Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation
Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation
Beyond Struggle and Power: Heidegger's Secret ... - Interpretation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 6 <strong>Interpretation</strong><br />
power to order the citizens’ lives, philosopher-kings could remain philosopherkings<br />
only in their own lives (52). Lacking political power per se would not<br />
necessarily mean that philosophers were not helping to order the lives of the<br />
city. Miriam Galston’s “Theoretical <strong>and</strong> Practical Dimensions of Happiness”<br />
poses the possibility of an informal kind of influence for philosophers in the<br />
political realm, as educators, for instance (Galston 1992, 148–49). And isn’t that<br />
what Alfarabi himself is doing?<br />
Still, Alfarabi may intend more. Recall his ambiguous advice<br />
in the Virtuous City, mentioned earlier: that it is an error to wholly refuse to<br />
judge relative truths <strong>and</strong> that it is also an error to believe definitive truth is<br />
humanly accessible. Applying that advice to the king-imam-philosopher in a<br />
real life society suggests that the role will vary within each society <strong>and</strong> over<br />
time. It is not merely religions that will differ across societies, according to<br />
Alfarabi’s logic, but also the extent to which the king-imam-philosopher is<br />
incorporated. Arriving at the appropriate influence of each is an objective worthy<br />
of our continuing effort. Even with the ultimate effort, no society will be<br />
perfectly happy or have a corner on the happiness market, but some societies<br />
will be happier than others, depending on how their citizens h<strong>and</strong>le the<br />
“human things.”<br />
Medieval Muslim society did not take Alfarabi’s advice.<br />
Parens sees a connection between that <strong>and</strong> what he describes as “Islam’s inability<br />
to adapt to the modern world,” so he has brought Alfarabi back for a repeat<br />
performance (4). Although “inability to adapt” is an overgeneralized characterization<br />
of the Muslim world, what Parens has successfully demonstrated in this<br />
work is that Islam’s own philosophic tradition—in the works of Alfarabi—<br />
contains a means of internally consistent adaptation to tolerance <strong>and</strong> even<br />
encouragement of religious diversity in the modern world.<br />
R EFERENCES<br />
Alfarabi. 1985. Principles of the Opinions of the Citizens of the Virtuous City.<br />
Translated <strong>and</strong> edited by Richard Walzer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.<br />
———. 2002. Philosophy of Plato <strong>and</strong> Aristotle. Translated with an introduction<br />
by Muhsin Mahdi. Foreword by Charles E. Butterworth <strong>and</strong> Thomas<br />
L. Pangle. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.