28.02.2014 Views

Download PDF - Optics InfoBase

Download PDF - Optics InfoBase

Download PDF - Optics InfoBase

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ered systems [23, 33], and obtain the exact dispersion equation of the HMM<br />

cosθ b =<br />

{cosθ d<br />

[<br />

k L ⊥m cosθ m sinθ l − k ‖(w d − w m )<br />

z m<br />

sinθ m cosθ l<br />

]<br />

+ k ‖(w d − w m )<br />

[ k<br />

2<br />

‖ (w d − w m ) 2<br />

k⊥m<br />

L + k⊥m<br />

L z d z m<br />

z d<br />

sinθ d<br />

(<br />

zd<br />

z m<br />

+ z m<br />

zd<br />

)]<br />

sinθ m sinθ l<br />

}<br />

(1 − cosθ m cosθ l ) − 1 2<br />

[<br />

k⊥m L (w d − w m )<br />

] −1,<br />

sinθ l − k ‖ sinθ m (2)<br />

z m<br />

where for convenience we introduced the dimensionless parameters<br />

θ b = k ⊥ d, θ d = k ⊥d a, θ m = k T ⊥mb, θ l = k L ⊥mb, (3a)<br />

z d = k ⊥d<br />

, w d = k ‖<br />

, z m = kT ⊥m<br />

k 0 ε d k 0 k 0 εm<br />

T , w d = k ‖<br />

k 0 εm<br />

T , (3b)<br />

and where k ⊥ represents the Bloch wavevector in the direction of the periodicity, k ‖ the wavevector<br />

along the layers,<br />

√<br />

and k 0 = ω/c the<br />

√<br />

free-space wavevector. We<br />

√<br />

also introduced the derived<br />

wavevectors k ⊥d = k0 2ε d − k 2 , ‖ kT ⊥m = k0 2εT m − k 2 , and ‖ kL ⊥m = (ω 2 + iγω − ωp 2 )/β 2 − k|| 2 .<br />

We note that solving the hydrodynamic Drude model requires boundary conditions in addition<br />

to the usual Maxwell boundary conditions. The dispersion relation Eq. (2) was derived<br />

using the continuity of the normal component of the free-electron current as the additional<br />

boundary condition. Details can be found in Refs. [26, 33, 34]. The exact dispersion relation<br />

for nonlocal response Eq. (2) reduces to the exact dispersion relation in the LRA by putting<br />

the longitudinal permittivity ε L m(k,ω) of Eq. (1) equal to the transverse permittivity ε T m(ω) of<br />

Eq. (1), in other words by taking the nonlocal parameter β to zero.<br />

3. Effective nonlocal material parameters<br />

As stated before, we consider sub-wavelength unit cells much smaller than optical wavelengths,<br />

but with metal layers much larger than the wavelengths of their longitudinal pressure waves. So<br />

we focus on the situation where the following two parameters are small,<br />

1<br />

k 0 d ≪ 1,<br />

|kmb| L ≪ 1, (4)<br />

√<br />

where km L = ω 2 + iγω − ωp 2 /β is the longitudinal wavevector. Furthermore, we will only<br />

consider the frequency range ω < ω p , where εm T < 0 and the dispersion curve of the HMM<br />

could be a hyperbola in the LRA. We now make a first-order Taylor approximation in the<br />

small parameters of Eq. (4) to the exact dispersion relation Eq. (2), and obtain the approximate<br />

dispersion relation<br />

{<br />

k 2 ⊥<br />

= k 2 0ε loc<br />

‖<br />

− k 2 ε loc<br />

‖<br />

‖<br />

ε loc −<br />

⊥<br />

k 2 ‖<br />

ε loc<br />

‖<br />

ε hdm + Δ la<br />

}. (5)<br />

⊥<br />

The two terms in the brace are two leading correction terms that originate from the nonlocal<br />

response of the free electrons and from the finite size of the unit cell, respectively. Without<br />

them, i.e. when neglecting both the finiteness of the unit cells and nonlocal response, we have<br />

the well-known dispersion relation in the LRA<br />

k 2 ⊥<br />

= k 2 0ε loc<br />

‖<br />

− k 2 ‖<br />

ε loc<br />

‖<br />

ε loc ⊥<br />

, (6)<br />

#189117 - $15.00 USD Received 18 Apr 2013; revised 14 May 2013; accepted 15 May 2013; published 17 Jun 2013<br />

(C) 2013 OSA 17 June 2013 | Vol. 21, No. 12 | DOI:10.1364/OE.21.015026 | OPTICS EXPRESS 15029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!