04.03.2014 Views

Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation

Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation

Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 6 <strong>Interpretation</strong><br />

power to order the citizens’ lives, philosopher-kings could remain philosopherkings<br />

only in their own lives (52). Lacking political power per se would not<br />

necessarily mean that philosophers were not helping to order the lives of the<br />

city. Miriam Galston’s “Theoretical <strong>and</strong> Practical Dimensions of Happiness”<br />

poses the possibility of an informal kind of influence for philosophers in the<br />

political realm, as educators, for instance (Galston 1992, 148–49). And isn’t that<br />

what Alfarabi himself is doing?<br />

Still, Alfarabi may intend more. Recall his ambiguous advice<br />

in the Virtuous City, mentioned earlier: that it is an error to wholly refuse to<br />

judge relative truths <strong>and</strong> that it is also an error to believe definitive truth is<br />

humanly accessible. Applying that advice to the king-imam-philosopher in a<br />

real life society suggests that the role will vary within each society <strong>and</strong> over<br />

time. It is not merely religions that will differ across societies, according to<br />

Alfarabi’s logic, but also the extent to which the king-imam-philosopher is<br />

incorporated. Arriving at the appropriate influence of each is an objective worthy<br />

of our continuing effort. Even with the ultimate effort, no society will be<br />

perfectly happy or have a corner on the happiness market, but some societies<br />

will be happier than others, depending on how their citizens h<strong>and</strong>le the<br />

“human things.”<br />

Medieval Muslim society did not take Alfarabi’s advice.<br />

Parens sees a connection between that <strong>and</strong> what he describes as “Islam’s inability<br />

to adapt to the modern world,” so he has brought Alfarabi back for a repeat<br />

performance (4). Although “inability to adapt” is an overgeneralized characterization<br />

of the Muslim world, what Parens has successfully demonstrated in this<br />

work is that Islam’s own philosophic tradition—in the works of Alfarabi—<br />

contains a means of internally consistent adaptation to tolerance <strong>and</strong> even<br />

encouragement of religious diversity in the modern world.<br />

R EFERENCES<br />

Alfarabi. 1985. Principles of the Opinions of the Citizens of the Virtuous City.<br />

Translated <strong>and</strong> edited by Richard Walzer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.<br />

———. 2002. Philosophy of Plato <strong>and</strong> Aristotle. Translated with an introduction<br />

by Muhsin Mahdi. Foreword by Charles E. Butterworth <strong>and</strong> Thomas<br />

L. Pangle. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!