03.03.2014 Views

Spring - InsideOutdoor Magazine

Spring - InsideOutdoor Magazine

Spring - InsideOutdoor Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the Use<br />

Intelligence<br />

Gear<br />

Real-Time Visibility<br />

Throughout the organization<br />

High Staff Turnover<br />

Capital Constraints<br />

Camping’s Cool Gear, Lukewarm Outlook<br />

by Martin Vilaboy<br />

Store-Level IT Investment<br />

Meeting High Customer<br />

“Steady, consistent, predictable”: those certainly are terms Expectations Federal & State Taxes Generated<br />

that could describe the camping market during the past several by Activity Category, $Billions<br />

years. “Flat participation” is another way to look at it.<br />

Camping 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

$36.4<br />

Bicycling<br />

And it’s hard to see the latter as anything other than negative,<br />

or at least worrisome, when considering the massive role Snow SMBsports All Retailers<br />

$8.8<br />

Percentage $17.7 of Respondents<br />

Trail $11.2<br />

camping sales play in the outdoor specialty sector. Camping-related<br />

Paddling $4.8<br />

activities, for example, annually generate almost as much Source: Fishing Gartner Group<br />

$4.1<br />

0.5 1<br />

retail gear sales as snow-, trail- and paddle-based recreations all<br />

Wildlife viewing $2.7<br />

Influence<br />

Hunting $2.2<br />

combined, say figures from Outdoor Industry Association. The<br />

Source: OIA<br />

federal and state taxes generated by camping are more than<br />

double those generated by bicycling, which is the number two Camping, for many, is thought of as a “family activity,” and<br />

activity in terms of tax dollars generated.<br />

How surveys Winners support Focus the on anecdotal Customer-Centricity<br />

assumptions that “camping” is<br />

Looking at the sheer numbers of participants, camping ranks<br />

Educate<br />

largely<br />

and empower<br />

reliant on families setting up a base next to their cars.<br />

behind only hiking, biking and fishing, according to OIA’s most our in-store In a 2005 employees OIA survey, for example, eight out of ten “car campers”<br />

90%<br />

recent participation figures, while the annual spending on durable<br />

using technology<br />

and about two-thirds of those who camped 67% away from<br />

goods per camping participant is second only to skiers their Add self-service cars (63 percent) said they go camping with other family 86%<br />

customer-facing Technologies<br />

among the primary categories of outdoor activities, at about members. We’d venture to guess that a goodly chunk 67% of the<br />

to Improve<br />

It’s all about our product<br />

$440 a year compared to skiers’ $480 a year.<br />

mix. If families we build it, found they at America’s campgrounds are what would 81% be<br />

nels<br />

considered will come. “traditional” families – two parents living together 80%<br />

U.S. Outdoor Activities Markets Comparison, 2006Focus on a<br />

with<br />

more convenient<br />

a couple of kids and maybe a dog.<br />

77%<br />

87%<br />

12%<br />

customerexperience<br />

64%<br />

Participants Gear Retail<br />

Category<br />

The problem is a shift in some U.S. demographics that’s<br />

(000s) Sales ($M)<br />

Improved in-store<br />

71%<br />

leading security to fewer and fewer traditional families to draw from.<br />

65% Camp-based recreation 23% 12% 45,161 $8,676<br />

69%<br />

More According personalized to figures from the U.S. Census and The Brookings<br />

Hunting 12,800 $6,886<br />

73%<br />

Institution, attention from both the average number of persons per household<br />

47% Fishing 36% 16% 32,900 $6,416<br />

our Employees<br />

58%<br />

Bicycle-based recreation 59,837 $6,230<br />

in the U.S. and 0% the percent 20% of family 40% households 60% compared 80% to 100%<br />

total U.S. households have been in decline for well more than<br />

71% Trail-based recreation 26%<br />

55,834 $3,340<br />

Retail Winners<br />

a decade, with those All declines Other<br />

Snow-based recreation 15,587 $3,125<br />

expected to continue into the<br />

5% Paddle-based 51% recreation14%<br />

23,596 $2,668<br />

foreseeable future.<br />

Source: Retail Systems Research<br />

Source: OIA<br />

Then again, maybe camping as a category really hasn’t had<br />

40% 34%<br />

a fair chance. For at least the last two decades, after all, the<br />

In other words, for most general outdoor stores, camping<br />

61%<br />

53%<br />

remains the 33% primary 6% reason why most folks walk through<br />

the doors, and with those campers come all manner of addon<br />

and impulse 38% sales. 9% Even for the more niche-enthusiast,<br />

sport specialty shops, it’s certainly not unusual for hard core<br />

Annual Durable Goods Expenditures Per Participant<br />

$500<br />

rtant<br />

climbers, Not paddlers very important or anglers to visit a campground as part<br />

of their play, so if camping is not a good part of your marketing<br />

$400<br />

and merchandising strategies, an opportunity likely<br />

t Important<br />

is being missed.<br />

$300<br />

Yet since OIA began tallying participation rates in<br />

1998, charts tracking how many people go camping and how $200<br />

often have been nothing but flat, with virtually no period of<br />

sustained growth.<br />

$100<br />

Certainly, it’s not hard to understand the powers working<br />

against camping’s popularity, such as some recent trends involving<br />

$0<br />

“done in a day” adventures, close-to-home pursuits and<br />

“outdoors as a gym.” At the same time, some much larger national<br />

trend lines aren’t exactly making the outlook any rosier for<br />

future participation.<br />

Bicycle<br />

Source: OIA<br />

Water Sports Camping Trail Snowsports<br />

34 | <strong>InsideOutdoor</strong> | <strong>Spring</strong> 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!