04.03.2014 Views

Zooplankton of the open Baltic: Extended Atlas - IOW

Zooplankton of the open Baltic: Extended Atlas - IOW

Zooplankton of the open Baltic: Extended Atlas - IOW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Measuring errors are to be divided into rough errors and absolute<br />

errors. The first category is not evaluated and <strong>the</strong>refore not taken into account.<br />

The second one splits into regular ε r and irregular errors ε ir . Irregular errors<br />

will be determined by calculation <strong>of</strong> confidence limits. Examples are <strong>the</strong><br />

results <strong>of</strong> sample splitting or <strong>of</strong> organisms counting in sub-samples. The<br />

regular errors include constant errors and systematic errors. A balance, which<br />

shows always a constant difference to <strong>the</strong> real weight, would be an example<br />

for a constant error, while an increasing weight <strong>of</strong> a dried sample due to an<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> moisture with time is an example for a systematic error. Both are to<br />

be quantified and consequently provide part <strong>of</strong> a correction mode. The<br />

terminology bases on Junge (1981). According to <strong>the</strong> author, a measured<br />

value a differs from <strong>the</strong> real value x by ε r and <strong>the</strong> scatter <strong>of</strong> ε ir , i.e.<br />

x = (a +/- ε r ) ± ε ir<br />

Finally, methods <strong>of</strong> data analysis may influence <strong>the</strong> outcome. For<br />

example, it is <strong>of</strong> importance to choose appropriate s<strong>of</strong>tware settings, e.g.<br />

interpolation modes, when performing contouring mapping.<br />

These and o<strong>the</strong>r aspects need to be considered when elaborating <strong>the</strong><br />

appropriate sampling strategies, planning <strong>the</strong> sampling surveys, or evaluating<br />

<strong>the</strong> outcomes.<br />

3.2. Sampling <strong>of</strong> meso- and macrozooplankton<br />

For measuring <strong>the</strong> total amount <strong>of</strong> plankton, a set <strong>of</strong> equipment is<br />

necessary. Protozoan sampling demands water bottles (see below); however,<br />

larger organisms are included only occasionally and in a non-representative<br />

manner in such samples. They will be caught by plankton nets with different<br />

mesh sizes and geometries. Mesozooplankton in <strong>the</strong> sea is sampled best by<br />

<strong>the</strong> already mentioned WP-2 UNESCO Standard net (UNESCO, 1968). It is a<br />

closing net suitable for vertical tows and stratified sampling. Considering <strong>the</strong><br />

smaller mesozooplankton in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> Sea, this net (Figure 3.2.1a) is<br />

recommended for <strong>the</strong> HELCOM Monitoring and Assessment programme<br />

with a mesh size <strong>of</strong> 100 µm (HELCOM, 1988, 2005). In shallow areas, <strong>the</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> horizontally or oblique towed instruments <strong>of</strong> a similar shape is suitable,<br />

like Bongo or Multiple nets (Figures 3.2.1b, c).<br />

Collecting macrozooplankton demands nets with larger <strong>open</strong>ing areas<br />

and mesh sizes (Fig. 3.2.1 d). For details regarding <strong>the</strong> different net<br />

characteristics see Wiebe and Benfield (2003) and references <strong>the</strong>rein.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!