''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

-1- I NT R0DUCT10N Scattered throughout Nabokov's Forewords to his own novels, interviews he gave, rare commentaries on his own work. (as his essay "On a Book Entitled Lolita") and his works themselves are a great number of statements - serious, ironical or parodistic - which offer valuable insights into his conception of art. These are supported by his treatment in The Gift of the views of the nineteenth century Russian journalist, critic and novelist N. G. Chernyshevskii. Briefly stated, what emerges from all. these sources is that Nabokov wants art to be created, evaluated, and enjoyed for its artistic values alone, independent of any "purposes" or "ideas" or ulterior motives. He dismisses the suggestion that any utility or morality should be attributed to his art "with the same scorn that he once made use of when a clubwoman asked him what butterflies were for. "1 "Nothing bores me more than political novels", he says, "and the literature of social intent"2, and "I have no social purpose, no moral message; I've no general ideas to exploit... "3 And speaking in more general terms: "A work of art has no importance whatever to society. "4 To save his own novels from gross misinterpretations he states plainly in some of his Forewords how his novels should not be read, and which considerations the reader had better leave aside. The Introduction to Bend Sinister, for example, even though

-2- granting that the Bolshevist and the Nazi-German re- gimes have to a certain degree acted as "models" of the world of the novel, yet warns the reader not to see this same novel as directly concerned with either of the two states: the influence ... of my epoch on my present book is as negligible as the influence of my books, or at least of this book, on my 5 epoch. He is even more outspoken in his Foreword to Invitation to a Beheading: The question whether or not my seeing both [the Bolshevist regime and the Nazi regime] in terms of one dull beastly farce had any effect on this book, should concern the good reader as little as it does me. 6 He does not always express his view quite so direct- ly. It is true that he is very explicit about Lolita: I am neither a reader nor a writer of didactic7 fiction,... and Lolita has no moral in tow , but he made this statement only after'Lolita had been thoroughly misunderstood despite the Foreword by'John Ray. This Foreword is a good example of how Nabokov integrates his view of art into the very art itself. John Ray's insistence on "the ethical impact the book should have on the serious reader", that "in this poignant study there lurks a general lesson", and that "Lolita' should make all of us - parents, social workers, educators - apply ourselves with still greater vigilance and vision to the task of bringing up a bet- ter generation in a safer world"8 expresses a view that is diametrically opposed to all of Nabokov's_prin- ciples, and in the light of, these principles the whole

-1-<br />

I NT R0DUCT10N<br />

Scattered throughout <strong>Nabokov's</strong> Forewords to his own<br />

novels, interviews he gave, rare commentaries on his<br />

own work. (as his essay "On a Book Entitled Lolita")<br />

and his works themselves are a great number of statements<br />

- serious, ironical or parodistic - which offer<br />

valuable insights into his conception of art. These<br />

are supported by his treatment in The Gift of the views<br />

of the nineteenth century Russian journalist, critic<br />

and novelist N. G. Chernyshevskii. Briefly stated, what<br />

emerges from all. these sources is that Nabokov wants<br />

art to be created, evaluated, and enjoyed <strong>for</strong> its<br />

artistic values alone, independent of any "purposes"<br />

or "ideas" or ulterior motives. He dismisses the<br />

suggestion that any utility or morality should be<br />

attributed to his art "with the same scorn that he<br />

once made use of when a clubwoman asked him what butterflies<br />

were <strong>for</strong>. "1<br />

"Nothing bores me more than political novels", he<br />

says, "and the literature of social intent"2, and<br />

"I have no social purpose, no moral message; I've no<br />

general ideas to exploit... "3 And speaking in more<br />

general terms: "A work of art has no importance whatever<br />

to society. "4<br />

To save his own novels from gross misinterpretations<br />

he states plainly in some of his Forewords how his<br />

novels should not be read, and which considerations<br />

the reader had better leave aside. The Introduction<br />

to Bend Sinister, <strong>for</strong> example, even though

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!