Crispus Attucks<br />
An Empirical Method for Accurately Sizing Wastewater<br />
UV Reactors for Disinfection <strong>of</strong> any Microorganism<br />
Harold Wright 1 , Andrew Salveson 1 , Tavy Wade, Sean Poust 1 , Allan Slater 2 ,<br />
Duncan Collins 2 , Jeremy Meier 2 , and Ian Dearnley 2<br />
1. 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94598<br />
2. Severn Trent Services, 580 Virginia Drive, Suite 300, Ft. Washington, PA 19034<br />
The reduction equivalent dose (RED) measured during biodosimetric UV validation depends on the test microbe’s<br />
UV dose-response kinetics as well as the reactor’s UV dose distribution. Because <strong>of</strong> these effects, the RED<br />
delivered to the test microbe will differ from the RED delivered to a target pathogen or indicator microbe if the<br />
dose-response <strong>of</strong> the test microbe differs from that <strong>of</strong> the pathogen or indicator. The difference is referred to as the<br />
RED bias. Recently, two approaches have been developed and demonstrated with drinking water UV reactors for<br />
analyzing validation data that accounts for the RED bias. This paper reports on the application <strong>of</strong> these methods<br />
with a wastewater UV reactor. The first approach incorporates a term for the UV sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the microbe into the<br />
equation used to fit the validation data. The second approach incorporates a lognormal prediction <strong>of</strong> the UV<br />
reactor’s dose distribution into the dose-monitoring algorithm and predicts log inactivation using the microbe’s UV<br />
dose-response curve. Both approaches calibrated using validation data measured using MS2 and T1 phage provided<br />
accurate predictions <strong>of</strong> the log inactivation <strong>of</strong> QB phage, fecal coliform, and total coliform.<br />
85<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-1<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Advanced Oxidation Process – Effective and Technical Suitable for<br />
Micropollutant Removal in Contaminated Water Sources<br />
J. Krüger1, A. Ried 1 , K. Teunissen 2 , A.H. Knol 2 , and D. Csalovszki 3<br />
1. ITT W&WW WEDECO GmbH, Boschstr. 6, 32051 Herford, Germany<br />
2. DZH & Delft University <strong>of</strong> Technology PO 34, 2270 AA Voorburg, Netherlands<br />
3. ITT W&WW USA WEDECO Products, 14125 South Bridge Circle, Charlotte, NC 28273<br />
Treatment concepts for drinking water supplies are <strong>of</strong>ten limited by their potential to remove emerging<br />
contaminants. Contamination <strong>of</strong> different water sources, e.g. river water, bank filtrate, lake water or ground water<br />
by micropollutants is a growing concern and is under investigation by several programs.<br />
Future treatment concepts need to be able to remove preferably all <strong>of</strong> the new discussed micropollutants. Therefore<br />
the right multiple barrier approach is required. Advanced oxidation is one option to upgrade treatment processes.<br />
Consulting engineers and end users are in need <strong>of</strong> a cost-effective solution to treat micropollutants <strong>of</strong> concern.<br />
As the concern about emerging contaminants grows, it is only a matter <strong>of</strong> time until they become regulated.<br />
Ozone treatment and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation are well known as individual treatment steps for oxidation or<br />
disinfection purposes. The combination <strong>of</strong> ozone and UV-radiation on one hand or ozone or UV and hydrogen<br />
peroxide on the other hand results in a more powerful process. These combined processes are able to remove many<br />
<strong>of</strong> the investigated micropollutants efficiently and in accordance with applicable regulations.<br />
Mobile pilot units were designed to test the different advanced oxidation processes based on ozone, UV and<br />
hydrogen peroxide. Pilot trials were conducted with different types <strong>of</strong> waters and varying contaminants.<br />
One groundwater studied was contaminated with 1.4 Dioxane and Trichlorethene, and pretreated river water was<br />
synthetically polluted by Atrazine, Isoproturone, Carbamazepine, Dicl<strong>of</strong>enac, Ibupr<strong>of</strong>ene, Amidotrizoic acid,<br />
Iohexol and MTBE.<br />
The achieved results indicated that all <strong>of</strong> these micropollutants could be removed by the advanced oxidation<br />
processes. The AOP O 3 /H 2 O 2 showed in both cases the best performance regarding the operational costs and the<br />
achieved degradation rates.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
86
Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-2<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Bromate Pre-systemic Detoxification Metabolism Research Progress<br />
Joseph Cotruvo 1* , Richard Bull 2 , Brian Cummings 3 , Jeffrey Fisher 3 , Zhongxian Guo 4 ,<br />
Choon Nam Ong 5 , Oscar Quinones 6 , Shane Snyder 6 , Jason Keith 7 ,<br />
Gilbert Gordon 7 , and Gilbert Pacey 7<br />
1. Joseph Cotruvo & Associates LLC, Washington, DC, USA.<br />
2. MoBull Consulting, Richland, Washington, USA.<br />
3. University <strong>of</strong> Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.<br />
4. PUB Waterhub Centre for Advanced Water Technology, Singapore.<br />
5. National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore.<br />
6. Southern Nevada Water Authority, Henderson, Nevada, USA.<br />
7. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.<br />
Bromate causes cancer in test animals at high doses and it limits use <strong>of</strong> ozone in desalination, indirect or direct water<br />
recycling, bottled water production and ground source drinking waters due to ozone’s ability to convert natural bromide to<br />
bromate. Bromate is also a contaminant in hypochlorite produced from electrolysis <strong>of</strong> salt that contains small amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
bromide. National standards and the WHO <strong>Guide</strong>lines for bromate are 10 ug/l based upon a hypothetical incremental<br />
lifetime cancer risk <strong>of</strong> approximately 1/10,000 depending upon which risk model is applied. All <strong>of</strong> the standards are subject<br />
to being lowered as the result <strong>of</strong> improved analytical methods and quantitation that is now on the order <strong>of</strong> 1 ug/l.<br />
The critical issue for current and future standards is the potential cancer risk at low drinking water doses. We are<br />
conducting studies aimed at producing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for the rat and humans<br />
quantifying the detoxification after ingestion and before it would reach a target organ like the kidney. A revised risk<br />
assessment will be computed using that mechanistic information at environmentally relevant doses. Pre-systemic<br />
metabolism can occur to varying degrees at least in the stomach. Significant metabolism occurs in the liver and blood. We<br />
have studied the kinetics and conditions <strong>of</strong> bromate decomposition in simulated stomach acid, by intravenous injection and<br />
after ingestion. It would be ideal if ingestion doses could be identified where bromate will be virtually completely<br />
detoxified before reaching a target organ so that the more accurate dose response can be determined at low doses. If the<br />
initial results are verified it is possible that bromate might ultimately be considered to be a practical threshold carcinogen<br />
with essentially no risk below the threshold metabolism dose.<br />
87<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-3<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies on Decomposition<br />
Reactions <strong>of</strong> Pyrrolidone Derivatives Using O 3<br />
Yu Tachibana, Masanobu Nogami, Yuichi Sugiyama, and Yasuhisa Ikeda<br />
Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors, Tokyo Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />
2-12-1-N1-34 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan<br />
Decomposition reactions <strong>of</strong> pyrrolidone derivatives (NRPs: R = methyl(M), ethyl(E), propyl(Pro), n-butyl(B),<br />
pentyl(P), iso-butyl(iB), cyclohexyl(C) groups) using O 3 have been studied at pH 2.0 and 288 K. The reaction rate<br />
was found to be expressed as k[NRPs][O 3 ] D ([O 3 ] D = the concentrations <strong>of</strong> dissolved O 3 ). It was found that the rate<br />
constants (k) slightly increase with increasing the length <strong>of</strong> alkyl groups and that the k value (2.93 ± 0.01 M -1 s -1 )<br />
<strong>of</strong> NBP is larger than that (2.67 ± 0.10 M -1 s -1 ) <strong>of</strong> more bulky NiBP. These results suggest that the decomposition<br />
reactions <strong>of</strong> NRPs with O 3 proceed through the attack <strong>of</strong> O 3 to N atom in NRPs.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
88
Tuesday PM – Session 20: AOP and Ozone Byproducts – S20-4<br />
Meeting Room: William Dawes<br />
Ozone Disinfection Reduces Disinfection Byproduct Formation<br />
to Comply with New Stage 2 DBP and LT2 Requirements<br />
Michael A. Oneby 1 , Richard Lin 2 , James H. Borchardt 2 ,<br />
and Charles O. Bromley 3<br />
1. MWH Americas, 789 N. Water St, Suite 430, Milwaukee, WI 53202-3558, USA<br />
2. MWH Americas, 618 Michillinda Ave., Suite 200, Arcadia, CA 91007, USA<br />
3. MWH Americas, 3010 W. Charleston Blvd, Suite 100, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA<br />
Four conventional surface water treatment plants owned and operated by a California water agency (Agency)<br />
integrated an ozone disinfection process into existing conventional treatment trains that produce potable water for<br />
several communities. Ozone replaced chlorine gas enabling the agency to meet regulated disinfection byproduct<br />
(DBP) limits for regulated trihalomethane (THM) and haloacetic acid (HAA) compounds at all sample locations in<br />
the respective distribution systems as required by the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule<br />
(Stage 2 DBP). The Stage 1 and Stage 2 DBP Rules, intended to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> adverse health effects, regulate<br />
two groups <strong>of</strong> chlorinated organic compound which are byproducts <strong>of</strong> chlorine disinfection, specifically four<br />
trihalomethane compounds known as total trihalomethane (TTHM) and five haloacetic acid compounds (HAA5).<br />
The existing treatment plants were able to meet the DBP limits with chlorine disinfection under the Stage 1 DBP<br />
Rule which allowed averaging <strong>of</strong> TTHM and HAA5 across all the distribution system sample points. Under the<br />
Stage 2 DBP Rule, community water systems must meet TTHM and HAA5 limits at each sample point using a<br />
calculation known as the locational running annual average (LRAA). To comply with the Stage 2 DBP Rule, the<br />
Agency authorized on a DBP control project which included construction <strong>of</strong> an ozone facility at each <strong>of</strong> its<br />
treatment plants. The agency’s treatment plants, classified as Bin 1 in the Long Term 2 Surface Water Treatment<br />
Rule (LT2), achieve inactivation requirements for Giardia lamblia and viruses using intermediate ozone. Under<br />
Bin 1, water systems are not required to achieve inactivation credits for Cryptosporidium in the primary<br />
disinfection process. Operation <strong>of</strong> the treatment plants employ control strategies that minimize the applied<br />
ozone dose and limit bromate formation. The ozone facilities were constructed in 2008 and began operation in<br />
early 2009.<br />
89<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-1<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Comparison Testing <strong>of</strong> ‘Spot’ vs. ‘Pellet’ LPHO UV Lamps<br />
Mike Santelli 1* and James R. Bolton 2<br />
1. Light Sources Inc., 37 Robinson Blvd., Orange, CT 06477<br />
2. Bolton Photosciences Inc., 628 Cheriton Cres., NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6R 2M5<br />
Two types <strong>of</strong> amalgam low pressure high output lamps (one with a ‘spot’ amalgam and another with a ‘pellet’<br />
amalgam) have been examined in a simulated UV reactor with a quartz sleeve and water flowing outside the quartz<br />
sleeve. These lamps were operated at 100%, 80% and 60% full power. It was found that the ‘pellet’ type amalgam<br />
lamps had superior performance at reduced power levels as compared to the ‘spot’ type lamps.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
90
Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-2<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Measurements <strong>of</strong> UV Lamp Performance<br />
in Near-Field and Far-Field Apparatus<br />
G. Fang, D.G. Knight, R. Kilgour, and T. Molyneux<br />
Trojan Technologies, 3020 Gore Road, London, Ontario, Canada N5V 4T7<br />
Low pressure mercury arc lamps have been widely used as an effective ultraviolet (UV) light source for<br />
disinfection <strong>of</strong> water. The UV flux <strong>of</strong> a lamp is normally measured in air, and referred as far-field (FF)<br />
measurement. When a UV lamp is operating in a sleeve in water, the measurement <strong>of</strong> the UV irradiance in water is<br />
referred as near-field (NF) measurement. The advantage <strong>of</strong> the NF measurement is that it represents the true lamp<br />
operating conditions, and the NF method has become acceptable in the UV industry. However, the NF<br />
measurement only detects the UV irradiance from a portion <strong>of</strong> the lamp, and it is difficult to directly obtain the UV<br />
flux <strong>of</strong> the lamp. The relationship between the NF and the FF measurements could be a key to determine how a<br />
lamp is performing under field operating conditions. It has been previously demonstrated that a NF measurement<br />
technique can reliably determine the UV lamp relative output, and there are several methods that could be applied<br />
to relate the FF results to those in the NF measurement. This paper examines the relationship between the UV flux<br />
from the FF measurement and the UV irradiance from the NF measurement when the lamp is overheated. The<br />
study includes the relationship at different water temperatures and at different input powers. It demonstrates that<br />
the maximum NF irradiance <strong>of</strong> a lamp in water is proportional to the maximum UVC flux <strong>of</strong> a lamp. The better<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the lamp performance when operating in water in terms <strong>of</strong> UV flux and efficiency could lead to<br />
further optimization in UV lamp and reactor design.<br />
91<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-3<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> Computational Fluid Dynamics to Support Design<br />
<strong>of</strong> Full-Scale Wastewater UV Disinfection Channels<br />
Shanshan Jin and Melanie A. Mann<br />
Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., 11242 Waples Mill Road, Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22030<br />
An open channel UV disinfection facility using horizontal lamps was designed for disinfection <strong>of</strong> tertiary filter<br />
effluent at a peak flow <strong>of</strong> 37.5 MGD. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis was conducted to evaluate<br />
various UV channel configurations that could impact the velocity distribution approaching the UV lamps and affect<br />
UV dose delivery. Features evaluated included depth <strong>of</strong> the UV channel inlet, approach length upstream <strong>of</strong> the first<br />
UV bank, location <strong>of</strong> inlet isolation valves, and width <strong>of</strong> the UV channel inlet. For the configurations studied,<br />
the channel inlet depth and width affected the velocity distribution more than valve location and channel length.<br />
The final channel configuration was based on both modeling results and practical considerations.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
92
Tuesday PM – Session 21: Modeling UV Systems – S21-4<br />
Meeting Room: Molly Pitcher<br />
A Genomic Model for the Prediction <strong>of</strong> Ultraviolet<br />
Inactivation Rate Constants for RNA and DNA Viruses<br />
Wladyslaw J. Kowalski 1 , William P. Bahnfleth 2 , and Mark T. Hernandez 3<br />
1. Immune Building Systems, Inc., 575 Madison Ave., 10th Floor, New York, NY10022<br />
2. The Pennsylvania State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Architectural Engineering, University Park, PA 16802<br />
3. University <strong>of</strong> Colorado, UCB 428, Department <strong>of</strong> Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering,<br />
1111 Engineering Drive #441, Boulder, CO 80309<br />
A mathematical model is presented to explain the ultraviolet susceptibility <strong>of</strong> viruses in terms <strong>of</strong> genomic<br />
sequences that have a high potential for photodimerization. The specific sequences with high dimerization potential<br />
include doublets <strong>of</strong> thymine (TT), thymine-cytosine (TC), cytosine (CC), and triplets composed <strong>of</strong> single purines<br />
combined with pyrimidine doublets. The complete genomes <strong>of</strong> 49 animal viruses and bacteriophages were<br />
evaluated using base-counting s<strong>of</strong>tware to establish the frequencies <strong>of</strong> dimerizable doublets and triplets. The model<br />
also accounts for the effects <strong>of</strong> ultraviolet scattering. Constants defining the relative lethality <strong>of</strong> the four dimer<br />
types were determined via curve-fitting. A total 77 water-based UV rate constant data sets were used to represent<br />
22 DNA viruses. A total <strong>of</strong> 70 data sets were used to represent 27 RNA viruses. Predictions are provided for<br />
dozens <strong>of</strong> viruses <strong>of</strong> importance to human health that have not previously been tested for UV susceptibility.<br />
93<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />
Monday PM – Session P1 – P1-1<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Passivation, Fabrication and Maintenance Issues<br />
in Ozone and Oxygen Systems<br />
Patrick Banes, Michel Dalglish, Brent Ekstrand, Ph.D. and Daryl Roll, P.E.<br />
Astro Pak Corporation, 270 E. Baker Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626<br />
This paper addresses the corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> stainless steel in ozone and oxygen systems as affected by<br />
fabrication, operation and passivation. Oxygen cleaning, passivation, proper fabrication techniques and<br />
maintenance will extend the life and improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> ozone systems. Corrosion products and rouge are<br />
discussed regarding damage, remediation, maintenance and effective system monitoring.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
94
Monday PM – Session P1 – P1-2<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> additives on the degradation <strong>of</strong><br />
Reactive Black 5 (RB5) by simple ozonation<br />
Arizbeth A. Pérez Martínez and Tatyana Poznyak<br />
Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Química e Industrias Extractivas – Instituto Politécnico Nacional,<br />
(ESIQIE-IPN), Edif. 7, UPALM, C.P 07738, D.F, México.<br />
In this study, the oxidation with ozone <strong>of</strong> Reactive Black 5 (RB5) was performed. To simulate dye bath effluents<br />
from dyeing processes, Na 2 CO 3 (30 g/L) and Na 2 SO 4 (100 g/L) each one separately and in mixture were used. The<br />
operation conditions were following: ozonation in a semibatch reactor (250 mL) with a glass diffuser in the bottom<br />
was performed; the dye concentrations <strong>of</strong> 50 mg/L, with the initial ozone concentration <strong>of</strong> 35 mg/L and ozone flow<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.5 L/min at the initial pH <strong>of</strong> solution (5.10). Ozonation procedure was carried out in two stages: first, the dye<br />
ozonation without additives and second, in the presence <strong>of</strong> additives. In both cases, the dye degradation dynamic<br />
was obtained by UV/VIS spectroscopy at λ=311 nm. To control the ozonation efficiency the ozone consuming,<br />
pH and the electrical conductivity (just for the first case) were measured. In base <strong>of</strong> the results obtained we can<br />
conclude that the effect <strong>of</strong> the additives is most evident in presence <strong>of</strong> Na 2 CO 3 (30 g/L), so, the decoloration time<br />
decrease at 82% (from 4.0 to 0.75 min) in comparison to dye solution without additives, also the pH remained<br />
constant along the ozonation (pH=11.0) and the UV/VIS spectroscopy showed that the total degradation was<br />
achieved at 30 seconds <strong>of</strong> the reaction.<br />
95<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session P2 – P2-1<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Electrolytic Ozone Generation Using Solid Diamond Anodes<br />
Bill Yost<br />
Electrolytic Ozone Inc, Cambridge Innovation Center, One Broadway, Cambridge MA 02142<br />
Electrolytic ozone generation has been understood as a concept for many years and has been the focus <strong>of</strong> a<br />
substantial amount <strong>of</strong> practical research. Creating ozone directly in a stream <strong>of</strong> water from the water itself holds the<br />
promise <strong>of</strong> reducing system complexity when compared with conventional corona discharge technology. Indeed,<br />
many potential applications that cannot bear the expense <strong>of</strong> corona discharge systems could be addressed with<br />
small and inexpensive electrolytic cells. Unfortunately, efforts to commercialize electrolytic generators have been<br />
hampered by the lack <strong>of</strong> a suitable anode material.<br />
This paper explores the material properties essential to choosing an anode for use within an ozone generating cell.<br />
The specific criteria used for evaluation are: over-potential with respect to oxygen evolution, resistance to chemical<br />
wear, material stability and environmental impact. While noble metals (such as platinum) and lead dioxide exhibit<br />
sufficient over-potential to drive the reaction leading to the formation <strong>of</strong> O 3 from H 2 O, both suffer from reliability<br />
issues. Further the use <strong>of</strong> lead dioxide is restricted by the European Reduction <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Substances (RoHS)<br />
Directive <strong>of</strong> 2002.<br />
While diamond in its intrinsic state is a good electrical insulator, synthetic diamond can be doped with boron to a<br />
level that it exhibits metallic conduction. The combination <strong>of</strong> a strong resistance to chemical attack, electrical<br />
conductivity and a high over-potential makes diamond an ideal candidate for an anode material. This paper<br />
details the benefits <strong>of</strong> using boron-doped diamond and provides data on ozone output stability and expected<br />
anode lifetime.<br />
Since depositing diamond films on conductive substrates raises a series <strong>of</strong> concerns over coating integrity, adhesion<br />
and CTE mismatch, the focus <strong>of</strong> this paper is on thick-film (>400 µm) free-standing plates <strong>of</strong> CVD diamond.<br />
A novel cell configuration incorporating free-standing plates is shown to be a robust and cost-effective means<br />
for reliable, long-term electrolytic ozone generation.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
96
Tuesday AM – Session P2 – P2-2<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Ozone-Based Clean-In-Place (CIP) <strong>of</strong> Bioreactors<br />
Hossein Zarrin 1 , Brian Hagopian 2 , and Dr. Carl Lawton 3<br />
1. MKS Instruments Inc.<br />
2. Mar Cor Purification<br />
3. University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Lowell<br />
Ozone can replace chemicals, hot water, and steam in Clean-In-Place (CIP) <strong>of</strong> bioreactors, reducing rinse water and<br />
chemical usage while saving energy costs. CIP is a time-saving method <strong>of</strong> cleaning the interior surfaces <strong>of</strong> pipes,<br />
vessels, and process equipment, without disassembly. Conventional CIP processes require high temperatures and<br />
significant amounts <strong>of</strong> energy to heat the entire system for sanitization. Chemical detergents are <strong>of</strong>ten required for<br />
effective cleaning followed by large quantities <strong>of</strong> rinse water. Dissolved Ozone can improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
CIP at reduced temperatures, saving energy. This report describes a CIP system that demonstrates Ozonation as an<br />
effective alternative cleaning agent for CIP processes in biopharmaceutical applications. A practical example <strong>of</strong><br />
the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> an Ozone-based CIP system using a typical mammalian cell culture media and a<br />
microbial cell culture media is discussed. Cleanness is measured by testing the final rinse water for traces <strong>of</strong><br />
materials from the media using HPLC in comparison to traditional chemical CIP methods.<br />
97<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday AM – Session P2– P2-3<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Noteworthy Nuances <strong>of</strong> Constructing and Starting Up an Ozone System<br />
Ben Kuhne1 1 , Jack Bebee 1 , Robert W. H<strong>of</strong>fman 2 , and Stephanie Bishop 3<br />
1. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1525 Faraday Avenue, Suite 290, Carlsbad, CA 92008<br />
2. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 12400 Coit Road, Dallas, TX 75251<br />
3. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 2301 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 244, Maitland, FL 32751<br />
Ozone systems have a number <strong>of</strong> critical system components that require specific attention throughout construction<br />
and start-up. These components are <strong>of</strong>ten critical to the overall success <strong>of</strong> the project and even if clearly detailed in<br />
the design documents, specific attention must be given to these items during construction and start-up. Three case<br />
studies will identify some <strong>of</strong> the key items and how they were addressed in an effort to increase awareness in<br />
planning for and implementing future ozone systems. The first case study involved the expansion <strong>of</strong> a 72 million<br />
gallon per day (mgd) water treatment plant (WTP) to 87 mgd including the addition <strong>of</strong> sidestream raw water<br />
ozonation for enhanced coagulation and settled water ozonation in a concrete contactor structure for primary<br />
disinfection and taste and odor control. The second case study includes the construction <strong>of</strong> a 200 mgd concrete<br />
ozone contactor structure and ozone system for primary disinfection and taste and odor control. The third study<br />
involved installation <strong>of</strong> a 9 mgd sidestream ozone injection system for hydrogen sulfide removal.<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned case studies had its own unique purpose however they presented similar challenges<br />
during construction and start-up <strong>of</strong> the ozone systems. Several items encountered that required attention during<br />
construction include:<br />
• Delineation <strong>of</strong> Programming Responsibilities and Location <strong>of</strong> Programming.<br />
• Placement <strong>of</strong> Concrete for the Contactors to Ensure Successful Testing <strong>of</strong> the Concrete Contactor Structure<br />
and Ozone Piping to Ensure that it is an Airtight System.<br />
• Development <strong>of</strong> a Strategy to Transfer Operation after Completion <strong>of</strong> the System Installation and Testing.<br />
• Coordination <strong>of</strong> Piping, Valves and Instrumentation with the Ozone Equipment Provided.<br />
Several items encountered that required attention during start-up include:<br />
• Programming <strong>of</strong> Control System<br />
• Determination <strong>of</strong> Alarm Setpoints<br />
• Calibration <strong>of</strong> Instruments (Flowmeters, Temperature, Pressure, Dewpoint, Etc.)<br />
• Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Ozone Analyzer Instruments<br />
• Transfer <strong>of</strong> Analyzer Maintenance Responsibility from Ozone System Supplier (OSS) to Owner<br />
• Approach for Phased Release <strong>of</strong> Constituents <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Existing Filter Media<br />
This paper will discuss the common challenges faced with ozone systems during construction and start-up while<br />
focusing on the resolutions that were necessary to implement ozone systems that provide robust controls and are<br />
properly maintained.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
98
Tuesday AM – Session P2 – P2-4<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Pilot Test Results Perozone TM Injection Technology Kitchener, Ontario<br />
Dave Montgomery and Darko Strajin<br />
Trow Associates, Inc., 1595 Clark Boulevard, Brampton, Ontario, Canada<br />
The subject property is located in Kitchener, Ontario. It houses a single storey shopping mall constructed in<br />
the 1950s. The building has a partial basement.<br />
Environmental investigations revealed the presence <strong>of</strong> Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) above the current standards in<br />
soil and groundwater. The PCE impacts originated from historical operation <strong>of</strong> a dry cleaning facility. The lateral<br />
and vertical extents <strong>of</strong> the impacts had been delineated. The groundwater plume is mostly located beneath the<br />
building and is approximately 120m in diameter. Predominant soil type is sandy silt with sand layers and some<br />
silty clay lenses.<br />
Based on the site conditions, Trow conducted a pilot test implementing the Perozone technology.<br />
The Perozone injection technology is an in-Situ process which involves the injection <strong>of</strong> two chemical oxidants,<br />
gas phase ozone and an aqueous phase hydrogen peroxide by means <strong>of</strong> a micro-bubble sparging system.<br />
To start the process an air/ozone mixture and aqueous hydrogen peroxide mixture are delivered separately via<br />
individual supply lines to strategically placed subsurface sparge points where they are mixed. This causes fine<br />
micro-bubbles <strong>of</strong> ozone-containing air coated by a thin film <strong>of</strong> aqueous hydrogen peroxide liquid to be released<br />
from the sparge points. These air micro-bubbles, by means <strong>of</strong> conventional sparging, act to strip dissolved and<br />
adsorbed volatile chemicals as they begin to migrate through the subsurface soil. Since both the ozone and<br />
hydrogen peroxide are both strong chemical oxidants, as the VOCs contract and diffuse within the air bubbles, they<br />
are then oxidized and broken down by the ozone and hydrogen peroxide into carbon dioxide or less harmful<br />
compounds which can be found in the natural environment.<br />
The combination <strong>of</strong> the two oxidants also forms hydroxyl radicals, a very reactive non-selective chemical species,<br />
which readily breaks down a number <strong>of</strong> organic contaminants. The ozone and hydrogen peroxide degrade into<br />
molecular oxygen, which is beneficial both as an oxidant and for enhancing biodegradation mediated by aerobic<br />
microbes present in the subsurface environment. The combination <strong>of</strong> the ozone and hydrogen peroxide is used as<br />
an advanced oxidation process to destroy slow-to-degrade and recalcitrant organic compounds in both soil and<br />
groundwater. The Perozone injection system runs continuously following a pre-programmed injection sequence<br />
and duration for each injection point.<br />
In order to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the Perozone TM injection technology, Trow designed a pilot test consisting<br />
<strong>of</strong> four sub-surface sparge points and conducted controlled injections <strong>of</strong> ozone and hydrogen peroxide over a two<br />
month period.<br />
After a review <strong>of</strong> the groundwater monitoring and analytical results related to the Pilot Test <strong>of</strong> the Perozone TM<br />
injection/sparge point system, it is evident that application <strong>of</strong> this injection system has the potential to significantly<br />
lower the concentrations <strong>of</strong> VOCs in groundwater within a reasonable timeframe. Trow recommended the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> a full-scale remediation system.<br />
99<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-1<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
The Bioassay Validation and Real-Time UV Dose Monitoring are Essential<br />
for Maintaining UV Disinfection Efficacy in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing<br />
Ismail Gobulukoglu, Ph.D.<br />
Science and Technology Department, Aquafine Corporation, 29010 Avenue Paine, Valencia, CA 91355, USA.<br />
Water is commonly used as a raw material and ingredient in the processing, formulation and manufacture <strong>of</strong><br />
pharmaceutical products. Microbial control at various points in the process loop is achieved by UV water<br />
disinfection systems. It is critical that these UV systems are properly sized for the water process parameters, and<br />
monitored for ensuring their continuous desired disinfection efficiencies. However, equipment design, reactor<br />
efficiency and performance vary with each manufacturer’s reactor. Therefore, bioassay validation is a safeguard to<br />
ensure the disinfection performance achieved by UV systems is equal to, or better than, theoretical predictions <strong>of</strong><br />
their performance and it is a physical verification that UV systems will perform as expected since their<br />
performance data is generated from real-world testing at a UV dose <strong>of</strong> 40 mJ/cm2 over a range <strong>of</strong> flows using<br />
EPA/DVGW validation protocol. The importance <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> bioassay validated UV systems along with their real<br />
time UV dose monitoring in the pharmaceutical applications will be discussed.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
100
Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-2<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> a CFD Simulation <strong>of</strong> the UV/H 2 O 2 Advanced Oxidation Process<br />
Scott M. Alpert, P.E. 1 and Joel J. Ducoste, Ph.D. 2<br />
1. HDR Engineering, Inc. <strong>of</strong> the Carolinas, Charlotte, NC<br />
2. NC State University, Raleigh, NC<br />
In order to meet the growing needs <strong>of</strong> the water treatment community in the treatment <strong>of</strong> emerging organic<br />
contaminants, a CFD model was developed to simulate the UV/hydrogen peroxide advanced oxidation process.<br />
Design and optimization <strong>of</strong> UV/H2O 2 systems must incorporate both reactor design (i.e., hydrodynamics and lamp<br />
orientation) and chemical kinetics (reaction mechanisms and kinetic rate constants). In this CFD model, the<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> turbulence sub-models, fluence rate sub-models, and kinetic rate equations results in a<br />
comprehensive and flexible design tool for predicting the effluent chemical composition from a UV-initiated AOP<br />
reactor. To validate the CFD simulation, the results <strong>of</strong> the model under various operating conditions were<br />
compared to pilot reactor trials for the target contaminants <strong>of</strong> an organic dye (methylene blue) and an antibiotic<br />
(sulfamethoxazole). The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the model to design conditions such as lamp output power and flow rate was<br />
determined. In addition, the effluent concentration dependence on the turbulence closure model, the fluence rate<br />
distribution model, and the reaction mechanism kinetics was evaluated. CFD for advanced oxidation process<br />
analysis is an important numerical tool for engineers in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> systems designed to degrade organic<br />
contaminants within water, wastewater, or industrial discharge systems. The optimization <strong>of</strong> such processes,<br />
including energy usage and hydrogen peroxide dosage, will be instrumental in allowing utilities to incorporate<br />
advanced oxidation systems for the removal <strong>of</strong> emerging contaminants.<br />
101<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-3<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Regenerating Spent Zeolites with UV and UV/H 2 O 2 to<br />
Enhance Removal <strong>of</strong> Endocrine Disrupting Compounds<br />
Safina Singh and Erik Rosenfeldt<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts-Amherst<br />
Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) have become contaminants <strong>of</strong> emerging concern due to their harmful<br />
effects on human and ecological heath, even at lower level <strong>of</strong> concentrations (ppb). EDCs have been detected in<br />
national surface waters (Kolpin et al., 2002) as they are continually discharged into surface waters by everyday<br />
agricultural, municipal and industrial activities. One <strong>of</strong> the methods currently being explored to attenuate EDCs in<br />
water includes adsorption <strong>of</strong> hydrophobic EDCs onto solid phase media such as activated carbon (AC) (Snyder et<br />
al., 2007, Zhang YP et al., 2005; Wintgens et al., 2003). Alternatively, high-silica zeolites provide a hydrophobic<br />
adsorption surface which may present some advantages over traditional AC sorption. Such sorption processes using<br />
hydrophobic media play a critical role in the fate and transport <strong>of</strong> toxic contaminants including EDCs.<br />
Zeolites are crystalline, porous alumino-silicate with well defined pore structures, and tetrahedral framework.<br />
The tetrahedral units can be arranged in numerous ways to engineer varying pore size and shapes <strong>of</strong> channels<br />
within a zeolite molecule. When the sorption capacity <strong>of</strong> activated carbon has been exhausted, a complicated,<br />
energy intensive process is required for regeneration. Conversely, some evidence has been shown that zeolites can<br />
be regenerated multiple times through relatively inexpensive methods using advanced oxidation process (AOP)<br />
(Koryabkina et al., 2007) and possibly even ultraviolet (UV) photolysis (Wen et al, 2008). The regeneration<br />
process not only presents potential for multiple uses <strong>of</strong> the sorption media, but provides the additional benefit <strong>of</strong><br />
oxidative treatment <strong>of</strong> back wash water produced from zeolite regeneration. This treatment may result in a<br />
reduction in hazardous waste production than that associated with traditional sorption methods.<br />
Bench scale adsorption studies are being performed to collect baseline adsorption data for each <strong>of</strong> the EDCs in<br />
Table 1 on three zeolytes (ranging from low to high hydrophobicity) shown in Table 2. Freundlich and Langmuir<br />
isotherms models are being considered to test the adsorption capacity and strength <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these zeolites. Results<br />
obtained have shown that equilibrium was reached within an hour when E2 and EE2 were separately adsorbed onto<br />
each zeolites- CBV-901 and CBV-780. Although CBV-780 has larger surface area it reduced EE2 by 75% as<br />
compared to 92% reduction by CBV-901. Despite surface area comparable to other two zeolites, CBV-400 showed<br />
only about 20% reduction; this may be explained by its lower SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio and lower hydrophobicity.<br />
Although CBV-901 initially showed higher adsorption capacity, it did not necessarily show higher regeneration<br />
capacity when UV/H2O2 AOP was used. Approximately, 24% <strong>of</strong> its initial adsorption capacity was retrieved after<br />
one regeneration run, whereas CBV-780 consistently showed retrieval <strong>of</strong> 33% <strong>of</strong> its initial adsorption capacity for<br />
at least two regeneration runs. EE2 solution was used for these regeneration tests.<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA<br />
102
Tuesday PM – Session P3 – P3-4<br />
President’s Ballroom, Prefunction Area<br />
Mixing Effects on the Chloramination Process<br />
Khyati Jain 1 and Irvine Wei 2<br />
1. CDM Inc., Walnut Creek, CA.<br />
2. Northeastern University, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Boston, MA.<br />
According to a recent study (AwwaRF Report 2760, 2004), more than 90 percent <strong>of</strong> water treatment plants utilizing<br />
chloramination for distribution system residuals indicate a certain level <strong>of</strong> dissatisfaction towards the process<br />
performance. One factor that may lead to such dissatisfaction is the inadequacy <strong>of</strong> mixing when ammonia is added<br />
to chlorinated water. If mixing is not uniform, the actual chlorine to ammonia nitrogen molar ratio will become<br />
variable at a micro-level, even though the overall ratio at the macro-level is close to the desired 1:1 ratio. Because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the non-uniform mixing, certain portions <strong>of</strong> the mixture might have a molar ratio exceeding the stoichiometric<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:1. In such instances, certain unintended reactions (e.g., breakpoint type <strong>of</strong> chlorine chemistry) can occur.<br />
This will lead to the resultant monochloramine concentration being significantly less than the stoichiometric<br />
concentration, based upon the calculation using the overall molar ratio. Other factors, such as pH variation in<br />
the micro environment, could also affect the final chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the chloramination process.<br />
In this study, the effect <strong>of</strong> mixing was studied by conducting breakpoint chlorination experiments under different<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> mixing, represented by the average velocity gradient, G in s -1 . A rather unique way <strong>of</strong> plotting breakpoint<br />
chlorination curve was utilized to analyze the data, which allowed a clear delineation whether the monochloramine<br />
formation was according to the stoichiometry. A quantitative comparison between experimental data and<br />
stoichiometry can clearly indicate the impact <strong>of</strong> non-uniform mixing. The experimental data clearly showed that<br />
as the G value increased from 35 to 500 s -1 and the monochloramine formation increased from 75 percent to<br />
87 percent <strong>of</strong> the stoichiometric value. The location <strong>of</strong> the breakpoint, correspondingly, increased from a molar<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.25 to 1.75.<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> 50rpm and 200rpm experimental data was conducted and a breakpoint curve was plotted imposing<br />
one over the other. It has been observed from previous literature that in ideal conditions, breakpoint occurs<br />
at chlorine to ammonia nitrogen molar ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.5:1, and the peak <strong>of</strong> monochloramine is expected at a molar ratio<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1:1. Hence, breakpoint curve was plotted at mixing speed <strong>of</strong> 50 and 200 rpm, indicating free chlorine,<br />
monochloramine, dichloramine, trichloramine, and total chlorine concentration at contact time <strong>of</strong> 45 minutes.<br />
Few studies were found in literature on mixing effects in chloramination. Data from a previous study (Yamamoto<br />
et al., Wat. Res.,1990) was re-analyzed and compared with the current study, and a similar trend was observed.<br />
In another case study, the design G value for a modern water treatment plant in metropolitan Boston was found to<br />
be 800 s -1 , which was higher than the maximum G value used in this study (500 s -1 ), and is likely to be sufficient.<br />
In conclusion, when chlorine and ammonia are combined to produce monochloramine, the degree <strong>of</strong> mixing indeed<br />
has significant impact on the performance <strong>of</strong> the chloramination process, and therefore must be a critical<br />
consideration in its design and operation. This paper will discuss the results <strong>of</strong> this study and provide practical<br />
guidance for those utilities currently using chloramination to optimize their disinfection process, and for design<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in designing new chloramination facilities.<br />
103<br />
IOA & IUVA 2009 North American Conference – May 4-5, 2009 – Boston, MA, USA
International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />
Wednesday Events<br />
May 6, 2009<br />
Visit us at the Registration Desk & ask about remaining availability for this BONUS interactive programming!<br />
Wednesday programming is NOT included in a full conference registration, and are separate events<br />
intended for those interested in seeing UV and Ozone applications firsthand. Each tour/workshop<br />
registration includes transportation and a luncheon.<br />
Ozone Technical Tour<br />
Tour stops include:<br />
- Cambridge, MA Water Treatment Plant (24 MGD)<br />
- MWRA John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant (405 MGD)<br />
- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f (before or by 3pm) at Logan Int’l Airport<br />
before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />
Depart 8:30 AM, Return 3:30 PM<br />
Onsite Price: $60<br />
UV Technical Tour<br />
Onsite Price: $60<br />
Tour stops include:<br />
- Pawtucket, RI Water Treatment Plant (25 MGD DW)<br />
- Brockton, MA Advanced Waste Water Treatment Plant (60 MGD WW)<br />
- Optional drop <strong>of</strong>f (before or by 3pm) at Logan Int’l Airport<br />
before returning to the Hyatt Regency Cambridge<br />
Depart 8:30 AM, Return 3:30 PM<br />
Ozone Municipal Operations Workshop<br />
Onsite Price: $130<br />
Intended for water treatment pr<strong>of</strong>essionals including plant operators,<br />
instrument and maintenance staff and utility managers who use, or<br />
may use, ozone for disinfection or other purposes, engineers who<br />
design ozone systems for water treatment and ozone system<br />
suppliers and technicians who install and start up ozone equipment.<br />
Join us as we conduct demonstrations and "hands-on" examples <strong>of</strong><br />
several activities encountered in water treatment plant, including<br />
Ozone systems operations and maintenance.<br />
Attendees will be driven by coach bus from the Hyatt Regency Cambridge to the<br />
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant<br />
in Marlborough, MA for approximately 6 hours, including refreshment breaks and luncheon.<br />
Depart 8:00 AM, Return 4:00 PM<br />
104
International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />
<strong>Exhibitor</strong>s<br />
Boston - 2009<br />
Ozone Water Systems, Inc.<br />
www.ozonewatersystems.com<br />
Booth #25<br />
Calgon Carbon Corporation<br />
www.calgoncarbon-us.com<br />
Booth #11<br />
Severn Trent Services<br />
www.severntrentservices.com<br />
Booth #15<br />
Mazzei Injector Company, LLC<br />
www.mazzei.net<br />
Booth #24<br />
ITT Water & Wastewater<br />
www.us.ittwww.com<br />
Booths #21-23<br />
Light Sources, Inc.<br />
www.light-sources.com<br />
Booth #1<br />
AirSep Corporation<br />
www.airsepcpd.com<br />
Booth #26<br />
The Ozone Man, Inc.<br />
www.theozoneman.com<br />
Booth #27<br />
Astro Pak Corporation<br />
www.astropak.com<br />
Booth #2<br />
Oxygen Generating Systems Int'l<br />
www.ogsi.com<br />
Booth #16<br />
Trojan Technologies<br />
www.trojanuv.com<br />
Booth #28<br />
Ozonia North America<br />
www.ozonia.com<br />
Booths #29-30<br />
IN USA Inc.<br />
www.inusacorp.com<br />
Booth #20<br />
Electrolytic Ozone, Inc.<br />
www.eoi-ozone.com<br />
Booth #10<br />
Mitsubishi Power Products, Inc.<br />
www.meppi.com<br />
Booths #6-7<br />
Guardian Manufacturing<br />
www.guardianmfg.com<br />
Booth #5<br />
Aquafine Corporation<br />
www.aquafineuv.com<br />
Booth #8<br />
Aquionics, Inc.<br />
www.aquionics.com<br />
Booth #3<br />
Plasma Technics, Inc.<br />
www.plasmatechnics.com<br />
Booth #4<br />
Teledyne - API<br />
www.teledyne-api.com<br />
Booth #9<br />
Ozone Solutions, Inc.<br />
www.ozonesupplies.com<br />
Booth #17<br />
OSTI, Inc.<br />
www.osti-inc.com<br />
Booth #14<br />
Nedap Light Controls<br />
www.nedaplightcontrols.com<br />
Booth #13<br />
Fuji - Water Treatment Division<br />
www.fujielectric.com<br />
Booth #19<br />
Statiflo Corporation<br />
www.statiflo.net<br />
Booth #12<br />
105<br />
Kerfoot Technologies, Inc.<br />
www.kerfoottech.com<br />
Booth #18<br />
Pacific Consolidated Industries<br />
www.pci-intl.com<br />
Booth #31
International Ultraviolet Association & International Ozone Association<br />
Thanks to our <strong>Sponsor</strong>s<br />
Boston - 2009<br />
The 2009 Boston Conference Technical Program Committee extends their thanks and<br />
appreciation to the following sponsors who made this educational event possible!