Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ... Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
among people who are going on foot to the park, the most popular intention is to do exercise (72 %); visitors going alone to parks also prefer to do sporting activities (52.8 %); this is the only group which does not rank relaxation in the first place; users traveling to parks by motorbike indicate that exercise is only the third most popular activity. Motorbike drivers prefer to relax (58.7 %)! people coming to parks with friends or colleagues like to relax; but this group is characterised by the highest quota for communication (28.9 %); they are coming in groups to “continue to talk”; additionally, this is the group which is focused on children (23.1 %), too. 4.5 Missing facilities and disturbance issues The surveys were established to find out about negative attitudes about the parks through questions about missing facilities and disturbance issues. The responses help to improve the parks as well as to attempt to quantify the share of recent problems in parks. 4.5.1 Missing facilities and features in parks Many people use the parks, often they are crowded, but nevertheless there might be things the park visitors are missing. 55 % of interviewed park users agreed in prepared demanding features being asked whether they are missing something in the park and 14 % gave additional suggestions about definite desired improvements. This indicates that there are weaknesses in the current park situation. missing toilets missing entertainment facility 32.3% 31.0% missing children's play ground 25.6% missing services 18.7% missing parking lot missing trees/ grass 14.3% 12.3% missing lakes 3.1% (N=2143) % 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Figure 4.25: Missing facilities and features of the parks (% of responding people) (Own survey, 2010-2011) 95
Figure 4.25 shows the high priority of the sanitary situation on the one hand and on the other hand the offer of entertainment facilities seems to be insufficient. Furthermore, many people wish to have a children’s playground inside the park. Each age group has different demands, shown specifically by table 4.12: People up to the age of 30 find that the parks lack entertainment facilities. This wish decreases with increasing age. The middle-aged visitors (30-54) focus on children’s playgrounds and other services. The retirees rank missing toilet facilities as a priority. It is obvious that the young people have a very low interest in (more) natural features, like lakes (1.7 % only) and trees/ grass (4.7 %). By focusing on single missing facilities or features, it can be stated that: “missing parking lots” are required disproportionately often by: o young people (15 - 29 years) o visitors travelling by motorbike or by bus; the complaints by motorbike drivers is to be expected whereas people coming by bus might have reacted already: they travel by bus due to the bad parking situation. mostly People up to 30 years find that the parks lack of entertaining facilities. This wish decreases with increasing age. Table 4.12: Missing facilities and features depending on age groups Feature age group 15-29 30-54 55+ parking lot 10.1% 4.3% 2.5% entertainment facilities 32.0% 14.5% 10.0% services 17.8% 23.2% 0.0% trees/ grass 4.7% 13.0% 17.5% toilets 22.9% 10.1% 45.0% lakes 1.7% 5.8% 0.0% children’s playground 10.8% 29.0% 25.0% Total 100% 100% 100% Number 297 69 40 (Own survey, 2010-2011) Of course, weaknesses differ between the parks. Thus the following figures show the ranking and level of demand for each of the four investigated parks. The complaint about missing toilets was the most prevalent in Thong Nhat park (see figure 4.26). There are several public toilets, but they are old, not very well maintained and very 96
- Page 65 and 66: surround. That is most intensive fo
- Page 67 and 68: First, rubbish accumulates in ill m
- Page 69 and 70: There are several approaches to con
- Page 71 and 72: Table 2.3: Publications about urban
- Page 73 and 74: BINH 2012). In 1986, Vietnamese gov
- Page 75 and 76: impact on the thinking and behaviou
- Page 77 and 78: The resulting homogeneous social st
- Page 79 and 80: for further understanding of lifest
- Page 81 and 82: y religion, e.g.: catholic lifestyl
- Page 83 and 84: some aspects of their lifestyle as
- Page 85 and 86: low-income and immigrant communitie
- Page 87 and 88: observe is activity of people. Ther
- Page 89 and 90: eality, each activity is done to sa
- Page 91 and 92: 4 Recent utilization of parks and g
- Page 93 and 94: (% of the time) 70 60 50 40 30 20 1
- Page 95 and 96: area (m 2 ) The collected data by t
- Page 97 and 98: (% of the entire week) 4.1.5 Expert
- Page 99 and 100: share of park users every hour 16%
- Page 101 and 102: These findings can be understood by
- Page 103 and 104: Social statuses of the visitors mig
- Page 105 and 106: Others, 5.8% from work/ school/ uni
- Page 107 and 108: Share of means of transportation 10
- Page 109 and 110: Regarding the age of visitors it ca
- Page 111 and 112: less frequent park users are higher
- Page 113 and 114: People walking (13 % of observed ac
- Page 115: From the point of view of park user
- Page 119 and 120: missing entertainment facilities. m
- Page 121 and 122: 4.5.2 Troubles / Disturbances It se
- Page 123 and 124: 5 Expected future demand of urban g
- Page 125 and 126: ights (e.g. regarding urban plannin
- Page 127 and 128: Picture 5.1 c: Skating (Own picture
- Page 129 and 130: But urban areas are meanwhile total
- Page 131 and 132: organize activities and sports whic
- Page 133 and 134: As the economy grows - Vietnam’s
- Page 135 and 136: countries, the result is that lifes
- Page 137 and 138: media”, like newspapers, take inf
- Page 139 and 140: environmental functions cause costs
- Page 141 and 142: Yes, the demand of public UGAs in i
- Page 143 and 144: Such a master plan has to clarify t
- Page 145 and 146: 7 Summary As a booming city, Hanoi
- Page 147 and 148: among both countries’ parks and V
- Page 149 and 150: Reference ABKLAR, Mahdieh; KAMAL, M
- Page 151 and 152: COCKERHAM, William; RUTTEN, A.; ABE
- Page 153 and 154: GIDDENS, Anthony (1991). Modernity
- Page 155 and 156: Department of Psychology, Universit
- Page 157 and 158: LUONG, Le To; STEINGRUBE, Wilhelm (
- Page 159 and 160: NGHIEM, Dao Ngoc (2011). Hanoi arch
- Page 161 and 162: STOXPLUS (Financial Media Corporati
- Page 163 and 164: VUONG, Tran Quoc (2000). Vietnamese
- Page 165 and 166: TUYEN, Trương Hữu “Planting u
Figure 4.25 shows the high priority <strong>of</strong> the sanitary situation on the one hand and on the<br />
other hand the <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> entertainment facilities seems to be insufficient. Furthermore, many<br />
people wish to have a children’s playground inside the park.<br />
Each age group has different demands, shown specifically by table 4.12:<br />
People up to the age <strong>of</strong> 30 find that the parks lack entertainment facilities. This wish<br />
decreases with increasing age.<br />
The middle-aged visitors (30-54) focus on children’s playgrounds and other services.<br />
The retirees rank missing toilet facilities as a priority.<br />
It is obvious that the young people have a very low interest in (more) natural features, like<br />
lakes (1.7 % only) and trees/ grass (4.7 %).<br />
By focusing on single missing facilities or features, it can be stated that:<br />
“missing parking lots” are required disproportionately <strong>of</strong>ten by:<br />
o young people (15 - 29 years)<br />
o visitors travelling by motorbike or by bus;<br />
the complaints by motorbike drivers is to be expected whereas people<br />
coming by bus might have reacted already: they travel by bus due to the bad<br />
parking situation.<br />
mostly People up to 30 years find that the parks lack <strong>of</strong> entertaining facilities. This<br />
wish decreases with increasing age.<br />
Table 4.12: Missing facilities and features depending on age groups<br />
Feature age group 15-29 30-54 55+<br />
parking lot 10.1% 4.3% 2.5%<br />
entertainment facilities 32.0% 14.5% 10.0%<br />
services 17.8% 23.2% 0.0%<br />
trees/ grass 4.7% 13.0% 17.5%<br />
toilets 22.9% 10.1% 45.0%<br />
lakes 1.7% 5.8% 0.0%<br />
children’s playground 10.8% 29.0% 25.0%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100%<br />
Number 297 69 40<br />
(Own survey, 2010-2011)<br />
Of course, weaknesses differ between the parks. Thus the following figures show the<br />
ranking and level <strong>of</strong> demand for each <strong>of</strong> the four investigated parks.<br />
The complaint about missing toilets was the most prevalent in Thong Nhat park (see figure<br />
4.26). There are several public toilets, but they are old, not very well maintained and very<br />
96