Volume II 1603-1660 - The Honourable Society of the Inner Temple

Volume II 1603-1660 - The Honourable Society of the Inner Temple Volume II 1603-1660 - The Honourable Society of the Inner Temple

innertemple.org.uk
from innertemple.org.uk More from this publisher
02.03.2014 Views

xxiv INTRODUCTION. community, with its rescues, its bravoes, its bullies, its highwaymen, and its termagant hags, was equally applicable to the one period and the other. The habits of these neighbours were naturally distasteful to the benchers as invading the privacy of their college and tempting the young bloods among the students and the barristers to indulge in riot and debauchery. Over the main entrance to Whitefriars they seem to have had no control beyond the power of temporarily closing the eastern gate when occasion arose. Over the other entrances they exercised summary jurisdiction. Access to the church, the master's garden, and the churchyard was obtained by these outlaws chiefly through a shop occupied by one Davies a tailor in Falcon Court. From Fleet Street and through this house came " a disorderly crew of outlawed persons which dare not shew themselves abroad in the streets." Here they made their daily sanctuary, and a member of the Middle Temple in a petition to the benchers of the p. 56 two houses, prayed them " for the honor of God and the church to take order that the churchyard be not, as now it is, made a common and most noysome lestal." 1 The benchers called upon the master P• 57 of the Temple to show by what right such shop was built, and in default of any satisfactory answer from him they ordered the house to be forthwith pulled down and the door into the churchyard to be p. 59 mured up " before the treasurer's going forth of town." Mr. Badger p. 36 having a chamber with double entrances, his door into the master's garden or churchyard was mured up, and thus all access to the church and churchyard, except from the Temple itself, was effectually prohibited. Another entrance to the Temple from Fleet Street was through either M itre Court or Ram Alley, two narrow passages running in parallel lines from the street to the back of Fuller's Rents. At the southern end of these lines were gates separating them from the Temple. In Ram Alley the inn owned five shops, if not more. One of these was occupied by Tailor and his successors, a stationer, one by Anthony Gibbes, a cook, and one by Hans, a tailor, and there were " 2 little shops " occupied, one by Webbe, at a rent of los. per annum, and one by Saunderson. The benchers, thus having property in Ram Alley, were met by Lestall, a dung-pit.

INTRODUCTION. X X V constant objections from their tenants when they ordered the permanent, or even temporary closing of these gates. Orders had been made under Elizabeth permitting the door from Fuller's Buildings to Ram Alley to be used in the daytime, provided children and idle persons were kept out, but to be locked from io p.m. to 5 a.m., and if any inconvenience arose, to be stopped up for ever. Now the house was " greatly grieved and exceedingly disquieted by many beggars vagabonds and sundry idle and lewd persons who daily pass out of all parts of the city into the garden through the same door and there have stayed and kept all the whole day as their place of refuge and sanctuary," and by persons sick of infectious diseases whose presence was dangerous to the health of the inn. An order was accordingly made that if the inhabitants of Ram Alley would at their own cost build a new door and keep a porter to exclude disorderly persons, the door might be opened in term time only, unless the reader should permit it being opened in vacation, and in case of further complaint the door to be walled up for ever. In the meantime, Mr. Gibbes having made an entrance from his cook's shop in Ram Alley into the Temple, it was ordered to be mured up forthwith. And some building having been erected near Sir Edward Coke's chambers in Fuller's Rents, order was given to inspect it with a view to its being removed. The door through the wall of the King's Bench office into Whitefriars, after being bolted and barred on several occasions against the dwellers in the sanctuary, and having as many times been broken open and the bolts and bars carried away, was finally closed " and strongly mured up with bricks," in 1631. The broken wall near the kitchen garden was also repaired, and the Temple was thus made as secure as circumstances would admit against the incursions of its unruly neighbours, This right of sanctuary, which could be pleaded in bar to most indictments for felonies and misdemeanours, became, however, so great a scandal, that in the year 1624 it was abolished for ever. " No sanctuary or privilege of sanctuary," it was declared by an Act of 21 James I., " shall be hereafter admitted or allowed in any case."' From that time no claim of sanctuary could be pleaded, but these antient privileged places still remained for a considerable time as houses of refuge for malefactors and debtors. They relieved, to some extent, the cruelty of perpetual imprisonment for debt, and they 11. Cap. 28, sec. 7. Vol. i., p. 283 P. 3 p. ISS

INTRODUCTION. X X V<br />

constant objections from <strong>the</strong>ir tenants when <strong>the</strong>y ordered <strong>the</strong> permanent,<br />

or even temporary closing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se gates. Orders had been<br />

made under Elizabeth permitting <strong>the</strong> door from Fuller's Buildings to<br />

Ram Alley to be used in <strong>the</strong> daytime, provided children and idle<br />

persons were kept out, but to be locked from io p.m. to 5 a.m., and if<br />

any inconvenience arose, to be stopped up for ever. Now <strong>the</strong> house<br />

was " greatly grieved and exceedingly disquieted by many beggars<br />

vagabonds and sundry idle and lewd persons who daily pass out <strong>of</strong><br />

all parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city into <strong>the</strong> garden through <strong>the</strong> same door and <strong>the</strong>re<br />

have stayed and kept all <strong>the</strong> whole day as <strong>the</strong>ir place <strong>of</strong> refuge and<br />

sanctuary," and by persons sick <strong>of</strong> infectious diseases whose presence<br />

was dangerous to <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inn. An order was accordingly<br />

made that if <strong>the</strong> inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Ram Alley would at <strong>the</strong>ir own cost<br />

build a new door and keep a porter to exclude disorderly persons, <strong>the</strong><br />

door might be opened in term time only, unless <strong>the</strong> reader should permit<br />

it being opened in vacation, and in case <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r complaint <strong>the</strong><br />

door to be walled up for ever. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, Mr. Gibbes having<br />

made an entrance from his cook's shop in Ram Alley into <strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong>,<br />

it was ordered to be mured up forthwith. And some building having<br />

been erected near Sir Edward Coke's chambers in Fuller's Rents,<br />

order was given to inspect it with a view to its being removed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> door through <strong>the</strong> wall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> King's Bench <strong>of</strong>fice into<br />

Whitefriars, after being bolted and barred on several occasions<br />

against <strong>the</strong> dwellers in <strong>the</strong> sanctuary, and having as many times been<br />

broken open and <strong>the</strong> bolts and bars carried away, was finally closed<br />

" and strongly mured up with bricks," in 1631. <strong>The</strong> broken wall near<br />

<strong>the</strong> kitchen garden was also repaired, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong> was thus made<br />

as secure as circumstances would admit against <strong>the</strong> incursions <strong>of</strong> its<br />

unruly neighbours, This right <strong>of</strong> sanctuary, which could be pleaded<br />

in bar to most indictments for felonies and misdemeanours, became,<br />

however, so great a scandal, that in <strong>the</strong> year 1624 it was abolished for<br />

ever. " No sanctuary or privilege <strong>of</strong> sanctuary," it was declared by<br />

an Act <strong>of</strong> 21 James I., " shall be hereafter admitted or allowed in any<br />

case."' From that time no claim <strong>of</strong> sanctuary could be pleaded, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>se antient privileged places still remained for a considerable time<br />

as houses <strong>of</strong> refuge for malefactors and debtors. <strong>The</strong>y relieved, to<br />

some extent, <strong>the</strong> cruelty <strong>of</strong> perpetual imprisonment for debt, and <strong>the</strong>y<br />

11.<br />

Cap. 28, sec. 7.<br />

Vol. i., p. 283<br />

P. 3<br />

p. ISS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!