''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses ''Vladimir Nabokov's Comic Quest for Reality' - Nottingham eTheses
- 166 - his brother's personal life and possibly an insight into his emotions, namely a bundle of letters, he does something quite unheard of: he burns them because this is what Sebastian has determined should. be done. Soon after destroying this clue, he indifferently includes two others in his collection of insignificant details: the two pictures on the wall, which he regards with complete incomprehension: "The taste of their juxtaposition seemed to me questionable" (38), and the collection of books set apart on one shelf. Through some unobtrusive touches of parody this instance of V's investigation illustrates from the beginning the limitations of this particular method of biographical research. It is constantly in danger of degenerating into a more or less automatic and indiscriminate accumulation of facts. V takes with him some meagre factual knowledge about the writer Sebastian Knight, but hardly anything from which it would be possible to draw any conclusion about the real person, and ironically he gets those two clues which might possibly tell him something about his brother's mind mixed up with a lot of insignificant details. Ironically, too, instead of filling in a gap in his knowledge of Sebastian, his visit tothe flat has created new and wider ones and has put new ques- tions: who is the woman that wrote to Sebastian in Russian, and what was their relation? And it has put V in the absurd situation of having to find out with
- 167 - infinite trouble what he could have learnt from the letters there and then. Again, V's account of his visit to Sebastian's best college friend at Cambridge, who was "the only man in [Sebastian's] life with whom [Sebastian] had been perfectly frank and natural" (44) and who had therefore known him "intimately" (42), is not quite so straightforward as it seems at first reading. Parody intrudes again. Disconcertingly, it is easy to be misled, for those passages of which one tends to be suspicious, appear to have some serious implication behind their seemingly parodistic surface, whereas those passages which seem to indicate "some lofty and rich intention" on the narrator's part and which seem to convey some insight into Sebastian's mind, turn out to be parodistic. Much of their conversation deals with superficial aspects of college life: breakfast in. Hall, lunch at the Pitt, lectures, playing fives, tea with friends, playing tricks on venerable old tutors. V asks questions that seem trivial: "And where did Sebastian sit? " (43); "And tell me,... what about games? Was Sebastian good at games? " (41), and receives answers that seem just as trivial, such as a lengthy description of Sebastian's failure at tennis. He indulges in an equally lengthy explanation about Sebastian's not quite perfect English. To all this apparently meaningless material Sebastian's old friend adds a few anecdotes from the beginning of Sebastian's time at Cambridge. One feels as if one were on the uncer-
- Page 121 and 122: - 115 - or to hold her on his knee
- Page 123 and 124: - 117 - ations ) (98). And he descr
- Page 125 and 126: - 119 - a strident, harsh high voic
- Page 127 and 128: - 121 - When Humbert talks of his d
- Page 129 and 130: - 123 -- could victimize her poor d
- Page 131 and 132: - 125 - this twelve-year-old girl s
- Page 133 and 134: - 127 - done her morning duty" (161
- Page 135 and 136: - 129 - experience, up to a certain
- Page 137 and 138: - 131 - her: "... -a life full of t
- Page 139 and 140: - 133 - Looking at it for a moment
- Page 141 and 142: - 135 - and Axel Rex delightful. Bu
- Page 143 and 144: - 137 - critics have made her, and
- Page 145 and 146: - 139 - not record images of the sy
- Page 147 and 148: - 141 - ous hallucination" (287). 6
- Page 149 and 150: - 143 - No hereafter is acceptable
- Page 151 and 152: - 145 - be possible for him to be t
- Page 153 and 154: - 147 - and it is also appropriate
- Page 155 and 156: - 149 - But Humbert's view of Lolit
- Page 157 and 158: - 151 - the truth of the theory dev
- Page 159 and 160: - 153 - part of it. Even with the i
- Page 161 and 162: - 155 - THE REAL LIFE OF SEBASTIAN
- Page 163 and 164: - 157. - consistent set of characte
- Page 165 and 166: - 159 - gathered from various sourc
- Page 167 and 168: - 161 - a very close one, and it se
- Page 169 and 170: - 163 - tiously follows all the mov
- Page 171: - 165 - go about it), behaving as i
- Page 175 and 176: - 169 - What were the things that r
- Page 177 and 178: - 171 share", as a good biographer
- Page 179 and 180: - 173 - seems to him too colourless
- Page 181 and 182: 175 - parody of what Stegner calls
- Page 183 and 184: - 177 - that lead to it, he is sing
- Page 185 and 186: - 179 - the time during which he li
- Page 187 and 188: - 181 - France. He is tormented by
- Page 189 and 190: - 183 - on the last page of the nov
- Page 191 and 192: - 185 - what he wants to find, that
- Page 193 and 194: - 187 - would not see him. Somewhat
- Page 195 and 196: - 189 - he falls back on passages f
- Page 197 and 198: - 191 - ticism as one possible way
- Page 199 and 200: - 193 - The passages betray not onl
- Page 201 and 202: - 195 - This "mental jerk" grants k
- Page 203 and 204: - 197 - clear, and the harmony and
- Page 205 and 206: - 199 - initiated the insight. In l
- Page 207 and 208: - 201 - himself, and in it V appear
- Page 209 and 210: - 203 - novels of Sebastian Knight,
- Page 211 and 212: - 205 - All those that knew Sebasti
- Page 213 and 214: - 207 - in his opinion not have for
- Page 215 and 216: - 209 - others as his remoteness an
- Page 217 and 218: - 210 - THEDEFENCE R. H. W. Dillard
- Page 219 and 220: - 212 - his own future, and it beco
- Page 221 and 222: - 214 - Unlike Shade, however, Luzh
- 167 -<br />
infinite trouble what he could have learnt from<br />
the letters there and then.<br />
Again, V's account of his visit to Sebastian's<br />
best college friend at Cambridge, who was "the only<br />
man in [Sebastian's] life with whom<br />
[Sebastian]<br />
had<br />
been perfectly frank and natural" (44) and who had<br />
there<strong>for</strong>e known him "intimately" (42), is not quite<br />
so straight<strong>for</strong>ward as it seems at first reading.<br />
Parody intrudes again. Disconcertingly, it is easy<br />
to be misled, <strong>for</strong> those passages of which one tends<br />
to be suspicious, appear to have some serious implication<br />
behind their seemingly parodistic surface,<br />
whereas those passages which seem to indicate "some<br />
lofty and rich intention" on the narrator's part and<br />
which seem to convey some insight into Sebastian's<br />
mind, turn out to be parodistic.<br />
Much of their conversation deals with superficial<br />
aspects of college life: breakfast in. Hall, lunch at<br />
the Pitt, lectures, playing fives, tea with friends,<br />
playing tricks on venerable old tutors. V asks questions<br />
that seem trivial: "And where did Sebastian<br />
sit? " (43); "And tell me,... what about games? Was<br />
Sebastian good at games? " (41), and receives answers<br />
that seem just as trivial, such as a lengthy description<br />
of Sebastian's failure at tennis. He indulges<br />
in an equally lengthy explanation about Sebastian's<br />
not quite perfect English. To all this apparently<br />
meaningless material Sebastian's old friend adds a<br />
few anecdotes from the beginning of Sebastian's time<br />
at Cambridge. One feels as if one were on the uncer-