Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ... Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...

ub.ed.ub.uni.greifswald.de
from ub.ed.ub.uni.greifswald.de More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

Theory Hypothesis Operationalization of concepts Selection of respondents Design of appropriate research instruments Collect data Analyse data Report findings and substantiate theoretical position. Figure 1.7: The survey process. Source: BURTON (2000: 293) The ongoing development of further proceeding has been driven in a way as the so-called Grounded Theory works partly (see in particular GLASER 1996, 2011; GTI 2013). The first step is data collection through a variety of methods and based on those collected information the next steps are derived. In this respect is an inductive way I proceeded. However, the final objective of this thesis is not the development of a (new) theory as it should be following the concept of the Grounded Theory, because that would have been a too big jump. If based on the results of this thesis further concepts might be initiated and derived it would be a nice outcome. In particular the very complex subject of this thesis which touches several scientific disciplines and is in practice in the responsibility of also totally different acting (and thinking) public bodies, requires the application of a methodological triangulation which comprises several techniques of data collection and analysis. Triangulation is stated by DENZIN (2006) that, a method used in social studies, designed to provide a higher quality of research and reduce measurement error. It involves data collection using two or more methods and then to compare and combine the results. It may also mean combining qualitative and quantitative methods: data triangulation comparing studies conducted in different populations, in different periods of time and in different places. Triangulation of methods is a linkage to measure the number of test methods. Basically there are two sources of obtaining information (see Figure 1.8): You can use existing sources which is the way of so-called secondary analysis and you can gather the needed information yourself that is the primary analysis. 19

Figure 1.8: Sources of data Source: STEINGRUBE (2011: 1/6) Secondary data are existing information collections; these are provided by any kind of facility, for instance governmental agencies and non-governmental organizations, factories, scientific research institutions, statistical offices and the media, including television and the Internet; the data are presented in the form of papers, scripts, reports and summaries often tabulated; for secondary analysis you need to select and process the information with regard to your own needs; this is the most common way of scientific work and the most effective because it reduces efforts and saves time and money; Primary data are those you gather empirically for the purpose of your specific task; appropriately selected composition of data by the investigator makes them unique; it is also a very valuable material; acquisition of data related to field work and use one or multiple sociological methods; this way is clearly focusing on the specific needs of the task, but is also much more expensive, time consuming and causes higher costs than the secondary analysis. Regarding the absorption of existing knowledge there is often a barrier: the language. For this thesis I had to restrict the information collection to English, German and Vietnamese sources. 20

Figure 1.8: Sources <strong>of</strong> data Source: STEINGRUBE (2011: 1/6)<br />

<br />

<br />

Secondary data are existing information collections; these are provided by any kind <strong>of</strong><br />

facility, for instance governmental agencies and non-governmental organizations,<br />

factories, scientific research institutions, statistical <strong>of</strong>fices and the media, including<br />

television and the Internet; the data are presented in the form <strong>of</strong> papers, scripts, reports<br />

and summaries <strong>of</strong>ten tabulated; for secondary analysis you need to select and process<br />

the information with regard to your own needs; this is the most common way <strong>of</strong><br />

scientific work and the most effective because it reduces efforts and saves time and<br />

money;<br />

Primary data are those you gather empirically for the purpose <strong>of</strong> your specific task;<br />

appropriately selected composition <strong>of</strong> data by the investigator makes them unique; it is<br />

also a very valuable material; acquisition <strong>of</strong> data related to field work and use one or<br />

multiple sociological methods; this way is clearly focusing on the specific needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

task, but is also much more expensive, time consuming and causes higher costs than<br />

the secondary analysis.<br />

Regarding the absorption <strong>of</strong> existing knowledge there is <strong>of</strong>ten a barrier: the language. For<br />

this thesis I had to restrict the information collection to English, German and Vietnamese<br />

sources.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!