Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a hotel, the public body manage the land must trade <strong>of</strong>f the benefits ahead <strong>of</strong> business to a<br />
public space (the park). In almost all cities, this essentially political trade-<strong>of</strong>f is not easy to<br />
arrange.<br />
2.5 <strong>Urban</strong> comfort<br />
The term “urban comfort” describes not another benefit additionally to those mentioned<br />
above <strong>of</strong> UGAs. HONJO (2009: 43) states that there is a rising demand on studies on urban<br />
comfort for outdoor environment in the recent context <strong>of</strong> “<strong>changing</strong> climate and increase <strong>of</strong><br />
heat stress in cities”. Main purpose <strong>of</strong> studying urban comfort is to find the environmental<br />
conditions pleasurable the people. Then planners need to calculate how much the benefit a<br />
park provides to comfort every single person and number <strong>of</strong> residents living around the<br />
park. For example, people feel comfortable at certain temperature, humidity and wind<br />
speed, these are urban comfort; then how much area <strong>of</strong> trees or lake is enough to create a<br />
micro climate matching with the certain urban comfort.<br />
<strong>Urban</strong> comfort is assessed by a number <strong>of</strong> indices based on empirical data. For example,<br />
Standard Effective Temperatures, outdoor Standard Effective Temperatures, Predicted<br />
Mean Vote, Predicted Mean Values and the Physiological Equivalent Temperature are the<br />
most common indices currently used (see MERTENS 1999: 4119, HWANG et. al. 2010).<br />
HONJO (2009) reviews applications <strong>of</strong> the broadest indices, Standard Effective<br />
Temperatures, Predicted Mean Vote and Physiological Equivalent Temperature. He<br />
concludes that there “remain problems in the assessment <strong>of</strong> outdoor comfort indices”, the<br />
three indices “have proven suitable for application at the current state <strong>of</strong> the art” (HONJO<br />
2009: 46).<br />
Such indices are necessary to summarise data and to make the benefits manageable for city<br />
planning and parks design. Thermal comfort has been studied in fourteen European cities<br />
(NIKOLOPOULOU/LYKOUDIS 2006) and both thermal and acid climate in Asian<br />
(AMED 2003), African (HASSAAN/MAHMOUD 2011) and European cities (COHEN<br />
2012; PANTANOU 2011). Those studies illuminate that thermal comfort is a major issue in<br />
UGA research with important implications for city planning and park design.<br />
Thermal comfort is studied in fourteen European cities (NIKOLOPOULOU/LYKOUDIS<br />
2006). Several specific case studies for hot and acid climate in Asian (AMED 2003),<br />
African (HASSAAN/MAHMOUD 2011) and European cities (COHEN 2012;<br />
PANTANOU 2011) elaborate related issues. Those studies illuminate that thermal comfort<br />
is a vivid issue in studies on UGAs. It either demonstrates for social benefit, or city<br />
planning as well as park designing. Due to “Outdoor spaces are important to sustainable<br />
cities because they accommodate pedestrian traffic and outdoor activities, and contribute<br />
greatly to urban liveability and vitality” (CHEN/EDWARD 2012).<br />
47