Guidelines for Authors GYIL Vol. 53 - Walther-Schücking-Institut für ...
Guidelines for Authors GYIL Vol. 53 - Walther-Schücking-Institut für ...
Guidelines for Authors GYIL Vol. 53 - Walther-Schücking-Institut für ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Editors: Thomas Giegerich and Alexander Proelss<br />
Assistant Editors: Katherine Houghton and Killian O’Brien<br />
Address: Westring 400, D-24098 Kiel, Germany<br />
Telephone: +49 (431) 880-2252<br />
Fax: +49 (431) 880-1619<br />
E-mail: yearbook@internat-recht.uni-kiel.de<br />
GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS<br />
I. STRUCTURE OF THE JOURNAL<br />
FORUM (by invitation only, reviewed by the editors)<br />
This section gives an invited author the opportunity to publish a thought-provoking extended<br />
essay on a significant topic in international law. This is a stand-alone piece solicited by the editors<br />
from a prominent scholar in international law.<br />
FOCUS (by invitation only, reviewed by the editors)<br />
This section gives a group of invited authors an opportunity to present original research and<br />
commentary on different aspects of a topic decided in advance by the editors. <strong>Authors</strong> are invited<br />
to contribute on the basis of their expertise in a given area. The editors seek a broad spectrum of<br />
authors to stimulate academic debate. <strong>GYIL</strong> <strong>53</strong> (2010) will examine issues in international law<br />
related to climate change.<br />
SYMPOSIUM (by invitation only, reviewed by the editors)<br />
This section publishes a variety of materials presented at and resulting from conferences and<br />
lecture series organized by the <strong>Walther</strong> Schücking <strong>Institut</strong>e dealing with a particular issue in<br />
international law. This section does not appear in every volume.<br />
GENERAL ARTICLES (open to all submissions, peer-reviewed)<br />
This section gives authors an opportunity to submit original manuscripts on a broad range of<br />
topics in international law. The editors encourage authors from both inside and outside Germany<br />
to submit manuscripts to ensure broad geographic representation in authorship and subject<br />
matter.<br />
GERMAN PRACTICE (open to all submissions, reviewed by the editors)<br />
This section gives (primarily, but not exclusively, German) authors an opportunity to discuss<br />
current state practice in Germany, which has a relevance <strong>for</strong> international law. This section<br />
presents shorter reports rather than extended essays.<br />
BOOK REVIEWS (open to all submissions, reviewed by the editors)<br />
1
This section gives authors an opportunity to publish review essays and short reviews of recent<br />
publications in public international law. We are particularly interested in expanding international<br />
interest in German and German-language scholarship in international law.<br />
II.<br />
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS<br />
A. Deadline <strong>for</strong> All Articles: 1 September 2010<br />
B. Submission of Manuscripts<br />
1. <strong>Authors</strong> are required to submit an electronic version of the text to the<br />
editors via e-mail at yearbook@internat-recht.uni-kiel.de.<br />
2. Articles should be submitted in MS Word (up to version 2007) or<br />
WordPerfect (up to version 12.0) and saved in a standard <strong>for</strong>mat (Times New<br />
Roman or Arial) with unjustified right margins, 1.5 line spacing and without<br />
automatic hyphenation.<br />
C. Length Requirements<br />
1. Word counts <strong>for</strong> manuscripts vary by section and according to the nature<br />
of the subject matter discussed. These word counts are there<strong>for</strong>e intended as<br />
guidance to authors rather than as strict requirements. Submissions significantly<br />
above or below these ranges may be returned to authors <strong>for</strong> revision.<br />
Forum, Focus and General Articles: 10,000-12,500 words<br />
German Practice Reports:<br />
Book Reviews:<br />
1,500-3,000 words<br />
750-1,500 words<br />
2. Manuscripts intended <strong>for</strong> the Forum, Focus and General Articles sections<br />
should also include a 100-200 word abstract which will be incorporated into the<br />
editors’ introduction and also be published in the <strong>GYIL</strong>’s online table of<br />
contents.<br />
3. <strong>Authors</strong> should provide a brief statement of affiliation which will be<br />
published in the List of Contributors. This statement of affiliation should be<br />
attached separately and must not appear in the footnotes.<br />
D. Style and Citation Requirements (Please refer to the ‘<strong>GYIL</strong> Style Guide’ <strong>for</strong><br />
detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation on preparing and submitting manuscripts)<br />
1. All in<strong>for</strong>mation quoted or relied upon from other sources (whether<br />
published or unpublished) must be fully and correctly cited in footnotes.<br />
2. The Journal publishes articles in both American English and International<br />
English. <strong>Authors</strong> are free to submit manuscripts in the language variant they are<br />
most accustomed to using, provided they remain consistent throughout the<br />
article. The <strong>GYIL</strong> no longer publishes articles in German.<br />
2
III.<br />
PEER REVIEW<br />
A. Background In<strong>for</strong>mation on the Peer-Review Process<br />
The <strong>GYIL</strong> seeks to publish thought-provoking and influential articles that will<br />
advance academic understanding of international law. The peer-review process is<br />
intended to enhance the quality of research by providing authors with feedback<br />
on submitted materials and constructive suggestions <strong>for</strong> consideration and<br />
revision where appropriate. The review process is conducted under strict<br />
considerations of anonymity in order to ensure absolute objectivity. The editors<br />
of the <strong>GYIL</strong> will never disclose the identities of reviewers to authors or other<br />
reviewers, nor will the editors disclose the identities of authors to the reviewers.<br />
Final responsibility <strong>for</strong> decisions to publish remains with the editors.<br />
B. <strong>Guidelines</strong> and Procedures <strong>for</strong> Peer Review <strong>for</strong> General Articles<br />
1. Reviewers (Please refer to the ‘<strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> Peer Review’ <strong>for</strong> more<br />
detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation)<br />
Reviewers are contacted in recognition of their expertise in the given<br />
subject matter. The review process is conducted completely anonymously.<br />
Reviewers are asked to evaluate manuscripts <strong>for</strong> their academic rigor,<br />
relevance and adherence to the <strong>GYIL</strong>’s style and in light of the journal’s<br />
goals. A minimum of two reviewers are selected <strong>for</strong> each article. Reviewers<br />
are required to make any conflicts of interest known to the editors and to<br />
uphold the confidentiality of the materials provided <strong>for</strong> review. Although<br />
reviewers make an overall recommendation on whether the manuscript<br />
should be published in the <strong>GYIL</strong>, the final responsibility <strong>for</strong> the decision<br />
to publish remains with the editors.<br />
2. <strong>Authors</strong><br />
<strong>Authors</strong> receive anonymous reviews of their submitted materials from at<br />
least two qualified reviewers who have evaluated the materials according<br />
to the <strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> Peer Review. <strong>Authors</strong> always retain their academic<br />
independence and are in no way required to incorporate the feedback<br />
provided by reviewers. When resubmitting their manuscripts, authors<br />
should prepare a brief response to the editors explaining where changes<br />
were made. Should they disagree with a reviewer’s comments or decide<br />
against making the suggested revisions, authors are asked to justify their<br />
decision to the editors who will take this into account when making the<br />
final decision to publish.<br />
3
IV.<br />
RIGHTS<br />
A. Editors’ Rights<br />
The editors accept manuscripts with the understanding that the contents are<br />
original, unpublished material and have not been submitted <strong>for</strong> publication<br />
elsewhere. <strong>Authors</strong> intending to republish <strong>GYIL</strong> articles or use previously<br />
published materials as part of a <strong>GYIL</strong> article must indicate their intentions at the<br />
time they accept the invitation to publish. The editors reserve the right to edit<br />
contributions. The editors reserve the right to return articles unpublished if they<br />
do not meet <strong>GYIL</strong> standards regarding substance. If an article is accepted <strong>for</strong><br />
publication but is not in substantial con<strong>for</strong>mance to the <strong>GYIL</strong> Style Guide and<br />
<strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Authors</strong>, the editors reserve the right to return the article to the<br />
author <strong>for</strong> revision. <strong>Authors</strong> acknowledge they may be waiving their rights to<br />
review proofs prior to printing if an article is returned <strong>for</strong> revision. If the author<br />
revises and returns the article to the editors on time according to publication<br />
deadlines, the article will appear in the same volume of the <strong>GYIL</strong>. If the articles<br />
are not revised and returned in time to be included in the current yearbook, the<br />
editors may consider the article <strong>for</strong> the following yearbook in view of the<br />
timeliness of the topic. There is no guarantee of publication in the following<br />
volume if the deadlines are not respected. <strong>Authors</strong> are solely responsible <strong>for</strong> the<br />
content of both text and footnotes.<br />
B. <strong>Authors</strong>’ Rights<br />
<strong>Authors</strong> will have the opportunity to review printer’s proofs of their articles prior<br />
to publication, provided that the articles are submitted in a timely manner.<br />
Revisions not submitted by a date agreed upon between the author and the<br />
editors will not be considered. <strong>Authors</strong> have the right to make corrections to the<br />
proofs prior to printing, bearing in mind the editors’ request that only minor<br />
alterations and corrections be made to proofs.<br />
Revised January 2010<br />
4