04.03.2014 Views

Zooplankton of the open Baltic: Extended Atlas - IOW

Zooplankton of the open Baltic: Extended Atlas - IOW

Zooplankton of the open Baltic: Extended Atlas - IOW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5. Biomass determination<br />

Information about numbers <strong>of</strong> organisms in a certain volume <strong>of</strong> water<br />

does not provide knowledge about <strong>the</strong>ir body mass which is essential for <strong>the</strong><br />

analyses <strong>of</strong> trophic webs, energy balance calculations and zooplankton<br />

productivity estimation. The calculation <strong>of</strong> biomass is a way to overcome this<br />

problem if suitable individual biomass factors or proper morphometric<br />

approaches are applied (for reviews see: Table 4.12 in Postel et al., 2000;<br />

Telesh & Heerkloss, 2002, 2004). Such biomass determination is zooplankton<br />

specific, in contrast to quantifying <strong>the</strong> biovolume or o<strong>the</strong>r sum biomass<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire sample by volumetric or o<strong>the</strong>r procedures (for details<br />

see Postel et al., 2000). The advantage <strong>of</strong> determining zooplankton biomass<br />

using <strong>the</strong> conversion factors or length/mass correlations is in clear results that<br />

can not be falsified by phytoplankton and detritus.<br />

For zooplankton monitoring purposes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> Sea area, biomass<br />

factors were recommended according to Hernroth (1985). This compilation<br />

includes individual wet mass <strong>of</strong> six copepod and three cladoceran taxa basing<br />

on volume calculations by morphometric approaches, for example, <strong>of</strong><br />

Chojnacki and Jankowski (1982), Chojnacki (1983), and Chojnacki (1986)<br />

and <strong>the</strong> successive conversion to wet mass. The compilation was<br />

supplemented by literature data for rotifers, chaetognaths, appendicularians<br />

and some copepods. Seasonal and regional differences were considered;<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> data was sufficient. Coarse conversion factors were<br />

used to reach comparability. Rough factors may produce significant errors<br />

when multiplied by large individual numbers. Therefore, factors and length to<br />

mass ratios based on direct measurements should be preferably used. There<br />

are some <strong>of</strong> those available from <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baltic</strong> Sea (Kankaala &<br />

Johansson, 1986; Kankaala, 1987; Tanskanen, 1994); <strong>the</strong>y are based on <strong>the</strong><br />

kryo-conservation technique (Latja & Salonen, 1978; Salonen, 1979).<br />

Currently, <strong>the</strong> Monitoring and Assessment Group <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Helsinki<br />

Commission (HELCOM MONAS) is going to include length to carbon ratios<br />

and individual carbon factors for <strong>the</strong> major mesozooplankton species as a<br />

standard procedure in <strong>the</strong> Manual for Marine Monitoring<br />

(http://www.helcom.fi/groups/monas/CombineManual/AnnexesC/en_GB/ann<br />

ex7/) basing on <strong>the</strong> rapid kryo-conservation technique (c.f. Postel et al.,<br />

2007).<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!