''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
28.02.2014 Views

- 219 - More hints are dropped which reveal that he only imagines this, that he is rea11y one of the professors (Botkin) of Wordsmith College, that he is probably mad, and that he has for some reason made up this fantastic past for himself. Persons and incidents from his present life and surroundings go into the making of this imaginary past. Gradus, for example, the third principal character, an extremist despatched from Zembla to kill the king and killing Shade instead through a fatal mistake, by and by turns out to be a criminal lunatic who has escaped from the asylum to revenge himself on the judge who committed him. Besides those critics who reacted with outraged comments to this5, there are others who were not so much exasperated as amused, and at the same time ready to acknowledge Pale Fire as one of the great pieces of literature of this century. K. Allsop pays tribute to both its difficulties and its uniqueness6, and so does Mary McCarthy: 'Pale Fire' is a Jack-in-the box, ..., a clockwork toy, a chess problem, an infernal machine, a trap*to catch reviewers, a cat-Ind-mouse game, a do-ityourself novel. Her detailed analysis ends in enthusiastic praise: this ... centaur-work of Nabokov's... is a creation of perfect beauty, symmetry, strangeness, originality, and, moral truth. Pretending to be a curio, it cannot disguise the fact that it is one of the very great works of art of this century, the modern novel that everyone thought was8dead and that was only playing possum. I

- 220 - The individual parts have provoked comments just as varied9, and Nabokov himself and his moral attitude when composing Pale Fire have been objects of both doubt and admiration. 10 Shade's poem, if taken by itself, does not present too much of a problem. The difficulties of Kinbote's story, too, can be overcome. He plants hints and clues quite generously, and with their help and some combinational talent it is possible to connect the various bits of the puzzle of his invented story and thus to arrive at the real story behind it and to recognize the levels of truth and reality in it, which are rather blurred at first. The basic questions, those that most tease and puzzle the reader and have given rise to irritation on the one side and to amused bewilderment or admiration on the other side, are those which concern the novel as a whole: the relation between the two principal characters, Shade and Kinbote; the relation between the two main parts, the poem and the commentary (there seems to be no connection at all), and the meaning of it all. A number of critics have arrived at the conclusion that Pale Fire is a malicious satire on scholars and scholarly editorial work, using parody as its medium, and have left it at that ll, and this is a plausible enough conclusion if the work is taken at its face value, for with its four parts it mimicks the form of a scholarly edition of a poem perfectly. Foreword, commentary and index all give the impression that here a diligent and conscientious scholarly editor

-<br />

220<br />

-<br />

The individual parts have provoked comments just as<br />

varied9, and Nabokov himself and his moral attitude<br />

when composing Pale Fire have been objects of both<br />

doubt and admiration.<br />

10<br />

Shade's poem, if taken by itself, does not present<br />

too much of a problem. The difficulties of Kinbote's<br />

story, too, can be overcome. He plants hints and<br />

clues quite generously, and with their help and some<br />

combinational talent it is possible to connect the<br />

various bits of the puzzle of his invented story and<br />

thus to arrive at the real story behind it and to<br />

recognize the levels of truth and reality in it, which<br />

are rather blurred at first. The basic questions,<br />

those that most tease and puzzle the reader and have<br />

given rise to irritation on the one side and to amused<br />

bewilderment or admiration on the other side, are<br />

those which concern the novel as a whole: the relation<br />

between the two principal characters, Shade and<br />

Kinbote; the relation between the two main parts,<br />

the poem and the commentary (there seems to be no<br />

connection at all), and the meaning of it all.<br />

A number of critics have arrived at the conclusion<br />

that Pale Fire is a malicious satire on scholars and<br />

scholarly editorial work, using parody as its medium,<br />

and have left it at that<br />

ll,<br />

and this is a plausible<br />

enough conclusion if the work is taken at its face<br />

value, <strong>for</strong> with its four parts it mimicks the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

of a scholarly edition of a poem perfectly. Foreword,<br />

commentary and index all give the impression that<br />

here a diligent and conscientious scholarly editor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!