''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

- 299 - nary and complicated by making not only the words look "self-conscious", which he avowedly likes to do (56), but the sentences, the structure, and the contents as well. At the first reading, when the "real" story remains rather obscure, his mannerisms of speech and style seem to unite simply to produce an overall comic effect. At hardly any one point does he refrain from commenting on the accepted stylistic conventions, which he has to follow himself to a certain degree, and on the conventional narrative patterns which he cannot quite avoid either: he exposes them, rejects them, sneers at them, parodies them. He intrudes into his narrative continually. "Intrusions discussing the book itself or its frailties can range from a 'mean- while' or explicit digression to the most elaborate burlesque of the technique of other authors. "3 Every- thing that this statement allows of can be found in Hermann's tale. There are his comments on his own choice of individual words, on his imagery, on his puns, some of them pleased and satisfied, some of them more critical. 4 There are his comments, mostly ap- preciative, on individual sentences or whole passages 5 and, once, his somewhat puzzled reaction to something he has just written. 6 Not only are there interruptions of the flow of the narrative throughout the book, and digressions; Hermann explicitly draws thq reader's at- tention to them as if they were not quite conspicious enough, and explains why they are there. 7 His comments on conventional narrative devices range from one on the habit that "indiscriminate novel-writers have of

- 300 - rendering a certain sound thus: 'H'm'" (115) to a long discussion of the epistolic form of narration (70) and to the spectacular parody of the opening of a chapter. In fact he offers three openings (Ch. III) all following well established patterns, but all of which he rejects because of the weaknesses he sees in them; and from there he unceremoniously slips back into his narrative without really having opened his chapter at all. He takes the same liberties with the end of his tale, if indeed it can be said to have an end. He toys with no less than four possible endings that occur to him at various stages (the first before he has even de- 8 cided on a title) and which are born of different moods. One of them, although it has almost a touch of probability about it, is no more than an evil dream9, two are just fleeting thoughts, the results of his 10; anxiety one, a lengthy and elaborate one, he wickedly declares to be a parody of Turgenev and Dostoievsky (188-190) and thus makes clear that it is not to be taken seriously either. (It is not the only parody of Dostoievsky, by the way). 11 At the end, the reader is left with the rather odd picture of Hermann-making a speech from his window: "Frenchmen! This is a re- hearsal. Hold those policemen" (222) and is left to wonder what really happens to Hermann and the others. From time to time he makes mistakes. He gets the facts wrong. Various experiences blend, and what belongs to one gets mixed up in his account of another one, so that the time sequence is often overthrown. He does not erase the faulty passages because, he says, that

-<br />

299<br />

-<br />

nary and complicated by making not only the words<br />

look "self-conscious", which he avowedly likes to do<br />

(56), but the sentences, the structure, and the contents<br />

as well. At the first reading, when the "real"<br />

story remains rather obscure, his mannerisms of speech<br />

and style seem to unite simply to produce an overall<br />

comic effect. At hardly any one point does he refrain<br />

from commenting on the accepted stylistic conventions,<br />

which he has to follow himself to a certain degree,<br />

and on the conventional narrative patterns which he<br />

cannot quite avoid either: he exposes them, rejects<br />

them, sneers at them, parodies them. He intrudes into<br />

his narrative continually. "Intrusions discussing the<br />

book itself or its frailties can range from a 'mean-<br />

while' or explicit digression to the most elaborate<br />

burlesque of the technique of other authors. "3 Every-<br />

thing that this statement allows of can be found in<br />

Hermann's tale. There are his comments on his own<br />

choice of individual words, on his imagery, on his<br />

puns, some of them pleased and satisfied, some of them<br />

more<br />

critical.<br />

4<br />

There are his comments, mostly ap-<br />

preciative, on individual sentences or whole passages<br />

5<br />

and, once, his somewhat puzzled reaction to something<br />

he has just written.<br />

6 Not only are there interruptions<br />

of the flow of the narrative throughout the book, and<br />

digressions; Hermann explicitly draws thq reader's at-<br />

tention to them as if they were not quite conspicious<br />

enough, and explains why they are there.<br />

7<br />

His<br />

comments<br />

on conventional narrative devices range from one on<br />

the habit that "indiscriminate novel-writers have of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!