23_237-252.pdf
23_237-252.pdf
23_237-252.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Lichenologist <strong>23</strong>(3): <strong>23</strong>7-252 (1991)<br />
MICROCLIMATIC INFLUENCES ON LICHEN<br />
DISTRIBUTION AND COMMUNITY<br />
DEVELOPMENT<br />
K. J. CANTERS*, H. SCHOLLERJ, S. OTT§ and H. M. JAHNS§<br />
Abstract: The distribution of cryptogams and phanerogams and the microclimate<br />
of different habitats have been studied. It is shown that a forest community of<br />
phanerogams includes an assemblage of different microhabitats inhabited by different<br />
lichens and mosses. The distribution of lichens and mosses is governed by factors<br />
that are often of little importance to higher plants.<br />
Introduction<br />
Plant communities dominated by lichens and mosses are less well known than<br />
those consisting mainly of phanerogams. The question whether cryptogams<br />
should be treated together with higher plants in the same associations has often<br />
been discussed. Arguments for a separate classification of cryptogamic<br />
communities are the widely differing minimum areas for mosses, lichens,<br />
herbs, shrub and trees and the entirely different microclimatic conditions for<br />
diese layers of the vegetation (Barkman 1990). However, the whole vegetation<br />
is connected in an ecological respect, which argues for a whole phytocoenosis<br />
system. There is no simple solution to these problems but in this paper an<br />
attempt is made to give some examples of the difficulties encountered in this<br />
area of research. The observations described here will be published in much<br />
more detail in other papers. They are used in this context for a broad and<br />
general discussion of some interesting problems.<br />
Methods<br />
Methods for microclimatic measurements have been described in several papers (Schuster et al.<br />
1982; Jahns & Ott 1983; Jahns & Fritzler 1982; Ott 1989). The details of mapping procedure etc.<br />
will be given in other papers together with a more detailed account of the experiments and results.<br />
For cluster analysis the' Tabord ' programme, developed by van der Maarel et al. (1979) was used.<br />
Results<br />
Plant distribution in a heterogenous forest area<br />
The research area investigated was situated in the valley of the Wisper, a<br />
tributary of the Rhine in the Taunus mountains. This tree-covered rocky spur<br />
of the mountain has one side exposed to the north-east and covered by beech<br />
forest and the other side faces south-west and is covered by open oak forest.<br />
*Centrum voor Milieukunde, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Garenmarkt lb, <strong>23</strong>11 PG Leiden, The<br />
Netherlands.<br />
JBotanisches Institut, Universitat Frankfurt, Siesmayerstr. 70, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany.<br />
§Botanisches Institut, Univeristat Diisseldorf, Universitatsstr. 1, D-4000 Diisseldorf, Germany.<br />
0024-2829/91/030<strong>23</strong>7+ 16 $03.00/0 © 1991 The British Lichen Society
<strong>23</strong>8 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol. <strong>23</strong><br />
FIG. 1. Vegetation on a tree-covered spur of a mountain with a north-east facing slope (left part) and<br />
a south-west facing slope (right part). Distribution of cluster-groups.<br />
The vegetation was studied by cluster analysis and by principal component<br />
analysis (PCA). Good correlations between the vegetation and the distribution<br />
of abiotic factors such as light and pH were observed.<br />
A cluster analysis of the complete research area showed several groupings<br />
(Fig. 1, A-F) each representing homogeneous vegetation according to the rules<br />
of plant sociology. The principal species in each group, higher plants as well as<br />
lichens and mosses, and their abundance are given in Fig. 2. No lichens were<br />
present (epiphytic lichens were excluded) in the cluster groups A and B from<br />
the north-east facing slope. In group C the first species of Cladonia appear, but<br />
only C.furcata is found with large numbers of thalli. The main occurrence of<br />
Cladonia is in the cluster groups E and F, with a marked increase in Parmelia<br />
conspersa and Polytrichum piliferum in cluster group F. This means that on the<br />
southern-facing slope lichens and mosses could be used together with the<br />
higher plants for the definition of the cluster groups.<br />
A PCA of both slopes together included the cryptogams and resulted in a<br />
clear picture. Only the occurrence of the plants and not their abundance was<br />
used. The resulting scatter showed a gradient that could be separated into 10<br />
parts (Fig. 3). The gradient shows a continuous change starting from the lower<br />
part of the northern slope, passing upwards to the transition zone between the<br />
two slopes and ending in three open areas at the margin of the south slope. A<br />
comparison between PCA and cluster analysis shows a high degree of conformity.<br />
The distribution of abiotic factors was also investigated by PCA and a<br />
high degree of conformity between the distribution of vegetation and the light<br />
intensity (Fig. 4), the pH and the ground cover by dead leaves was found.
1991 Microclimate influences on lichens—Canters et al. <strong>23</strong>9<br />
Oxolis acetosella<br />
IW.VJ<br />
H * » * »1<br />
Cardamine pratensis I.V.'.'.I<br />
Mercurialis perennis<br />
Anemone nemoroso<br />
Lamiastrum galeobdolon<br />
Dryopteris filix-mos<br />
Festuca altissima r<br />
Luzula luzuloides [•:•<br />
Polypodium vulgare<br />
I<br />
Polytrichum formosum<br />
Hypnum cupress i for me<br />
Dicronum scopar/um<br />
Avenella flexuosa<br />
Clodonia furcato<br />
Pleurozium schreberi<br />
Fagus sylvatica (seedling)<br />
Hierocium lacnenalii and H. glaucinum<br />
Clodonia coniocraea<br />
Cladonia orbusculo<br />
Quercuspetraea (seedling)<br />
Clodonia ciliota<br />
Cladonia squamoso<br />
Cladonio rangiferina<br />
Dicronun spunurn<br />
Calluna vulgarls<br />
Hieracium umbellatum<br />
Polytrichum piliferum<br />
Genista pilosa<br />
Parmelia conspersa<br />
X-Uv<br />
II<br />
LZZJL<br />
E<strong>23</strong>L<br />
•:-:ii<br />
II<br />
:VMK-:-:-:-II<br />
X-ires^k-:<br />
\mm\<br />
tv<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
II<br />
II<br />
II<br />
II 1<br />
II<br />
X-ll 1<br />
II 1<br />
M^FXy^<br />
•XU-:-<br />
iK-x '•il.' :-:->HF>:-:-H<br />
it-:-'.-XJ N<br />
\[yy.<br />
ICv/<br />
II<br />
1<br />
'.*. W.V.I lA A A A A 1<br />
'.V.V.V.i 1 * A A A J<br />
s?i:-ga C-:-:*:-.M<br />
:•:•:•:•! Pv>:-:1<br />
Ml WKMMMM<br />
If: •.vHEv.v]<br />
A A A A '!J t*i*i%*i"»%"»1 r<br />
A A A A AI CVXVXVH 1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
It-:<br />
JI±<br />
It-:<br />
II<br />
II<br />
y-iwmm<br />
'»]•••<br />
1 tvX-M<br />
lf#?SSSi|<br />
| I
240 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol. <strong>23</strong><br />
4 * 4 5<br />
1 33<br />
'• X #<br />
. -a 1<br />
2<br />
,»< '<br />
FIG. 3. PCA of the occurrence of phanerogams and cryptogams on the mountain spur. The gradient<br />
is divided into 10 parts and starts from the lower part of the northern slope and ends at the upper<br />
margin of the south slope.<br />
A separate PCA was made for the south-west exposed slope, which alone is of<br />
interest for the cryptogams. Not only the distribution of clusters along the first<br />
axis, but also the arrangement of individual species showed the same interesting<br />
pattern. For example, Polypodium vulgare was found at one end of the axis and<br />
Calluna vulgaris at the opposite end. Festuca cinerea occurs mainly in the<br />
middle part of the axis. This corresponds with a light gradient from dark<br />
{Polypodium) to light {Calluna). Of the cryptogams Polytrichum piliferum is<br />
found at the end of the axis together with Calluna. For Cladonia a characteristic<br />
distribution exists along the axis: all species occur in the middle part of the axis<br />
and not at the extremes but C.furcata and C. squamosa are found nearer to the<br />
darker part of the gradient and C. arbuscula and C. rangiferina in the lighter<br />
areas.<br />
This summary of the experiments shows that cryptogams can be included<br />
with phanerogams in both cluster analysis and PCA, and that they contribute to<br />
the study of the whole phytocoenosis. To summarize the results: Cladonia<br />
(sect. Cladina) species are absent in the shady beech forest and in the open<br />
sunny areas of the oak forest but dominate the rest of the oak forest. The<br />
open oak forest contains an undergrowth of certain cryptogams, which can be<br />
included in the sociological characteristics of the Quercetalia roboris-petraeae.<br />
This statement does not answer the question whether, for lichens and mosses,<br />
the open forest is a homogeneous area or an accumulation of completely<br />
different microhabitats. Probably only the sum of these habitats together gives
1991 Microclimate influences on lichens—Canters et al. 241<br />
-ss-<br />
-50 SO too<br />
180<br />
X »0" a<br />
FIG. 4. PCA of the light intensity (largest dots = highest intensity). The gradient shows the same<br />
pattern as the PCA of the vegetation (see Fig. 3).<br />
the impression of homogeneity. In this case the separated associations of<br />
cryptogams are obscured by their inclusion into the description of the forest<br />
community. To answer this question the scale of research must be reduced.<br />
Lichen distribution in microhabitats in the forest<br />
The tree-crowns of the open forest are responsible for variations in the light<br />
intensity at ground level. Small 2 x 2 m plots were marked out at the border of<br />
shadow areas in such a way that in summer there was a gradient from light,<br />
warm and dry conditions at the lower left corner to dark, humid and cold<br />
conditions at the upper right corner. The result should be a gradient of those<br />
microclimatic factors that are most important to cryptogams. In winter, when<br />
the trees are bare, the microclimate is more homogeneous. Therefore the differentiation<br />
in the distribution of species must occur in the other months of the<br />
year. The spatial distribution of microclimatic data was recorded for every hour<br />
of the day; an example is given in Fig. 5. The microclimatic measurements were<br />
combined in a gradient, which is shown in Fig. 6 for three plots.<br />
The distribution of the plants was recorded in each quadrat including some<br />
higher plants and the dominant lichens and mosses. For mapping, the 2 x 2 m<br />
plots were divided into 400 small 10x10 cm quadrats. Figures 7 & 8 show the<br />
distribution in two plots. The upper row contains the frequently occurring<br />
plants common to all plots. The second row shows the distribution of frequently<br />
occurring plants found only in one or two quadrats. The last row
242 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol. <strong>23</strong><br />
LOT<br />
•<br />
rel E 84 %<br />
=100 = 68250 Lux<br />
gOO<br />
o°°<br />
* ;<br />
1• =100=7000 Lux<br />
K<br />
7"<br />
• = 100 = 84000 Li<br />
A1 = 100=17250 Lu<br />
(V<br />
4 = 100=14000 Lux<br />
4 = 100= 55250 Lu<br />
8"<br />
• =100 = 45000 Lux rel. F4I %<br />
12°"<br />
41 = 100=14500 Lux<br />
el. F 45 %<br />
• = 100=7000 Lux rel F 45%<br />
13"<br />
= 100 = 35750 Lu><br />
*<br />
"So<br />
rel. F 39 %<br />
L \<br />
=IOO = l7OOLux rel FT 53%<br />
14"<br />
S "\><br />
• =100=50500 Lux<br />
rel.E35%<br />
FIG. 5. Distribution of microclimatic factors in the 2 x 2 m plots during the day. 1 = relative light<br />
intensity (percentage of lightest spot), 2 = temperature (°C), 3 = vapour pressure deficit (mm Hg),<br />
(*light intensity at lightest spot; rel.F. =rel. humidity).<br />
contains the rare species. Species with a concentration in the lower left (light)<br />
corner are placed in the left part of the figures, species with a preference for the<br />
darker corner are situated to the right and plants without obvious preference in<br />
the middle. Figure 7 shows that many species are concentrated in corners or at<br />
one side of a quadrat. Examples are Polytrichum piliferum and P. formosum,
1991 Microclimate influences on lichens—Canters etal. 243<br />
13<br />
— —<br />
9 \<br />
I<br />
•<br />
I<br />
J<br />
I<br />
1<br />
14<br />
10<br />
1<br />
1<br />
l5<br />
I<br />
I „<br />
1 ^r*<br />
2 3<br />
' / /<br />
1 L/,e<br />
1 r^6<br />
1/<br />
5<br />
V<br />
n<br />
y.<br />
i<br />
A<br />
\ /Pi<br />
1 *.<br />
1<br />
J<br />
1 ^<br />
1<br />
FIG. 6. Microclimatic gradients for direct gradient analysis in the 2 x 2 m plots, divided into 16<br />
quadrats for mapping of vegetation. The quadrats are projected onto the gradients.<br />
which occur in opposite corners. The same is more or less true for Cladonia<br />
arbuscula and Dicranum scoparium. Avenella flexuosa seems to show a certain<br />
preference for the right upper corner of the area. In Fig. 8 the quadrat shows a<br />
concentration of P. piliferum and D. spurium in the left part and of P. formosum<br />
in the upper part of the area. Among the rare species, Genista pilosa prefers the<br />
left lower corner, Festuca cinerea the lower part and Luzula luzuloides the right<br />
upper corner.<br />
Of the total of 25 species, 12 occurred in all quadrats examined. A comparison<br />
of these 12 species shows that:<br />
(1) Some species (e.g. P. piliferum, C. portentosa) occurred in the left or the<br />
left lower part (with more light).<br />
(2) Some species (e.g. C.furcata, A. flexuosa, H. cupressiforme, D. scoparium,<br />
P. formosum) were distributed in the right part or the upper right corner (darker<br />
area).<br />
(3) Some species (e.g. C. rangiferina, C. arbuscula, Pleurozium schreberi, C.<br />
ciliata) showed no clear preferences.<br />
The results were also examined by direct gradient analysis. The 2 x 2 m plots<br />
were divided into 16 quadrats of 25 x 25 cm and the occurrence and abundance<br />
of species were recorded. The quadrats were projected onto the microclimatic
Polytrichum<br />
piliferum<br />
Dicranum<br />
spurium<br />
Cladonia<br />
portentosa<br />
Cladonia<br />
Pleurozium Melampyrum Cladonia<br />
Dicranum Hypnum<br />
arbuscu/a schreberi pratense ciliata scoporium cupressiforme<br />
Cladonia<br />
furcata<br />
m<br />
• "<br />
• ' 3<br />
Parmelia<br />
conspersa<br />
Hieraciun<br />
pilosella<br />
Hypogymnia<br />
physodes<br />
Calluna Quercus<br />
vulgaris petraea<br />
m Teucrium<br />
scorodonic<br />
Hieracium<br />
um be IIa turn cf. Hieracium<br />
lachenalii<br />
Cladonia<br />
cornuto<br />
Cladonia<br />
coccifera<br />
Cladonia<br />
pyxidata<br />
Cladonia<br />
sguamosa<br />
Cladonia<br />
g/auca<br />
•<br />
•<br />
m<br />
• 1<br />
• i<br />
1<br />
Genista<br />
pilosa<br />
Festuca<br />
cinerea<br />
C/adonia<br />
verticillata<br />
Fagus<br />
sylvatica<br />
m m<br />
Galeopsis<br />
tetrahit<br />
Cladonia<br />
macilenta<br />
Cladonia<br />
gracilis<br />
Cladonia Luzula<br />
floerfteano luzuloides<br />
m<br />
•<br />
FIG. 7.<br />
Polytrichum<br />
piliferum<br />
Dicranum<br />
spurium<br />
Cladonia Cladonia Cladonia Pleurozium Melampyrum Cladonia Polytrichum Dicranum Hypnum Avenella Cladonia<br />
portentosa rangiferina arbuscula<br />
m<br />
schreberi pratense ciliata scoparium cupressiforme flexuosa furcata<br />
m<br />
Hierocium<br />
pilosella<br />
Hypogymnia Caliuna Quercus Teucrium Hieracium Hieracium C/adonia C/adonia Cladonia Ciadonio Clodonia<br />
physodes vulgaris petraea scorodonia umbellatum cf lachenalii cornuto coccifera pyxidata squamosa gtouco<br />
i"'<br />
Genista<br />
pilosa<br />
m<br />
• •<br />
m<br />
a<br />
Festuca Cladonia Fagus Galeopsis C/adonia Clodonia Cladonia Luzula<br />
cinerea verticillatc sylvatica tetrahit macilenta gracilis fioerkeana luzuloides<br />
•<br />
7.* • \<br />
FIG. 8.<br />
FIGS 7 & 8. Distribution of species in two 2 x 2 m plots divided into 400 quadrats. Upper rows = frequently occurring species; middle rows = species frequent<br />
but c ilv found in r fe 1 r r=<br />
quadrats; Jo' x ro"<br />
r 8 = r'<br />
r<br />
^ «•" "'is., -
1991 Microclimate influences on lichens—Canters et al.<br />
Polytrichum pil/ferum<br />
Cladonia ciliata<br />
245<br />
I 2 5 9 6 131014 3 7 II 15 4 8 12 16 I 2 5 9 6 13 10 143 7 II 15 4 8 12 14<br />
FIG 9<br />
FIGS 9—11. Abundance of species in quadrats 1—16 in the direct gradient analysis for three 2 x 2 m<br />
plots. Warm and dry conditions to the left, dark and wet conditions to the right of every diagram.<br />
gradients described above (Fig. 6), in order to compare the distribution of<br />
species along the gradient. Figures 9-11 demonstrate the preference of certain<br />
species for the light, warm end of the gradient while others prefer the darker<br />
end. A third group seems to react indifferently. Among these is C. furcata, a<br />
species that will be discussed separately (see below).<br />
It is concluded that the distribution of lichens and mosses show characteristic<br />
patterns on a very small scale. The same is apparently true for some<br />
phanerogams.<br />
Lichen distribution in microhabitats in an open area<br />
In the open forest area the tree crowns are responsible for a distinct pattern of<br />
light patches and a resulting microclimatic variation. For comparison an open
246 THE LICHENOLOGIST<br />
Polytrichum piliferum<br />
Cladonia ci/iata<br />
Vol. <strong>23</strong><br />
Cladonia portentosa<br />
Cladonia furcata<br />
60 - ^^<br />
I 5 2 9 6 3 10 13 7 4 14 II 8 12 15 16<br />
FIG. 10.<br />
20<br />
I I I I I I i i<br />
5 2 9 6 3 10 13 7 4 14 II 8 12 15 16<br />
area at the border of the forest was examined. This area was only 10x3 metres<br />
but the distribution of cryptogams showed distinct patterns. A microclimatic<br />
gradient from the trees to the open parts could be observed along which the<br />
lichens showed distinct preferences. From the forest outwards the vegetation<br />
was dominated by Polytrichum formosum, Cladonia arbuscula and C. rangiferina.<br />
Towards the open parts followed in sequence C. portentosa, P. piliferum,<br />
C. macilenta and C. floerkeana,and finally Baeomyces roseus and Pycnothelia<br />
papillaria. Cladonia furcata again showed no clear preferences. The details of<br />
these patterns and the behaviour of other species together with microclimatic<br />
correlations will be discussed elsewhere.<br />
The distribution patterns exist not only for species but also for groups<br />
of species. It is possible to distinguish (Fig. 12) a Polytrichum formosum-<br />
Cladina zone (1), a P. piliferum zone (2), a C. portentosa zone (3), a
1991 Microclimate influences on lichens—Canters et al.<br />
247<br />
Polytrichum piliferum<br />
Cladonia ciliata<br />
g, Cladonia rangiferina<br />
5 2 9 6 3 10 13 7 4 14 II 8 12 15 16 I 5 2 9 6 3 10 13 7 4 14 II 8 12 15 16<br />
FIG. 11.<br />
C. portentosa-Baeomyces transition zone (4), a Baeomyces zone (5), a Grimmia<br />
pulvinata zone (6), and other transition zones (7).<br />
Microclimatic influences on lichen distribution and community<br />
development<br />
The last section again showed a separation of cryptogam vegetation into units<br />
on a scale much too small for phanerogams. A joint treatment of both groups<br />
would only serve to obscure the existing differences. If the distribution of<br />
cryptogams is characterized by small areas, the influence of abiotic factors must<br />
also be effective on a corresponding scale. In the first instance this means<br />
microclimatic influences. Some of the decisive factors are also relevant to<br />
ecological investigations of higher plants. However, often the distribution of
248 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol.<strong>23</strong><br />
FIG. 12. Distribution pattern of species groups in an open area 1, Polytrichum formosum-Cladonia<br />
(Sect. Cladina) zone; 2, P. piliferum zone; 3, C. portentosa zone; 4, C. portentosa-Baeomyces<br />
transition zone; 5, Baeomyces zone; 6, Grimmia pulvinata zone; 7, other transition zones.<br />
lichens can only be explained by factors that are irrelevant to higher plants or at<br />
least different in their way of influencing the higher and lower vegetation.<br />
The influence of many factors such as light, water relations and insolation<br />
have been discussed in many papers. Some of these factors have already been<br />
mentioned together with the examination of the forest area (see above). Here,<br />
only some aspects will be reported that are often omitted.<br />
The influence of dead leaves<br />
The examination of small areas in the forest showed an influence of light and<br />
temperature on the distribution of cryptogams. The occurrence of many<br />
lichens showed a correlation with these factors and the real distribution<br />
patterns of these species could only be explained by work on this microscale.<br />
However, some species such as C.furcata seemed to be indifferent to light and<br />
temperature. The climatic conditions on the lichen-free, north-east facing slope<br />
should also be suitable for the species, but it does not occur there. This could be<br />
due to the influence of dead leaves, which gather on this slope in a thick layer. To<br />
test this hypothesis some transplantation experiments were carried out.<br />
Thalli of several species of Cladonia were transplanted from the south slope<br />
to the north slope. Each species was exposed on two 1 m 2 plots. One plot was<br />
regularly cleared of all dead leaves (plot B) while from the other only sufficient<br />
leaves were removed to prevent the lichens from being completely covered (plot<br />
A). The condition of the lichens and their disintegration was classified with a<br />
simple system. The development of the transplants is shown in Table 1.
1991 Microclimate influences on lichens—Canters etal. 249<br />
TABLE 1. Condition of several transplanted Cladonia species<br />
Date<br />
16 September 1976<br />
6 October 1976<br />
22 November 1976<br />
17 February 1977<br />
31 March 1977<br />
13 May 1977<br />
6 July 1977<br />
8 September 1977<br />
13 December 1977<br />
1 March 1978<br />
C. rangiferina<br />
A* B<br />
_ +<br />
—<br />
—<br />
-<br />
—<br />
—<br />
-<br />
0<br />
0<br />
C. arbuscula<br />
A B<br />
+<br />
+ —<br />
+ — —<br />
+ -<br />
+ —<br />
+<br />
+-_0<br />
+ —<br />
__<br />
0<br />
0 0<br />
C. squamosa<br />
A B<br />
+<br />
+<br />
—<br />
-<br />
—<br />
- 0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
—<br />
-<br />
--0<br />
0<br />
C.furcata<br />
A B<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ + +<br />
+ + +<br />
+ ++§<br />
•Plot A with only a few leaves removed. Plot B regularly cleared of all dead leaves.<br />
X + +, Very good (thallus upright without any disintegration); +, good (some small discoloured<br />
parts); +, intermediate (discoloured parts and some spots with disintegration beginning; —, bad<br />
(thallus partly dead and disappearing, some parts still left alive); , very bad (only some parts of<br />
the thallus left, discoloured, broken down); 0, disappeared.<br />
§Fertile thallus with apothecia.<br />
The transplant experiment showed that for three of the four species the<br />
microclimate of the north slope is unsuitable and the thalli degenerate. The<br />
remaining dead leaves in plot A have an additional negative influence. On the<br />
other hand C. furcata can, as expected, survive under these microclimatic<br />
conditions only if the dead leaves are removed. In the completely leaf-free plot<br />
B even apothecia were formed.<br />
Dead leaves are therefore an extremely important factor for lichens in forest<br />
communities. On the south slopes most leaves are blown away by the wind. The<br />
remaining leaves do not lie on the cushions of Cladonia sect. Cladina species;<br />
they slide down and gather between the cushions. The growth form of these<br />
lichens therefore enhances their chances for survival in wooded areas.<br />
The combined influence of wind and rain<br />
The importance of some climatic factors can be understood only when they<br />
are observed together. During research on the microclimate of lichen habitats<br />
on an island in the North Sea the distribution of Physcia tenella on Sambucus<br />
was recorded. It could be shown that the development depended on the water<br />
relations, but that there existed no simple correlation with precipitation. The<br />
really important influence was the wind from the sea, which in open locations<br />
could direct the rain through the foliage to the trunk. In the lee of the dunes this<br />
did not happen. The combination of exposure to wind with the rainfall was a<br />
decisive factor for lichen occurrence.<br />
Dewfall and 'dry nights '<br />
Another example of an environmental influence often omitted is dewfall,<br />
which is always important to lichens. In the course of a project, a transect
1991 Microclimate influences on lichens—Canters et al. 251<br />
LI Lh Tl T2 L2Pr HR Ra Hu Wm Me Hs Wl Mb Hz Sa G2 Go W2 W4 NA HT la<br />
FIG. 15. Key: H, Parmelia caperata; 0, Ochrolechia androgyna; •, Graphis scripta.<br />
;<br />
nz<br />
i<br />
n<br />
i<br />
n n n<br />
M<br />
n<br />
i<br />
i i i i 10<br />
11Hi 6 H n c<br />
' fa<br />
J;<br />
i<br />
y Lin<br />
Ml:<br />
:j H H<br />
• : w, ', ', ', ; > • •<br />
LI Lh Tl T2 L2 Pr HR Ra Hu WmMe Hs Wl Mb Hz Sa G2 Go W2 W4 NA HT 2a<br />
FIG. 16. Key: fS,Pseudeverniafurfuracea; 0, Platismatiaglauca; U,Cetrariachlorophylla.<br />
through the valley of the Wisper from the Rhine valley to the Taunus mountains<br />
was examined. The results of this study will be published in more detail<br />
elsewhere (Scholler unpublished data). The Rhine valley is characterized by<br />
warm, subcontinental summers and mild, sub-oceanic winters. The Wisper<br />
valley is colder and the hills of the Taunus have a submontane climate. The<br />
climate can be characterized by diagrams including factors such as rainfall and<br />
humidity but in the usual form both are of little relevance to lichen vegetation.
252 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol.<strong>23</strong><br />
It is better to count the number of nights without dewfall. In the narrow Wisper<br />
valley dew accounts for one-tenth of the precipitation. Figure 13 shows along<br />
the transect the number of dry nights during a 2-year period. It can be seen that<br />
in the middle part of the valley hardly any night without dewfall occurred,<br />
and this was the only part with an exceptionally rich lichen vegetation. The<br />
parameter of dry nights and the distribution of lichen vegetation show a high<br />
degree of conformity.<br />
The study of an open oak forest showed the advantage of studying lichen<br />
distribution on a microscale as opposed to the variations in higher plants on a<br />
much larger scale. The distribution along the transect in the valley of the<br />
Wisper deals with both groups of organisms on the same scale, but here again<br />
the lichens give a much more detailed separation of vegetation zones. Naturally<br />
not all lichen species react in the same way. Figure 14 shows that some species<br />
occur in the lower part of the valley, whereas others (Fig. 15) grow in the middle<br />
part and a third group are found in the upper hills (Fig. 16). Sometimes a lichen<br />
species may be replaced by a closely related species along the transect. An<br />
example of such a lichen pair with different microclimatic requirements is<br />
Parmelia conspersa and P. somloensis. The picture is further complicated by the<br />
fact that certain species seem to change their microclimatic requirements along<br />
the transect. Cladonia arbuscula occurs in open localities in the middle part of<br />
the valley and particularly in shady places in the warmer, lower parts. This is<br />
the well-known law of relative habitat constancy. For lichens this law applies to<br />
smaller areas than for higher plants.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The distribution of lichens is governed by microclimatic factors that influence<br />
higher plants in different ways or not at all. The microclimate causes a separation<br />
of much smaller units in cryptogams than in phanerogams. A joint treatment<br />
of both types of plants in ecological investigations can sometimes obscure<br />
the existing differences. On the other hand the description of a phytocoenosis<br />
including cryptogams together with the higher plants may be of advantage in<br />
some cases. However, it must be remembered that the lichens and mosses<br />
inhabit special microhabitats and niches within the phytocoenosis. There<br />
probably exists no general solution for these problems and the selection of a<br />
suitable method must be governed by the nature of the problem.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Barkman, J. J. (1990) Controversies and perspectives in plant ecology and vegetation science.<br />
Phytocoenologia 18: 565-589.<br />
Jahns, H. M. & Fritzler, E. (1982) Flechtenstandorte auf einer Blockhalde. Herzogia 6: 243-270.<br />
Jahns, H. M. & Ott, S. (1983) Das Mikroklima dicht benachbarter Flechtenstandorte. Flora 173:<br />
183-222.<br />
Maarel, E. van der, Jansen, J. G. M. & Louppen, J. M. W. (1979) TABORD, a program for<br />
structuring phytosociological tables. VegetatioiS: 143-156.<br />
Ott, S. (1989) Standorte epiphytischer Flechten in einem Diinengebiet. Herzogia 8: 149-175.<br />
Schuster, G., Herold, K. & Jahns, H. M. (1982) Mikroklimatische Messungen an Flechtenstandorten.<br />
Neue Messapparaturen. Herzogia 6: 183-200.<br />
Accepted for publication 27 April 1991