''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
- 170 - Et puis, Dieu merci, nous avons la psychologie du sujet, le freudisme folätre, la description empätee de ce que le heros pensait ä tel moment, - un assemblage de mots quelconque pareil au fil de fer qui retient les pauvres os d'un squelette, - terrain vague de la litterature oü parmi les chardons, traine un vieux meuble ev22- tre que personne n'a jamais vu y venir. This settles the matter. With Nabokov's ironic statement in mind, one reluctantly has to accept the fact that this passage must not be taken seriously, and that V's account has imperceptibly again become a parody of what he wants it to be. So far, then, this particular method of research has failed. It has not disclosed anything essential about Sebastian. "... what actually did I know about Sebastian? " V had to ask himself before he set out on his quest (31). And he still has to admit what he does not know and what he cannot do22 , violating one of the principles of biography which says that the reader "must not be reminded that there is no information about the principal figure. "23 V has many other shortcomings both as a biographer and as a detective. He sometimes forgets the sources of what little information he has and completely ig- nores other sources offered to him: there is no in- dication that he would have attempted to find out the "somebody" who is also collecting data about Sebastian Knight, had he not discovered by chance that this somebody is Mr Goodman, whom he has already seen and whom he dismisses as unqualified. He has taken an instinctive dislike to him and is forever after unable to 'ideal fairly with [his] views which he does not
- 171 share", as a good biographer should. - 24 His worst blunders V commits when he comes to the period during which Sebastian lived together with Clare Bishop. Clare is alive and V knows where she lives. He goes there and allows himself to be sent away by her husband. He sees her in the street, and does not make himself known to her. In Sebastian's flat he burnt her letters together with those of the unknown Russian woman, now he lets the most important and knowledgeable witness of six years go by unquestioned. His motive may be praiseworthy although it is none too clear. Whatever it is, the consequences for his work are disastrous. It degenerates into a mixture of second-hand information and, what is worse, conjecture and speculation, innocent of "'authentic 25 information' from which... good biography is made. " There is a longish passage that looks somewhat like an objective (even though second-hand) account of those particular six years in Sebastian's life. Clare is described, a sensible and sensitive young woman who apparently fitted perfectly into Sebastian's life, who helped him in many ways and with whom, it seems, he was happy. He wrote his first three books during the six years he lived with her. There is some first indication of his illness; then, after a period during which Sebastian seemed strangely moody and unpredictable, it became necessary for him to spend some time at Blauberg. And after his return from there, we learn, Sebastian inexplicably stopped taking any
- Page 125 and 126: - 119 - a strident, harsh high voic
- Page 127 and 128: - 121 - When Humbert talks of his d
- Page 129 and 130: - 123 -- could victimize her poor d
- Page 131 and 132: - 125 - this twelve-year-old girl s
- Page 133 and 134: - 127 - done her morning duty" (161
- Page 135 and 136: - 129 - experience, up to a certain
- Page 137 and 138: - 131 - her: "... -a life full of t
- Page 139 and 140: - 133 - Looking at it for a moment
- Page 141 and 142: - 135 - and Axel Rex delightful. Bu
- Page 143 and 144: - 137 - critics have made her, and
- Page 145 and 146: - 139 - not record images of the sy
- Page 147 and 148: - 141 - ous hallucination" (287). 6
- Page 149 and 150: - 143 - No hereafter is acceptable
- Page 151 and 152: - 145 - be possible for him to be t
- Page 153 and 154: - 147 - and it is also appropriate
- Page 155 and 156: - 149 - But Humbert's view of Lolit
- Page 157 and 158: - 151 - the truth of the theory dev
- Page 159 and 160: - 153 - part of it. Even with the i
- Page 161 and 162: - 155 - THE REAL LIFE OF SEBASTIAN
- Page 163 and 164: - 157. - consistent set of characte
- Page 165 and 166: - 159 - gathered from various sourc
- Page 167 and 168: - 161 - a very close one, and it se
- Page 169 and 170: - 163 - tiously follows all the mov
- Page 171 and 172: - 165 - go about it), behaving as i
- Page 173 and 174: - 167 - infinite trouble what he co
- Page 175: - 169 - What were the things that r
- Page 179 and 180: - 173 - seems to him too colourless
- Page 181 and 182: 175 - parody of what Stegner calls
- Page 183 and 184: - 177 - that lead to it, he is sing
- Page 185 and 186: - 179 - the time during which he li
- Page 187 and 188: - 181 - France. He is tormented by
- Page 189 and 190: - 183 - on the last page of the nov
- Page 191 and 192: - 185 - what he wants to find, that
- Page 193 and 194: - 187 - would not see him. Somewhat
- Page 195 and 196: - 189 - he falls back on passages f
- Page 197 and 198: - 191 - ticism as one possible way
- Page 199 and 200: - 193 - The passages betray not onl
- Page 201 and 202: - 195 - This "mental jerk" grants k
- Page 203 and 204: - 197 - clear, and the harmony and
- Page 205 and 206: - 199 - initiated the insight. In l
- Page 207 and 208: - 201 - himself, and in it V appear
- Page 209 and 210: - 203 - novels of Sebastian Knight,
- Page 211 and 212: - 205 - All those that knew Sebasti
- Page 213 and 214: - 207 - in his opinion not have for
- Page 215 and 216: - 209 - others as his remoteness an
- Page 217 and 218: - 210 - THEDEFENCE R. H. W. Dillard
- Page 219 and 220: - 212 - his own future, and it beco
- Page 221 and 222: - 214 - Unlike Shade, however, Luzh
- Page 223 and 224: - 216 - has recognized as the basic
- Page 225 and 226: - 218 - The sensitive reader dislik
- 171<br />
share", as a good biographer should.<br />
-<br />
24<br />
His worst blunders V commits when he comes to the<br />
period during which Sebastian lived together with<br />
Clare Bishop. Clare is alive and V knows where she<br />
lives. He goes there and allows himself to be sent<br />
away by her husband. He sees her in the street, and<br />
does not make himself known to her. In Sebastian's<br />
flat he burnt her letters together with those of the<br />
unknown Russian woman, now he lets the most important<br />
and knowledgeable witness of six years go by unquestioned.<br />
His motive may be praiseworthy although it<br />
is none too clear. Whatever it is, the consequences<br />
<strong>for</strong> his work are disastrous. It degenerates into a<br />
mixture of second-hand in<strong>for</strong>mation and, what is worse,<br />
conjecture and speculation, innocent of "'authentic<br />
25<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation' from which... good biography is made. "<br />
There is a longish passage that looks somewhat like<br />
an objective (even though second-hand) account of<br />
those particular six years in Sebastian's life. Clare<br />
is described, a sensible and sensitive young woman<br />
who apparently fitted perfectly into Sebastian's life,<br />
who helped him in many ways and with whom, it seems,<br />
he was happy. He wrote his first three books during<br />
the six years he lived with her. There is some first<br />
indication of his illness; then, after a period during<br />
which Sebastian seemed strangely moody and unpredictable,<br />
it became necessary <strong>for</strong> him to spend some time<br />
at Blauberg. And after his return from there, we<br />
learn, Sebastian inexplicably stopped taking any