28.02.2014 Views

Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a hotel, the public body manage the land must trade <strong>of</strong>f the benefits ahead <strong>of</strong> business to a<br />

public space (the park). In almost all cities, this essentially political trade-<strong>of</strong>f is not easy to<br />

arrange.<br />

2.5 <strong>Urban</strong> comfort<br />

The term “urban comfort” describes not another benefit additionally to those mentioned<br />

above <strong>of</strong> UGAs. HONJO (2009: 43) states that there is a rising demand on studies on urban<br />

comfort for outdoor environment in the recent context <strong>of</strong> “<strong>changing</strong> climate and increase <strong>of</strong><br />

heat stress in cities”. Main purpose <strong>of</strong> studying urban comfort is to find the environmental<br />

conditions pleasurable the people. Then planners need to calculate how much the benefit a<br />

park provides to comfort every single person and number <strong>of</strong> residents living around the<br />

park. For example, people feel comfortable at certain temperature, humidity and wind<br />

speed, these are urban comfort; then how much area <strong>of</strong> trees or lake is enough to create a<br />

micro climate matching with the certain urban comfort.<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> comfort is assessed by a number <strong>of</strong> indices based on empirical data. For example,<br />

Standard Effective Temperatures, outdoor Standard Effective Temperatures, Predicted<br />

Mean Vote, Predicted Mean Values and the Physiological Equivalent Temperature are the<br />

most common indices currently used (see MERTENS 1999: 4119, HWANG et. al. 2010).<br />

HONJO (2009) reviews applications <strong>of</strong> the broadest indices, Standard Effective<br />

Temperatures, Predicted Mean Vote and Physiological Equivalent Temperature. He<br />

concludes that there “remain problems in the assessment <strong>of</strong> outdoor comfort indices”, the<br />

three indices “have proven suitable for application at the current state <strong>of</strong> the art” (HONJO<br />

2009: 46).<br />

Such indices are necessary to summarise data and to make the benefits manageable for city<br />

planning and parks design. Thermal comfort has been studied in fourteen European cities<br />

(NIKOLOPOULOU/LYKOUDIS 2006) and both thermal and acid climate in Asian<br />

(AMED 2003), African (HASSAAN/MAHMOUD 2011) and European cities (COHEN<br />

2012; PANTANOU 2011). Those studies illuminate that thermal comfort is a major issue in<br />

UGA research with important implications for city planning and park design.<br />

Thermal comfort is studied in fourteen European cities (NIKOLOPOULOU/LYKOUDIS<br />

2006). Several specific case studies for hot and acid climate in Asian (AMED 2003),<br />

African (HASSAAN/MAHMOUD 2011) and European cities (COHEN 2012;<br />

PANTANOU 2011) elaborate related issues. Those studies illuminate that thermal comfort<br />

is a vivid issue in studies on UGAs. It either demonstrates for social benefit, or city<br />

planning as well as park designing. Due to “Outdoor spaces are important to sustainable<br />

cities because they accommodate pedestrian traffic and outdoor activities, and contribute<br />

greatly to urban liveability and vitality” (CHEN/EDWARD 2012).<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!