Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation
Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation
Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Book Review: Reconstructing Woody<br />
8 9<br />
Mary Nichols, Reconstructing Woody: Art, Love, <strong>and</strong> Life in the Films of Woody<br />
Allen. Lanham, MD: Rowman <strong>and</strong> Littlefield, 1998, 253 pp., $21.95 paper.<br />
N ATALIE<br />
E LLIOT<br />
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS<br />
ne0017@unt.edu<br />
It may seem strange for a political philosophy professor to<br />
undertake an extensive interpretation of Woody Allen’s films. Why, one might<br />
wonder, would a scholar versed in the writings of the greatest philosophers <strong>and</strong><br />
dramatists opt to dedicate a book-length project to the works of a contemporary<br />
filmmaker—a mere celebrity, as might be said? In the opening pages of her<br />
book, Mary Nichols explains that Reconstructing Woody: Art, Love, <strong>and</strong> Life in<br />
the Films of Woody Allen began when she recognized in Allen’s comedy a glimmer<br />
of insight reminiscent of the ancient comedian Aristophanes. Nichols<br />
noticed that Allen, in his Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy, like Aristophanes, in<br />
his Clouds, saw fit to render ridiculous an empiricist professor who derives his<br />
views from an absurdly narrow basis of observable phenomena. After making<br />
this observation, Nichols decided to draw Allen’s comic insight to the attention<br />
of her graduate students, with whom she discussed his films over a series of<br />
movie nights. Her book might thus be said to derive from admiration for a<br />
filmmaker who can provide insight into perennial problems in their modern<br />
manifestations, <strong>and</strong> the recognition that such insight can be particularly helpful<br />
for bringing these problems to light to modern students.<br />
But does Allen actually provide such insight? Do Allen’s films<br />
illuminate modernity in a manner that is worthy of such attention? Nichols<br />
argues against several of Allen’s critics <strong>and</strong> says that they do. Generally speaking,<br />
her book is an account of Allen as a moral comic: as a filmmaker whose<br />
comedy successfully makes us laugh in a manner that also makes us think; <strong>and</strong><br />
as a humorist whose works can provide society with a moral <strong>and</strong> intellectual<br />
education (xiv).<br />
©2007 <strong>Interpretation</strong>, Inc.