Volume II 1603-1660 - The Honourable Society of the Inner Temple

282 A CALENDAR OF THE [1648
Special admissions of H enry Cater, son-in-law of Baron Tomlins ;
and of Samuel Tomlins, one of the sons of Baron Tomlins.
Order that Baron Tomlins, Babington, Aske, Crooke, Johnson,
Awdley, and Cory shall consider of a new building to be erected in
the Temple Lane from Aske's chamber to Browne's chamber, viz.,
where the chambers of Cholmeley, late a bencher, and of Burbage
were, and the ground chamber under them, and they shall consider
how much farther the said buildings should go into Hare's Court,
how many stories in height, what thickness of brick, and whether
an entry should be made out of the Inner Temple Lane into Hare's
Court, and to consult with the builders upon such matters.
Orders that the consideration of the question of Turner, the
barber's new building, and of Burre, Massingborne, Freeman, and
Armiger taking off the padlocks set upon their chamber doors, be
referred to the bench table ; and that Wightwicke shall have the
chamber in dispute between him and Cantrell, son-in-law of Baron
Tomlins, and the said Cantrell and his wife shall have time till
Bartholomewtide next for removing their goods.
The petition of Edward Heyward, setting forth that the petitioner,
together with Roger Nicolls, William Saunders, and Harborne
Feltham, in accordance with an act of parliament of 28 May, 7 James
I., did erect certain buildings and quietly enjoyed the privileges in
the same for ten years or thereabouts, but at the parliament held on
13 June, 17 James I., upon pretence that the act of parliament had
not been performed in build:no- substantially and in building half a
story more than was authorized, and that he had gained 400/i.
clear besides his own chamber, the said privilege was resumed and
the chambers have since been disposed of to the use of the House.
The petitioner prays that the order for resumption may be repealed
and that he be restored to his privilege. It is thereupon ordered out
of respect for the petitioner, that the said act of resumption shall be
repealed for the time to come, without any re-examination of acts and
orders formerly made concerning the same.
The petition of the panierman and under-cook for a further
allowance when commons were discontinued, is referred to the next
parliament, in the meantime the treasurer is desired to look into the
accounts and acts of parliament and see what has been formerly
allowed,