Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ... Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
UGA improves business by attracting more people in to area. For example, companies are attracted to locations that offer well-designed, well-managed public places and these in turn attract customers, employees and services. UGA invigorates local businesses and neighbourhood economies by attracting tourists and investment in real estate. UGA offers direct employment opportunities for those people who develop, manage and maintain the sites. 2.4.3 Social benefits Parks provide benefits to the physical, mental and social well-being of local residents (WTO 1948). Many leisure activities (i.e., sports, relaxation, socializing etc) take place in UGAs. It is better for physical and mental health to exercise in parks or gardens than to do it indoors. For example, teenagers gather in groups in open space in parks and gardens to dance and make sports. No doubt, the open air supplies more oxygen for breathing. And green makes people’s mind relax better so that “subsequently the recreation benefit can be determined from actual behaviour of park users.” (IAMTRAKUL et al. 2005: 1262). UGA helps people’s physical and mental health (calm mental-patients and crime down). ULRICH (1986) shows that natural scenes (lakes and rivers, vegetation) have better relaxation and less fatigue than city scenes (skyscrapers) have. His research also implies that medical treatment of patients in hospital room with nature view was statistical more successful than medical treatment of patients with view to concrete walls of adjoining (neighbour) house (WITTIG in SUKOPP/WITTIG et al.1993: 97). Mood changes, stress, health (ABKLAR et al. 2010), “enhance the positive qualities of urban life: variety of opportunities and physical settings; sociability and cultural diversity” (BURGESS et al. 1988: 455), city sustainability (CHIESURA 2004). A park is also used as an informal meeting place (communication): Residents take parks and gardens as meeting places when they exercise or go for a walk. As a consequence, those crowded places “discourage crime, in turn make green spaces even more desirable and lead to further outdoor social interaction” (TROY/GROVE 2008). And that is beneficial for social environment in cities. (ERTSTSON 2008: 31). 2.4.4 Possible negative aspects Besides the above benefits, when parks are badly maintained, several negative aspects arise (see BURKE 2007; YANEZ/MUZZY 2005, TROY/GROVE 2008). 45
First, rubbish accumulates in ill maintained parks: waste is not well collected; dead fish lie in the polluted water of lakes and ponds; badly maintained sanitation units smell. Under these circumstances rats multiply and people avoid these areas. Second, when a park attracts not many people, it becomes deserted. This deserted place often facilitates crimes, social evil and violence to occur, for instance, pick-pocket, sexual crime, drug and violent attack. According to data recorded about “the occurrence of various types of crimes for the year 2000”, BURKE (2007: 29) proves by the situation in for North Nazimabad town (Pakistan). (BURKE et al. 2007). Furthermore, open parks are often places where homeless people reside. This situation makes parks lose their beauty, order and security of the areas. Also YANEZ/MUZZY (2005: 1) conclude that “Unsafe, ill maintained and inequitably distributed park space denies the residents” living in the park’s neighbouring. Third, problems of dogs in parks are also very popular, e.g., un-safety, noise, sanitation and location (HART et al. 2012). Parks become unsafe by cruel dogs. Cruel dogs scare many people and children who just try to play with those dogs and do not know what could make the dogs angry. Cruel dogs are not only dangerous for people by biting but also by their activities, especially when those dogs are big. Dangers by dogs are recognized to the people as well as other dogs. In additionally, the un-well behaviour and bad purposes of cruel dog’s owners in parks are warning recently in the UK (SCHROER/SCHAFFRANKE 2004). Even HART (et. al. 2012: 3/7) found “no correlation approaching significance between the increase in noise level at dog parks during times of heavy use and ranking of park success”, though noise of dog barking is also a type pollution. It breaks quite atmosphere for people who want to relax. Regarding to sanitation from dog, it is often in grass where people want to sit, on the path where people walk on. As consequence, people go to park but do not dare to sit on grass and enjoy nature; unlucky people step on dog feces become angry. Thus, a conflict among dog owners and other park users is established. Those park users might do not go to the parks any more. Last but not least, parks are financial burden for public bodies because of costly and compete in areas against other land-use purposes. Parks are often large areas and have many facilities which requires investing costs for planning, designing, constructing. Then when parks open to public uses, it requires maintaining and managing costs. Plus, parks are public; they serve people for free or little fees which are little to pay employees, to maintain parks or to continue new investing. In the second point, it is a big challenge for a city to keep a park in a well located place. Because, when compare primary economic benefits from a park and from a shopping centre, a park profits worse than a shopping centre in the same size, at the same location. To keep a park instead of building a new shopping centre or 46
- Page 15 and 16: List of Figure: Figure 1.1: Implica
- Page 17 and 18: (% of responding people)………
- Page 19 and 20: List of Pictures Picture 1.1a: Tran
- Page 21 and 22: n.n. Nov. No author November R- Rec
- Page 23 and 24: 1.1 Hanoi - the city under study Vi
- Page 25 and 26: Table 1.1: Climate indicators (2006
- Page 27 and 28: The administrative organization and
- Page 29 and 30: 1.2.1.4 Period 1964-1974 (see CHIEN
- Page 31 and 32: 10 BACH THAO PARK HOAN KIEM PARK TH
- Page 33 and 34: This “2020 Hanoi master plan” s
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 1.6: Organisation of Hanoi C
- Page 37 and 38: After that Hanoi citizens become mo
- Page 39 and 40: to predict the future demand of UGA
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 1.8: Sources of data Source:
- Page 43 and 44: Observations are systematically pla
- Page 45 and 46: (SUPPITAKSAKUL et al. 2006; VISSCHE
- Page 47 and 48: esearch fields in developed countri
- Page 49 and 50: 2 Urban green areas (UGAs) UGAS are
- Page 51 and 52: 2.1.1.7 Ancient Roman gardens Those
- Page 53 and 54: trees were not planted in rows whil
- Page 55 and 56: elements from earlier English, Fren
- Page 57 and 58: In the early modern period, the spr
- Page 59 and 60: esponsible administrative level, et
- Page 61 and 62: As showing in the Figure 2.1, some
- Page 63 and 64: and quantity of the available trees
- Page 65: surround. That is most intensive fo
- Page 69 and 70: There are several approaches to con
- Page 71 and 72: Table 2.3: Publications about urban
- Page 73 and 74: BINH 2012). In 1986, Vietnamese gov
- Page 75 and 76: impact on the thinking and behaviou
- Page 77 and 78: The resulting homogeneous social st
- Page 79 and 80: for further understanding of lifest
- Page 81 and 82: y religion, e.g.: catholic lifestyl
- Page 83 and 84: some aspects of their lifestyle as
- Page 85 and 86: low-income and immigrant communitie
- Page 87 and 88: observe is activity of people. Ther
- Page 89 and 90: eality, each activity is done to sa
- Page 91 and 92: 4 Recent utilization of parks and g
- Page 93 and 94: (% of the time) 70 60 50 40 30 20 1
- Page 95 and 96: area (m 2 ) The collected data by t
- Page 97 and 98: (% of the entire week) 4.1.5 Expert
- Page 99 and 100: share of park users every hour 16%
- Page 101 and 102: These findings can be understood by
- Page 103 and 104: Social statuses of the visitors mig
- Page 105 and 106: Others, 5.8% from work/ school/ uni
- Page 107 and 108: Share of means of transportation 10
- Page 109 and 110: Regarding the age of visitors it ca
- Page 111 and 112: less frequent park users are higher
- Page 113 and 114: People walking (13 % of observed ac
- Page 115 and 116: From the point of view of park user
First, rubbish accumulates in ill maintained parks: waste is not well collected; dead fish lie<br />
in the polluted water <strong>of</strong> lakes and ponds; badly maintained sanitation units smell. Under<br />
these circumstances rats multiply and people avoid these areas.<br />
Second, when a park attracts not many people, it becomes deserted. This deserted place<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten facilitates crimes, social evil and violence to occur, for instance, pick-pocket, sexual<br />
crime, drug and violent attack. According to data recorded about “the occurrence <strong>of</strong> various<br />
types <strong>of</strong> crimes for the year 2000”, BURKE (2007: 29) proves by the situation in for North<br />
Nazimabad town (Pakistan).<br />
(BURKE et al. 2007). Furthermore, open parks are <strong>of</strong>ten places where homeless people<br />
reside. This situation makes parks lose <strong>their</strong> beauty, order and security <strong>of</strong> the areas. Also<br />
YANEZ/MUZZY (2005: 1) conclude that “Unsafe, ill maintained and inequitably<br />
distributed park space denies the residents” living in the park’s neighbouring.<br />
Third, problems <strong>of</strong> dogs in parks are also very popular, e.g., un-safety, noise, sanitation and<br />
location (HART et al. 2012). Parks become unsafe by cruel dogs. Cruel dogs scare many<br />
people and children who just try to play with those dogs and do not know what could make<br />
the dogs angry. Cruel dogs are not only dangerous for people by biting but also by <strong>their</strong><br />
activities, especially when those dogs are big. Dangers by dogs are recognized to the people<br />
as well as other dogs. In additionally, the un-well behaviour and bad purposes <strong>of</strong> cruel<br />
dog’s owners in parks are warning recently in the UK (SCHROER/SCHAFFRANKE<br />
2004).<br />
Even HART (et. al. 2012: 3/7) found “no correlation approaching significance between the<br />
increase in noise level at dog parks during times <strong>of</strong> heavy use and ranking <strong>of</strong> park success”,<br />
though noise <strong>of</strong> dog barking is also a type pollution. It breaks quite atmosphere for people<br />
who want to relax.<br />
Regarding to sanitation from dog, it is <strong>of</strong>ten in grass where people want to sit, on the path<br />
where people walk on. As consequence, people go to park but do not dare to sit on grass<br />
and enjoy nature; unlucky people step on dog feces become angry. Thus, a conflict among<br />
dog owners and other park users is established. Those park users might do not go to the<br />
parks any more.<br />
Last but not least, parks are financial burden for public bodies because <strong>of</strong> costly and<br />
compete in areas against other land-use purposes. Parks are <strong>of</strong>ten large areas and have<br />
many facilities which requires investing costs for planning, designing, constructing. Then<br />
when parks open to public uses, it requires maintaining and managing costs. Plus, parks are<br />
public; they serve people for free or little fees which are little to pay employees, to maintain<br />
parks or to continue new investing. In the second point, it is a big challenge for a city to<br />
keep a park in a well located place. Because, when compare primary economic benefits<br />
from a park and from a shopping centre, a park pr<strong>of</strong>its worse than a shopping centre in the<br />
same size, at the same location. To keep a park instead <strong>of</strong> building a new shopping centre or<br />
46