03.03.2014 Views

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Trade Marks Journal No. 013/2012<br />

Page No. xlvii<br />

F) PERTAINING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES<br />

(I) General Information<br />

Pre-2004 Circulars<br />

(8 th Edition of the International Classification of Goods and Services, this circular was<br />

removed on 18 January 2008)<br />

Compliance with the International Classification of Goods and Services<br />

To assist the Registrar in expediting the acceptance of trade mark applications for<br />

registration, agents are reminded to ensure that the specifications of goods or services set<br />

out in the application forms conform with the International Classification of Goods and<br />

Services as far as possible. Very often, the Registrar receives applications where the marks<br />

are acceptable for registration but the specifications are not in order. This slows down the<br />

registration process.<br />

Precedents in Support of Specification<br />

In the examination of the specification of goods or services for compliance with the<br />

International Classification of Goods and Services, the Registrar is prepared to rely on<br />

precedents relating to Singapore, United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong registrations.<br />

Applicants and agents are therefore free to file these precedents in support of their<br />

specifications of goods and services for the Registrar's consideration.<br />

However, the Registrar would not rely on such precedents in the following situations:<br />

(a) where the precedent relates to goods or services which have been accepted by the<br />

Registrar concerned in the wrong class;<br />

(b) where the precedent relates to goods or services which are no longer classified in the<br />

class stated in the precedent in view of a change of classes by the Special Union for the<br />

International Classification of Goods and Services for the purposes of the Registration of<br />

Marks (Nice Union);<br />

(c) where the precedent relates to goods or services which are no longer classified in the<br />

class stated in the precedent in view of a change or clarification of practice by the Registry<br />

concerned.<br />

The use of square brackets [ ] and round brackets ( ) in specifications<br />

An expression between square brackets is intended to define more precisely the text or<br />

item preceding the brackets. Square brackets are used when the item is ambiguous for<br />

classification purposes. Round brackets are used to qualify the text or item preceding the<br />

brackets to ensure the correct classification. Round brackets are used when it is possible<br />

that the item can be classified in various classes depending on the intended goods or<br />

services sought to be covered.<br />

Use of the term “Internet” in specifications of goods and services<br />

In view of the widespread use of the term “Internet” in the generic sense, the Registrar will<br />

henceforth not raise any objections to the use of the term “Internet” in the specifications of<br />

goods and services of Singapore national applications or international registrations<br />

designating Singapore.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!