''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
- 301 - would be "wicked" (47), but he corrects them, offers explanations, and sometimes even an apology. 12 His very addresses to the reader, artificial in themselves, become the objects of his comments, so that their ar- tificiality is heightened. 13 This list could be continued, but the examples may suffice to illustrate that Hermann's devices all work together to produce something very much like the effect produced by a Shandian commentary. One wonders at the extraordinary kind of novel one is reading. One wonders why an action that is to all appearances so simple and the chronology of which is so straightforward and logical, should in its telling become such a perfect jumble of incoherent odds and bits. It is through the incongruity between the apparent simplicity of what is told and the complex and almost chaotic way in which it is told, as much as through the parodies of literary conventions, that a comic effect is 14 achieved. The comedy is effective only so long as the surface pattern is seen separately from the contents of the story. When seen in connection with it, the analysis tells quite a different tale, and what seems at first serenely comic, then turns out to have a grim import at its heels. Hermann makes a remark that gives a clue to the mystery of his muddled style and at the same time throws some light on the story under the confusing sur- face:
- 302 - I have grown much too used to an outside view of myself, to being both painter and model, so no wonder my style is denied the blessed grace of spontaneity (29). "I have grown... used to... being both painter and model" says in fact that Hermann has got used to being two persons at once, so to speak, somewhat like Smurov in The Eye, one of his selves observing what the other is doing. While explaining that under this constant super- vision his spontaneity is lost, his remark also estab- lishes a link to the story he is telling about himself and takes one right to its central concern. The central concern is Hermann's obsession with the idea that he has a double. Just how much of the story that revolves round this double is based on fact never becomes clear. There are a great many questions none of which can be satisfactorily answered at the end. Is there such a person as Felix? If Hermann meets him, does he really write to him? Does he really see him again? Does he really murder him? Or is it their first meeting that starts off Hermann's imagination and makes him invent the rest? There are some indications that this might be the case. There is one point at which Hermann is seen practically creating Felix: it ... was not at once that I glanced at his face; I started working from his feet upward, as one sees on the screen when the cameraman is trying to be tantalizing. First came big, dusty shoes, thick socks sloppy about the ankles, then shiny blue trousers-and a hand holding a crust of dry bread. Then a blue coat over a dark- grey sweater. Still higher the soft collar that I knew-There I stopped. Should I leave him headless or go on building him? (83-84) The description he gives of Tarnitz reads as if he
- Page 257 and 258: - 250 - "really" Kinbote who has wr
- Page 259 and 260: - 252 - standing' of the poem do no
- Page 261 and 262: - 254 - Shade mentions a famous fil
- Page 263 and 264: - 256 - is left-handed (180) and he
- Page 265 and 266: - 258 - The sea's a thief, whose li
- Page 267 and 268: - 260 - much a person even on the l
- Page 269 and 270: - 262 - In the relationship between
- Page 271 and 272: - 264 - even for his own death. It
- Page 273 and 274: - 266 - TRANSPARENT THINGS An old N
- Page 275 and 276: - 268 - the name as if it were simp
- Page 277 and 278: - 270- Armande that has brought him
- Page 279 and 280: - 272 - a conscious effort. Things
- Page 281 and 282: - 274 - intention either to convey
- Page 283 and 284: - 276 - past with utmost precision
- Page 285 and 286: - 278 - Hugh Person ignores a vague
- Page 287 and 288: - 280 - the wall which in his wakin
- Page 289 and 290: - 282 - thus opening the view into
- Page 291 and 292: - 284 - tain moments he positively
- Page 293 and 294: - 286 - We thought that he had in h
- Page 295 and 296: - 288 - The thought throws more lig
- Page 297 and 298: - 290 - That Nabokov does consider
- Page 299 and 300: - 292 - which strangely prefigures
- Page 301 and 302: - 294 - become no doubt a new bible
- Page 303 and 304: - 296 - It probably is Mr. R. 's ph
- Page 305 and 306: - 298 - DESPAIR Despair1, though wr
- Page 307: - 300 - rendering a certain sound t
- Page 311 and 312: - 304 - dimensions of artistic crea
- Page 313 and 314: - 306 - when he starts writing his
- Page 315 and 316: - 308 - in its capability of photog
- Page 317 and 318: - 310- next morning, none would bel
- Page 319 and 320: - 312 - To the end, then, he remain
- Page 321 and 322: - 314 - tangible double of himself,
- Page 323 and 324: - 316 - this attack of his second s
- Page 325 and 326: - 318 - ... the ruddy horror of my
- Page 327 and 328: - 320 - only a limited number of su
- Page 329 and 330: - 321 - BENDSINISTER INVITATIONTOAB
- Page 331 and 332: - 323 - the Dark Comedies of the Tw
- Page 333 and 334: - 325 - and that one has first to p
- Page 335 and 336: - 327 - the absurd fate he himself
- Page 337 and 338: - 329 - perhaps in some archaic let
- Page 339 and 340: - 331 - this fantasy with bits of L
- Page 341 and 342: - 333 - in the solution it offers.
- Page 343 and 344: - 335 - no more than the strange an
- Page 345 and 346: - 337 - clown (IB, 104-105). And th
- Page 347 and 348: - 339 - of the original still shine
- Page 349 and 350: - 341 - each of them. There is Mart
- Page 351 and 352: - 343 - "cleared his throat and sof
- Page 353 and 354: - 345 - and then perhaps we shall s
- Page 355 and 356: - 347 - our own world , and with it
- Page 357 and 358: - 349 - the river we see him fishin
- 302<br />
-<br />
I have grown much too used to an outside<br />
view of myself, to being both painter<br />
and model, so no wonder my style is denied<br />
the blessed grace of spontaneity (29).<br />
"I have grown... used to... being both painter and model"<br />
says in fact that Hermann has got used to being two<br />
persons at once, so to speak, somewhat like Smurov in<br />
The Eye, one of his selves observing what the other is<br />
doing. While explaining that under this constant super-<br />
vision his spontaneity is lost, his remark also estab-<br />
lishes a link to the story he is telling about himself<br />
and takes one right to its central concern.<br />
The central concern is Hermann's obsession with the<br />
idea that he has a double. Just how much of the story<br />
that revolves round this double is based on fact never<br />
becomes clear. There are a great many questions none<br />
of which can be satisfactorily answered at the end.<br />
Is there such a person as Felix? If Hermann meets him,<br />
does he really write to him? Does he really see him<br />
again? Does he really murder him? Or is it their first<br />
meeting that starts off Hermann's imagination and makes<br />
him invent the rest? There are some indications that<br />
this might be the case. There is one point at which<br />
Hermann is seen practically creating Felix:<br />
it<br />
... was not at once that I glanced at<br />
his face; I started working from his feet<br />
upward, as one sees on the screen when<br />
the cameraman is trying to be tantalizing.<br />
First came big, dusty shoes, thick socks<br />
sloppy about the ankles, then shiny blue<br />
trousers-and a hand holding a crust of<br />
dry bread. Then a blue coat over a dark-<br />
grey sweater. Still higher the soft collar<br />
that I knew-There I stopped. Should<br />
I leave him headless or go on building<br />
him? (83-84)<br />
The description he gives of Tarnitz reads as if he