Films minces à base de Si nanostructuré pour des cellules ...

Films minces à base de Si nanostructuré pour des cellules ... Films minces à base de Si nanostructuré pour des cellules ...

tel.archives.ouvertes.fr
from tel.archives.ouvertes.fr More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

The LO 3 and TO 3 peaks approach each other, resulting in the increasing intensity of LO 4 -TO 4 doublet. This is an indication that the increasing Si excess induces disorder in the deposited layer. Since the peak around 1107 cm −1 appears from P Si = 2.07 W/cm 2 onwards and increases gradually with increasing power applied on Si cathode, we can conrm that this peak is associated with Si excess. This peak thus can be attributed to be a combined contribution of increasing disorder in the matrix and agglomeration of Si with interstitial oxygen. (c) Si excess estimation tel-00916300, version 1 - 10 Dec 2013 P Si (W/cm 2 ) ν T O3 x = 0/Si from FTIR Si excess (at.%) from FTIR (unbonded Si) x = 0/Si from ellipsometry Si excess (at.%) from ellipsometry (agglomerated Si) 1.62 1046 1.62 7.25 1.75 5.4 1.77 1045 1.61 7.47 1.68 6.7 2.07 1042 1.57 8.2 1.64 7.6 2.22 1042 1.57 8.2 1.57 9.2 2.37 1041 1.56 8.45 1.57 9.2 2.66 1040 1.55 8.8 1.50 10.8 2.96 1039 1.54 8.96 1.43 12.57 Table 3.5: Si excess estimation by FTIR and refractive index (Bruggeman method) analysis with varying P Si . The Si excess estimated from FTIR (unbonded Si) within an uncertainity of ±0.2% and ellipsometry (Bruggeman method-agglomerated Si) analysis within an uncertainity of ±3% are given in table 3.5. Comparing with the results of previous deposition approach (ref. Tab. 3.2), it can be noticed that the increase of P Si leads to an increase in Si excess estimated from both FTIR and ellipsometry methods. This can be attributed to the increasing RF power density applied on the Si target that favours the incorporation of isolated Si (i.e. unbounded Si) as well as the formation of Si-np (i.e. agglomerated Si). 3.4 Reactive Co-sputtering- Method 3 In order to take advantage of the above described two methods, in favouring the incorporation of Si excess within the SiO 2 matrix, reactive co-sputtering method is 72

initiated in this thesis, for the growth of SRSO layers. From the parameters analyzed above, T d was chosen as 500°C, and r H as 26% for this set of studies. 3.4.1 Eect of power density applied on Si cathode, (P Si ) The eect of varying the P Si during the reactive co-sputtering is investigated. The same range of power densities and time of deposition as used in method 2 were employed. (a) Deposition rates (r d ) and Refractive index (n 1.95eV ) tel-00916300, version 1 - 10 Dec 2013 The inuence of P Si on r d and n 1.95eV is shown in gure 3.9 with the values of sample thicknesses at each P Si , in the inset. The time of deposition was xed to be 3600s. There is an increase of r d with P Si , similar to the trend observed in method 2. The deposition rate obtained by method 3 is higher than that obtained by method 1 (at T d = 500°C) and lower than that obtained by method 2. The comparison between thicknesses obtained from method 2 and 3 shows this decrease in r d more evidently. For the same deposition conditions, the addition of hydrogen in the plasma decreases the thickness by about 70%. The variation of refractive index shown in the right axis of the gure 3.9 shows a steady increase with P Si . Besides it can be noticed that the refractive index values have increased signicantly as compared to the other two methods. This can be attributed to the combination of deposition methods 1 and 2 that allows in achieving higher Si incorporation in the lm. Figure 3.9: Eect of P Si on deposition rate (left axis), refractive index (right axis), and thickness (Inset). (b) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy Figure 3.10 shows the eect of P Si as seen from Brewster and normal incidence FTIR spectra. In all the spectra, TO 3 peak is normalized to unity for comparison. It can be seen from the Brewster incidence spectra (Fig. 3.10a), that the LO 3 peak intensity is very low as compared to the other two methods of SRSO growth, 73

The LO 3 and TO 3 peaks approach each other, resulting in the increasing intensity<br />

of LO 4 -TO 4 doublet. This is an indication that the increasing <strong>Si</strong> excess induces<br />

disor<strong>de</strong>r in the <strong>de</strong>posited layer. <strong>Si</strong>nce the peak around 1107 cm −1 appears from<br />

P <strong>Si</strong> = 2.07 W/cm 2 onwards and increases gradually with increasing power applied<br />

on <strong>Si</strong> catho<strong>de</strong>, we can conrm that this peak is associated with <strong>Si</strong> excess. This peak<br />

thus can be attributed to be a combined contribution of increasing disor<strong>de</strong>r in the<br />

matrix and agglomeration of <strong>Si</strong> with interstitial oxygen.<br />

(c) <strong>Si</strong> excess estimation<br />

tel-00916300, version 1 - 10 Dec 2013<br />

P <strong>Si</strong> (W/cm 2 ) ν T O3 x = 0/<strong>Si</strong><br />

from<br />

FTIR<br />

<strong>Si</strong> excess<br />

(at.%) from<br />

FTIR<br />

(unbon<strong>de</strong>d<br />

<strong>Si</strong>)<br />

x = 0/<strong>Si</strong><br />

from ellipsometry<br />

<strong>Si</strong> excess<br />

(at.%)<br />

from<br />

ellipsometry<br />

(agglomerated<br />

<strong>Si</strong>)<br />

1.62 1046 1.62 7.25 1.75 5.4<br />

1.77 1045 1.61 7.47 1.68 6.7<br />

2.07 1042 1.57 8.2 1.64 7.6<br />

2.22 1042 1.57 8.2 1.57 9.2<br />

2.37 1041 1.56 8.45 1.57 9.2<br />

2.66 1040 1.55 8.8 1.50 10.8<br />

2.96 1039 1.54 8.96 1.43 12.57<br />

Table 3.5: <strong>Si</strong> excess estimation by FTIR and refractive in<strong>de</strong>x (Bruggeman method)<br />

analysis with varying P <strong>Si</strong> .<br />

The <strong>Si</strong> excess estimated from FTIR (unbon<strong>de</strong>d <strong>Si</strong>) within an uncertainity of<br />

±0.2% and ellipsometry (Bruggeman method-agglomerated <strong>Si</strong>) analysis within an<br />

uncertainity of ±3% are given in table 3.5. Comparing with the results of previous<br />

<strong>de</strong>position approach (ref. Tab. 3.2), it can be noticed that the increase of P <strong>Si</strong> leads<br />

to an increase in <strong>Si</strong> excess estimated from both FTIR and ellipsometry methods.<br />

This can be attributed to the increasing RF power <strong>de</strong>nsity applied on the <strong>Si</strong> target<br />

that favours the incorporation of isolated <strong>Si</strong> (i.e. unboun<strong>de</strong>d <strong>Si</strong>) as well as the<br />

formation of <strong>Si</strong>-np (i.e. agglomerated <strong>Si</strong>).<br />

3.4 Reactive Co-sputtering- Method 3<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to take advantage of the above <strong>de</strong>scribed two methods, in favouring the<br />

incorporation of <strong>Si</strong> excess within the <strong>Si</strong>O 2 matrix, reactive co-sputtering method is<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!