''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

- 301 - would be "wicked" (47), but he corrects them, offers explanations, and sometimes even an apology. 12 His very addresses to the reader, artificial in themselves, become the objects of his comments, so that their ar- tificiality is heightened. 13 This list could be continued, but the examples may suffice to illustrate that Hermann's devices all work together to produce something very much like the effect produced by a Shandian commentary. One wonders at the extraordinary kind of novel one is reading. One wonders why an action that is to all appearances so simple and the chronology of which is so straightforward and logical, should in its telling become such a perfect jumble of incoherent odds and bits. It is through the incongruity between the apparent simplicity of what is told and the complex and almost chaotic way in which it is told, as much as through the parodies of literary conventions, that a comic effect is 14 achieved. The comedy is effective only so long as the surface pattern is seen separately from the contents of the story. When seen in connection with it, the analysis tells quite a different tale, and what seems at first serenely comic, then turns out to have a grim import at its heels. Hermann makes a remark that gives a clue to the mystery of his muddled style and at the same time throws some light on the story under the confusing sur- face:

- 302 - I have grown much too used to an outside view of myself, to being both painter and model, so no wonder my style is denied the blessed grace of spontaneity (29). "I have grown... used to... being both painter and model" says in fact that Hermann has got used to being two persons at once, so to speak, somewhat like Smurov in The Eye, one of his selves observing what the other is doing. While explaining that under this constant super- vision his spontaneity is lost, his remark also estab- lishes a link to the story he is telling about himself and takes one right to its central concern. The central concern is Hermann's obsession with the idea that he has a double. Just how much of the story that revolves round this double is based on fact never becomes clear. There are a great many questions none of which can be satisfactorily answered at the end. Is there such a person as Felix? If Hermann meets him, does he really write to him? Does he really see him again? Does he really murder him? Or is it their first meeting that starts off Hermann's imagination and makes him invent the rest? There are some indications that this might be the case. There is one point at which Hermann is seen practically creating Felix: it ... was not at once that I glanced at his face; I started working from his feet upward, as one sees on the screen when the cameraman is trying to be tantalizing. First came big, dusty shoes, thick socks sloppy about the ankles, then shiny blue trousers-and a hand holding a crust of dry bread. Then a blue coat over a dark- grey sweater. Still higher the soft collar that I knew-There I stopped. Should I leave him headless or go on building him? (83-84) The description he gives of Tarnitz reads as if he

- 302<br />

-<br />

I have grown much too used to an outside<br />

view of myself, to being both painter<br />

and model, so no wonder my style is denied<br />

the blessed grace of spontaneity (29).<br />

"I have grown... used to... being both painter and model"<br />

says in fact that Hermann has got used to being two<br />

persons at once, so to speak, somewhat like Smurov in<br />

The Eye, one of his selves observing what the other is<br />

doing. While explaining that under this constant super-<br />

vision his spontaneity is lost, his remark also estab-<br />

lishes a link to the story he is telling about himself<br />

and takes one right to its central concern.<br />

The central concern is Hermann's obsession with the<br />

idea that he has a double. Just how much of the story<br />

that revolves round this double is based on fact never<br />

becomes clear. There are a great many questions none<br />

of which can be satisfactorily answered at the end.<br />

Is there such a person as Felix? If Hermann meets him,<br />

does he really write to him? Does he really see him<br />

again? Does he really murder him? Or is it their first<br />

meeting that starts off Hermann's imagination and makes<br />

him invent the rest? There are some indications that<br />

this might be the case. There is one point at which<br />

Hermann is seen practically creating Felix:<br />

it<br />

... was not at once that I glanced at<br />

his face; I started working from his feet<br />

upward, as one sees on the screen when<br />

the cameraman is trying to be tantalizing.<br />

First came big, dusty shoes, thick socks<br />

sloppy about the ankles, then shiny blue<br />

trousers-and a hand holding a crust of<br />

dry bread. Then a blue coat over a dark-<br />

grey sweater. Still higher the soft collar<br />

that I knew-There I stopped. Should<br />

I leave him headless or go on building<br />

him? (83-84)<br />

The description he gives of Tarnitz reads as if he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!