Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ... Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of ...
Table 4.10: Relationship among activities and gender of users in the parks. Groups of activities meeting friends/ colleagues doing sport/ exercise relaxing accompanying children Playing with entertainment facilities Total gender male female total count 178 212 390 Within % activities 45.6% 54.4% count 413 365 778 Within % activities 53.1% 46.9% count 542 579 1121 Within % activities 48.3% 51.7% count 40 47 87 Within % activities 46.0% 54.0% count 37 46 83 Within % activities 44.6% 55.4% count 900 977 1877 47.9% 52.1 % (Own survey, 2010-2011) Regarding age it can be seen that (see figure 4.23) “playing with entertainment facilities” is an activity of people up to 30 years; “middle-aged” visitors (30 – 54 years) predominantly “take care of children”; relaxation is practiced disproportionately by young people up to 30 years; “sport & exercises” are predominantly done by elderly people; communication (“meeting friends and colleagues”) is clearly an activity of young visitors. (Activities) total 1.5 52.4 18.1 27.9 playing with entertainment facilities 9.5 76.2 9.5 4.8 1.1 children accompanying 16.5 70.3 12.1 1.5 relaxing 65.4 15 18 sport & exercises 1 18 24.1 56.9 1.8 meeting friends&colleagues 76.8 8.7 12.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (age group) 10-14 15-29 30-54 55+ (N=2143) Figure 4.23: Share of activities by age group (Own survey, 2010-2011) 93
From the point of view of park users’ age, figure 4.24 shows that: young people up to 30 years focus much more than other age groups on “playing with entertainment facilities” and they are very communicative (“meeting friends and colleagues”); nevertheless relaxing is the most important activity for these visitors; at about the age of 30 priorities change: people older than 30 like to “do sports” most; above the age of 55 it is even the highest priority (62.5 %, which is the highest share among all activities and age groups). (age group) 55+ 7 62.5 28.4 1.5 0.6 meeting friends&colleagues 30-54 7.3 40.7 36.4 13.8 1.7 sport & exercises 15-29 23.9 11.2 58.6 1.2 5.1 relaxing 10-14 17.1 19.5 41.5 2.4 19.5 children accompanying 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% playing with entertainment facilities (N=2143) Figure 4.24: Share of age groups and activities in parks (Own survey, 2010-2011) Furthermore, it can be noted (see table 4.11) that Table 4.11 Share of activities between different groups visitors who go to parks .. (in % of responses) Activities ... on foot ... by motorbike ... alone ... with friends or colleagues meeting friends/ colleagues 11.3 20.9 10.4 28.9 sport/ exercise 72 15.8 52.8 23.1 relaxation in parks 41.3 58.7 47.7 58.5 accompanying children 3.5 9 1.0 23.1 playing with entertainment facilities 1.8 4.3 1.4 0.8 providing services/ selling 1.6 1.6 3.9 6.1 training in an organized group. 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 (Own survey, 2010-2011) 94
- Page 63 and 64: and quantity of the available trees
- Page 65 and 66: surround. That is most intensive fo
- Page 67 and 68: First, rubbish accumulates in ill m
- Page 69 and 70: There are several approaches to con
- Page 71 and 72: Table 2.3: Publications about urban
- Page 73 and 74: BINH 2012). In 1986, Vietnamese gov
- Page 75 and 76: impact on the thinking and behaviou
- Page 77 and 78: The resulting homogeneous social st
- Page 79 and 80: for further understanding of lifest
- Page 81 and 82: y religion, e.g.: catholic lifestyl
- Page 83 and 84: some aspects of their lifestyle as
- Page 85 and 86: low-income and immigrant communitie
- Page 87 and 88: observe is activity of people. Ther
- Page 89 and 90: eality, each activity is done to sa
- Page 91 and 92: 4 Recent utilization of parks and g
- Page 93 and 94: (% of the time) 70 60 50 40 30 20 1
- Page 95 and 96: area (m 2 ) The collected data by t
- Page 97 and 98: (% of the entire week) 4.1.5 Expert
- Page 99 and 100: share of park users every hour 16%
- Page 101 and 102: These findings can be understood by
- Page 103 and 104: Social statuses of the visitors mig
- Page 105 and 106: Others, 5.8% from work/ school/ uni
- Page 107 and 108: Share of means of transportation 10
- Page 109 and 110: Regarding the age of visitors it ca
- Page 111 and 112: less frequent park users are higher
- Page 113: People walking (13 % of observed ac
- Page 117 and 118: Figure 4.25 shows the high priority
- Page 119 and 120: missing entertainment facilities. m
- Page 121 and 122: 4.5.2 Troubles / Disturbances It se
- Page 123 and 124: 5 Expected future demand of urban g
- Page 125 and 126: ights (e.g. regarding urban plannin
- Page 127 and 128: Picture 5.1 c: Skating (Own picture
- Page 129 and 130: But urban areas are meanwhile total
- Page 131 and 132: organize activities and sports whic
- Page 133 and 134: As the economy grows - Vietnam’s
- Page 135 and 136: countries, the result is that lifes
- Page 137 and 138: media”, like newspapers, take inf
- Page 139 and 140: environmental functions cause costs
- Page 141 and 142: Yes, the demand of public UGAs in i
- Page 143 and 144: Such a master plan has to clarify t
- Page 145 and 146: 7 Summary As a booming city, Hanoi
- Page 147 and 148: among both countries’ parks and V
- Page 149 and 150: Reference ABKLAR, Mahdieh; KAMAL, M
- Page 151 and 152: COCKERHAM, William; RUTTEN, A.; ABE
- Page 153 and 154: GIDDENS, Anthony (1991). Modernity
- Page 155 and 156: Department of Psychology, Universit
- Page 157 and 158: LUONG, Le To; STEINGRUBE, Wilhelm (
- Page 159 and 160: NGHIEM, Dao Ngoc (2011). Hanoi arch
- Page 161 and 162: STOXPLUS (Financial Media Corporati
- Page 163 and 164: VUONG, Tran Quoc (2000). Vietnamese
Table 4.10: Relationship among activities and gender <strong>of</strong> users in the parks.<br />
Groups <strong>of</strong> activities<br />
meeting friends/ colleagues<br />
doing sport/ exercise<br />
relaxing<br />
accompanying children<br />
Playing with entertainment<br />
facilities<br />
Total<br />
gender<br />
male female<br />
total<br />
count 178 212 390<br />
Within % activities 45.6% 54.4%<br />
count 413 365 778<br />
Within % activities 53.1% 46.9%<br />
count 542 579 1121<br />
Within % activities 48.3% 51.7%<br />
count 40 47 87<br />
Within % activities 46.0% 54.0%<br />
count 37 46 83<br />
Within % activities 44.6% 55.4%<br />
count 900 977 1877<br />
47.9% 52.1 %<br />
(Own survey, 2010-2011)<br />
Regarding age it can be seen that (see figure 4.23)<br />
“playing with entertainment facilities” is an activity <strong>of</strong> people up to 30 years;<br />
“middle-aged” visitors (30 <strong>–</strong> 54 years) predominantly “take care <strong>of</strong> children”;<br />
relaxation is practiced disproportionately by young people up to 30 years;<br />
“sport & exercises” are predominantly done by elderly people;<br />
communication (“meeting friends and colleagues”) is clearly an activity <strong>of</strong> young<br />
visitors.<br />
(Activities)<br />
total<br />
1.5<br />
52.4<br />
18.1 27.9<br />
playing with entertainment facilities<br />
9.5<br />
76.2<br />
9.5 4.8<br />
1.1<br />
children accompanying<br />
16.5<br />
70.3<br />
12.1<br />
1.5<br />
relaxing<br />
65.4<br />
15 18<br />
sport & exercises 1 18 24.1<br />
56.9<br />
1.8<br />
meeting friends&colleagues<br />
76.8<br />
8.7 12.8<br />
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />
(age group) 10-14 15-29 30-54 55+ (N=2143)<br />
Figure 4.23: Share <strong>of</strong> activities by age group (Own survey, 2010-2011)<br />
93