''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

- 364 - executions and other authorial intrusions. "7 Fowler adds to this list of complaints "the unpleasantness of Van and Ada"8 whom he describes as "stylized fantasy-figures. "9 All this, he concludes, makes both the situations and the characters of the novel unconvincing10 and "makes it impossible for the reader to have any real sense of participation in [the] story. -, 11 What remains is "a textbook for a course in Nabokov", "naked Nabokoviana"12, demanding "the Nabokov, "specialist: a reader with sympathy, access to a good library, and a great deal of time. " 13 All of these things are true only to a certain degree and should not lead to the harsh judgement of Fowler, who calls Ada "a very imperfect book. "" 14 The elements to which he objects constitute only the surface appearance of the novel, and will be seen to have very specific functions, just as the unrealistic mode of narration of which Fowler complains. Fowler's description of Ada as "Nabokoviana" cannot be accept- ed unless the word is given a more comprehensive meaning than Fowler assigns to it. As L. L. Lee has pointed out, the novel contains indeed Nabökov's signature: "Ada or Ardor: a Family Chronicle, a novel that contains another title within itself, Van's Book, which is Nabokov in anagram... "15 (Nabokov has been seen to make his presence clear in a similar way in 4. the Preface to Lolita). Quite clearly, then, Nabokov's is the ultimate voice behind the book, and its con- cerns are not just Van's but Nabokov's own. However, they are not so much the rather obvious elements that

- 365 - combine to form the surface texture of the novel, but a whole cluster of concerns which are central to Nabokov's whole oeuvre. Time-is the central one in this novel, and around it are grouped reality, love, death, memory, and art. It is in this sense that Ada can be described as "Nabokoviana". This also provides an answer to Fowler's complaint that it is difficult to develop any real. sense of participation in-the story. This is a true enough statement, and the difficulty arises from precisely the reasons which Fowler quotes: Van and Ada are unlikable, and somehow it all remains rather abstract. Also, the overwhelming amount of what Fow1er calls "Nabokoviana" and the strange and confusing background from which the story must be disengaged are indeed responsible for this effect. But with the central preoccupations of the novel in mind, one can assume that it is the author's intention to make participation difficult. One. -can assume that he deliberately gives the story its distant and somewhat unreal quality so as to prevent it from becoming the novel's main issue and from absorbing the reader's attention by involving him emotionally. Much of the surface texture of the novel and of the story's background is not only strange and confusing, but also comic. Chief among the elements that make it so is again parody. Parody starts with the family tree and does not end before the last page, on which Van's memoirs fade into a mock-serious blurb praising "the joyousness and Arcadian innocence" of

-<br />

364 -<br />

executions and other authorial intrusions. "7 Fowler<br />

adds to this list of complaints "the unpleasantness<br />

of Van and Ada"8 whom he describes as "stylized<br />

fantasy-figures. "9 All this, he concludes, makes<br />

both the situations and the characters of the novel<br />

unconvincing10 and "makes it impossible <strong>for</strong> the<br />

reader to have any real sense of participation in<br />

[the] story. -, 11 What remains is "a textbook <strong>for</strong> a<br />

course in Nabokov", "naked Nabokoviana"12, demanding<br />

"the Nabokov, "specialist: a reader with sympathy, access<br />

to a good library, and a great deal of time. " 13<br />

All of these things are true only to a certain<br />

degree and should not lead to the harsh judgement<br />

of Fowler, who calls Ada "a very imperfect book. "" 14<br />

The elements to which he objects constitute only the<br />

surface appearance of the novel, and will be seen to<br />

have very specific functions, just as the unrealistic<br />

mode of narration of which Fowler complains. Fowler's<br />

description of Ada as "Nabokoviana" cannot be accept-<br />

ed unless the word is given a more comprehensive<br />

meaning than Fowler assigns to it. As L. L. Lee has<br />

pointed out, the novel contains indeed Nabökov's<br />

signature: "Ada or Ardor: a Family Chronicle, a novel<br />

that contains another title within itself, Van's Book,<br />

which is Nabokov in anagram... "15 (Nabokov has been<br />

seen to make his presence clear in a similar way in<br />

4.<br />

the Preface to Lolita). Quite clearly, then, <strong>Nabokov's</strong><br />

is the ultimate voice behind the book, and its con-<br />

cerns are not just Van's but <strong>Nabokov's</strong> own. However,<br />

they are not so much the rather obvious elements that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!