28.02.2014 Views

Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regarding to structured observation, it is well recognized by its higher reliability and<br />

better comparability than unstructured observation. Nevertheless, this technique is required<br />

selective perception and not flexible. Therefore, it is recommended to have accurate trails<br />

or thorough information before planning observation. It is also worthy to note down as<br />

details as possible what happens beside the main objects.<br />

Mean while, unstructured observation is fine in preliminary phase or exploratory,<br />

because it is a “complete” perception which is “open for unexpected things”.<br />

Participatory observation, on the one hand, might show deeper <strong>under</strong>standing on the<br />

situation. On the other hand, received information is <strong>of</strong>ten affected on the situation.<br />

Furthermore, activities <strong>of</strong> the observer modify the original perception. Applying this<br />

technique, observer are doing double burden (namely, participation and perception).<br />

Therefore, the observer <strong>of</strong>ten has to delay recording. Thus, memory errors occurs during<br />

the process is unavoidable.<br />

In contrast, pro <strong>of</strong> non-participatory observation is having no impact from the observed<br />

objects. But because <strong>of</strong> no taking part, observer cannot <strong>under</strong>stand the meaning or reasons<br />

<strong>under</strong> the phenomenon. This leads to misjudgment and over-interpretation.<br />

Besides, two techniques can be combined to bring about better results, e.g., covert<br />

observation and participatory observation, nown as “<strong>under</strong>cover” observation; or covert<br />

observation and non-participatory observation, nown as “ eyhole-method”.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study there were used all kinds <strong>of</strong> observations, beside laboratory<br />

observation.<br />

1.4.3 Visitor counting<br />

Sometimes observations and countings are considered as separated techniques. But very<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten both techniques are combined: The quality <strong>of</strong> observations can be improved by<br />

additional countings.<br />

Counting the number <strong>of</strong> visitors at public places “can be very time consuming and<br />

resource-heavy” (GREE S ACE 1999: 1/13). There are several types <strong>of</strong> technical<br />

equipments to support counting operations and these include video cameras, light beam<br />

counters, radio beam counters or body heat detectors (see GREENSPACE 2011: 6; CHEN<br />

et al. 2011: 12-22).<br />

In general, the counting method used depends on what researches are looking for (see<br />

MUHAR et al. 2002: 3). Usually, counting is carried out for a defined time interval. Results<br />

can be averaged or stratified (GREENSPACE 2011: 4). Then this activity must be repeated<br />

several and in different times, different days, times <strong>of</strong> day, etc. Results can get an average<br />

count, or if we see too many differences between times, make stratified analysis.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!